US$31 trillion in wealth extracted from Indonesia during Dutch colonial rule: President Prabowo
JAKARTA: US$31 trillion - that's the amount of wealth that Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto claimed the Netherlands had extracted from Indonesia during its colonial rule over the archipelago, as he used the historical context to justify increased investment in national defence.
He added that the figure is nearly 18 times Indonesia's current gross domestic product (GDP) of US$1.5 trillion, or 'the equivalent of 144 years' of national budget spending.
Prabowo had cited the figures in a speech at the opening of a defence exhibition in Jakarta on Wednesday (Jun 11).
"According to a study published a few weeks ago, the Netherlands took resources from Indonesia valued at US$31 trillion in today's terms during their colonisation of our country," Prabowo said at the Indo Defence Expo and Forum, as reported by local news outlet Metro TV.
He did not identify the study, its author or methodology, and there are no previous reports of similar calculations.
Indonesia was under Dutch colonial rule for close to 350 years, from the 1600s till it declared independence in 1945. Command was exerted initially through the Dutch East India Company and later under formal state control by the Dutch East Indies.
Prabowo also claimed that the Netherlands enjoyed the world's top GDP per capita while Indonesia was under Dutch colonial rule.
'If only we could protect our riches (from the Dutch back then), perhaps our GDP per capita could be among the world's largest,' he said as reported by local news site Jakarta Globe.
Resources were extensively extracted from Indonesia during Dutch colonial rule, particularly spices like nutmeg, cloves and pepper. There were also schemes like the Cultivation System - known locally as 'forced planting' or 'tanam paksa' in Indonesian - that saw locals forced to grow export crops like coffee and sugarcane instead of food.
The Cultivation System was implemented from 1830 to 1870. According to a study by British historian and economist Angus Maddison, contributions from Indonesia amounted to about 31.5 per cent of Dutch state coffers between 1851 and 1870.
In his Wednesday speech, Prabowo highlighted this historical period for Indonesia to make the case for enhanced defence spending.
"History shows that nations that fail to invest in their own defence often lose their autonomy and are vulnerable to subjugation. Those that don't defend themselves often become slave nations," he said as reported by Metro TV.
The former general and defence minister, now president, has made no bones about his focus on modernising Indonesia's military. Prabowo has pledged to gradually elevate the country's defence budget to 1.5 per cent of GDP by 2029, effectively doubling current levels.
Speaking at the Indo Defence Expo and Forum on Wednesday, Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin announced defence contracts worth up to 33 trillion rupiah (US$2.03 billion) would be signed during the exhibition, which runs till Saturday.
He also highlighted that between 2020 and June 2025, a total of 792 contracts had been made with domestic defence industries, amounting to 230 trillion rupiah.
Former colonial tensions between the Netherlands and Indonesia have been in the spotlight in recent years, with the Dutch making efforts to mend old wounds. Among them was the repatriation of hundreds of Indonesian artefacts, the bulk of which were looted by the Dutch during colonial rule.
In the present day, the Netherlands and Indonesia are close trade and economic partners. The Netherlands is the European Union's largest investor in Indonesia, reaching close to 50 per cent of total European investments, according to media reports.
The Dutch government has set aside a US$300 million investment to support various sustainable development projects in Indonesia, Anindya Bakrie, chairman of the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said on Tuesday.
At the same time, 120 Dutch companies are scheduled to visit Indonesia for a trade and investment mission on Jun 16.
The trip will cover several cities, including Jakarta, Medan, Semarang and Makassar, focusing on sectors such as food security, maritime, and water management, Jakarta Globe reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
All town councils receive top ratings for second year running
SINGAPORE: All 17 town councils have scored "green" - the highest rating - across four indicators in the latest estate management report released by the Ministry of National Development (MND) on Friday (Jun 13), the second time in as many years. The report covered the financial year from April 2024 to March 2025. Singapore's General Election took place on May 3. Green is the top rating, followed by amber and red, and the town councils are assessed by their estate cleanliness, estate maintenance, lift performance, as well as service and conservancy charges (S&CC) arrears management. MND said on Friday it will not publish the estate management report for the financial year from April 2025 to March 2026. This is because the town councils were formed on May 30 following GE2025 and as such, they will "require a transition period to stabilise their operations after the handover of towns," the ministry added. "During this period, MND will continue to monitor the performance of the town councils and share our feedback with the town councils to better support their transition." The ministry said that it will resume publication of the reports from FY2026 (April 2026 to March 2027). 'This is consistent with the approach taken after GE2020,' added MND. REPORT OBSERVATIONS In terms of estate cleanliness, the ministry noted that all town councils before GE2025 scored "green" as they had less than four counts of cleanliness observations per block on average. The "green" rating applied across the board in relation to estate maintenance as these town councils had an average of under four counts of maintenance observations per block. As for lift performance, they all had less than two lift faults per 10 lifts, and less than one hour of downtime per lift each month. The frequency of faults and duration of downtime are measured by the Tele-Monitoring System. Lastly, they all had less than 40 per cent of the monthly collectible S&CC for the town overdue and fewer than four in 100 households that owed arrears for three months or more. The Town Council Management Report (TCMR) was first introduced in 2009. Assessments for estate cleanliness are made based on observations, such as the presence of stain and litter, bulky refuse, cobwebs, graffiti, moss, and faeces or bird droppings. As for estate maintenance, obstructions in common areas, storage of combustible items, unauthorised fixtures, damaged plaster/large cracks/spalling concrete and the presence of wild plants/weeds are taken into account. MND also said it will publish the corporate governance report for the period from April 2024 to March 2025 period in December, after it has received and reviewed the town councils' audited financial statements and their auditor's reports.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Trump-Albanese G7 meeting in limbo as ties sour over Israeli sanctions, AUKUS pact
CANBERRA: Highly-anticipated plans for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to hold face-to-face talks with United States President Donald Trump at the upcoming Group of Seven (G7) summit are in limbo. Canberra's sanctions on two Israeli cabinet members and a new US review of a defence pact with Australia and the United Kingdom have cast doubt on whether the crucial meeting would take place. Albanese was expected to meet Trump for the first time on the sidelines of the G7 leaders' summit, which kicks off on Sunday (Jun 15) in Alberta, Canada, to discuss trade, tariffs and military spending. This is the first big diplomatic test for Albanese since Australia's Labor government was re-elected last month. Australia on Tuesday joined Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Norway in a coordinated action to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. The move drew condemnation from Washington. On defence, Trump wants Canberra to increase its military spending from 2 per cent of its gross domestic product to at least 3.5 per cent. Albanese had previously said his government is already raising defence spending to 2.3 per cent and has declined to commit to the US target, saying Australia would focus on capability needs. Jennifer Parker, an expert associate at the Australian National University's National Security College, said: 'I don't think we should be increasing defence spending because the US says so. 'Australia should be increasing defence spending because we have assessed there's an increased risk in the region and our capability, our defence force is not resourced to meet that risk." AUSTRALIA-US DEFENCE TIES Australia has a long-standing military alliance with the US. Canberra in 2023 committed to spending A$368 billion (US$250 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, Australia's biggest ever defence project with the US and Britain, to acquire nuclear-powered submarines. But the Trump administration recently launched a formal review of the defence pact. Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday he was confident the submarine deal would proceed. Domestically, questions have risen over the agreement and its effect on the overall military budget. "The Australian defence spending is being cannibalised by its contributions to AUKUS. It's overwhelming the budget for all the other conventional parts of the Australian defence forces,' said James Curran, a modern history professor at the University of Sydney. Parker, who is a former anti-submarine warfare officer, acknowledged AUKUS' value but warned it must be part of a broader defence strategy. 'When you think about the defence of Australia you really need to think about not the defence of Australian territory but the defence of Australia's vital interests. Much of that exists in the maritime domain,' she told CNA. 'When it comes to protecting the maritime domain, nuclear powered submarines, which are submarines that can go incredibly fast, are a key asset for Australia." TRADE AND TARIFFS Aside from defence, trade tensions loom large – particularly over the 50 per cent tariff imposed on Australian steel, which Albanese hopes to raise with Trump. The Australian Steel Institute said the real danger facing the country's steel industry due to the tariff hike is dumping by other countries such as China. "Steel is a globally traded commodity. If countries or businesses can't find a home in the US for their exports, they will look elsewhere,' said the institute's CEO Mark Cain. 'We're an open trading nation and so the risk for our industry is quite pronounced if we become a dumping ground for that surplus steel that would be awash in the global market.' There are also geopolitical concerns over regional instability triggered by America's strategic plans in the Indo-Pacific and Australia's role as an ally. "The (Trump) administration hasn't played all its geo-political cards in Asia yet. I don't think the US is leaving the region or preparing to withdraw,' said Curran. 'But I think (Washington) is making an assessment deep down about what the costs of a potential conflict with China might mean. And that may well be uncomfortable for US allies in this part of the world."
Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘Why do my friends earning S$10K/month still feel financially insecure?' — Singaporean man who's 'getting by on way less salary' asks
SINGAPORE: A Singaporean man has stirred up debate online after expressing confusion over why some of his high-earning friends, despite making around S$10,000 a month, still say they're struggling to feel financially secure. In a post on the r/askSingapore subreddit, the man shared that these friends are also single, yet often lament that their salary is not enough to live comfortably in Singapore. In contrast, he himself earns much less and is managing to get by, prompting him to wonder if the feeling of financial inadequacy is really about how much one earns, or more about something else. Curious and slightly baffled, he asked the community if it is truly possible to live decently, save a bit, and still enjoy life in Singapore, or if it always feels like it's not enough, regardless of how much you bring home. He also posed a straightforward question to fellow Singaporeans: 'Singaporeans, what's your salary, and is it enough for you? Are you happy with your salary? Not trying to flex or judge, just want to know what people out there are experiencing.' 'S$10k a month is plenty to live very well in Singapore…' The thread quickly filled up with responses from users across the income spectrum. Some shared that they earn under S$3,000 a month and are just managing to stay afloat. One user earning S$2,400 after CPF deductions said, 'I'm okay. More would be nice, of course, but I'm getting by. I'm single and live with my family. Hoping to start some savings soon.' Another, who earns S$2,500 and is a breadwinner at age 30, described their situation bluntly: 'I'm drowning.' Others chimed in with a different perspective, saying that earning S$10,000 a month should be more than enough to live comfortably in Singapore. One user said, 'I don't care what anyone says, S$10K a month is plenty to live very well in Singapore. You can afford all sorts of luxury at that level.' However, not everyone agreed. One explained, 'If you are the contented type, anything above S$2K for one person is enough. If you are the type who always wants to compare and always wants the finer things in life, then S$20K per month is also not enough. See also Life in Singapore vs Taiwan: British vlogger says its a tie Those who always travel in economy think it is great to sit in business; those who always travel in business look forward to sitting in first class; and those who always travel in first class want to have their own private jet. Like that, how to be enough?' Cost of living for a single person The amount of money a person needs to live comfortably in Singapore really depends on several factors, such as their personal lifestyle, financial responsibilities, and living arrangements. For example, someone who lives with their family and does not pay rent might be able to manage with a lower income. On the other hand, someone who rents their own place, supports family members, or prefers a more luxurious lifestyle may need a significantly higher salary to feel financially secure. However, if we focus strictly on the general cost of living for a single individual in Singapore, the Economic Development Board (EDB) provides an estimated monthly range of S$1,391 to S$4,076. This estimate typically includes housing (such as renting a room or a small apartment), daily essentials, meals, transportation, and basic leisure. Read also: 'Job portals are dead' — Retrenched Singaporean shares his 'Actually Applicable' job hunting tips for others in the same boat Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
