logo
Tebbit the Tory hard man who took on the trade unions

Tebbit the Tory hard man who took on the trade unions

Leader Live08-07-2025
To political opponents, the comment – a paraphrase of his exhortation to the unemployed to go out and look for work – encapsulated what they saw as the callous indifference of the Conservatives to the rising joblessness of the 1980s.
Once memorably described by Labour's Michael Foot as a 'semi-house-trained polecat', Mr Tebbit revelled in his reputation as a political bruiser as the government drove through its controversial programme of free market reforms.
As employment secretary, he piloted key legislation which diluted the power of the trade union 'closed shop' and weakened the unions' immunity from civil damages.
He suffered grave injuries in the 1984 Brighton bombing, which left his wife, Margaret, paralysed from the neck down and tore a hole in his side which needed regular treatment for years afterwards.
Few who saw them would forget the grim TV pictures of the badly wounded Mr Tebbit being eased gingerly out of the rubble of the Grand Hotel after it was ripped apart in a massive IRA blast.
However his ordeal did nothing to diminish his appetite for political combat and the man dubbed the 'Chingford skinhead' – a reference to his Essex constituency – returned to Westminster as abrasive and vitriolic as ever.
But for all his reputation for thuggishness, he was privately a kindly man who could mix amiably with those whom he bitterly scorned in public.
After masterminding Mrs Thatcher's third general election victory in 1987, Mr Tebbit stepped down from the government so that he could spend more time caring for his wife.
He nevertheless remained politically active, proving to be a thorn in the side of her successor, John Major, as wrangling over Europe tore the Tories apart in the 1990s.
He sparked controversy with his advocacy of the so-called 'cricket test' – suggesting which side British Asians supported in internationals should be seen as an indicator of their true loyalties – leading to accusations of racism.
Born on March 29 1931 in Ponders End, Middlesex, Norman Beresford Tebbit was the son of Leonard Tebbit, a pawnbroker, and his wife, Edith.
After attending Edmonton County Grammar, he took a job aged 16 as a trainee journalist at The Financial Times, where the requirement for him to join a trade union in order to be employed sowed a determination to break the power of the closed shop.
Following national service with the RAF – when he flew Meteor and Vampire jets, narrowly surviving one terrifying crash – he joined the airline BOAC as a long-haul pilot and navigator.
His previous unhappy encounter with the unions did not stop him becoming a highly effective official for the pilots' union, Balpa.
He entered Parliament in 1970 as Conservative MP for Epping, joining the right-wing Monday Club.
When Mrs Thatcher became party leader in 1975, he strongly backed her agenda of free market reforms and curbing the power of the unions which had brought down Edward Heath's Tory government.
She in turn encouraged him to harass Labour ministers from the backbenches – he made headlines after accusing Michael Foot of 'pure undiluted fascism' during a heated exchange over closed shops.
Following the Tories' general election victory of 1979, she made him a junior trade minister, promoting him to the cabinet as employment secretary two years later.
Certainly he was cut from a very different cloth than a previous generation of Conservative ministers – the patrician Harold Macmillan once sniffily remarked: 'Heard a chap on the radio this morning talking with a cockney accent. They tell me he is one of Her Majesty's ministers.'
He was, however, tailor-made for Mrs Thatcher, spearheading the government's legislative assault on the power of the unions – who had brought down the last Tory administration of Edward Heath – with his Employment Act.
It was following inner city riots in Handsworth and Brixton in 1981 that he made the infamous remark which led to him being dubbed 'Onyerbike'.
Rejecting suggestions the violence was a natural response to rising unemployment, he retorted: 'I grew up in the Thirties with an unemployed father. He didn't riot. He got on his bike and looked for work, and he kept looking till he found it.'
Such comments fuelled his hardline 'Nasty Norm' reputation – the satirical puppet show Spitting Image memorably portrayed him as a leather-jacketed thug brutally beating up political opponents and fellow ministers alike.
For all their political affinity, his relations with Mrs Thatcher did not always run smoothly and he later recalled there were occasions when he left No 10 unsure whether he would still have a job by the time he had returned to his department.
'But I was never frightened of her,' he remembered. 'The most she could do was sack me. I didn't see any point in not standing up to her.'
Following the Tories' 1983 general election victory, there was a move to trade and industry but his life was turned upside down the following year when an IRA bomb tore through Brighton's Grand Hotel during the Conservative Party conference.
Mrs Thatcher, the main intended target of the attack, escaped unscathed but it took four hours for fire crews to extricate Mr Tebbit and his wife from the wreckage.
While Mrs Tebbit was left needing round-the-clock care for the rest of her life, he recovered to return to the political fray with his appetite for confrontation very much intact.
The prime minister believed his populist instincts – he was described as the personification of 'Essex man' – made him the ideal candidate to plot her bid for a third term in No 10 and in 1985 she made him Tory Party chairman.
She was however reportedly not amused when he urged her to take more of a back seat in campaigning after polling showed her leadership – the so-called 'that bloody woman' factor – was turning off voters.
The 1987 general election campaign was marked by rows and tensions within the Tory camp amid suspicions among Mrs Thatcher and some of her allies that Mr Tebbit was more interested in advancing his own leadership ambitions.
It culminated on so-called 'wobbly Thursday' with Lord Young – who Mrs Thatcher had installed in No 10 to keep an eye on her chairman – allegedly grabbing Mr Tebbit by the lapels and yelling: 'Norman, listen to me, we are about to lose this f****** election'.
Nevertheless, come polling day, the Conservatives were again returned with a three-figure majority and Mr Tebbit appeared at the window of Central Office alongside the prime minister to enjoy the acclaim of the party faithful.
It was to be the apogee of his frontline political career, and in the aftermath of victory he announced he was leaving government so he could devote more time to looking after his wife.
For all the difficulties of the preceding months, Mrs Thatcher said she 'bitterly regretted' losing a kindred spirit from the cabinet.
Having once been seen as her natural successor, it meant giving up any hope of taking the top job, a lost opportunity which, he later acknowledged, was a source of regret for him also.
He remained politically active however – particularly on Europe – and, after stepping down as an MP in 1992, he was made a life peer.
In the House of Lords, he formed a new alliance with Baroness Thatcher (who had also been ennobled) to oppose the Maastricht Treaty, signed by John Major, which created the modern European Union.
That year he brought the Tory party conference to its feet with a rabble-rousing speech condemning the agreement, much to the fury of Mr Major who accused him of hypocrisy and disloyalty.
In later years, Lord Tebbit continued to attract controversy with outspoken remarks on a range of issues from immigration to homosexuality.
He refused to attend services conducted by the dean of St Edmundsbury Cathedral after he entered into a civil partnership and warned that legislation to allow same-sex marriage passed under David Cameron was alienating the Tory faithful.
He was the author of a number of books including The Game Cookbook – featuring his favourite recipes for partridge, grouse, pheasant and the like – which proved to be a surprise hit in 2009.
In 2020, his wife, Lady Tebbit, died aged 86. He never forgave the IRA terrorist responsible for her terrible injuries.
Lord Tebbit is survived by two sons and a daughter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't call rural voters Nimbys, Labour MPs tell Starmer
Don't call rural voters Nimbys, Labour MPs tell Starmer

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Don't call rural voters Nimbys, Labour MPs tell Starmer

Sir Keir Stamer has been told to stop calling rural voters 'Nimbys' by Labour MPs representing rural seats. The Rural Research Group, which represents seats the party won for the first time at last year's election, branded the term 'toxic' and said may alienate voters in the countryside. Sir Keir and risked a further drop in the 'goodwill' shown by rural voters that handed Labour a historic election win last year. Labour has already been accused of betraying those voters by limiting inheritance tax relief for family farms in last year's Budget. The Prime Minister has regularly used the phrase, which means 'not in my back yard', to describe those he believes are blocking new housing and infrastructure which Labour sees as crucial to boosting economic growth. He said previously: 'For too long, blockers have had the upper hand in legal challenges - using our court processes to frustrate growth. 'We're putting an end to this challenge culture by taking on the Nimbys and a broken system that has slowed down our progress as a nation.' Jenny Riddell-Carpenter, the Labour MP who chairs the Labour Rural Research Group, said many people 'despise' the term. Ms Riddell-Carpenter told The Mirror: 'The term Nimby isn't just toxic, it's politically pointless. We win nothing by labelling people 'anti development' or 'anti growth'.' The Rural Research Group - set up to champion rural issues - published their first report on Wednesday on the attitudes of their countryside constituents. Their survey of 1,412 people found 56 per cent 'firmly do not see themselves as Nimbys'. More than 60 per cent also agreed developments in their areas should go ahead 'as long as it is delivered thoughtfully, and with consideration for local needs and identity'. The group's intervention will be seen as evidence of growing concern amongst rural MPs about Labour's poll ratings. Research group caucuses are becoming more popular in parliament, reflecting how Conservative factions sought to wield power under previous administrations. The Prime Minister has been told to show more recognition for rural identity, which Rural Research Group said had 'for too long been misunderstood and overlooked by policymakers'. A Rural Research Group poll showed that 65 per cent of voters have little trust in politicians. The MPs said: 'This should serve as a clear warning sign to all parties: disillusionment in rural Britain runs deep, and restoring trust will require more than promises - it must be backed by visible, long-term local action rooted in authenticity.'

Why Chancellor Rachel Reeves must resist pressure to become a left-wing Liz Truss
Why Chancellor Rachel Reeves must resist pressure to become a left-wing Liz Truss

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Why Chancellor Rachel Reeves must resist pressure to become a left-wing Liz Truss

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There is no doubting that Rachel Reeves is in an extremely difficult position – caught between Labour's pre-election promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', party rebellions over proposed benefit cuts, her own 'fiscal rules', and a national debt of £2.7 trillion. Amid these competing pressures, the Chancellor somehow needs to find a way to fill a £51 billion black hole in the government's finances in time for her autumn Budget, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a leading think tank. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite the exhortations of some on the hard-left, the Chancellor must avoid seeking the easy way out by suddenly deciding to throw out the rule book and transforming herself into a sort of left-wing Liz Truss. To be fair to Reeves, she shows no signs of making such a horrendous mistake, but political pressure can do strange things to even normally sensible people. A lettuce covers the face of Liz Truss on a campaign advertising board ahead of last year's general election, when she lost her seat (Picture: Jacob King) | PA Clever ploy that backfired The immediate market reaction to the disastrous mini-budget concocted by Truss and her Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng in 2022 led to her downfall within weeks. Despite containing an eye-watering £45 billion of unfunded tax cuts, the then Conservative Prime Minister pretended this was not a proper 'Budget' but only a mere 'mini-budget'. They thought this was a clever ploy, as it avoided the need to get an assessment from the Office for Budget Responsibility. However it turned out to be another reason why investors were so worried that the government's plans did not add up. The result was a fall in the value of the pound, rises in both mortgage rates and the cost of UK Government borrowing, and very real pain for ordinary people. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ideological dreamers on the hard-left and hard-right may refuse to accept the advice of the 'experts' they love to deride, but no Chancellor can afford to be so cavalier and hope to survive in their job for long.

Labour is making Britain a more European country
Labour is making Britain a more European country

New Statesman​

timean hour ago

  • New Statesman​

Labour is making Britain a more European country

Illustration by Jonathan McHugh / Ikon Images It was Nigel Lawson who stated the ambition most clearly. Nine years ago, a fortnight after the UK voted to leave the EU, the late Conservative chancellor hailed an opportunity to 'finish the job that Margaret Thatcher started'. For free marketeers, Brexit was the method, the object was to change the country's soul. The description of their vision as 'Singapore-on-Thames' has always been erroneous – this imagined libertarian Disneyland has a highly dirigiste state. But the aim was not in doubt: a Britain in which taxes would be cut, spending reduced and regulations eliminated. Brexit is an increasingly friendless project – Labour MPs note with interest how rarely Reform dares mention it; the last reference on the party's X account was in March. Only 29 per cent of the country, according to a new More in Common poll, would still vote Leave, while 49 per cent favour a referendum on rejoining the EU within the next five years. Far from regarding Keir Starmer's Europe deal as a 'betrayal', most believe it is too modest. Leavers can take solace from the implacability of Labour's red lines: Starmer has suggested there will be no return to the single market, the customs union and free movement in his lifetime. But those on the right who always viewed Brexit as a means rather than an end lack such consolation. If there is anything resembling a clear pattern from Labour's first year in office it might be this: the embrace of a more European-style economy. After Brexit, France and Germany took seriously the threat of acquiring a free-market upstart on their doorstep. In practice, the UK is mirroring them. Start with taxes and spending. As Rachel Reeves likes to remind left-wing critics, she used her first Budget to impose the largest increase in the former since 1993: £41.5bn, or 1.2 per cent of GDP. By 2027-28, the UK, a country traditionally described as having 'US-style taxes', will have a tax take of 37.7 per cent, putting it within touching distance of the Netherlands and Germany (even before Reeves' planned sequel). Public spending will settle at a similarly European level of 43.9 per cent of GDP. A shift that the Conservatives could plead was temporary – owing to the emergencies of the pandemic and the energy crisis – is becoming permanent under Labour. Reeves, fittingly, replaced a portrait of Lawson in her office with one of Ellen Wilkinson, Clement Attlee's education minister and a founding member of the Communist Party of Great Britain. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Next turn to workers' rights. Tony Blair once described his government's role as 'to campaign to extend flexible labour markets to the rest of Europe'. Starmer, by contrast, through the Employment Rights Bill, is importing a more continental model: a ban on 'exploitative' zero-hours contracts, an end to 'fire and rehire' and the extension of full rights to workers from day one. Cabinet ministers proudly point out that, far from being 'watered down', the bill has been strengthened in areas such as non-disclosure agreements. Then there is ownership. The UK's aversion to nationalisation under Thatcher and New Labour was yet another dividing line between it and statist Europe. Now Ed Miliband boasts of having established the 'first publicly owned energy company in over 70 years' (GB Energy), and rail franchises – some of them previously held by France and the Netherlands – are being reclaimed by the British state. This European turn could yet extend to welfare. Papers by Labour Together call for the reassertion of the contributory principle – with a far clearer link between what people pay in and what they get out, as is typical on the continent. This, the think tank suggests, would serve as an antidote to populists exploiting a broken social contract – one adviser references the fury of the Inbetweeners actor James Buckley at having to pay for a garden waste collection even as council tax continually rises. A new digital contribution card – recalling the National Insurance stamps once received by employees – is proposed alongside a system of unemployment insurance (potentially set as a share of earnings). Back in 2021, in a 12,000-word essay for the Fabian Society, Starmer championed the 'contribution society', one based on 'being part of something bigger, playing your part, valuing others'. This notion, cabinet ministers such as Liz Kendall and Shabana Mahmood believe, should be central to Labour's philosophy. There are moments when Starmer's often inchoate approach acquires more definition. During his press conference with Emmanuel Macron last month, he spoke of proving 'that social democracy has the answers' in contrast to the 'performative populism' of Nigel Farage. Here was a riposte to those who accuse him of engaging in no act more complex than chasing Reform's tail. But what direction is Starmer heading in? The UK is charting a different course yet Labour has left voters wondering whether this is the product of accident or design. In his first speech as Prime Minister, Starmer vowed to lead a government 'unburdened by doctrine' – an approach that disillusioned MPs contend has left his administration rudderless. 'There's too many concepts floating around at too high a level, which is what happens when intellectual leadership is lacking,' says one. The task facing Labour this autumn is to provide it. Rather than finishing the job that Thatcher started, Starmer has chosen to begin reversing it. He will soon have to tell voters why. [See also: The Online Safety Act humiliates us all] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store