logo
At Pittsboro town hall, US Rep. Valerie Foushee warns of 'constitutional crisis' facing America

At Pittsboro town hall, US Rep. Valerie Foushee warns of 'constitutional crisis' facing America

Yahoo23-04-2025

Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-N.C.) speaks to voters at the historic Chatham County Courthouse. (Photo: Brandon Kingdollar/NC Newsline)
North Carolina Congresswoman Valerie Foushee (D-NC4) condemned the Trump administration at a Pittsboro town hall Tuesday evening for carrying out a 'campaign to undermine the very foundations of our democracy.'
Foushee was joined by fellow Democrats, Rep. Robert T. Reives II, the minority leader of the state House of Representatives, and Karen Howard, the chair of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners, at a gathering that brought around 100 of their constituents to the historic Chatham County Courthouse for a little over an hour.
Unlike high profile town halls held by Republicans around the U.S., Foushee's event drew a largely friendly, if anxious, crowd. Questions focused on steps she and other Democrats were taking to resist the Trump administration's cuts to funding for education, scientific research, and social services.
Foushee spent most of the event taking aim at President Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress, condemning efforts to 'target our rights, gut governmental protections, defund public education, criminalize immigrants and asylum seekers, weaken worker protections, and slash social safety net programs.'
'What we are currently facing is truly unprecedented. The stakes are high, and the urgency is real. This is a moment where we all need to show up, speak out, and stand together,' Foushee said. 'The American people cannot afford this extreme agenda, and frankly, our democracy cannot afford this extreme agenda either. Our country is facing a constitutional crisis, one that demands urgent action.'
She added that she was particularly concerned by threats to the legitimacy of elections, telling the audience that 'nothing hurt more' in the first 100 days than the House passage of the SAVE Act — a measure to require proof of citizenship at polling places that voting rights advocacy groups warn could disenfranchise millions of legal voters. Foushee invoked the ongoing legal challenge by losing state Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin as another attack on election integrity.
'We have to protect the right to vote because we know what is coming forward to some make sure that some folk are not given access to the ballot box,' Foushee said. 'We have to stand up against those types of legislation.'
Among the audience members who spoke was a teacher at the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics who asked what he should tell the aspiring scientists in his classes amid the administration's broad cuts to research and education.
In response, Rep. Reives said these efforts are evidence that Republican officials and their donors are 'scared to death of an educated populace,' and that it's critical to stay focused on the importance of education amid attempts to distract from those issues in the coming years.
'There's one group of people in the entire country who are trying to stop everybody else from achieving an American dream, and that are the wealthy billionaires that have taken over your government,' Reives said. 'Somehow, they have convinced themselves that, God help us, if you get an education, if you're healthy and you get a chance to work, that somehow they're going to lose that billion dollars before they die.'
Howard, the county commission chair, said the most important thing attendees of the town hall could do is act as 'ambassadors' to their friends and neighbors so that they fully understand the consequences of the election. She invited the NCSSM teacher to bring her letters from his class about what education opportunities mean to them that she can deliver in an upcoming meeting with U.S. Senators Thom Tillis and Ted Budd.
'We need to broaden our tent, and we need to start reaching out to people that can hear us,' Howard said. 'Every single person in every single audience that you ever sit in has somebody that will listen to them, someone who believes them, someone who trusts them.'
Reives cited the ongoing tribulations surrounding Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as proof that just a few lawmakers willing to resist Trump could make a substantial difference, noting that Tillis cast the deciding vote that allowed him to be confirmed. 'Could you have gotten a better secretary?' he asked, drawing laughter from the town hall audience.
After the event, Durham resident Joe English said his respect for Reives was 'greatly improved' after hearing him speak so emphatically about democracy and the crises facing the U.S. 'To see the three of them interplay was phenomenal. This is what I needed,' English said.
He said while he would have liked to see more attendance, it was good to see Foushee holding an in-person discussion with constituents — adding that he was pleased when she did not attend Trump's inauguration as a show of defiance.
Gary Simpson and Connie McAdams, local activists and members of Pittsboro Presbyterian Church, said they had tried to meet with Tillis earlier in the day but could only speak to a staffer in his office. Though they didn't know about Foushee's town hall in advance, they were able to get in at the last minute.
'I just applaud Valerie Foushee for doing this and giving people a chance to interact with her, and I appreciate her listening and trying to answer those hard questions,' McAdams said. 'Everything is tough, and I appreciate her working as hard as she can in tough circumstances to make things better for all of us.'
Foushee's take-home message was that while she and other Democrats can vote against the Trump administration's agenda, it's up to engaged citizens to vote out officials supporting his initiatives and to convince the people in their lives to do the same — a call to action that drew applause throughout the historic courtroom.
'Don't be surprised when that person does exactly what he said he would do. Nothing should surprise you except how quickly he was able to do it,' Foushee said. 'What you can do is to change the faces of the folks in the spaces that determine the future of this generation and the next generation and generations to come.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Planned PBS, NPR cuts would overwhelmingly hit outlets in states Trump won, report finds
Planned PBS, NPR cuts would overwhelmingly hit outlets in states Trump won, report finds

CBS News

time8 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Planned PBS, NPR cuts would overwhelmingly hit outlets in states Trump won, report finds

The looming federal funding cuts to public television and radio would overwhelmingly gut outlets in states won by President Trump in 2024, according to a new congressional report. Approximately 60% of the hundreds of radio and television stations that could suffer funding cuts are in Trump-won states, according to a congressional report obtained by CBS News from Senate Democrats. The organizations that would be affected include public media outlets in cities as large as Houston and Miami, as well as smaller stations in tiny communities like Douglas, Wyoming, which has a population of 6,000 and hosts the Wyoming State Fair. The widespread cuts to public radio and television are a component of a Republican congressional plan to eliminate $9 billion in funding for programs approved before President Trump's second term began. The proposed rescissions package, which is scheduled for a House vote Thursday, includes $1.1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to NPR and PBS. The cuts to public broadcasting are being touted by the Trump administration and Republicans as an effort to slash taxpayer funding for news media outlets they accuse of being "liberal" or politically biased in their content. Advocates for public broadcasting have lambasted the cuts as destructive, needless and harmful to communities that have very limited sources of local broadcast news. They also deny allegations of political bias. The list of hundreds of TV and radio outlets facing funding cuts shows a broad range of impact. Major public television and radio stations in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Washington, D.C., could each lose nearly $1 million in grants in the coming months. An FM community public radio station in Carbondale, Colorado, which touts itself as "Public access radio that connects community members to one another and the world," received $145,000 in federal grant funding last year. At each of the public media outlets, the list shows reductions that are sizable enough to potentially require staffing cuts, programming reductions or news cutbacks that threaten to exacerbate shortages of local news content. CBS News' review of proposed grant cuts shows Alabama, a state with an estimated 215 public media employees, would lose as much as $3 million in funding for its public television outlets in the coming months. In South Dakota, a sparsely populated state that nonetheless receives $3 million in funds for public broadcasting employees, the funding cuts would gut money for at least 20 media outlets, according to the report provided by congressional aides to CBS News. "The path to better public media is achievable only if funding is maintained. Otherwise, a vital lifeline that operates reliable emergency communications, supports early learning, and keeps local communities connected and informed will be cut off with regrettable and lasting consequences," said Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. "Federal funding for the public broadcasting system is irreplaceable," Harrison said. "Public media serves all — families and individuals, in rural and urban communities — free of charge and commercial free." Both PBS and NPR have sued the Trump administration over previous executive orders cutting their funding, with lawyers for both alleging that among other issues, the cuts violate the First Amendment. PBS CEO Paula Kerger previously said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" that while PBS only receives 15% of its funding from the federal government, some of its smaller stations receive up to 50% of their funding from federal sources and said the risks to the smaller stations are "existential" if the funding is cut. NPR CEO Katherine Maher has said roughly 1% of the organization's budget comes directly from federal dollars. Some of the many impacted public radio and TV stations have posted messages protesting the proposed cuts in funding. The social media account of a Baltimore public radio station leader said, "This isn't hypothetical—it's real, it's happening, and it places the future of local, trusted public media at serious risk. Let me be clear: this is not a symbolic move. If approved, this action could irreparably damage the local public media." Rural communities, often referred to as "news deserts" because of the lack of local news organizations, would suffer the brunt of the pain. According to a joint statement by Rep. Mark Amodei, a Nevada Republican, and Rep. Dan Goldman, a New York Democrat, "Rural broadcasters face significant challenges in raising private funds, making them particularly vulnerable if government funding is cut." Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat who is the vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement to CBS News, "Trump wants Congress to vote to cut off public radio broadcasts our constituents count on for weather forecasts, emergency alerts, and updates on what's going on in their community—and force layoffs at local TV stations." House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has championed the cuts and sought to rally support ahead of Thursday's vote on the rescissions package. "House Republicans will fulfill our mandate and continue codifying into law a more efficient federal government," Johnson said in a statement. "This is exactly what the American people deserve." In April, the White House released a statement saying taxpayers had funded NPR and PBS "for too long" and said they've "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'" The White House Office of Management and Budget did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Toni Biancardi returns to Burns Harbor Town Council
Toni Biancardi returns to Burns Harbor Town Council

Chicago Tribune

time11 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Toni Biancardi returns to Burns Harbor Town Council

Toni Biancardi took her familiar seat at the Burns Harbor Town Council table Wednesday evening. Porter County Democratic Party Chair Don Craft appointed Biancardi to fill the vacancy left by Nick Loving, who moved over from council to the clerk-treasurer's job. Biancardi, a Republican, had previously served for 8 years on the Burns Harbor Town Council from 2015 to 2023. She decided against seeking re-election in 2023. 'I am excited because I love my community and the opportunity to serve,' Biancardi said. Craft is empowered to make the council appointment because Burns Harbor consists of one voting precinct. All five Burns Harbor Council members serve at large. The seat was originally held by Kurt Jordan, who resigned along with his wife Jane Jordan, the town's clerk-treasurer, on May 8, 2024. Loving was appointed last June to fill Jordan's seat and now Biancardi will serve the remainder of the term, which lasts through the end of 2027. Biancardi was sworn into office Monday by Loving after she learned of her appointment. The Wednesday meeting was the first time that Loving attended a council meeting in his new position as clerk-treasurer. He received applause from those in council chambers. During his opening remarks, Loving repeated a sentiment that he expressed when he swore Biancardi into office Monday. 'There's a lot that's wrong in this world, but having Toni back in the chair is one step in making it right,' Loving said. Biancardi said that she will be working as the council's liaison to the street department. During the next few weeks, Biancardi said she will become reacquainted with the town's operations. Biancardi is on summer break from her teaching job at Westville High School. She teaches computer science, cyber security, marketing and sales and also supervises work-study-based students. Meanwhile, Loving said that he is adjusting well to his new job as clerk-treasurer. Loving complimented his predecessor, Nicole Migliorini, for helping to smooth the transition. Migliorini resigned from the clerk-treasurer's job on May 14, citing a 'toxic' work environment.

Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows
Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows

Politico

time11 minutes ago

  • Politico

Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows

A majority of Americans believe President Donald Trump's multimillion-dollar parade celebrating the Army in Washington on Saturday is not a good use of government funds, a new AP-NORC poll shows. Sixty percent of Americans surveyed in the June poll said they believe the parade is not a good use of funds, while 38 percent said they believe the parade is worth the cost. Forty percent of Americans approve of Trump's decision to hold the parade, compared with 31 percent who neither approve or disapprove and 29 percent who are against the decision to hold a parade. The parade this weekend, which also coincides with Trump's 79th birthday, is expected to feature 6,600 soldiers marching along with 25 M1 Abrams main battle tanks and dozens of other military vehicles. Several generations of military aircraft are planned to fly overhead, including a World War II-era B-25 bomber, Huey helicopters similar to those used in the Vietnam War, and a P-1 biplane fighter aircraft like the ones first used in the 1920s. Trump is also expected to give a speech. The cost of the parade is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million, according to Army officials. Some Republicans have raised concerns over the cost. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, told POLITICO last week he 'would have recommended against the parade' after learning of its estimated cost. In an NBC News interview in May, Trump said the amount spent on holding the parade would be 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' Most Republican lawmakers are planning to skip the parade, including Speaker Mike Johnson and several members who have previously served in the military. Only seven out of 50 congressional Republicans surveyed by POLITICO as of Tuesday said they were planning to attend. The poll also finds 60 percent of Americans disapprove of Trump's job performance, while 39 percent approve, marking Trump's highest disapproval rating in an AP-NORC poll since he returned to office in January. The AP-NORC poll was conducted June 5-9 and is based on interviews with 1,158 adults around the country. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 4.0 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store