Fuel margins remain high despite lower prices at the pump, watchdog finds
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said retailers' margins – the difference between what they pay for fuel and what they sell it at – remained high compared to historic levels.
Fuel prices across the UK fell for both petrol and diesel over the three months to the end of May by 7.6 pence per litre (ppl) and 8.4 ppl respectively.
But the CMA found that fuel margins were similar to the high levels seen during its road fuel market study – a review of the market to understand the factors influencing fuel prices undertaken in 2023 – which suggested overall competition in the UK's road fuel retail market remained 'weak'.
Supermarket fuel margins fell from 8.9% in December 2024 to 7.9% in February 2025, before rising to 8.3% in March 2025, the regulator found.
Non-supermarket fuel margins fell from 9.9% in December 2024 to 8.9% in January 2025, before rising to 10.4% in March 2025.
The CMA also looked at the retail spread – the average price that drivers pay at the pump compared to the benchmarked price that retailers buy fuel at – across the UK from March 2025 to May 2025.
It found that petrol retail spreads averaged 15.4 ppl, which was 1.5 ppl higher than the previous four-month period – and still more than double the average of 6.5 ppl over 2015 to 2019.
Diesel retail spreads averaged 18.8 ppl, which was 4.6 ppl higher than the previous four-month period and more than double the average of 8.6 ppl in 2015 to 2019.
Dan Turnbull, senior director of markets at the CMA, said: 'While there is uncertainty over how global events will impact the price of oil, our report shows fuel margins remain high compared to historic levels despite lower prices at the pump in recent months.
'The Government committed to launching a 'fuel finder' scheme following our recommendation to help drivers compare real-time prices and boost competition.
'Once launched, it will make it easier than ever to shop around and find the best deals.'
RAC head of policy Simon Williams said: 'Given fuel is a major expense for households, and with eight in 10 drivers dependent on their cars, it's disappointing to see they've paid over the odds yet again.
'We have to hope the launch of the Government-backed Fuel Finder scheme, due at the end of the year, will stimulate competition and finally lead to fairer pump prices.'
AA president Edmund King said: 'Once again, the CMA has exposed boosted margins and profits from petrol and diesel. Road fuel is a critical part of a consumer and family budgets. Increased fuel costs have a major influence on inflation.
'While the hope is that pump price reporting, which becomes mandatory at the start of the next year, might bring about more competition, what is happening now is not only bad news for drivers and businesses but also siphoning off potential consumer spending for the likes of tourism and others.'
Mr King added: 'The clear and present danger now is the cost of petrol and diesel along holiday routes. Some of the prices are outrageous and we can only hope that drivers take maximum advantage of the price transparency provided by the CMA's voluntary reporting scheme to locate the competitive forecourts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves to announce cash Isa cut
Rachel Reeves is poised to announce a cut to the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance, reports suggest. The Chancellor is expected to confirm that she will reduce the £20,000 cap on the amount that can be shielded from tax in cash Isas each year in her Mansion House speech on July 15. Ms Reeves confirmed last month that she had no plans to reduce the total amount that can be paid into Isa products each year. However, the cash Isa limit is understood to still be under threat, with the Chancellor having previously been urged by City bosses to reduce the allowance to as little as £4,000. One Whitehall source familiar with the discussions told the Financial Times that ministers had been listening to those lobbying in favour of a higher limit, and that negotiations about the level it would be set at were still ongoing. The Government wants to reform cash Isas to push more people to invest in stocks and shares. There has been intense lobbying on either side of the debate by building societies who use cash Isa savings to fund loans, and City firms keen to boost investment in the stock market. Industry experts have condemned any move to slash the cash Isa allowance, warning it would damage incentives for long-term investment. Cutting the allowance would mean millions of people could save less each year tax-free, and would face a choice between putting money into taxable savings accounts or investing in riskier stocks. A recent survey by stockbroker, AJ Bell, suggested that only one in five savers would switch to the stock market if their limits were cut. There are four main types of Isa: cash, stocks and shares, lifetime, and innovative finance. Cash Isas are the most popular product, with savers stashing away a record £49.8bn last year – a 6pc increase on the previous year. Isa limits were originally set at £7,000 when the savings accounts were introduced by Gordon Brown, the former chancellor, in 1999. The annual allowance was fixed at £20,000 from the 2017-2018 tax year, with no requirement for savers to put money in stocks and shares instead of cash. Junior Isas (Jisas) have an annual limit of £9,000.
The National
14 minutes ago
- The National
Changes to UK disability cuts will cost billions
Liz Kendall told MPs on Monday that the UK Government would be putting forward a number of changes to its welfare reform bill following a backbench rebellion ahead of a second vote in the Commons. Kendall pointed to 'real concerns' that had been raised regarding the changes and insisted that ministers were 'making positive changes' after over 120 MPs forced ministers into a partial U-turn. MPs are set to vote on the legislation on Tuesday, with 50 Labour backbenchers expected to vote against the Government. Speaking to MPs, Kendall said the Government is 'putting an additional £300 million into employment support for sick and disabled people'. READ MORE: Labour MPs call out Keir Starmer's 'rushed' disability cuts Kendall said 'We will be delivering a total of £600 million for support next year, £800 million the year after, and £1 bn in 2028/29, increasing our total spending on employment support for sick and disabled people to £3.8bn over this Parliament, because disabled people who can work shouldn't wait to have the same rights and chances to work as everybody else. 'And the measures we are announcing today will cost around £2.5bn in 2029/30.' She said 'the overall savings and costings' of the reform package 'will be certified by the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) in the normal way'. The Work and Pensions Secretary said that the welfare reforms will now only apply the four-point requirement for Personal Independent Payments (PIP) will only apply to those applying from November 2026, so no existing claimants will lose the benefit. 'Now, some people have said they're concerned it will create a two-tier system, but I would say to the House, including members opposite that our benefits system often protects existing claimants from new rates or new rules, because lives have been built around that support, and it's often very hard for people to adjust,' Kendall said. Kendall also told MPs that the new proposals will mean no existing claimants of the Universal Credit standard allowance and health top-up 'are put into poverty as a result of the changes' in the welfare Bill. (Image: House of Commons) It comes as the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) own modelling said that 150,000 people will be pushed into poverty by 2030 as a result of the UK Government's welfare cuts. A review of PIP will also be 'co-produced' with disabled people, Kendall said, adding that the Government had published the terms of reference for the review. 'The review will look at the role of the Pip assessment, including activities, descriptors, and the associated points, to ensure these properly capture the impact of long-term health conditions and disability in the modern world,' she said. 'And it will be co-produced with disabled people, their organisations, clinicians, other experts, and MPs, before reporting to the Secretary of State by autumn next year, and implemented as soon as possible thereafter.' Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately said the changes showed a Government in 'chaos' and attempts to quash a rebellion led to 'un-funded U-turns costing billions and welfare plans that are not worth the paper that they are written on' READ MORE: Social Security Scotland is 'shining example of what independence can do' 'Their latest idea is a two-tier welfare system to trap people in a lifetime on benefits and deny them the dignity of work while leaving the taxpayer to pick up the ever-growing bill,' the Tory MP said. Whately said the increasing welfare budget was too high, as she said it will reach £100 billion by 2031. SNP MP Kirsty Blackman pressed Kendall on why the Labour party did not put the welfare cuts in their manifesto. 'Is it perhaps because she realised how deeply unpopular and wrong these changes would be?' Blackman asked. Kendall replied: 'I don't expect her to have read every line of our manifesto, but reforming the benefits system was in our manifesto, and so too is our commitment to tackling child poverty.' Earlier, Scottish Labour MP Johanna Baxter, Paisley and Renfrewshire South, asked Kendall what discussions she had had with the Scottish Government about the impact on Scotland. The Work and Pension Secretary said she hopes 'that the SNP matches our ambition to get more people into work'. Only one Scottish Labour MP, Brian Leishman, Alloa and Grangemouth, has publicly said he will vote against the welfare reforms. It has been widely reported that 50 Labour MPs are set to rebel during the vote on Tuesday.
Business News Wales
22 minutes ago
- Business News Wales
The UK Government Industrial Strategy: Was it Worth the Wait?
Economists and policymakers have recently renewed their interest in industrial strategies; that is, the coordinated policies designed to influence a nation's industrial composition. Continuing this recent trend, the UK Government has released its long-awaited industrial strategy. Rethinking government's role in shaping economies Over the course of the late 20th century, overt industrial strategies lost popularity due to growing political scepticism about the state's capacity for successful market intervention. A key reason for this scepticism is that the future is quite difficult to predict. There was criticism of government's ability to see into the future and 'picking winners' to support through industrial strategies, and the adverse impact of lobbying by influential groups. However, there are several significant challenges facing all economies that governments will have to address (the green transition serves as a prime example). Because of this, there's been a resurgence of interest in industrial strategies. Industrial strategies: From May to Hunt The last official industrial strategy from the government was published by Theresa May's government in 2017. Then, the government's industrial strategy aimed to grow the UK economy by focusing on five foundations of productivity. Boris Johnson's government unveiled a new 'Plan for growth' in 2021, replacing Theresa May's strategy. The plan outlined the government's post-pandemic strategy for boosting the economy and 'build back better'. In January 2023, Jeremy Hunt outlined the government's new economic growth plan, emphasizing five key sectors: digital technology, green industries, life sciences, advanced manufacturing, and creative industries. A 10-year industrial blueprint The current UK Government's new industrial strategy details a 10-year plan to revitalise the British economy and boost industrial heartlands and regions suffering from economic stagnation. Eight sectors with the highest economic growth potential (judged by the Government) have been identified: advanced manufacturing, the creative industries, life sciences, clean energy, defence, digital and technology businesses (including artificial intelligence and quantum computing), financial services such as banking and insurance, and professional services such as accounting and the legal profession. The majority of the support – cheaper energy, trade support, and skills training – will go to those sectors. The UK Government also announced that freeports, investment zones, and enterprise zones will be grouped under the 'Industrial Strategy Zones' initiative. This restructuring aims to resolve the overlap between the three nearly identical special economic zones, a problem acknowledged even by those involved with them. There is still more detail to come on various important sectors: life sciences and financial services sector plans, along with the separate defence industrial strategy, remain unpublished. A Strategic Fit for Wales? This industrial strategy will help many parts of the Welsh economy. The UK Government's emphasis on key sectors and its long-term economic vision aligns with Wales's strengths in clean energy, defence, and advanced manufacturing. The initial response from Welsh industry leaders shows mostly optimism and positivity. Welsh stakeholders across sectors strongly support the UK Government's industrial strategy, citing its alignment with their goals. There is a shared desire for swift implementation but effective implementation and impact hinges on collaboration with the Welsh Government, local authorities, and regional bodies. Although early responses are positive, more information is needed to understand how Welsh businesses will be supported in their growth plans and how the strategy will contribute to the growth of the economy. Some have argued that the government should have concentrated on the larger economy, taking into account the retail and hospitality businesses that have been harmed by recent policies. The strategy offers no support for energy costs or business rates reform for them. Such inclusion would have had a positive impact on several areas in Wales where such industries dominate the economy. The tourism and hospitality industries in Wales employed nearly 160,000 people in 2024, representing 11.8% of the nation's workforce. The food industry and other important sectors in Wales are unsure if they qualify for the new funding and support programs. Bold vision, hard choices The UK (and Wales) needs more 'creative destruction,' a term coined by the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter to describe the replacement of underperforming businesses with more productive, high-growth ones. It therefore makes sense for the UK government to favour high productivity sectors that could grow further and have potential to form economic clusters. The UK Government has deemed its industrial strategy vital to its overall growth objectives. However, its success hinges on the government's courage. Governments tend to support thriving businesses but hesitate to let failing ones go, especially in politically sensitive areas. While aiming to stimulate investment by easing regulations and planning, the government must overcome local opposition to various development proposals. The strategy is bold and ambitious and looks to target long-term flaws in the UK economy. Providing the Government is serious about what it says, we should all give this strategy a chance to succeed.
