Grand Forks lawmaker resigns to join North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services
Rep. Emily O'Brien, R-Grand Forks, is leaving her legislative seat to become second-in-command at the North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services.
O'Brien starts her new job as deputy commissioner of the department Wednesday. According to a Tuesday announcement from the agency, she will serve as a liaison between Health and Human Services and the Legislature, and oversee a funding and performance tracking system.
O'Brien's resignation from the Legislature takes effect Tuesday, according to a Monday letter she sent to Legislative Council and legislative leaders.
'This role will allow me to continue serving our state, but in a different capacity — one that complements the work we have done together in the Legislature to strengthen the health, well-being, and future of North Dakotans,' O'Brien wrote in the letter.
O'Brien was first elected to represent District 42 in the North Dakota House in 2016, winning her bids for reelection in 2020 and 2024.
She served on the Human Resources Division of the House Appropriations Committee, which works on the Department of Health and Human Services budget, during the 2023 and 2025 legislative sessions.
O'Brien also chaired the Legislative Audit and Fiscal Review Committee over the 2023-2025 interim session, and served as its vice chair for the 2021-2023 and 2025-2027 interim sessions.
During the 2023-2025 interim, she served on the Health Care and Health Services committees.
'We are thrilled to welcome Emily as our new deputy,' Pat Traynor, interim commissioner, said in the Tuesday announcement. 'She brings a proven track record of leadership, deep experience in public service, and a strong commitment to using data to guide decisions.'
The North Dakota Constitution forbids members of the Legislature from holding a full-time appointed position at the state level.
It'll be up to the District 42 Republican Party to fill O'Brien's seat, Legislative Council Director John Bjornson said in an email.
Once the district leaders receive an official letter from Legislative Management notifying them of the vacancy, they will have three weeks to name a temporary replacement. That replacement will serve until the 2026 general election, during which voters will elect someone to serve the final two years of O'Brien's term, Bjornson said.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge tells Trump admin to pack up Alligator Alcatraz, leave the Everglades, Big Cypress
A federal judge says the Trump administration must halt construction, stop bringing new detainees, and begin winding down operations at the mass detention center in the Big Cypress National Preserve known as Alligator Alcatraz. 'This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited,' said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades. 'It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government — and there are consequences for ignoring them.' U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued a temporary restraining order on Aug, 7, which put a stop to new construction and any additional infrastructure at Alligator Alcatraz for two weeks. Late in the evening on Aug. 21 she doubled-down on the restraining order, saying the state and federal government should pack everything up at Alligator Alcatraz and prepare to shut down the facility. This preliminary injunction will last until the trial is complete. The ruling stems from a June 27 lawsuit filed by Friends of the Everglades, the Center for Biological Diversity, and joined by the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. 'This ruling affirms what we argued in court — that the government can't just build something in the middle of the Everglades and the Big Cypress preserve with no environmental review, and no public input,' said Tania Galloni, managing attorney for the Florida office of Earthjustice. 'This is why we have environmental laws — to protect the wetlands and ecosystems we all depend on from illegal development.' Others said the detainment facility is a clear violation of major federal laws put in place to protect wildernesses like the Big Cypress and Everglades National Park. 'The state and federal government paved over 20 acres of open land, built a parking lot for 1,200 cars and 3,000 detainees, placed miles of fencing and high-intensity lighting on site and moved thousands of detainees and contractors onto land in the heart of the Big Cypress National Preserve, all in flagrant violation of environmental law,' said Paul Schwiep, counsel for Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity. More: Naples Daily News reporter Chad Gillis describing the scene outside Alligator Alcatraz Alligator Alcatraz sprang to existence early this year, after Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced on social media that a detention facility would be constructed at the old jetport in rural eastern Collier County. That facility has been managed and maintained by Miami-Dade County for decades but was taken over by the state when Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a state of emergency, which allowed the construction of the center to bypass staff review, public comment and permitting. Typically a facility proposed within the boundaries of a National Park Service preserve must go through extensive federal review, a process that can take years. Alligator Alcatraz was up and running in a matter of days, by July 2. More: Hundreds flock to Clyde Butcher's gallery to hear him speak on Alligator Alcatraz The defendants in the case include the Florida Division of Emergency Management, the Department of Homeland Security, ICE and Miami-Dade County. In another case focusing on plaintiffs legal and civil rights, U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz ruled Aug. 18 the matter should move to a different court while also declaring part of the lawsuit moot. At the heart of the case was whether the government had violated detainees' rights to due process and legal counsel. Civil rights attorneys had said the remote Everglades facility made it nearly impossible for immigrants to speak confidentially with lawyers or even find out which immigration court can hear their cases. The plaintiffs' attorneys filed suit in the Southern District of Florida, which includes Miami-Dade County, though state and federal officials argued that it should have been filed in the Middle District of Florida, which includes Collier County. In his 47-page order, Ruiz agreed, transferring the case to the middle district. He also dismissed the immigration-court allegations in the lawsuit, saying they were moot after a federal decision that judges at Krome North Processing Service Center would handle the detainees' cases. The case now heads to 'a sister court in the Middle District of Florida to reach the merits of plaintiffs' remaining claims under the First Amendment,' Ruiz wrote. Amy Bennett Williams contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Fort Myers News-Press: Alligator Alcatraz: Judge moves to shut down Florida detention center Play Farm Merge Valley
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. military presence along the southern border expands again
Last month, the federal government expanded the military's presence along the southern border after transferring control of 285 acres of public land in Arizona to the Navy. Now, more than a third of the state's border is under the jurisdiction of the Marine Corps Air Station Yuma. The new allotment of land is the fourth installation of what are being referred to as 'national defense areas.' They are large tracts of American soil that run along the Mexico border that have officially become part of military bases such as Fort Huachuca in Arizona and Fort Bliss in Texas. The NDAs, which are subject to operational protocols of the military, now cover about a third of the entire southern border. 'As with any military installation, this land is under (the Department of Defense's) administrative jurisdiction, which has been further delegated to MCAS Yuma,' Capt. Owen VanWyck, the communications and strategy director for MCAS Yuma, wrote in an email. 'This includes the authority to prevent unauthorized access and to detect and deter potential security threats to maintain security, order, and discipline, which may include apprehending those who enter without authorization.' That means anyone who steps over the border from Mexico into the U.S. along the range of an NDA is trespassing on military grounds, which is a different category of legal infraction than crossing the border illegally and subject to higher penalties. 'Any person apprehended for trespassing (or committing other criminal offenses) on a military installation, regardless of citizenship,' VanWyck wrote, 'will be transferred over to appropriate non-DOD law enforcement officials as promptly as practical for appropriate action.' With the change of jurisdiction, the full might of the military's infrastructure can now be leveraged in defending the borders of each base — which is, as a result of those land transfers, the southern border of the United States. Rather than smaller law-enforcement agencies monitoring and defending against illegal immigration within public lands, the Joint Task Force-Southern Border — a task force that rolls up to the Defense Department's Northern Command — is now responsible for the newly established territories. By setting up those vast swaths of American land as part of military bases, the federal government is able to assist with immigration enforcement while sidestepping long-standing constitutional law — such as the Posse Comitatus Act from 1878 — that mostly prevents the use of the military in law enforcement efforts. While there are those that argue it's still an illegal use of the military to support law enforcement, it has been an effective part of the strategy to stop illegal border crossings since the first NDA was established this past April. Over 1,400 people have been apprehended in NDAs since they were established and overall illegal border crossing encounters are down 93% year over year. Though, a spokesperson from the JTF-SB made clear that less than ten of those caught crossing into NDAs were actually arrested by the military, as local law enforcement has been on hand to conduct the vast majority of arrests. How does it work? On July 23rd, the Department of the Interior announced that it was transferring 285 acres of land to the Navy. 'By making this land available for border infrastructure improvements and defense operations, we are closing critical security gaps, stopping illegal activity and protecting both our nation and its natural resources from the damage caused by unchecked illegal immigration,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. 'This is about law and order, national sovereignty and using our public lands to defend the American people.' The acres run in a strip along the U.S.-Mexico border adjacent to and east of the Barry M. Goldwater Range of southern Arizona, wrote VanWyck. When asked about when the Marines — who are, operationally, part of the Navy — began managing the area, VanWyck wrote that, 'exercise of all necessary authority, direction, and command and control over the land has been assigned to MCAS Yuma from the Dept. of Navy.' The Marines will be working closely with the federal and local law enforcement, too. 'MCAS Yuma has a long-standing relationship with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which has been operating throughout the Barry M. Goldwater Range–West for some time," VanWyck wrote. 'Additionally, MCAS Yuma will be working with the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish & Wildlife, who oversee national wildlife refuges; Bureau of Land Management, and Arizona Game and Fish regarding the NDA area.' It is not uncommon for the military to assist with domestic issues, like natural disasters. In those instances, however, the federal agencies generally pay the military's expenses. FEMA, for example, will pay the costs of using the Army in disaster cleanup. In this instance, the financial responsibility for the deployments falls on the Navy, whose budgets are managed by congressional appropriation committees. 'The Department of the Navy is assessing costs and will closely track all funds associated with administration of the NDA,' VanWyck wrote. Where else are there NDAs? The NDAs were established as a result of one of the many executive orders President Donald Trump signed on his first day in office. One called 'Protecting the American People Against Invasion' established the administration's emphasis on addressing immigration and set the terms and rhetoric for how the issues are understood. More specifically, another executive order — Clarifying the Military's Role in Protecting the Territorial Integrity of the United States — called on the Defense Department to use the U.S. Northern Command to assist in sealing the southern border. As a result of those orders, a 170-mile strip of noncontiguous land in New Mexico was designated on April 21st as an extension of Fort Huachuca, an Army base in Arizona. On May 1st, a second NDA was created in west Texas, that spans a separate 63 miles of land between El Paso and Fort Hancock, which became an extension of Fort Bliss, another Army base. A third was created along 250 miles of the Rio Grande River that runs from South Padre Island to Roma, Texas. Those lands came from the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission, and are now under the jurisdiction of the Air Force. All of the land transfers are considered temporary. Though the scale of border crossings is going down considerably, there are other issues — like the 'illegal activity' Burgum mentioned — that the DOD is still focused on. Regarding the longevity of the installations, VanWyck wrote that, 'While the Yuma NDA is temporary and mission specific, we will not speculate about future requirements.' Play Farm Merge Valley
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marine Corps wife and mom slams blue state for allegedly draining her family's savings: 'I just want my money back'
Sarah Ogasian, wife of USMC Master Sgt. Jon Ogasian, speaks to Fox News Digital about her claim that the state of New York was in violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act after taking all of their family savings in error.
