UN slams 'adult crime, adult time' expansion
The Queensland government is set to add 20 more offences to its landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws, meaning children will face lengthy sentences for committing a raft of crimes.
New offences include sexual assault and rape, attempt to murder, kidnapping, arson and attempted robbery.
The Liberal National government quickly passed the laws central to its 2024 election win to ensure children as young as 10 serve a life sentence for murder and manslaughter, while prison time for offences like grievous bodily harm doubled.
The decision to expand the laws came in the wake of several serious crimes, including a teenager who was charged with attempted murder following the alleged stabbing attack on a supermarket worker in Ipswich.
The "adult crime, adult time" laws have previously been slammed by youth advocates who say the scheme breaches the human rights of children.
But the state government has again earned the ire of international human rights experts who say the laws disproportionately impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.
"Children are suffering undue harm to their safety and well-being, as well as to their educational and life prospects as a result of short-sighted approaches to youth criminality and detention," the United Nations' Alice Jill Edwards and Albert K Barume said.
The UN has previously criticised the Queensland government for its controversial laws.
Chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Ann Skelton, posted a video before the laws were passed in December, saying they were a "flagrant disregard" for children's human rights.
Now the two UN human rights experts have written a letter to Australian authorities expressing concerns about the expansion of Queensland's "adult crime, adult time" laws.
They said the amended laws would harm the lives of Aboriginal children and urged members of the state parliament to vote against the bill.
"The first goal should always be keeping children out of prison," the experts said.
"We are extremely concerned that present approaches are creating a future underclass of Australians."
It is not the only state pursuing tough youth crime laws after Victoria recently passed an amendment to bail laws that included removing the principle of remand as a last resort for children.
In NSW, controversial youth bail laws passed in 2024 make it harder for 14 to 18-year-olds to be released on serious charges while out on bail for similar offences.
Bail laws in the Northern Territory were strengthened after a teenager was charged following a 71-year-old Darwin store owner's fatal stabbing.
The UN experts said Australia may be violating its international obligations to children with Queensland's harsh criminal laws and the country's criminal age of responsibility, which is 10 in the Sunshine State and the Northern Territory and 14 in other states.
International human rights experts have slammed one state, accusing its government of causing undue harm to children as it bolsters controversial youth crime laws.
The Queensland government is set to add 20 more offences to its landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws, meaning children will face lengthy sentences for committing a raft of crimes.
New offences include sexual assault and rape, attempt to murder, kidnapping, arson and attempted robbery.
The Liberal National government quickly passed the laws central to its 2024 election win to ensure children as young as 10 serve a life sentence for murder and manslaughter, while prison time for offences like grievous bodily harm doubled.
The decision to expand the laws came in the wake of several serious crimes, including a teenager who was charged with attempted murder following the alleged stabbing attack on a supermarket worker in Ipswich.
The "adult crime, adult time" laws have previously been slammed by youth advocates who say the scheme breaches the human rights of children.
But the state government has again earned the ire of international human rights experts who say the laws disproportionately impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.
"Children are suffering undue harm to their safety and well-being, as well as to their educational and life prospects as a result of short-sighted approaches to youth criminality and detention," the United Nations' Alice Jill Edwards and Albert K Barume said.
The UN has previously criticised the Queensland government for its controversial laws.
Chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Ann Skelton, posted a video before the laws were passed in December, saying they were a "flagrant disregard" for children's human rights.
Now the two UN human rights experts have written a letter to Australian authorities expressing concerns about the expansion of Queensland's "adult crime, adult time" laws.
They said the amended laws would harm the lives of Aboriginal children and urged members of the state parliament to vote against the bill.
"The first goal should always be keeping children out of prison," the experts said.
"We are extremely concerned that present approaches are creating a future underclass of Australians."
It is not the only state pursuing tough youth crime laws after Victoria recently passed an amendment to bail laws that included removing the principle of remand as a last resort for children.
In NSW, controversial youth bail laws passed in 2024 make it harder for 14 to 18-year-olds to be released on serious charges while out on bail for similar offences.
Bail laws in the Northern Territory were strengthened after a teenager was charged following a 71-year-old Darwin store owner's fatal stabbing.
The UN experts said Australia may be violating its international obligations to children with Queensland's harsh criminal laws and the country's criminal age of responsibility, which is 10 in the Sunshine State and the Northern Territory and 14 in other states.
International human rights experts have slammed one state, accusing its government of causing undue harm to children as it bolsters controversial youth crime laws.
The Queensland government is set to add 20 more offences to its landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws, meaning children will face lengthy sentences for committing a raft of crimes.
New offences include sexual assault and rape, attempt to murder, kidnapping, arson and attempted robbery.
The Liberal National government quickly passed the laws central to its 2024 election win to ensure children as young as 10 serve a life sentence for murder and manslaughter, while prison time for offences like grievous bodily harm doubled.
The decision to expand the laws came in the wake of several serious crimes, including a teenager who was charged with attempted murder following the alleged stabbing attack on a supermarket worker in Ipswich.
The "adult crime, adult time" laws have previously been slammed by youth advocates who say the scheme breaches the human rights of children.
But the state government has again earned the ire of international human rights experts who say the laws disproportionately impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.
"Children are suffering undue harm to their safety and well-being, as well as to their educational and life prospects as a result of short-sighted approaches to youth criminality and detention," the United Nations' Alice Jill Edwards and Albert K Barume said.
The UN has previously criticised the Queensland government for its controversial laws.
Chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Ann Skelton, posted a video before the laws were passed in December, saying they were a "flagrant disregard" for children's human rights.
Now the two UN human rights experts have written a letter to Australian authorities expressing concerns about the expansion of Queensland's "adult crime, adult time" laws.
They said the amended laws would harm the lives of Aboriginal children and urged members of the state parliament to vote against the bill.
"The first goal should always be keeping children out of prison," the experts said.
"We are extremely concerned that present approaches are creating a future underclass of Australians."
It is not the only state pursuing tough youth crime laws after Victoria recently passed an amendment to bail laws that included removing the principle of remand as a last resort for children.
In NSW, controversial youth bail laws passed in 2024 make it harder for 14 to 18-year-olds to be released on serious charges while out on bail for similar offences.
Bail laws in the Northern Territory were strengthened after a teenager was charged following a 71-year-old Darwin store owner's fatal stabbing.
The UN experts said Australia may be violating its international obligations to children with Queensland's harsh criminal laws and the country's criminal age of responsibility, which is 10 in the Sunshine State and the Northern Territory and 14 in other states.
International human rights experts have slammed one state, accusing its government of causing undue harm to children as it bolsters controversial youth crime laws.
The Queensland government is set to add 20 more offences to its landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws, meaning children will face lengthy sentences for committing a raft of crimes.
New offences include sexual assault and rape, attempt to murder, kidnapping, arson and attempted robbery.
The Liberal National government quickly passed the laws central to its 2024 election win to ensure children as young as 10 serve a life sentence for murder and manslaughter, while prison time for offences like grievous bodily harm doubled.
The decision to expand the laws came in the wake of several serious crimes, including a teenager who was charged with attempted murder following the alleged stabbing attack on a supermarket worker in Ipswich.
The "adult crime, adult time" laws have previously been slammed by youth advocates who say the scheme breaches the human rights of children.
But the state government has again earned the ire of international human rights experts who say the laws disproportionately impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.
"Children are suffering undue harm to their safety and well-being, as well as to their educational and life prospects as a result of short-sighted approaches to youth criminality and detention," the United Nations' Alice Jill Edwards and Albert K Barume said.
The UN has previously criticised the Queensland government for its controversial laws.
Chair of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Ann Skelton, posted a video before the laws were passed in December, saying they were a "flagrant disregard" for children's human rights.
Now the two UN human rights experts have written a letter to Australian authorities expressing concerns about the expansion of Queensland's "adult crime, adult time" laws.
They said the amended laws would harm the lives of Aboriginal children and urged members of the state parliament to vote against the bill.
"The first goal should always be keeping children out of prison," the experts said.
"We are extremely concerned that present approaches are creating a future underclass of Australians."
It is not the only state pursuing tough youth crime laws after Victoria recently passed an amendment to bail laws that included removing the principle of remand as a last resort for children.
In NSW, controversial youth bail laws passed in 2024 make it harder for 14 to 18-year-olds to be released on serious charges while out on bail for similar offences.
Bail laws in the Northern Territory were strengthened after a teenager was charged following a 71-year-old Darwin store owner's fatal stabbing.
The UN experts said Australia may be violating its international obligations to children with Queensland's harsh criminal laws and the country's criminal age of responsibility, which is 10 in the Sunshine State and the Northern Territory and 14 in other states.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
21 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What about the 1.2 million Australians who receive no super tax breaks?
If we want true tax reform we need to start with changes for the lowest balances, not the highest. After the Albanese government's landslide return to government all eyes have been on tax reform and in particular, a proposal to trim tax concessions for the 80,000 Australians with balances over $3 million. In the frenzied debate over the changes to tax concessions for this small group, commentators, news outlets and politicians continue to make noise over what is 'fair'. At the same time, we keep hearing calls for more ambitious tax reform policy that achieves two aims – to help the economy recover and, again, to strike a balance that's fair. So while everyone focuses on the super balances of 80,000 Australians with a handsome $3 million nest egg, what we should be asking is: what about the 1.2 million Australians who receive no super tax concessions whatsoever? Loading Is it fair that the majority of those 1.2 million Australians who miss out on tax concessions are women earning between $37,000 and $45,000? Including aged care workers, childcare workers, apprentices and women working part-time while caring for family. Is it fair that this group pay more in tax on their super than their take-home pay? Is it fair that we provide little to no tax concessions to those who typically have the lowest levels of retirement savings? And that the majority of tax concessions are skewed in favour of men despite the fact that many Australian women retire in abject poverty?
The Age
21 minutes ago
- The Age
What about the 1.2 million Australians who receive no super tax breaks?
If we want true tax reform we need to start with changes for the lowest balances, not the highest. After the Albanese government's landslide return to government all eyes have been on tax reform and in particular, a proposal to trim tax concessions for the 80,000 Australians with balances over $3 million. In the frenzied debate over the changes to tax concessions for this small group, commentators, news outlets and politicians continue to make noise over what is 'fair'. At the same time, we keep hearing calls for more ambitious tax reform policy that achieves two aims – to help the economy recover and, again, to strike a balance that's fair. So while everyone focuses on the super balances of 80,000 Australians with a handsome $3 million nest egg, what we should be asking is: what about the 1.2 million Australians who receive no super tax concessions whatsoever? Loading Is it fair that the majority of those 1.2 million Australians who miss out on tax concessions are women earning between $37,000 and $45,000? Including aged care workers, childcare workers, apprentices and women working part-time while caring for family. Is it fair that this group pay more in tax on their super than their take-home pay? Is it fair that we provide little to no tax concessions to those who typically have the lowest levels of retirement savings? And that the majority of tax concessions are skewed in favour of men despite the fact that many Australian women retire in abject poverty?
Sky News AU
21 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘Cut off his access': AFP veteran David Craig outlines how to target exiled illicit tobacco kingpin Kazem Hamad
A law enforcement veteran has outlined what Australian authorities can do to go after exiled crime boss Kamez Hamad. Hamad is widely reported to control the majority of Victoria's illicit tobacco trade, with experts estimating his profits to be in the billions – well above the wealth accumulated by the likes of Carl Williams and Tony Mokbel. In a series of articles published on Monday, the Herald Sun revealed the luxury Middle Eastern lifestyle of the crime boss, with trips to idyllic beach destinations like Bodrum in Turkey. According to Deakin University criminologist James Martin, Hamad likely makes an 'extraordinary' amount of money from the illicit tobacco trade. 'Whichever way you look at the numbers, if he controls the majority of the illicit trade – and that market is worth billions of dollars – he is making an extraordinary amount of money,' he said. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Monday, former Australian Federal Police detective superintendent David Craig said Hamad had managed to remain in control of his organisation despite being deported to Iraq in 2023 following a prison sentence for heroin trafficking. Asked how Hamad managed to get his profits out of the country, Mr Craig said while international organised crime still used cash couriers who were 'willing to carry large amounts of cash on assignment on a percentage basis', this method would not work for the amount of money Hamad was accruing. 'I would expect that he's diversified his money laundering efforts and that would be one method he would rely upon,' he said. 'The other is the traditional Middle Eastern Hawala banking system, where money isn't actually transferred across international lines, so it stays below the radar of the monitoring of the local governments. 'What I highly suspect is occurring in this case is cryptocurrency – mass crypto being transferred into his wallet or wallets of his associates in the Middle East, directly from Australia. It's very, very hard to police that.' While stating Australia does have extradition treaties with the UAE and Turkey – where Hamad has reportedly spent time - Mr Craig said attempting to extradite him might not be the best use of law enforcement resources. 'The question in my mind would be, do we want to actually bring this person back to our justice system again so then we can deport him again, or do we spend those resources to cut off his access to the illegal gains coming out of Australia,' he said. 'And the people that are working for him in Australia, if they can be deported, let's move them on as well.' The law enforcement veteran also said the Australian government was ignoring a major tool to go after the illicit tobacco trade. 'Australia is actually a signatory to the… prevention of illicit Tobacco Goods Act,' he said. 'We signed that in 2013 and came into power two years ago in September 2023… the main thrust of that agreement is to have a track and trace system so that tobacco products could be tracked from manufacture to point of sale. 'That allows law enforcement multiple access points that allows us to monitor the illegal bleed between illegal markets and legal markets. It allows us to not just guess what's happening in the marketplace, but to proactively plan interventions to stop this. 'Now this government has done nothing to actually start this. It's in law. They have it in the UK, they have it in Europe and a number of other countries. Australia simply hasn't done that.' According to Mr Martin, the size of Australia's illicit tobacco market was directly linked to government policies designed to reduce smoking rates. 'If you overtax a product, like we've seen with tobacco, then it doesn't make sense to purchase it legally, so it will drive demand to black market substitutes and that provides opportunities for organised crime and that's what has happened here in Australia.' He said in order to combat the issue, the tax on legal cigarettes and vapes needed to come down and enforcement ramped up. 'It's an issue of resourcing and if these people are making billions of dollars and we are only funding our law enforcement agencies $300m then who's got the resources to win a fight like that,' Mr Martin said. Mr Craig said the penalties associated with trafficking in illicit tobacco were significantly less than with illicit drugs while the profits were higher. 'Why wouldn't you go to a softer market, which is exactly what these people are doing, going to illicit market of tobacco,' he said.
