Punjab: NIA conducts searches in 3 border districts
The NIA teams seized several incriminating materials, including mobile phones and digital devices, during the searches carried out in the border districts of Amritsar, Gurdaspur and Batala.
On the night of March 14, terrorists, backed by foreign-based handlers, had hurled a grenade at Thakur Dwara Sanatan Temple, Sher Shah Road, Amritsar. The incident was one of the many recent grenade attacks carried out by operatives of different terror groups in the state of Punjab, on the directions of their handlers based abroad.
During investigation in the case, NIA found that the attack was carried out by accused Gursidak Singh (now deceased) and Vishal Gill.
'Gursidak was in contact with foreign based handlers, who recruited India-based individuals and conspired to spread terror by providing grenades/explosives and funds. The handlers radicalised vulnerable youth and induced them to unleash terror in lieu of money and drugs,' the NIA said in a statement.
'Gursidak Singh and Vishal Gill were involved in multiple instances of picking and dropping of grenades, weapons etc., as per the NIA investigations, which are continuing,' it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Can Abu Salem walk free soon? Here's what the Maharashtra government and the courts have said
Gangster Abu Salem, who was extradited to India from Portugal in 2005, has been trying to make the case for premature release from prison. But the state government told the Bombay High Court this week that he has to serve out a term of 25 years as per the conditions of his extradition from Portugal – which means that he cannot be released before 2030. India had assured Portugal that Salem would not be given the death penalty or jail term exceeding 25 years if he was found guilty in cases that were pending against him. In 2015 and 2017, Salem was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of builder Pradeep Jain and the 1993 Bombay blasts, respectively. On what basis is Salem seeking release? Abu Salem, or Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari, was named as an absconding accused in the first chargesheet filed by Mumbai Police in the Bombay blasts case on November 4, 1993. The police claimed that Salem had been given the task of transporting and concealing weapons, and was linked to the conspiracy to execute the blasts. On March 12 that year, a dozen bombs went off across Mumbai in a terrorist attack coordinated by Dawood Ibrahim and his gang, killing 257 people. Salem remained a wanted accused in the blasts case as well as the 1995 murder of Jain, a Mumbai-based builder. He was said to have fled the country, and remained absconding as the trial against the other accused began and ended. It was only in 2002 that investigators had a breakthrough, and Salem was detained in Lisbon, the capital of Portugal. He was said to have undergone plastic surgery to change his appearance, but his identity was established on the basis of his fingerprints that were available in police records. A year later, the Portuguese government consented to India's request for Salem's extradition on the basis of documents and evidence that were made available on his alleged role in crimes in India, including the 1993 terrorist attack. Salem appealed against the government's order in courts in Portugal, and L K Advani, then deputy Prime Minister, gave an assurance that he would not be given the death penalty or a prison term of more than 25 years. On November 11, 2005, Salem was extradited to India. He was put on trial for the murder of the builder, and the 1993 blasts case. He was found guilty of murder and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and sections of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), and was sentenced to life imprisonment. For the past few years, Salem, who is lodged in a jail in Maharashtra, has been knocking on the doors of various authorities, including the trial court, Bombay High Court, and the Supreme Court, asking for the date on which he would be released. He has been claiming that he is entitled to benefits that a prisoner gets, including remission. Remission is a reduction in the jail term based on grounds including the nature of the offence and good conduct, and as part of special schemes, etc. Salem has claimed that based on the time he has spent in jail, he is entitled to 3 years and 16 days of remission. Also, given that he had been detained in Portugal from September 2002 onward, he has spent more than 25 years in jail, and should have been released on March 31, 2025. Based on these calculations, Salem has written to Portuguese authorities on various occasions, claiming that the conditions of his extradition have been violated. He has also written to the Maharashtra Prison Department, the state government, and the courts. Back in 2017, Salem had sought remission under a special scheme introduced by the state to mark the 125th birth anniversary of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar. He had said that his case was 'entirely different' from that of other convicts, as the agreement between Portugal and India guaranteed 'pardon, reprieve, respite or remission'. And what have the courts ruled in this matter? * Salem had approached the Supreme Court in 2018 with his plea on early release. In 2022, the court said that considering the gravity of his offences, no special privileges could be extended to him. The court also said that his contention that the period of his detention should be considered to have started in 2002 when he was first detained could not be accepted, as he was convicted of entering Portugal on a fake passport and had been punished in that country. The court said that in keeping with the assurance given to Portugal, once Salem completed 25 years in jail, which would be in 2030, the Union of India would consider the matter. * Last year, Salem approached the trial court in Mumbai, asking for the tentative date of his release, and a calculation of his remission as per prison rules. The court rejected his plea in December 2024 after the CBI submitted that as per the order of the Supreme Court, he could be released only in 2030. * Salem then approached the Bombay High Court, where the Prison Department and Home Department of the state submitted in May that he had actually been in prison for 19 years. The Home Department also submitted that since Salem is a convict in two cases, under the anti-terror law, TADA, his life imprisonment would not be calculated as a 14-year prison term. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs too filed an affidavit in May, saying that as a TADA convict, Salem's life imprisonment was for 60 years – however, to honour the assurance given to Portugal, the question of his release would arise on November 10, 2030, after he had served 25 years. The Union of India would abide by the assurance at the appropriate time, subject to remedies which may be available, the affidavit said. In July, the High Court admitted Salem's plea seeking remission and early release, but said that he was yet to complete the 25-year term, and that his plea would be heard in due course. This week, the state informed the court in an affidavit that Salem does not have a 'palatable history', citing the criminal offences he had been convicted of. It said that given his criminal record, Salem was a 'Category 8' prisoner who would have to spend 60 years in jail before being considered for release. However, as per the agreement with the Portuguese, Salem would not be put in jail for more than 25 years, the state said. But these 25 years would be 'actual imprisonment', and would not include remission. Therefore, he cannot be released before 2030.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Court allows 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana to talk to family to engage Counsel to represent him
Court allows 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana to talk to family to engage Counsel to represent him NEW DELHI: Patiala House Court on Thursday allowed 26/11 Mumbai terror Attack alleged mastermind Tahawwur Rana to talk to his family for discussion to engage a private counsel to represent him. Tahawwur Rana is chargesheeted by the National Investigation Agency ( NIA ) in this case. He wanted to engage a private counsel. Special Judge (NIA) Chander Jit Singh pronounced the order in a closed courtroom. The court allowed the plea for the limited purpose of discussing engagement of Pvt counsel, legal aid counsel Advo Piyush Sachdeva for Tahawwur Rana , confirmed. The conversation will be recorded, it will be in presence of DS Jail, only English or Hindi, he confirmed. Patiala House Court on Tuesday reserved the order on this issue after receiving replies from the NIA and Jail authorities. On August 1, the court disposed of an application of Rana seeking a regular telephone facility for his family in view of the denial of the facility by the jail authorities. Earlier, he was permitted to make a single call to his family. Rana is in judicial custody after NIA interrogation in the 26/11 Mumbai Terror Attack case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find the Lowest Auto Insurance Rates in Your Area AutoSaveMax Get Quote Undo He was extradited from the USA in April this year. Earlier, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on July 9 filed a supplementary charge sheet against Tahawur Rana in the 26/11 Mumbai terror case. The court had extended the judicial custody of Rana till August 13. This supplementary charge sheet contains procedural documents like arrest memo, seizure memo and other documents, Rana's counsel Piyush Sachdev had told ANI. The main charge sheet was filed by the NIA in December 2011. On June 9, the Court had granted Tahawwur Rana permission to make a single phone call to his family for the time being. The call was strictly conducted in accordance with jail regulations and under the supervision of a senior official from the Tihar jail authorities. Recently, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) collected voice and handwriting samples from Rana, who was extradited from the United States. The NIA had previously informed the court that Rana was confronted with substantial evidence related to the 26/11 attacks. The agency argued for further custody, citing his evasive behaviour during questioning and lack of cooperation. Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan and Special Public Prosecutor Narender Mann represented the NIA in the proceedings, while Advocate Piyush Sachdeva defended Rana. 64-year-old Canadian businessman of Pakistorigin, Rana, was extradited recently in connection with his alleged involvement in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. The devastating attack, orchestrated by Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed over 170 lives and left hundreds injured.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Justice out there': Indian-origin man Mahendra Patel, wrongfully accused of Walmart kidnapping attempt, cleared of charges in Georgia
Indian-origin Georgia man Mahendra Patel who spent 45 days in jail earlier this year has been cleared of all charges. 57-year-old Mahendra Patel , an Indian-origin, Georgia-based man, who spent 45 days in jail earlier this year, after a woman brought an attempted kidnapping accusation against him, has finally been cleared of all charges. Patel was arrested in March after Caroline Miller, a woman, alleged that Patel tried to kidnap her 2-year-old child when they were shopping at the Walmart Cobb Parkway. Patel was charged with criminal attempt to commit kidnapping, which was later amended to attempted kidnapping, along with simple assault and simple battery, accusing Patel of causing 'violent injury' by pulling on the child. Patel told the investigators that he held the child to stop him from falling and he exchanged a few words with the mother as well -- about where to find one particular medicine in the store. As Patel was spending days in jail, his attorney secured the surveillance footage of the incident that gained national attention as Patel's arrest was called a racial injustice. Contrary to the claims that Patel fled the store, the surveillance footage revealed that Patel paid for what he bought and exited the store without any rush. Hours later, Patel was arrested and he could not understand why he was being arrested and initially thought that they were arresting the wrong person. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Public Speaking Course for Children Planet Spark Book Now Undo An online petition calling for Patel's release drew nearly 100,000 signatures and Patel was released on bond after spending 45 days in jail. The Cobb County District Attorney's Office released a statement, saying the decision to drop Patel's charges came after a meeting between him and Miller, who expressed that they wanted to "put the incident behind them." The office further stated they are "pleased to have facilitated a resolution and are encouraged by the willingness of both parties to engage in a constructive dialogue." "It made me realize there's justice out there. There are good people," Patel said, adding that he will use his story as a lesson to be more vocal about those who are wrongfully jailed.
