Karnataka BJP legislators to give a month's salary for Bengaluru stampede victims
Leader of Opposition in Karnataka Assembly R Ashoka announced that all BJP MLAs and MLCs in Karnataka will donate one month's salary to the families of those killed in the stampede at Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4.Calling for the government's accountability, Ashoka demanded a three-day special session of the Assembly to discuss the tragedy and said a formal request would be sent to the Speaker and Chief Minister.advertisement'Innocent 11 students lost their lives. It's a sad thing. Congress people were enjoying this event,' he said at a protest held in front of the Mahatma Gandhi statue at Vidhana Soudha on Sunday. He accused the Congress government of ignoring police warnings, violating safety instructions, and focusing on political optics over public safety.
'Police officers enforce the law,' Ashok said, referring to a letter from the Vidhana Soudha police to the Chief Secretary ahead of the June 4 event. 'The event was organised in haste. Security was compromised. All warnings were ignored.'He also demanded the resignation of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar alleging they continued with the programme despite being informed of deaths beforehand. 'Eight children had already died when the event began. Yet the programme continued. These leaders have hearts of stone,' he said.advertisementAshoka further criticised the suspension of police officers following the incident and demanded a judicial probe. 'Three inquiries have been ordered, but it's unclear which one is genuine. A probe under a High Court judge is necessary,' he said.'If the government is not guilty, it should provide Rs 1 crore as compensation,' Ashok added.Eleven people died and 56 others were injured in a stampede outside M Chinnasawamy Stadium in Bengaluru on June 4, where Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) were being felicitated for their maiden IPL title.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
30 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
ED raids premises linked to Congress MP E Tukaram, 3 MLAs in Karnataka ST corporation scam case
The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday conducted searches at premises linked to Congress MP from Ballari E Tukaram and three MLAs in Karnataka in a case about alleged irregularities in the state Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation, PTI reported. Five locations in Ballari and three in Bengaluru belonging to Tukaram and the three MLAs – the Congress' Nara Bharath Reddy, JN Ganesh and NT Srinivas – were being searched under provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the news agency quoted unidentified officials as saying. Commenting on the searches, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said that the state government would not support any violation of the law nor come in the way of its implementation, PTI reported. 'Let them do whatever they want in accordance with the law…We won't obstruct it,' he said. The case pertains to the alleged misappropriation of funds belonging to the state Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation. The matter came to light in May 2024 after its accounts superintendent, Chandrashekhar, died by suicide. In a note left behind, Chandrasekhar alleged that funds to the tune of Rs 187 crore had been transferred from the corporation's bank account. A Special Investigation Team set up by the Karnataka government is looking into the allegations of misappropriation of funds. The team has arrested 14 persons in the case, including two officials of the corporation – managing director Padmanabha GJ and accounts officer Parashuram Dugganavar, The Indian Express reported. The Enforcement Directorate has also claimed that Rs 20.19 crore of the funds siphoned from the Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribes Development Corporation was used to support the Tukaram's campaign from Ballari constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.
NDTV
34 minutes ago
- NDTV
No, India Is Not Israel, And Pak Is Not Palestine
In the immediate aftermath of the April 2022 Pahalgam terror attack - where Indian civilians were targeted in a region long destabilised by cross-border militancy - an old but deeply flawed analogy began circulating with renewed vigour: that India is becoming Israel, with Pakistan being touted as the new 'Palestine'. This comparison, invoked by a range of commentators from populist influencers to academic quarters, attempts to overlay the Middle Eastern fault lines onto South Asia. However, while superficially tempting, this analogy is strategically misleading, historically untrue, and morally hazardous. At its core, the Israel-Palestine conflict is a struggle between a militarily dominant state and a stateless people living under occupation. It is defined by asymmetric power, a denial of sovereignty, and ongoing territorial annexation. India and Pakistan, by contrast, are both fully sovereign states that emerged from a negotiated partition of British India in 1947, each with their own internationally recognised borders and UN memberships. The bilateral conflict, especially over Kashmir, stems not from a denial of statehood but from unresolved territorial claims. Pakistan's continued insistence on linking Kashmir to Palestine flattens these distinctions and obfuscates the history of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism across Indian territory - from Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir to episodic destabilisation in India's Northeast. Equating Pakistani actions with Palestinian resistance also undermines the moral and strategic integrity of the Palestinian cause. It erases the fact that, unlike Palestinians under occupation, Pakistan has used its sovereign apparatus to sponsor and shelter groups involved in acts of terror. This deliberate state complicity - acknowledged even by global institutions - makes Pakistan an aggressor, not an aggrieved actor. Minorities, Democracy, and Statehood One of the more dangerous simplifications of the analogy lies in the misrepresentation of internal minority politics in both regions. It is true that India is facing criticism over recent communal tensions, polarised discourse, and policies perceived as marginalising Muslims. However, equating that with the condition of Palestinians under occupation ignores the difference between a flawed democracy and an apartheid state structure. In India, Muslims remain an electorally significant, constitutionally recognised group whose cultural, linguistic, and religious institutions are protected under law. Their political presence - though under strain - remains visible. From Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, the country's first Education Minister, to Dr APJ Abdul Kalam, one of India's most beloved Presidents, the leadership and legacy of Indian Muslims is historically well-anchored. In contemporary times, figures like Asaduddin Owaisi, a staunch government critic, and Salman Khurshid, a senior Congress leader with no constitutional post, were both part of an all-party delegation sent abroad to brief international counterparts in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. Their inclusion, despite being politically oppositional, signals a rare bipartisan consensus on matters of national security. Contrast this with Pakistan, where Ahmadiyyas are constitutionally barred from calling themselves Muslims, and Shias are frequently targeted in sectarian violence. The state's own structures are often complicit in marginalising non-Sunni groups, with blasphemy laws regularly weaponised against minorities. These are not merely social biases but systemic exclusions - legally and politically embedded. Meanwhile, in Palestine, the question is not one of minority rights within a sovereign state but of basic human existence under foreign occupation. Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza live without freedom of movement, due legal process, or political autonomy. Lumping these distinct contexts together does violence to the nuance required to address each problem on its own terms. Terrorism, Occupation, and Policy India's security doctrine has consistently emphasised that its conflict is not with the people of Pakistan but with its military-intelligence apparatus and its use of terrorism as statecraft. From the insurgency in Kashmir and the Khalistani separatist movement in Punjab to arms flowing into the Northeast in the 1980s and 1990s, India's internal challenges have often traced back to external sponsorship. These were not acts of a stateless community demanding dignity but the result of a neighbour using irregular war to destabilise a regional adversary. Israel, by contrast, has often responded to Palestinian armed resistance with disproportionate force - demolishing homes, bombing refugee camps, and applying collective punishment policies. These actions have generated global concern about human rights violations, and rightly so. However, attempts to map these punitive actions onto India's counter-terror operations obscure the scale, nature, and intent of both countries' military strategies. What makes the analogy particularly hollow is India's long-standing commitment to the Palestinian cause. Even under the Modi government, which has expanded strategic ties with Israel, India has repeatedly reaffirmed its support for a two-state solution and spoken against occupation at UN fora. Far from mimicking Israeli policy, India has walked a diplomatic tightrope - deepening bilateral defence relations with Israel while maintaining principled solidarity with Palestine. Conflating these divergent positions is not only analytically lazy but diplomatically counterproductive. It risks damaging India's credibility in the Global South, especially at a time when New Delhi seeks to position itself as a mediator and developmental partner in multilateral spaces. More importantly, it insults the Palestinian struggle by associating it with Pakistan's agenda of using terrorism and religious nationalism as tools of foreign policy. Reject Lazy Analogies Both the Israel-Palestine and India-Pakistan conflicts demand global attention. But attention should not mean abstraction. The occupation of Palestine is a human rights crisis rooted in land, displacement, and statelessness. The India-Pakistan dynamic, while also involving land and identity, is situated in a very different matrix: of two sovereign nations, one of which has routinely used terrorism to internationalise what is essentially a bilateral issue. Sympathy for the Palestinian cause should not be hijacked to justify flawed analogies that exonerate state complicity in South Asia. Nor should India's legitimate counterterrorism operations be lumped with settler-colonial violence. Doing so only weakens both struggles - reducing history, diplomacy, and suffering to hashtags. In times of polarisation, strategic clarity is not just a virtue, it is a necessity. India is not Israel. Pakistan is not Palestine. And equating them does justice to neither the complexity of history nor the urgency of peace. (Ashraf Nehal is an author, analyst and columnist, who writes on South Asian geopolitics, climate action and world affairs. He was a former PM Young Writing Fellow)
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Delhi private schools may face Rs 10 lakh fine for fee violations under new rule
In a significant step aimed at protecting parents from unjustified school fee hikes, the Delhi Cabinet has approved an ordinance that seeks to tighten regulations on private school fees and impose strict penalties for violations. The ordinance, based on the draft Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, will now be sent for presidential approval through the Lieutenant the decision, Delhi's Education Minister Ashish Sood said the move is a major victory for parents, especially those with children studying in private unaided schools. This is a landmark day. Once enacted into law, it will prevent schools from hiking fees arbitrarily,' he PENALITIES FOR VIOLATIONSThe ordinance empowers the government to fine private schools up to Rs 10 lakh for non-compliance. For first-time violations, the penalty ranges from Rs 1 to Rs 5 lakh. Repeat offenders could face fines of between Rs 2 and Rs 10 lakh. Additionally, if a school fails to refund excess fees collected in violation of the norms within 20 working days, the penalty amount will double every 20 days of delay. Schools that repeatedly flout regulations may also lose their right to propose future fee hikes, and members of their management could be disqualified from holding key COMMITTEES FOR OVERSIGHTadvertisementTo ensure proper oversight, the ordinance provides for the creation of three-tiered committees at the school, district, and revision levels. The top-tier Revision Committee—headed by the Director of Education—will include government officials, financial experts, and parent representatives, with its rulings binding for three SCHOOL-LEVEL FEE COMMITTEESAll private schools, including those offering international curricula or minority institutions on subsidised land, will be required to establish a School Level Fee Regulation Committee annually by July 15. This committee will include members from both staff and parent communities, with mandates to reflect diversity and FOR FEE PROPOSALS AND RESTRICTIONS ON OFFENDERSThe government clarified that while schools retain the right to propose fees, they must do so within a defined framework. Schools under suspension or repeated penalty will be barred from suggesting any revisions for the academic year.(With PTI inputs)Must Watch
