Sabah polls: PBS calls on its grassroots to support any GRS candidate
Native-based multiracial parties PBS and Sabah STAR are working to ensure that their respective grassroots support any candidate contesting on a GRS ticket in Kadazandusun, Murut and Rungus seats.
In a show of support for the cooperation agreement between the two parties, PBS president Datuk Seri Dr Joachim Gunsalam visited the Tulid state constituency, currently held by Sabah STAR's Datuk Flovia Ng.
ALSO READ: A solo sojourn?
Dr Gunsalam made it clear to his grassroots that they must support the GRS candidate in the state election, due by Nov 11.
'I hope all PBS members in Tulid will give full cooperation to any component party in GRS," the Deputy Chief Minister II told party members in the interior seat in Keningau district recently.
Sabah STAR president Datuk Seri Dr Jeffrey Kitingan and Dr Gunsalam have agreed that both parties would not ask for their candidates to be fielded in seats they currently hold.
PBS has seven seats while Sabah STAR holds six.
The two parties, bitter rivals until after the 2018 general election, held a convention earlier this month to strengthen their cooperation.
They aim to contest more than 20 non-Muslim native seats under GRS, led by Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor.
ALSO READ: Sabah at a crossroads over next state polls
'The cooperation within GRS is the best for us (PBS and Sabah STAR). The convention reflected an agreement that needs to be continued and translated when the time comes to officially merge,' Dr Gunsalam told his party members in Telupid.
He said PBS was committed to supporting the decisions of the GRS top leadership in its choice of candidates.
In the 2020 state election, both parties fielded candidates against each other despite a prevailing agreement.
The two parties, major partners in GRS, agreed last year to work together as a team with an eye on merging into a single political entity to unite the non-Muslim natives.
ALSO READ: PBS, Sabah STAR grassroots call for GRS to go solo in upcoming Sabah polls
Following the fall of the PBS government led by Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan in 1994, the Kadazandusun, Murut and Rungus have been widely divided by various splinter parties that emerged.
Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRS), under Barisan Nasional, and Upko, under Pakatan Harapan, are strong in certain seats, while the state opposition Parti Warisan has also gained ground in some non-Muslim seats, particularly in semi-urban areas.
Hajiji's Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah, the anchor of GRS, also holds some non-Muslim native seats.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
3 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Belgium's airdrop ignites global aerial aid movement for Gaza
ON August 4, 2025, as part of a coordinated humanitarian mission, the Belgian Air Force dropped 15 tonnes of food and medical aid over Gaza, followed by another 16 tonnes the next day. It was the first European nation to boldly participate in this form of direct aerial aid to the besieged Palestinian enclave — without waiting for Israel's green light or America's diplomatic blessing. This airdrop shattered the illusion that nothing could move into Gaza without Israel or US approval. What followed was just as remarkable. Inspired by Belgium's courage, a number of countries quickly followed. France began its own airdrops, delivering over 40 tonnes of aid. Germany, Spain, and Italy joined with commitments and logistical coordination. Jordan, acting as a central hub, helped facilitate these missions, while the UAE and Egypt also pledged and executed deliveries. The United Kingdom announced its intent to begin airdrops, and Saudi Arabia is reportedly preparing its entry into the mission. In total, over a dozen nations are now either actively participating or making logistical arrangements to deliver aid from the skies to a population pushed to the brink of starvation. What makes this different from earlier "statements of concern" is that these actions are material, not symbolic. They directly bypass the decades-long stranglehold that Israel and the US have exerted over humanitarian corridors to Gaza. Belgium's decision didn't come with a negotiated corridor, but with a moral one: the belief that starving people do not need permission slips for mercy. In terms of international relations, this moment could signal the slow dismantling of US-Israeli impunity. For decades, Israel has maintained that any uncoordinated delivery into Gaza is a violation of its sovereignty. The US has echoed that position while shielding Israel from global accountability. But now, as countries like Belgium, France, and Spain take matters into their own hands, that consensus is breaking down. Even in the US, there is growing frustration. The American public is beginning to question why their tax dollars fund weapons but not food. And the same Congress that routinely rubber-stamps military aid to Israel is now watching European nations act with moral clarity. The more countries join this momentum, the harder it becomes for Israel to justify the continued strangulation of 2.3 million civilians. And the harder it becomes for the United States to maintain its credibility as a defender of international law while standing by a partner accused of war crimes. What if the Muslim world now followed suit — not just with speeches and resolutions, but with economic action? If the 57 Muslim-majority countries were to impose a complete embargo on imports from and exports to Israel and the United States until the siege is lifted and a ceasefire implemented, the financial impact would be staggering. Based on conservative trade data from 2024, Muslim countries import approximately US$290 billion worth of goods and services annually from the United States and US$23 billion from Israel. In return, they export around $190 billion to the U.S. and $15 billion to Israel. This results in a total bilateral trade volume of approximately $480 billion with the United States and $38 billion with Israel. If even a partial embargo were enacted — on petroleum, consumer goods, technology, or financial services—the ripple effect could hit supply chains, energy markets, and corporate interests in both countries. Oil exports alone could be used as leverage against US support for continued Israeli aggression. Trade redirection toward pro-Palestinian allies, or toward neutral trading blocs, could shift global economic balances. The Muslim world can also reward those who stand up for justice. Belgium, for example, could be granted Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status among OIC member states. Similar preferential treatment could be extended to France, Germany, and any country that dares to take humanitarian action where superpowers have failed. A reward-based system would reshape international diplomacy — where moral courage earns access and political cowardice invites isolation. What's especially powerful — and painful — is that this initiative has come not from the Islamic world but from Christian-majority European nations. While Muslim governments have delivered strong words, they have stopped short of concrete action. Belgium did not. Neither did Spain or France. Their aid drops have reached Palestinian children before many Muslim leaders even held emergency summits. Yet it's not too late. Imagine a unified Muslim airlift: planes from Turkiye, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Qatar, and Egypt dropping food and medicine directly into Gaza, without seeking Israeli clearance. Imagine a simultaneous suspension of trade with the United States and Israel. The political impact would be seismic. It would demonstrate that the Muslim world is not merely a collection of markets and oil wells but a bloc capable of coordinated, morally driven global action. Belgium has done what much of the world failed to do — show up. Not with drone strikes or naval blockades, but with parachutes and provisions. Not with threats, but with compassion. In defying silence and cowardice, Belgium has reminded the world what moral clarity looks like. It has reopened the sky—not just above Gaza, but above all of us.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Best for GRS to go solo, polls pact talks with PH, BN confusing voters, says Sabah STAR deputy chief
KOTA KINABALU: Electoral pact talks between three major coalitions are just confusing the people and it is best for Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) to go it alone, says Sabah STAR deputy president Datuk Kenny Chua. Chua said that GRS should contest the coming state election solo instead of entering into any electoral pact with national party coalitions like Pakatan Harapan or Barisan Nasional. Chua said discussions about potential cooperation between GRS, Pakatan and Barisan have caused confusion among voters and did not reflect the sentiments of the people at the grassroots. He said that Sabahans were keen to be governed by local parties that understand the state's unique needs and priorities. "It's the wish of Sabah and that local parties govern the state. All this talk about GRS, Pakatan, and Barisan has created confusion. It shouldn't be. For me, it's only fair to Sabah that GRS goes solo,' he said in a statement Tuesday (Aug 5). He cautioned that any attempt to compel cooperation between parties would be seen as a 'forced marriage' and not sit well with voters. Sabah STAR, the third largest partner in the eight-party GRS, has been advocating to go solo but its president Datuk Seri Dr Jeffrey Kitingan has yet to comment on the July 27 statement by Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor's that GRS has agreed to form an electoral pact with Pakatan. Pakatan has more or less formalised an electoral seat arrangement with Barisan and its (Pakatan) move to work on a pact with GRS separately is also raising political eyebrows. Sabah Barisan led by Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin has refused to forge any sort of alliance with its estranged partner GRS under Hajiji following their fallout in January 2023. On Sunday (Aug 3), Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said that Pakatan would work towards resolving conflicts to allow the unity government partners to contest the coming state election without clashing with each other. However, Chua believes that Sabah has already enjoyed political stability since GRS formed the state government and that this stability would be further strengthened if the mandate is clearly given to local-based parties. "Political stability has been established since GRS came to power and will be further strengthened when voters choose for autonomy in which Sabah local parties govern the state, just like in Sarawak,' he added. He said while cooperation with national parties may have played a role in the past, Sabah is now in a stronger position to decide its future through its own local leadership. The current political collaboration talks will see GRS and Barisan contesting each other while both parties will not field candidates against Pakatan candidates under seats sharing formulas being worked out.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Govt backbencher, opposition MPs clash during Prime Minister's Question Time in Parliament
KUALA LUMPUR: Tensions flared in the Dewan Rakyat this morning when a government backbencher got into a shouting match with an opposition member of Parliament over Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin's remarks on the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). The exchange began when the opposition leader posed a question to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim regarding the 13MP, which was tabled last week. During a supplementary question, Hamzah said the 13MP lacked firmness in addressing the socioeconomic gap between Bumiputera and non-Bumiputera communities. "This isn't specifically about developing new Chinese villages. But when other MPs bring it up, what can I do?" he said. His remarks did not sit well with Mohd Sany Hamzan (PH–Hulu Langat), who interjected and asked the Larut MP, "Is this a debate?" He reminded the House that the session was Prime Minister's Question Time, not a debate. Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal (PN-Machang) then rose to defend Hamzah, questioning Sany's interruption. "Why are you interrupting the opposition leader? You keep interjecting. Just let him speak," he said. Sany shot back, reminding Hamzah and Wan Fayhsal that the session was meant for questions directed at the Prime Minister, not a debate. "Kau kenapa koyak? Koyak pula engkau." ("Why are you getting so worked up? You're the one losing it now.") The heated exchange was eventually diffused when Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul intervened, instructing all MPs to take their seats and allowing Hamzah to finish his remarks. Yesterday, tempers flared in the Dewan Rakyat after Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim (PN-Pendang) warned the government about a possible repeat of the May 13, 1969 race riots. Awang had alleged this could happen because the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) "sidelined Bumiputera interests". The uproar began when Awang interjected during opposition leader Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin's debate speech on the 13MP, claiming the plan lacked development for Bumiputera while discussing Chinese new villages.
