Barrett eviscerates Jackson, Sotomayor takes on a 'complicit' court in contentious final opinions
By Ashley Oliver
Published June 27, 2025
Justice Amy Coney Barrett had pointed words for her colleague Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, accusing Jackson of taking an "extreme" position on the role of the judiciary branch.
Writing in her Supreme Court opinion on nationwide injunctions on Friday, Barrett said Jackson's dissent contained "rhetoric," and she signaled that the liberal justice's arguments were not worth much attention.
"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."
The Supreme Court's decision came as part of an emergency request from the Trump administration asking the high court to put an end to judges issuing universal injunctions, including those that judges have placed on President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order.
TRUMP CELEBRATES SUPREME COURT LIMITS ON 'COLOSSAL ABUSE OF POWER' BY FEDERAL JUDGES
Barrett, who was appointed by Trump, wrote that when judges issue injunctions to block policies, like those the Trump administration is trying to implement, they cannot apply the injunction to more than the parties involved in the case. Barrett said that type of order, often called a "nationwide injunction," is judicial overreach.
But Barrett's opinion left open numerous other ways that plaintiffs can seek broad forms of relief from the courts, including by bringing class action lawsuits or statewide lawsuits.
SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS REINS IN SOTOMAYOR AFTER REPEATED INTERRUPTIONS
Jackson wrote that nationwide injunctions should be permissible because the courts should not allow the president to "violate the Constitution." Barrett said that was not based on any existing legal doctrine.
"She offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush," Barrett wrote.
Sotomayor, meanwhile, wrote in her own dissenting opinion that the Supreme Court was being "complicit" by allowing the Trump administration to extract a perceived win out of the high court over birthright citizenship.
SUPREME COURT TAKES ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: LIBERALS BALK AT TRUMP ARGUMENT TO END NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS
Sotomayor said that every court that has reviewed Trump's birthright citizenship plan thus far has blocked Trump from carrying it out. Trump played a "different game," Sotomayor said, by bringing the case before the Supreme Court without actually asking the justices to analyze the merits of his plan. Trump instead asked the justices to weigh in on the legality of nationwide injunctions in general.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Trump's birthright citizenship order would eliminate the 150-year-old right under the 14th Amendment that allows babies born in the United States to receive automatic citizenship regardless of their parents' citizenship status.
The Supreme Court's decision still allows for the high possibility that judges will continue to widely block Trump's birthright citizenship order, but with different legal maneuvering on the part of the plaintiffs and the courts. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barrett-eviscerates-jackson-sotomayor-takes-complicit-court-contentious-final-opinions
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
American Democracy's Safety Nets Are Now Snares
The US's two-party system is accelerating extremism, Hong Kong is staging a comeback and one Australian smelter is a test case for combating China. By Save Welcome to the weekend! The US just got its first outpost of China's biggest coffee chain, whose name comes from something represented in China by the number 8. Which chain is it? Test your knowledge with the Pointed quiz.
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
From Washington: One Big, Beautiful Win For President Trump
On Thursday, the House passed President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' securing a major legislative win for the administration. The bill permanently extends the President's 2017 tax cuts, slashes spending on Medicaid and food assistance, and boosts funding for the military and border. FOX News Washington-based Correspondent Mark Meredith explains the complicated journey to pass the bill and discusses how the legislation will impact next year's midterms. Later, former federal prosecutor Jim Trusty breaks down the latest Supreme Court rulings on abortion funding, parental rights in schools, and the power of federal judges. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Multiple arrested as anti-ICE protesters clash with police, US troops in Los Angeles
Multiple people were arrested in Los Angeles on Friday as anti-ICE demonstrators clashed with law enforcement and the U.S. military after weeks of protests against deportations and ICE raids, police said. Los Angeles police said there were "multiple arrests today during several different demonstrations" downtown. "Most were peaceful, but once again, as the evening approached, outside agitators began to cause issues," the department wrote on X. Earlier in the night, police wrote that demonstrators were "confronting Federal Protective Security Personnel and National Guard members." "Less Lethal munitions have been deployed by Federal authorities," police wrote, adding that they may cause pain and discomfort. In response to the anti-ICE protests that began last month, the Trump administration deployed National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles, despite opposition from Gov. Gavin Newsom. Demonstrators met up for the protest on Friday at around 9:30 a.m. outside City Hall on Spring Street and took a 1.5-mile route through downtown, according to local outlet KCAL. Police said the group dispersed shortly after the incident commander authorized a dispersal order for the area on Friday night, according to a post at 7:17 p.m. local time. Officers from the Department of Homeland Security had declared the protest an unlawful assembly, independent journalist Anthony Cabassa wrote on X, adding that Marines and federal agents were using riot gear while ordering the crowd to disperse.
