Judy Murray reveals what Andy's kids call her and next thing on the agenda for twice Wimbledon champion
Judy Murray has revealed that her grandchildren call her "Naughty Nana" and that it's not tennis she's teaching them.
Judy has five grandchildren - two-time Wimbledon champion Andy 's three girls and a boy and brother Jamie 's daughter.
Andy, who retired from tennis last year, had a six month spell coaching former rival Novak Djokovic but has stepped back from the court to focus on his golf game and his various business interests after embarking on a recent nationwide speaking tour.
Mum Judy has launched a career as an author, writing her first novel 'Game, Set & Murder' which was released last week.
That was inspired by her time as a contestant on Strictly Come dancing in 2014, when she edited a draft of dance partner Anton du Beke's book, and he suggested that she give it a go herself.
And while she passed the tennis bug onto Andy and Jamie, coaching them fro a young age, she's explained that her grandkids have a nickname for her and that it will be dancing rather than serving on the menu for them.
"They call me Naughty Nana," she told Hello!"When I'm with them, I like to take them to do anything active, from swimming to soft play. But I'm not teaching them how to play tennis – I'm going to teach them how to dance."
As for what's next for Andy, Judy admitted that it won't be tennis related for a while yet after retirement.
She added: "Coaching is something he may do in years to come but right now he's had the best part of 20 years travelling the world on a relentless circuit. I don't think anybody who retires wants to immediately jump back on that merry-go-round."
You can get all the news you need on our dedicated Rangers and Celtic pages, and sign up to our newsletters to make sure you never miss a beat throughout the season. We're also WhatsApp where we bring all the latest breaking news and transfer gossip directly to you phone. Join our Rangers community here and our Celtic community here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
17 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Former Rangers coach joins Tottenham Hotspur first-team staff
Campbell, who spent the last year-and-a-half at RB Leipzig, will serve as the 'first team individual development coach' under Thomas Frank. He had previously worked at Rangers' training centre in Auchenhowie for more than three years, coaching the under-18s and taking charge of their professional development programme. He secured his position at Rangers after stints with Aberdeen and the Right to Dream Academy. Read more: In February last year, Campbell left Rangers to seize the opportunity at RB Leipzig. In Germany, he served as the head of player development, aiding the transition of youth players into the first team. As he left Rangers last year, Campbell signed out with an emotional message. He wrote on social media: "Privileged to have spent 3.5 years at RFC Youth working with some brilliant people on & off the pitch. "An incredible opportunity that I never took for granted, from watching academy lads play for Rangers & forging careers in the game to winning the U18 League & Scottish Youth Cup. "Overwhelmed by the messages I've received from players, parents and staff which have all been greatly appreciated."
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Mirra Andreeva flies into quarter-finals with straight-sets win over Navarro
If being a fast learner is a prerequisite for a potential champion, Mirra Andreeva fits the bill perfectly. Beaten in the first round here a year ago, the 18-year-old Russian defeated Emma Navarro 6-2, 6-3 on Monday to reach the quarter-finals at Wimbledon for the first time, with the promise of much more to come. Taking the ball early to deny the American time, she changed the pace, as she loves to do, and manoeuvred her opponent into uncomfortable positions from which mistakes flowed. Andreeva is the youngest player to reach this stage at Wimbledon since the Czech Nicole Vaidisova in 2007 and on her Centre Court debut, with Roger Federer watching from the Royal Box, she was so much in the moment that she didn't even realise she had won. 'It's something crazy,' said Andreeva, who will now play Belinda Bencic, the Swiss who also reached her first Wimbledon quarter-final, having become a mother in April last year. 'I was super-nervous, playing first time on Centre Court. I really tried my best not to look in the box because I knew that I would lose focus, as I did at 4-1 [in the second set], [when] I saw Roger and Mirka [his wife]. It's been one of my dreams to see you in real life, so when I saw both of you I got really, really nervous. But I'm super-happy I managed to stay focused.' The great thing about young players is that they seem to improve almost week on week, improvements in their game appearing from one tournament to another. Coached by Conchita Martínez, the 1994 singles champion, Andreeva has been tipped for the top for a while but has really hit her stride this year, winning the Masters 1000 title in Indian Wells. Her serve has also become a real weapon. She dropped only two points on first serve in the opening set, giving her the platform to show off her full game, from drop shots and angles to power and lobs. Tennis IQ, they call it. She was 5-1 up before Navarro knew what had hit her and she closed it out two games later. A brilliant point, which ended with a flicked forehand pass, gave Andreeva the break in the opening game of the second set and though Navarro broke back immediately, the Russian broke twice more to open up a 4-1 lead. The American nabbed one of the breaks back but Andreeva then broke to love for victory, even if she didn't know it at first. 'I just kept telling myself I'm facing break points, tried to tell myself I'm not the one who's up in the score,' she said. 'I think that helped me to stay focused and in the end I completely forgot the score. I'm happy I did it because I think I would be three times more nervous on a match point.' Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion It is a little over 14 months since Bencic gave birth to her daughter and on Monday the Swiss beat the No 18 seed, Ekaterina Alexandrova, 7-6 (4), 6-4. It is her fourth major quarter‑final in all but first since 2021 and her first away from the US Open. 'Finally I managed to do the next step to go to the quarter-finals,' Bencic said. 'I think it's just really a result of the work we put in and also the mindset that I have now. Of course, you could see I'm trying my best to win. I'm fighting with everything I have on the court. I still want to win very badly. It's much different now and I am surprised, but of course I'm not going to complain about it.' Liudmila Samsonova will also play in her first Wimbledon quarter-final after beating Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 7-5, 7-5. The Spaniard had a set point at 5-4 in the opener but Samsonova, the 19th seed, came through.
BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
Why don't we trust technology in sport?
For a few minutes on Sunday afternoon, Wimbledon's Centre Court became the perfect encapsulation of the current tensions between humans and Britain's Sonay Kartal hit a backhand long on a crucial point, her opponent Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova knew it had landed out. She said the umpire did too. Television replays proved the electronic line-calling system - which means humans have been fully replaced this year following earlier trials - remained ticked by. The human umpire eventually declared the point should be time Pavlyuchenkova lost it. She went on to win the match but, in that moment, she told the umpire the game had been 'stolen' from her. She wondered aloud if it might be because Kartal was later emerged the reason was a more mundane, but still quintessentially human reason: someone had accidentally switched the line judge simple explanation hasn't stopped disgruntled discussions that - unlike strawberries, Pimm's and tantrums - the tech does not deserve a place among Wimbledon McEnroe might have been a lot less famous in his prime if he hadn't had any human judges to yell recently, Britain's Emma Raducanu expressed "disappointment" with the new technology after querying its decisions during her match on FridayFormer Wimbledon champion Pat Cash disagrees."The electronic line-calling is definitely better than the human eye," he told the BBC."I have always been for it, since day one. Computer errors will come it at times, but generally speaking, the players are happy with it."There have been a lot of conversations with players and coaches about the line-calling not being 100% this week. But it is still better than humans."He's right: the tech is demonstrably more accurate than the human eye across various sports. Diego Maradona's notorious 'Hand of God' goal at the 1986 World Cup would probably not have got past artificial electronic line-calling (ELC) system has been developed by the firm uses 12 cameras to track balls across each court and also monitors the feet of players as they serve. The data is analysed in real time with the help of AI, and the whole thing is managed by a team of 50 human operators. ELC has a rotation of 24 different human voices to announce its decisions, recorded by various tennis club members and tour may use artificial intelligence to analyse the footage, but the All England Lawn Tennis Club says AI is not used to directly officiate. The club also says it remains confident in the tech, and CEO Sally Bolton told the BBC she believes it's the best in the business."We have the most accurate officiating we could possibly have here," she following Sunday's incident, it can now no longer be manually deactivated. So why don't we trust this kind of tech more?One reason is a collectively very strong, in-built sense of "fairness", argues Professor Gina Neff from Cambridge University."Right now, in many areas where AI is touching our lives, we feel like humans understand the context much better than the machine," she said."The machine makes decisions based on the set of rules it's been programmed to adjudicate. But people are really good at including multiple values and outside considerations as well - what's the right call might not feel like the fair call."Prof Neff believes that to frame the debate as whether humans or machines are "better" isn't fair either."It's the intersection between people and systems that we have to get right," she said."We have to use the best of both to get the best decisions."Human oversight is a foundation stone of what is known as "responsible" AI. In other words, deploying the tech as fairly and safely as means someone, somewhere, monitoring what the machines are that this is working very smoothly in football, where VAR - the video assistant referee - has long caused was, for example, officially declared to be a "significant human error" that resulted in VAR failing to rectify an incorrect decision by the referee when Tottenham played Liverpool in 2024, ruling a vital goal to be offside when it wasn't and unleashing a barrage of Premier League said VAR was 96.4% accurate during "key match incidents" last season, although chief football officer Tony Scholes admitted "one single error can cost clubs". Norway is said to be on the verge of discontinuing human failings, a perceived lack of human control plays its part in our reticence to rely on tech in general, says entrepreneur Azeem Azhar, who writes the tech newsletter The Exponential View."We don't feel we have agency over its shape, nature and direction," he said in an interview with the World Economic Forum."When technology starts to change very rapidly, it forces us to change our own beliefs quite quickly because systems that we had used before don't work as well in the new world of this new technology."Our sense of tech unease doesn't just apply to sport. The very first time I watched a demo of an early AI tool trained to spot early signs of cancer from scans, it was extremely good at it (this was a few years before today's NHS trials) - considerably more accurate than the human issue, its developers told me, was that people being told they had cancer did not want to hear that a machine had diagnosed it. They wanted the opinion of human doctors, preferably several of them, to concur before they would accept autonomous cars - with no human driver at the wheel - have done millions of miles on the roads in countries like the US and China, and data shows they have statistically fewer accidents than humans. Yet a survey carried out by YouGov last year suggested 37% of Brits would feel "very unsafe" inside one.I've been in several and while I didn't feel unsafe, I did - after the novelty had worn off - begin to feel a bit bored. And perhaps that is also at the heart of the debate about the use of tech in refereeing sport."What [sports organisers] are trying to achieve, and what they are achieving by using tech is perfection," says sports journalist Bill Elliott - editor at large of Golf Monthly."You can make an argument that perfection is better than imperfection but if life was perfect we'd all be bored to death. So it's a step forward and also a step sideways into a different kind of world - a perfect world - and then we are shocked when things go wrong."
