After almost losing Trump, Putin shifts tack and gets his ideal summit
So Putin shifted tack ever so slightly.
Despite previous refusals by Russian officials to negotiate over territory in the Russia-Ukraine war, the Russian leader, during a meeting at the Kremlin last week, left Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, with the impression that Russia was now willing to engage in some deal-making on the question of land.
'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' Trump said on Friday. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.'
By speaking a language Trump understands — the language of real estate — Putin secured something he had been seeking ever since January: a one-on-one meeting with the US leader, without Zelenskyy present, to make his case and cut a deal.
'It has been a very good week for Putin,' said Sam Greene, a professor of Russian politics at Kings College London.
'He has taken himself out of a position of significant vulnerability.
'He has manoeuvred this entire process into something that is more or less exactly what he needed it to be.'
At the same time, tensions between Washington and Kyiv have reappeared.
Zelenskyy said that the Ukrainian Constitution does not allow his Government to negotiate away the country's land.
Trump initially told European officials that the meeting with Putin would be followed by a three-way summit with both Putin and Zelenskyy. The Kremlin quickly said no such promise had been made. The White House proceeded anyway.
Few analysts believe the Russian leader will be content to stop the war based on a real estate negotiation alone.
Putin has made it clear that, among other things, he wants a formal promise that Ukraine will not enter Nato or any other Western military alliances, host Western troops on its territory or be allowed to build up a military that threatens Russia — making Ukraine perpetually vulnerable.
'The fundamental thing for Russia is domination,' Greene said.
Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre in Berlin, said Putin would come into the summit in Alaska pursuing various scenarios.
Those include a favourable deal with Trump that the US President successfully forces upon Ukraine or a favourable deal with Trump that Zelenskyy refuses, causing the US to walk away from Ukraine, Gabuev said.
The third option, he noted, is that the Russian leader continues his current path for another 12 to 18 months, with the expectation that Ukraine will run out of soldiers faster than the Russian war economy runs out of steam.
Putin understands that Trump is willing to offer things few other American leaders would ever consider, which could help Russia fracture Ukraine and divide the Western alliance.
'If you could get Trump to recognise Russia's claim to the lion's share of the territory that it has taken, understanding that the Ukrainians and the Europeans might not come along for the ride on that, you drive a long-term wedge between the US and Europe,' Greene said.
Despite wanting those things, Putin won't stop the war for them, if getting them means agreeing to a sovereign Ukraine with a strong military, aligned with the West, that is able to make its own arms, Gabuev said.
'Trump is a big opportunity for him,' Gabuev said. 'I think that he understands that. But at the same time, he is not ready to pay the price of Ukraine slipping away forever.'
Stefan Meister, a Russia analyst at the German Council on Foreign Relations, said the two leaders would come into the summit with different goals — Trump's being to end the war and Putin's being a strategic repositioning of Russia.
'For Putin, it's really about bigger goals,' Meister added. 'It is about his legacy. It is about where Russia will stand after this war. It is much more fundamental. This creates a different willingness to pay costs.'
And despite negotiations about his country's land, Zelenskyy will not be in the room.
'For Ukraine, it is a disaster,' Meister said.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Paul Sonne
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Gore to seek sister city relationships in France
Gore could soon formalise sister-city relationships with Longueval and Flers in northern France - two towns with deep World War 1 connections to New Zealand - under a proposal put forward by the local RSA. Driven by remembrance but looking to the future, the plan was presented to the Gore District Council by Gore RSA committee members Shaun Fogarty and Wayne McLelland, with support from the RNZRSA's national remembrance committee. The Otago Infantry Regiment fought on the Western Front in the Somme region, creating lasting historical ties that Mr Fogarty believes can evolve into educational exchanges, cultural visits and economic opportunities, particularly given the shared agricultural foundations of both regions. Notably Gore has only one other sister city relationship at the moment, with Tamworth, a city in New South Wales. This relationship was born out of a shared culture of country music, but Mayor Ben Bell noted it had grown to include shared collaboration in business and agriculture as well. The majority of councillors were in support of the measure, noting the historic ties between the two regions and thanking the RSA for its hard work bringing it to them. A sister city relationship with Nanning, a city in China, which sought a potential connection with Gore, was also discussed, but was declined. Cr Andy Fraser said he was not a fan of the concept of sister cities at all, and suggested it was important to consider the cost and the potential for what it could look like in the future. He said it had to be worth it for ratepayers. Cr Fraser also supported a previous question by Cr John Gardyne about the time and cost of setting up such an arrangement. Cr Paul McPhail was in full support of the Gore district acknowledging its ties and paying respect to the sacrifices made by those who fought on the Western front. "There are huge ties to families in Southland - some have family buried in that area. "[We should] never forget those who fought and died for democracy, I think, and I'm backing it 100%". The proposal was passed unanimously, and a letter proposing the sister city relationship to the mayors of Longueval and Flers proposing the relationship will now be sent. Both mayors, Jany Fourier (Longueval) and Pierrick Capelle (Flers), have already expressed strong support for the idea.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Putin's key aim has not changed - a Moscow-friendly government in Ukraine
For European diplomats, officials and analysts, Vladimir Putin has done little to soften his long-standing war aims in Ukraine. They say the Russian President wants nothing less than a Kremlin-friendly government in Kyiv, Ukraine blocked from joining Nato, and the size of its armed forces curtailed.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump sets a low bar for high-stakes summit and avoids key issues for Kyiv
He added, 'I may leave and say good luck, and that'll be the end.' Trump's own description of his goals for the negotiation, the most high-stakes international meeting yet in his second term, were telling — as much for what he omitted as for what he included. And that is what worries both the Ukrainians and Washington's European allies, who have committed to keep arming Ukraine no matter the outcome in Anchorage. What wasn't mentioned Ceasefire Zelenskyy, who has not been invited to join the talks in Alaska, has said that any agreement must start with a some kind of truce or ceasefire so that negotiations were not being conducted amid continued air attacks and territorial grabs. Trump has not stipulated that a truce must come first. Guarantees During his hour-long news conference, he never once mentioned security guarantees for Ukraine, intended to assure that Putin does not exploit a break in the fighting or new territorial gains as his moment to regroup, rearm and resume his effort to seize the whole country. Support Nor did Trump commit to making sure that Ukraine has the arms, intelligence and co-operation it needs to defend its territory and deter Russia from future attacks. His Vice-President, JD Vance, a longtime critic of American aid to Ukraine, was quite explicit during an appearance on Fox News. 'We're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business,' he said, insisting that the only way American arms would make it into Ukrainian hands would be if European allies bought and transferred them. A sense of haste Trump's comments came as the White House scrambled to make arrangements for one of the most hastily assembled summits of recent times. Usually, such sessions are preceded by detailed advance negotiations, with prearranged agreements and communiqués. Trump seemed to suggest that he was walking into this discussion with none of those, though European officials say they have seen evidence that, at lower levels, Russian and American officials are talking. Adding to the sense of haste, the White House has still not said where, exactly, the meeting will be held, how long it is expected to last or whether at the end Trump will preside over a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, two avowed enemies. Influencing Trump The risk now, as even some of Trump's Republican allies have conceded, is that Putin will see an opportunity to flatter Trump, play for time, and perhaps win him over to the Russian leader's own interpretation of events. Recent history suggests that Trump is inclined to accept Putin's version of reality. This year he suggested that Ukraine was responsible for the invasion of its own territory, and he refused to join America's traditional Western allies in voting for a United Nations resolution condemning Russia's aggression. Earlier this week, Zelenskyy worried aloud that Trump could be easily 'deceived'. For that reason, European and Nato officials — who mollified Trump at the alliance's summit in the Netherlands in June by pledging to spend 3.5% of their gross domestic product on defence over the next decade — are now carefully trying to hedge him in. They arranged a video call for tomorrow with Trump, aware that they will not be in the room in Alaska, so their power is limited to persuading him beforehand and risking his wrath by dissenting later. One of the most explicit warnings to Trump came from the Secretary-General of Nato, Mark Rutte, a former Netherlands Prime Minister who has invested heavily in developing a relationship with the President and devised the Nato summit to minimise the chances he would disrupt it. His bet paid off, and Trump sang the alliance's praises, rather than declare that it was 'obsolete', as he did in his first term. Rutte's guardrails But this week, Rutte was clearly drawing some guardrails for the coming negotiation. 'Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end,' Rutte said on ABC. 'When it comes to full-scale negotiations, and let's hope that Friday will be an important step in that process', territory will be only one issue, he said. 'It will be, of course, about security guarantees, but also about the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides on its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future — of course having no limitations to its own military troop levels,' Rutte said. 'And for Nato, to have no limitations on our presence on the eastern flank.' The dealmaker Trump said none of that in his comments in the White House briefing room yesterday. But he made it clear that striking an agreement was the key. 'I make deals,' he said. Trump has made no secret of his desire to win a Nobel Peace Prize, and has claimed that he was the driving force in recent ceasefires or peace accords in disputes between India and Pakistan, Azerbaijan and Armenia, and other regional conflicts. 'What's the definition of a good deal?' Trump asked reporters. 'I'll tell you after I hear what the deal is, because there could be many definitions.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: David E. Sanger Photograph by: David Guttenfelder ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
