My favorite iOS 18.4 feature is ambient music — here's how to activate it
Plenty of software features on your phone promise to make you more productive, with iOS 18 boasting more than its share. But the iOS 18.4 update takes things a step further, adding a new capability that aims to bring a productivity-boosting soundtrack to your iPhone.
Specifically, iOS 18.4 introduces an ambient music feature to the Control Center that lets you play tunes in the background.
In addition to a productivity option, ambient music genres include "chill" for more relaxing tunes and "wellbeing," which seems geared toward being the soundtrack of any mindfulness or meditation sessions you engage in.
Finally, a "sleep" mode includes sounds geared toward lulling you off to dreamland.
My ears pricked up when I heard about the arrival of ambient music in iOS 18.4. That's because I'm always looking for ways to stay focused when I'm trying to complete a task, and music often plays a big role in that.
I like to play music as I work, and since I work remotely, I don't have to worry about donning the best headphones to keep my taste in music from distracting others.
So when it's time to hunker down and work on a project, I usually wind up launching the Music app on my Mac or iPhone, hitting the shuffle button and getting down to business while the randomized playlist goes from one song to the next.
There's an issue with this approach, though. Because a lot of my work involves writing, I find that some times music can be a distraction, particularly when we're talking about songs with lyrics. It's not really helpful when I'm trying to describe some of the finer points of, say, Apple Intelligence, and all of a sudden "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" starts playing, distracting a part of my brain that's trying to explain how to get the most out of Writing Tools to instead focus on whatever the hell it is Iron Butterfly is singing about.
True, I could create a playlist of instrumental songs, saving me the embarrassment of inadvertently transposing the lyrics of "She's a Rainbow" when I'm writing about iPhone 16 color options. But since I like a variety of audio playing in the background, it'd have to be a very long playlist. And why go through the trouble of creating a playlist when Apple can do it for me?
That's the promise of ambient music — it can play in the background, doing just enough to stimulate the brain with particular beats and rhythms optimized for specific tasks like productivity or relaxation, without making you think about lyrics or artists or who opened for Guns N' Roses on the Appetite for Destruction tour.
It's a solution long discovered by people like my wife who plays ambient music via YouTube when she needs to concentrate on a task, but now it's right there on my iPhone, giving me a convenient way of trying ambient music for myself.
To access ambient music in iOS 18.4, you're going to want to start in the Control Center section of your iPhone. Just swipe diagonally from the upper right corner of the home screen to bring up Control Center.
You're going to need to customize Control Center in iOS 18 to add ambient music controls. Press and hold anywhere on the screen to edit Control Center, and then tap Add a Control at the bottom of the page.
On the subsequent screen, scroll down to the Ambient Music section, and then select the particular genre you want to add to the Control Center — Sleep, Chill, Productivity or Wellbeing. You can add one or even multiple controls if you have the space.
Once you've got an ambient music control in the Control Center, all you have to do is tap on that control any time you want to play music in the background. You can then pause or stop the music using your iPhone's regular playback controls.
If you really enjoy ambient music, you can use the ability to customize lock screen controls in iOS 18 to add an ambient music control to the bottom of your lock screen. That way, you can just control music playback from there.
With the iOS 18.4 public beta installed on my phone, I've been trying out most of the different ambient music genres, with a particular focus on the Productivity tunes. (I haven't played anything from Sleep, as I don't need any help falling asleep these days — and certainly not during work hours.)
The genres sound pretty distinct to my ears. Productivity offers a very synthesized sound, with steady, rhythmic beats that are clearly intended to keep you pounding away at the work in front of you while Chill has much more mellow tone. The Wellbeing sound relies heavily on piano, to the point where it sounded like the kind of ambient music that plays in the waiting room a funeral parlor. I'm not sure if that would contribute to my sense of well-being.
As for the Productivity tunes, I certainly never felt the urge to glance at the playback controls on my iPhone to see if there was an artist or title to the song. (If I had, all I would have seen would be a generic title like "Momentum Beats.") In that sense, iOS 18's Ambient Music feature is serving its purpose — fill the air with enough sound to keep my brain stimulated but not to the point of distraction.
If I have one complaint about Ambient Music, it's that you have to set different controls for the different genres — there doesn't appear to be any way to toggle from Productivity over to, say, Chill without setting up separate controls in the Control Center. If you're really into ambient music, that's a lot of space to devote to one feature.
Ambient music is available on any phone that can run iOS 18.4. It's not Apple Intelligence-specific as so many new features are these days, so anyone with an older iPhone can enjoy just as easily as an iPhone 16 owner.
Not everyone's going to embrace the feature, not even music lovers. If you don't find background music to be particularly helpful for your state of mind, then Ambient Music won't have much to offer you. But if you are like me and need something playing as you work, this is definitely an iOS 18 feature you need to try.
iOS 19 risks turning Apple Intelligence into the new Siri — and that's not good
Apple CarPlay just got a welcome upgrade in iOS 18.4
iPhone 16e vs iPhone 17: Everything we know so far
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
23 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. What's happening? The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. Why would Trump do this? In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. Didn't Trump want Intel's CEO to quit? That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' Why would Intel do a deal? The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Would this deal be unusual? Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. Would the government run Intel? U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. What government grants does Intel receive? Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
JD Vance 'directly' convinced UK to drop Apple backdoor data demand, protecting Americans' rights: US official
Vice President JD Vance – who eviscerated European leaders earlier this year for allegedly retreating on free speech, essentially threatening fundamental democratic values – recently played a commanding role in convincing the United Kingdom to drop its demands that Apple provide the British government a "backdoor" to personal user data, Fox News Digital has learned. A U.S. official told Fox News Digital that Vance "was in charge and was personally involved in negotiating a deal, including having direct conversations with the British government." Working with U.K. partners, the vice president "negotiated a mutually beneficial understanding" that the British government "will withdraw the current backdoor order to Apple," the U.S. official said, adding that the "agreement between our two governments maintains each country's sovereignty while ensuring close cooperation on data sharing." The U.S. official further told Fox News Digital that the vice president "took a strong interest in this issue because of his background in technology, his concern for privacy, and his [sincere] commitment to maintain a strong U.S.-U.K. relationship." Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard said in an X post on Monday that she, alongside President Donald Trump and Vance, had been working "closely with our partners in the U.K." over the past several months "to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected." "As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties," Gabbard wrote. Fox News Digital reached out to Apple and the British Home Office for comment but did not immediately hear back. In February, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., penned a letter to the then-newly confirmed DNI, informing Gabbard of recent press reports that the U.K.'s home secretary "served Apple with a secret order" at the start of the year, "directing the company to weaken the security of its iCloud backup service to facilitate government spying." The directive reportedly required Apple to weaken the encryption of its iCloud backup service, giving the British government "blanket capability" to access customers' encrypted files. Reports further stated that the order was issued under the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Act 2016, commonly known as the "Snoopers' Charter," which does not require a judge's approval, according to the letter previously obtained by Fox News Digital. Wyden, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Biggs, who chairs a House Judiciary subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance, informed Gabbard that Apple "is reportedly gagged from acknowledging that it received such an order, and the company faces criminal penalties that prevent it from even confirming to the U.S. Congress the accuracy of these press reports." The letter focused on the threat of China, Russia and other adversaries spying on Americans. At the Munich Security Conference in February, Vance, meanwhile, said that the threat he worried about the most when it comes to Europe was not China, Russia or "any other external actor," but rather "the threat from within the retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values, values shared with the United States of America." Vance specifically cited the case of Adam Smith-Connor, a British Army veteran and physiotherapist, who was prosecuted under the U.K.'s "buffer zone" or "safe access zone" laws around abortion clinics. British police confronted him for silently praying outside the clinic. The vice president also called out Europe more broadly for stifling opposition speech. "To many of us on the other side of the Atlantic, it looks more and more like old, entrenched interests hiding behind ugly Soviet-era words like misinformation and disinformation, who simply don't like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion or, God forbid, vote a different way, or even worse, win an election," Vance said at the time. More recently, Vance made a diplomatic visit to the U.K. earlier this month, meeting with the British foreign secretary for talks centered on the Ukraine-Russia and Israel-Hamas wars. Last week, the State Department, meanwhile, released its 2024 annual country report on "human rights practices." In the report on the United Kingdom, the Trump administration cited "credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression," including "enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism." The State Department asserted that the British government "sometimes took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, but prosecution and punishment for such abuses was inconsistent." The report said British authorities, including the U.K. Office of Communications (Ofcom), are legally authorized to monitor all forms of communication for speech they deemed "illegal." The U.K. Online Safety Act of 2023, which came into force in 2024, "defined the category of 'online harm' and expressly expanded Ofcom's authority to include American media and technology firms with a substantial number of British users, regardless of whether they had a corporate presence in the UK," according to the State Department. Under the law, the report said, companies were required to engage in proactive "illegal content risk assessment" to mitigate the risk of users encountering speech deemed illegal by Ofcom. "Experts warned that one effect of the bill could be government regulation to reduce or eliminate effective encryption (and therefore user privacy) on platforms," the report said. The U.K. has been increasingly cracking down on British citizens for opposition commentary, especially online posts and memes opposing mass migration. In August 2024, as riots broke out in the U.K. after a mass stabbing at a Taylor Swift-themed dance event left three girls dead and others wounded, London's Metropolitan Police chief warned that officials could also extradite and jail U.S. citizens for online posts about the unrest. In its report, the State Department noted that the local and national government officials in the wake of the Southport attack "repeatedly intervened to chill speech as to the identity and motives of the attacker," who was later identified as Axel Rudakubana, a British citizen of Rwandan origins. The British government "called on companies, including U.S. firms, to censor speech deemed misinformation or 'hate speech,'" according to the State Department, which also noted that Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Parkinson threatened to prosecute and seek the extradition of those who "repost, repeat, or amplify a message which is false, threatening, or stirs up racial/religious hatred." The report noted that numerous individuals were arrested for online speech about the attack and its motivations, though in some cases charges were later dropped. "Numerous nongovernment organizations (NGOs) and media outlets criticized the government's approach to censoring speech, both in principle and in the perceived weaponization of law enforcement against political views disfavored by authorities."
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Very constructive on Apple longer term despite near-term headwinds, says BofA's Wamsi Mohan
Wamsi Mohan, Bank of America Securities analyst, joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss Apple's stock performance, iPhone production in India, AI development, and more.
