Mabe has suffered 'emotional trauma' for being dragged back and forth to court with wife, says lawyer
JOHANNESBURG – The former African National Congress (ANC) national spokesperson, Pule Mabe, has suffered 'emotional trauma' from being dragged back and forth to court with his wife, Hleki.
On Tuesday, the husband and wife appeared alongside their five co-accused at the Johannesburg Specialised Commercial Crimes Court sitting in Palm Ridge.
They are all charged with multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and contraventions of the Public Management Finance Act.
The charges stem from an irregular R27 million tender awarded to Mabe's Enviro Mobi company to supply 200 three-wheeler motorbikes to waste pickers in the Ekurhuleni area.
ALSO READ: Pule Mabe's lawyers say delays in corruption case costing him a lot of money
NPA requests more time to finalise charge sheet in corruption case against Pule Mabe, co-accused
Mmathlekelo Elsie Mabe was listed as a director of Enviro Mobi when it scored the R27 million tender in 2017.
At the time, the company did not disclose its affiliation with Mabe, who was a member of Parliament (MP) and was not allowed to do business with the government.
The State also alleges that money from the tender flowed to Mmathlekelo's account.
Advocate Zola Majavu, who is representing the couple, says this has been a difficult period for them.
'There is emotional trauma my clients are subjected to, whether they are found guilty or not guilty, we need to get going.'
Majavu added, 'He's (Pule) not very happy, but he doesn't locate himself above the law. It's not a nice thing to be subjected to court processes with your wife. The toll it's taking on them is unbearable, but that is how the legal cookie crumbles.'
The case has been adjourned to 7 July 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Too many parties and too little progress
An overcrowded political arena, fuelled by breakaways and egos, leaves voters confused and public needs ignored. Who still fights for the people's cause? Ballot papers are seen as South Africans cast special votes at the Berario Recreation Centre on 27 May 2024. Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen South Africa has a book-and-a-half that doubles up as an election ballot paper. The list of parties is long. There are many parties whose political agenda and manifestos are unclear. One would be forgiven for not knowing all of them. More so, for not knowing who stands for these parties and what it is that they speak of. The Polokwane elective conference created breakaways from the ANC. We watched as Congress of the People descended into nothingness as internal squabbles took centre stage. On the other side, DA supporters are in disbelief that a party hopper has jumped ship. ALSO READ: Democracy in retreat: Magaqa's murder shows the cost of silence and apathy Liam Jacobs, who rose through the ANC's ranks, has left the DA for the Patriotic Alliance (PA), declaring it as his 'freedom'. He labelled PA leader Gayton McKenzie's conduct as thuggish in certain instances, but now he finds his freedom in the comfort of the same thuggish people. In all this time, people who followed the individuals, not the party, find themselves having to jump ship with their preferred faces because they are convinced by charisma over political acumen. Floyd Shivambu, Mzwanele Manyi and Jacobs – these are just a few of the people who have found themselves as the conversation piece of political musical chairs. The former is strongly suspected to be considering starting an independent movement, to add to the book-and-a-half that doubles up as an election ballot paper. ALSO READ: Westbury caught in a cycle of fear, silence and gang violence All of which remains speculation that would have been put to rest after yesterday's press briefing. But, can you imagine another political party to further divide an already over-indulged society? No ways. And all the while, the youth need jobs and electricity needs to stay on. Buying food seems to have become the most expensive chore of the adult years. Access to education, jobs and resources are hard to come by now – no matter your skin colour, gender, creed or station in life. But with so many political parties, personal agendas seem to take precedent over political responsibility and the oath of office. Who then fights the cause of the people in this country? Who guarantees us education, jobs, health services and the right to dignity? ALSO READ: Let SA rise above the false narratives The politicians are so concerned with positioning themselves favourably for parliament and Cabinet roles that the people who brought them to power are long forgotten, as are their struggles.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Coalition governance: Will the GNU forge a new centrist political landscape?
There is the potential that the ANC and DA partnership in the GNU may provide the impetus for a new centrist political consensus for South Africa, which spans ideology, race and class in the country's politics, economics and society. Given that coalitions at the national level will from now onwards be the dominant form of governance, South Africa's Government of National Unity (GNU), whether it is successful or not, may very likely be the catalyst over time to unleash a much-needed realignment of the country's current not-fit-for-purpose political party system, with its origins in our apartheid-era divisions, into future national coalitions that could group political party coalitions into pro-constitutional versus populist ones. There is the potential that the ANC and DA partnership in the GNU may over time provide the impetus for President Cyril Ramaphosa's social democratic, constitutionalist, and non-racial wing of the ANC to partner with the DA in a long-term governing pact, like for example the post-World War 2 coalition between Germany's Christian Democratic Union and its Bavarian ally, the Christian Social Union (CSU), or they may even merge. Such a new political party arrangement could, over time, lead to the formation of a new pragmatic centrist political consensus for South Africa, which spans ideology, race and class in the country's politics, economics and society. South Africa needs such a new pragmatic, Constitution-based, evidence-based policy that is racially inclusive, with centrist governing consensus that goes beyond past entrenched apartheid-era political party divisions. South Africa's current identity-based, past-based, outdated ideology-based, narrow village-view outlook of political party politics, and slogans for policies, is not fit for purpose for the requirements of Constitutional democracy, or to ensure effective public service delivery or for non-racial unity. South Africa will not be able to tackle its complex problems based on the current flawed political party set-up. The reality is that South Africa is facing deep existential crises, which one ethnic group, party, or colour alone cannot solve. There is currently a fierce battle within the ANC between the party's constitutionalist, Social Democratic and non-racial wing that favours the ANC's GNU alliance with the DA and members of the former Multiparty Charter (MPC); and the left populist wing of the party, centred around the ANC's Gauteng provincial party, who want the ANC to align with the populist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and former president Jacob Zuma's uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party. The endgame of this internal ANC battle may be another split in the ANC, possibly this time between the party's constitutionalist, Social Democratic and non-racial wing on the one hand; and on the other hand, the remainder of its left populist wing that has not defected to either the EFF or MK party. Ironically, Zuma, immediately after the GNU announcement, angrily said that the ANC partnering with the former Multiparty Charter or 'Moonshot Pact' parties, the Democratic Alliance, Inkatha Freedom Party and the Freedom Front Plus, meant the ANC had now joined the Multiparty Charter. There is some truth in his statement. South African Communist Party Chairperson Blade Nzimande at the party's fifth Special National Congress in December 2024 said: '(The) Moonshot Pact whose aim was bringing the ANC under 50%… They attained their goal of bringing the ANC under 50%.' Moonshot and doomsday The Multiparty Charter was aimed at kick-starting the realignment of South Africa's politics. The original agreement was that the 15-party member Multiparty Charter would, if the ANC fell below 50% in the 29 May 2024 elections, form a government, if needed, with pro-constitutional, business-friendly, civil society-friendly and media freedom supportive and racial diversity supporting parties, not part of the Multiparty Charter, but part of a Multiparty Charter Plus, who would be willing to govern with the group. The idea was that if the charter was unable to put together a national government, they would go into opposition as a collective and fight the 2026 local and the 2029 elections together. By working together in a pre-electoral coalition, the Multiparty Charter's aim was, whether in power or in opposition, to lay the foundations for the possibility for some members of the charter to be in a permanent coalition, or some members even merging in the future. The outcome of the 29 May 2024 general elections were dramatically different from what Multiparty Charter members or even the ANC or EFF had projected. The ANC dropped below the psychological barrier of 40% to 39.7% after the IEC's final audit of the results. Many of the Multiparty Charter members obtained fewer votes than they thought they would get. Although the collective opposition secured 61% of the vote, the Multiparty Charter group — even with the additional Multiparty Charter Plus members, parties such as Bosa and Rise Mzansi, who were not part of the charter, but who were open to joining it in the government — could not put together a government, because they would have needed the support of anti-constitutional parties the MK party and EFF, which want anti-democratic changes to the Constitution. A key pillar of the Multiparty Charter agreement was not to work with the ANC or with unconstitutional, violent parties or those that opposed non-racialism. The combination of bringing the ANC to below the 40% floor, and the inability to put together an alternative government of opposition parties, left the Multiparty Charter with one of two alternatives. The Multiparty Charter could stick with its founding agreement not to partner with the ANC and go into opposition, using the time also to forge closer unity. The charter, in opposition, could then benefit from the country's doomsday crash and in the 2029 election come to power. However, this would leave the ANC to partner with the EFF and MK in a 'doomsday' populist coalition that could lead to capital flight, skills flight, the rand to crash, and more state failure, lawlessness and corruption. In such a scenario, the Multiparty Charter would take over an Argentinian-collapse-like country. The other option was to ditch the Multiparty Charter principle of not partnering with the ANC, in order to try to prevent a South African crash, by partnering with the ANC to create a centrist leaning growth coalition. Key members of the Multiparty Charter, such as the DA, the IFP and Freedom Front Plus, decided to co-govern with the ANC, to prevent a 'doomsday' crash government. ActionSA and the African Christian Democratic Party declined to work with the ANC, deciding to stay true to the original Multiparty Charter agreement, that if the charter could not put together a government, it must as a group oppose the ANC in opposition, and then fight the 2026 local government elections and the 2029 national elections together. Unintended realignment The GNU is likely to change the ANC — and may lead to another breakaway in the ANC, between the pro-GNU and anti-GNU groups. There is a coming fallout within the ANC tripartite alliance of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) and SACP, between the factions that want to continue the ANC having a partnership with the former Multiparty Charter members; and the factions wanting the ANC to align with the EFF and MK, formed by breakaway ANC members. The SACP claimed the ANC's partnership with the DA, IFP and FF Plus was the party embracing 'white monopoly capital'. The SACP will now contest the upcoming local elections as a separate party to the ANC. Cosatu said it remained 'concerned' about the DA/IFP/FF Plus inclusion in the GNU, and that it wanted the ANC to pursue a 'different option', meaning a GNU partnership with the EFF/MK. The endgame of this internal ANC battle may be another split in the ANC, this time between the party's constitutionalist, Social Democratic and non-racial wing and the remainder of its left populist wing, that has not defected to either the EFF or MK party. South Africa desperately needs a consolidation of parties. Many of the current parties should ideally close down, fold into bigger parties, or smaller parties should merge. If a consolidation of parties is not the route taken, then South African parties should form coalitions whereby they operate almost as one party, but retain their individual identity. Most of South Africa's parties share the same policies, ideologies, slogans and even colours, which can rarely be distinguished from one another, beyond having different leaders. Despite the many parties, South African voters have little choice, as parties are all the same. This is one of the reasons why so many parties get so few votes in elections, and why many South Africans refrain from voting. Sadly, gangsters, populists, ideologues, the prejudiced, the narrow-minded, the violent, the ignorant, and the corrupt are increasingly dominating South Africa's mainstream politics, economic, public and cultural discourse. The failure of the ANC-run state, the decline of the economy and the rising fracture of society, because the ANC, before the GNU, had become increasingly racially exclusionary, gave the space to populists, the corrupt, the violent and ideologues to mobilise support based on narrow identity laager politics, and to secure parliamentary and municipal positions. It is critical that the angry, violent, ignorant, narrow-minded and populist 'leaders' and groups on both the far left and far right be prevented from dominating South Africa's mainstream politics. South Africa needs a new pragmatic centre based on the embrace of the Constitution, common sense, reality, pragmatism and racial inclusivity. Such a new pragmatic centre must be based on honesty, decency, rationality and compassion that goes across race, identity or political affiliation and on governing in the widest public interests of all South Africans. The unintended impact of the GNU could just be such a realignment of the country's political parties, which could transform components of the current GNU political parties into a long-term centrist national coalition. DM Professor William Gumede is based at the School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand, and is the author of the bestselling Restless Nation: Making Sense of Troubled Times; and former Independent Chairperson of the negotiations to establish the Multiparty Charter (Moonshot Pact), the 15-party pre-electoral opposition coalition group before the 29 May 2024 general elections, and advised parties in their negotiations to form the Government of National Unity.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Reassessing SA's political holidays: Are they still relevant in our changing society?
While our public holidays that commemorate important events in our history should have a place in the calendar, it can sometimes feel as if fewer people care about the real reason for the day off. This apparent feeling seems to mirror the ANC's political decline. The two may well be related. South Africa, like many other countries, has public holidays that commemorate important political events. Who can deny the importance of 27 April? If you were alive in 1994 you may well remember voting yourself, or watching other people voting for the first time. Each of our political holidays (as opposed to religious and international holidays like New Year's Day or Christmas Day) commemorates something important. But they are also the result of the settlement involving the forces that were dominant during the early 1990s. For example, Cosatu and the union movement were powerful enough to ensure that there was a Workers' Day. If there had to be a negotiation process now, it is not certain that unions would have the power to force their will on this issue. At the time, there were only two major players. Famously, when there were negotiations on issues like public holidays, decisions were made by the concept of 'sufficient consensus'. In practice that came to mean when the ANC and the National Party agreed. It also meant that there were some clever solutions to difficult problems. The 16th of December is now the Day of Reconciliation. Battle of Blood River But its date was chosen to allow people to continue their celebrations of their victory over the Zulu nation in the Battle of Blood River in 1838 (the fact this battle occurred should put to bed the colonial myth that South Africa was 'empty' when white people moved into the interior of the country). While it could be argued that we most certainly do need a day of reconciliation, no one would argue now that it should be held on that date. But something else may now be happening. As we move further away from the historical events they are supposed to commemorate, they feel less important. If you were alive during the Sharpeville Massacre in 1960, you might well remember the horror when it emerged that so many people had been killed by the police in one incident. If you were not alive during that time, you might well ask why it is that Human Rights Day falls on that day, and not on the date of the Marikana Massacre (16 August 2012)? Especially, as the argument would go, when that date marks a moment when a democratic state used police to defend the interests of capital against workers. This was always foreseeable. While our society is still defined by racialised inequality, personal memories of apartheid may recede. This then leads to a question about whether or not our political public holidays should continue or if there should be a change. It is likely that the ANC would argue they should all remain. But in fact, it is possibly because of the ANC that there is also less support for some of our current holidays. For many years it has been common practice for government figures, who were all from the ANC at the time, to almost monopolise these events. The PAC has always been almost ignored on Human Rights Day for example, when it was they who led the march on the Sharpeville Police Station. Generations have now grown up who have seen only ANC figures on a stage during a public holiday commemoration. Strategy At the time, the ANC was doing this deliberately. It was part of a strategy to remind people that they must vote for the ANC because it was the ANC that had fought for freedom from apartheid. The impression being given was that the ANC was using these events to campaign. There were government stages and sound systems and celebrations, but all presided over by ANC figures. But as the ANC has lost credibility, so it may also have weakened the credibility of our political public holidays. It is true that some figures from other parties are now joining these events through the coalition. PA leader and Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie presided over the national government's Youth Day event on Monday, 16 June 2025. Interestingly, President Cyril Ramaphosa was not there. The keynote address was given by Deputy President Paul Mashatile. And his critics might well accuse him of using the event to campaign. Because while he is correct to say that youth unemployment is a 'moral emergency', it is interesting that he is only entering this debate now, while campaigning for the position of ANC leader. It is a well-known facet of human culture that the meaning and importance of past events shifts according to present-day dynamics. From time to time events and figures rise and sink in prominence as present day politicians seek to use them for their own ends. It is entirely possible, for example, that someone like Julius Malema could seek to make 16 December less about reconciliation, and more about a day to commemorate how white people took land from black people through violence. The fact that both the ANC's armed wing Umkhonto weSizwe and Jacob Zuma's MK were formed on 16 December suggests this date might well continue to carry important significance. Zuma could certainly continue to use the day to stir an ethnic nationalism of some kind. But some of our other public holidays might simply continue to recede to the point where questions are asked about why we retain them. National Dialogue This could be one of the questions that the National Dialogue has to grapple with. And it could reveal the relative strength of certain constituencies. For example, it seems unlikely that unions will have the power to make Workers' Day great again. And thus it could lead to that day falling away. Women's Day is both a symptom of the government's weakness (it has failed to stop so many women being killed by so many men) and a reminder of how deep the need for change is. But political formations formed to serve only the interests of women have failed to make important headway in our society in the past (the last party that tried this approach, Women Forward, won just over 6,000 votes in 2019). This suggests that few people will stand up to defend Women's Day, even if there is an important need for it. If there ever is a proper national debate about our public holidays, that will be a sign that the end of apartheid is no longer the foundation of our society. And it will reveal how power is shifting into a proper post-apartheid nation. DM
