
Reassessing SA's political holidays: Are they still relevant in our changing society?
South Africa, like many other countries, has public holidays that commemorate important political events.
Who can deny the importance of 27 April? If you were alive in 1994 you may well remember voting yourself, or watching other people voting for the first time.
Each of our political holidays (as opposed to religious and international holidays like New Year's Day or Christmas Day) commemorates something important.
But they are also the result of the settlement involving the forces that were dominant during the early 1990s.
For example, Cosatu and the union movement were powerful enough to ensure that there was a Workers' Day. If there had to be a negotiation process now, it is not certain that unions would have the power to force their will on this issue.
At the time, there were only two major players. Famously, when there were negotiations on issues like public holidays, decisions were made by the concept of 'sufficient consensus'.
In practice that came to mean when the ANC and the National Party agreed. It also meant that there were some clever solutions to difficult problems. The 16th of December is now the Day of Reconciliation.
Battle of Blood River
But its date was chosen to allow people to continue their celebrations of their victory over the Zulu nation in the Battle of Blood River in 1838 (the fact this battle occurred should put to bed the colonial myth that South Africa was 'empty' when white people moved into the interior of the country).
While it could be argued that we most certainly do need a day of reconciliation, no one would argue now that it should be held on that date.
But something else may now be happening. As we move further away from the historical events they are supposed to commemorate, they feel less important.
If you were alive during the Sharpeville Massacre in 1960, you might well remember the horror when it emerged that so many people had been killed by the police in one incident.
If you were not alive during that time, you might well ask why it is that Human Rights Day falls on that day, and not on the date of the Marikana Massacre (16 August 2012)? Especially, as the argument would go, when that date marks a moment when a democratic state used police to defend the interests of capital against workers.
This was always foreseeable. While our society is still defined by racialised inequality, personal memories of apartheid may recede.
This then leads to a question about whether or not our political public holidays should continue or if there should be a change.
It is likely that the ANC would argue they should all remain.
But in fact, it is possibly because of the ANC that there is also less support for some of our current holidays.
For many years it has been common practice for government figures, who were all from the ANC at the time, to almost monopolise these events.
The PAC has always been almost ignored on Human Rights Day for example, when it was they who led the march on the Sharpeville Police Station.
Generations have now grown up who have seen only ANC figures on a stage during a public holiday commemoration.
Strategy
At the time, the ANC was doing this deliberately. It was part of a strategy to remind people that they must vote for the ANC because it was the ANC that had fought for freedom from apartheid.
The impression being given was that the ANC was using these events to campaign. There were government stages and sound systems and celebrations, but all presided over by ANC figures.
But as the ANC has lost credibility, so it may also have weakened the credibility of our political public holidays.
It is true that some figures from other parties are now joining these events through the coalition. PA leader and Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie presided over the national government's Youth Day event on Monday, 16 June 2025.
Interestingly, President Cyril Ramaphosa was not there. The keynote address was given by Deputy President Paul Mashatile.
And his critics might well accuse him of using the event to campaign. Because while he is correct to say that youth unemployment is a 'moral emergency', it is interesting that he is only entering this debate now, while campaigning for the position of ANC leader.
It is a well-known facet of human culture that the meaning and importance of past events shifts according to present-day dynamics. From time to time events and figures rise and sink in prominence as present day politicians seek to use them for their own ends.
It is entirely possible, for example, that someone like Julius Malema could seek to make 16 December less about reconciliation, and more about a day to commemorate how white people took land from black people through violence.
The fact that both the ANC's armed wing Umkhonto weSizwe and Jacob Zuma's MK were formed on 16 December suggests this date might well continue to carry important significance.
Zuma could certainly continue to use the day to stir an ethnic nationalism of some kind.
But some of our other public holidays might simply continue to recede to the point where questions are asked about why we retain them.
National Dialogue
This could be one of the questions that the National Dialogue has to grapple with. And it could reveal the relative strength of certain constituencies.
For example, it seems unlikely that unions will have the power to make Workers' Day great again. And thus it could lead to that day falling away.
Women's Day is both a symptom of the government's weakness (it has failed to stop so many women being killed by so many men) and a reminder of how deep the need for change is.
But political formations formed to serve only the interests of women have failed to make important headway in our society in the past (the last party that tried this approach, Women Forward, won just over 6,000 votes in 2019).
This suggests that few people will stand up to defend Women's Day, even if there is an important need for it.
If there ever is a proper national debate about our public holidays, that will be a sign that the end of apartheid is no longer the foundation of our society. And it will reveal how power is shifting into a proper post-apartheid nation. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Malusi Gigaba and Senzo Mchunu face disciplinary action over controversial statements
Malusi Gigaba is facing possible disciplinary action from his party following comments he made during a recent gathering Image: Phando Jikelo/Independent Newspapers The African National Congress (ANC) is set to take disciplinary action against two of its senior members, Malusi Gigaba and Senzo Mchunu, following their recent remarks that the party claims undermine its unity and operational integrity. The decision to pursue actions against the two was announced through a statement released on Monday night by Mahlengi Bhengu, the National Spokesperson for the ANC. Bhengu asserted that both Gigaba and Mchunu acted outside the sanctioned organisational structures, making statements that deliberately disparaged the ANC. "There should be no doubt we reject the views of any intimate structure of the movement and must be seen as an opportunistic assault on the collective image, credibility, and cohesion of the African National Congress," Bhengu said. This controversy was ignited after former Minister Gigaba remarked at a ceremonial unveiling of a tombstone for late struggle stalwart Nokuhamba Nyawo in Ngwavuma, northern KwaZulu-Natal. He warned that 'the ANC will be history' if it fails to secure victory in upcoming local government elections. Gigaba expressed concern over the party's internal divisions, stating, 'We are preoccupied with our little corners, our little groupings. There doesn't seem to exist the possibility for us to get up briefly from these little groupings, so that we can now discuss what is ... in the best interest of our country, of our movement, of our people.' The ANC highlighted the significance of maintaining its integrity as a "revolutionary movement," which operates under the principles of democratic centralism and internal discipline. Bhengu articulated the detrimental implications of Gigaba and Mchunu's statements, indicating that such remarks could discredit the party and create confusion among its ranks. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'Their statements sow discord and confusion and weaken the people's confidence in their movement. No disciplined comrade would out of their own volition make statements that embolden forces that have long sought to reverse the gains of our revolution,' she stated firmly. In the wake of this controversy, the ANC has reiterated that it is the constitutional prerogative of the Secretary-General to govern internal communications, an authority that extends to the National Spokesperson for all operational functions. The party aims to address what it calls 'a breach of established communication protocols' and has resolved that no one shall be exempt from accountability within the organisation. IOL

The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
ANC to discipline Gigaba and Mchunu for 'opportunistic assault' on party
Bhengu said their comments did not reflect the views of any legitimate structure of the movement. 'And [the comments] must be seen as an opportunistic assault on the collective image, credibility, and cohesion of the ANC. The ANC categorically states that it is a revolutionary movement guided by democratic centralism principles and led through disciplined structures.' The party gagged the two, saying: 'Communications in the ANC is a constitutional mandate of the secretary-general [Fikile Mbalula], these powers are entrusted to the national spokesperson [Bhengu] for operational purposes. Any deviation from this established protocol undermines internal cohesion, unity and renewal. No comrade, regardless of their history or standing, is above the requirements of organisational discipline.' Bhengu said the party would take the necessary steps against Gigaba and Mchunu. 'No comrade will be exempt from the discipline of the organisation, which demands unity, discipline and revolutionary morality from all. As we advance the programme of renewal in the ANC and society, we must intensify our efforts to serve our people with humility and dignity,' said Bhengu. 'The renewal programme cannot coexist with ill-discipline; we have no tolerance for conduct that seeks to weaken the collective. We call on all members and leaders of our movement to return to the basic principles and values of our movement and be committed to respecting the integrity and sanctity of our organisational processes.' SowetanLIVE


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Cartoon of the day: 19 August 2025
The government has been accused of trying to control the process around the National Dialogue. The National Dialogue has been criticised after the ANC was accused of hijacking what was supposed to be a process led by civil society. Six legacy foundations, as well as the DA and Freedom Front Plus, pulled out of the National Dialogue after complaining that the government was trying to control the process. Before the National Dialogue properly got underway, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Oliver & Adelaide Tambo Foundation and Desmond & Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation all pulled out. President Cyril Ramaphosa, however, brushed off their absence, saying that he has to be 'allowed to be the president'. READ NEXT: National Dialogue has big gaps in it