Road accident in northern Nigeria kills 22 athletes returning from a sports festival
The cause of the accident, which happened on Saturday, was not immediately known. The athletes had taken part in the Nigerian National Sports Festival in the southern state of Ogun over the last week.
The driver appeared to lose control of the bus and the vehicle, with over 30 passengers, plunged off the Chiromawa Bridge on the Kano-Zaria expressway, according to Abba Kabir Yusuf, the governor of Kano.
Survivors of the crash were taken to a local hospital for treatment.
Yusuf said the athletes, who were accompanied by their coaches and sporting officials, were representing Kano at the sports festival, a major multi-sports event that bringing together athletes from the country's 35 states every two years.
The governor declared Monday a day of mourning for the state. The families of the victims are to receive 1 million naira (about $630) and food supplies as support, Kano's deputy governor, Aminu Gwarzo, said.
Road accidents are frequent in Africa's most populous country, in part due to poor road conditions and lax enforcement of traffic laws.
In March, at least six people died near Nigeria's capital of Abuja after a trailer crashed into parked vehicles and burst into flames.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is turbo-nostalgia ruining people's enjoyment of contemporary football?
To anyone who remembers World Cup 2010, the Jabulani football was, by common consent, a major factor in contributing to an underwhelming tournament in South Africa. Its unusual construction, featuring fewer panels than any ball before or since, meant a lack of 'drag', so the ball didn't decelerate properly, and moved unpredictably late. It had long been a cliche for goalkeepers to complain about a new tournament ball, but in 2010 outfielders were appalled too. Advertisement 'It's taken some of the skill out of the game,' complained England midfielder Joe Cole. Brazil's Robinho agreed. 'The guy who designed this ball never played football,' he said. 'But there's nothing we can do.' Yet if you spot the Jabulani mentioned 15 years on, it's often in positive, fond terms. 'Every league in the world should be required to use the Jabulani on a random week of the season,' read one viral tweet last season. 'Every game would be chaos. Goals being scored from everywhere.' But hang on: that was the opposite of what the Jabulani offered. It didn't produce chaos; it contributed to the second-lowest goals-per-game rate of any World Cup (after the 1990 edition that was so tedious that it led to the introduction of the backpass rule to reform the sport). The winners, Spain, triumphed largely because they kept the fly-away ball on the ground, but they scored just eight goals in seven games. As for 'goals being scored from everywhere': there were the same number of goals scored from outside the box in 2010, 26, as at World Cup 2006. And while that was simply one light-hearted tweet, others convey a similar message, suggesting the Jabulani was 'a blessing for spectators', or 'the best ball ever made' or, inevitably, 'the GOAT ball', all of which is the complete opposite of what everyone thought at the time. This about-turn is presumably not because people have reconsidered what they want from a football. It's because they've spent 15 years seeing the same three goals again: Giovanni van Bronkhorst's top corner strike against Uruguay, Keisuke Honda's swerving free kick against Denmark, and one of two Diego Forlan free kicks. And when goals did go in, the unconventional trajectory of the Jabulani was oddly fascinating. But we haven't re-watched all the terrible shots, all the misplaced long-range passes, and all the things that made for a World Cup which was flatter than the bellow of the vuvuzelas. Advertisement Rose-tinted spectacles are nothing new, particularly when it comes to sport. A common pattern is that everyone's favourite World Cup is generally the first they experienced, which might explain why World Cup 2010 seems popular with people who are probably now in their mid-twenties. But football coverage — and, let's be honest, the wider world — still hasn't quite got to grips with how easily-accessible bitesize clips of the past have warped our perception of the present. We are living in an age of turbo-nostalgia. It is simpler than ever, for example, to create a playlist that demonstrates why your favourite year of music (bonus points if this was the same year as your favourite World Cup) was so great. What once involved buying and assembling various records, cassettes or CDs and manually recording the music can be performed on Spotify in a couple of minutes. And, of course, someone's already done it for you anyway, so you can just click on that playlist. And if you subsequently click on the 'best new music' playlist, it just won't be as good. Because, obviously, you're comparing one random week to your favourite-ever year. The effect in football occurs in various forms, but chiefly when comparing individual players. Whenever up-and-coming footballers are asked for their favourite all-time player, the most common answers are Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, but an intriguing number select Ronaldo and Zinedine Zidane, even if they were born after those players retired. The era of YouTube means you can watch them as easily as, say, Erling Haaland. And their best bits are better, in part because they have a whole career to select from. Ronaldo and Zidane have become so adored based upon, say, that goal against Compostela or that Champions League winner against Bayer Leverkusen — and various compilations — that there's actually no rational analysis about their careers. People think you've some kind of vendetta if you point out that Ronaldo only won one league title in Europe and never got close to winning the European Cup, or recall that Zidane had a disastrous 18-month period between winning World Cup 1998 and Euro 2000 when he looked completely bereft of confidence, and both Juventus and Real Madrid improved when he left. But if we speak about, say, Kylian Mbappe in those terms, it's only applying the current standard of scrutiny to the past. Advertisement So, George Weah's goal for Milan versus Verona in 1996 was brilliant, and yes, he won that year's Ballon d'Or, but he also only scored seven goals that calendar year. Yes, that scary bloke Duncan Ferguson (who the commentators insist Everton 'could do with out there today!') scored lots of thumping headers, but his best-ever return in a season, from over a decade in the Premier League, was 11 goals, which was one more than Beto scored in 2024-25. But almost any retrospective coverage of anything in football — particularly, it must be said, from the 1990s — is so overwhelmingly positive to the point of delusion. 'When you watch football in the Premier League or other top divisions, it's so robotic,' said David McGoldrick, briefly an enigmatic Premier League forward for Sheffield United, now at Barnsley in League One. 'In my day, there was Ronaldinho, Paul Gascoigne and those kinds of players who were great to watch.' But those two players' careers barely overlapped. They peaked about 15 years apart. They were considered special cases even at the time. And the current era does have, for example, Lamine Yamal. The current vibe amongst football fans is not solely typical nostalgia felt solely by middle-aged people, but an intense level of anemoia — as American writer John Koenig has termed it — essentially, false nostalgia for a time you can't recall. Even teenagers insist they're 'against modern football', and think 'the game has gone', which could conceivably be because modern football truly is rubbish, and the game has actually gone. But they're all still hooked on it, so, to paraphrase Ron Atkinson, it must be not-bad then. All this would basically be fine, and completely unworthy of any comment, if it wasn't compromising people's enjoyment of what's actually happening in their own time. The reaction to Euro 2024 — a perfectly good competition that produced some excellent games and best major tournament winner for well over a decade — was strange. 'Why is Euro 2024 so dull?,' was the headline in The Spectator. 'One of the poorest tournaments we've seen in a long time,' claimed former Sky Sports presenter Richard Keys. But it was surely better than both Euro 2020, which was compromised by geography, Covid-19 and a lack of convincing sides, and Euro 2016, a tournament which never really took off. Again, people were presumably comparing watching 120 minutes of a flat game to a couple of standout, YouTube-aided memories from otherwise dull tournaments. Away from football, this has more serious ramifications. A poll by YouGov last year asked around 2,000 people, grouped by age, when they thought life was best. Those aged 70+ generally thought it was the 1960s, people in their sixties thought it was the 1970s, people in their 50s thought it was the 1980s, and so on. That was, in itself, funny but not surprising — everyone enjoyed being young. A more interesting side story was that people in their twenties were more likely than older generations to point to periods before they were born as the best time to have lived, which surely results in flawed perceptions of the current day. Comparatively, the 'make football great again' vibe is mostly harmless. But for the record, as the new Premier League campaign gets underway, the quality of technical and tactical play is better than ever, the goals-per-game rate has reached incredibly high levels over the last couple of seasons, attendances are at record numbers, and the English top flight is now unquestionably the best around. Let's try to enjoy it. In 2040, some will speak about this as the GOAT season — even if this campaign is as bad as the Jabulani was. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Michael Johnson admits Grand Slam Track cannot pay its athletes until new investors are found
Grand Slam Track founder Michael Johnson has spoken out after failing to pay athletes and said the event would not go ahead in 2026 unless a solution was found. The league, which is in its inaugural season, owes competitors millions of dollars in appearance fees and prize money, and in June the fourth and final meet on the calendar, scheduled for Los Angeles, was cancelled. Johnson's deal with host UCLA had become financially unviable, with estimated losses of more than $2m had the event gone ahead. In a statement on Friday, Johnson said the company was 'struggling with our ability to compensate' athletes due to not receiving promised funding. 'It is incredibly difficult to live with the reality that you've built something bigger than yourself while simultaneously feeling like you've let down the very people you set out to help. However, I have to own that,' the former Olympic champion said. 'And yes, the cruellest paradox in all of this is we promised that athletes would be fairly and quickly compensated. Yet, here we are struggling with our ability to compensate them. 'We were devastated when we learned we would not receive the funding committed to us. We worked tirelessly alongside our investors and board to find a quick solution to the problem. Up until and even after the LA postponement, we were getting positive signs that a solution was close.' Before the opening event in Kingston, Jamaica, Johnson's co-founder Steve Gera told The Independent that they were 'maniacally focused on having the youngest fanbase of any sports league in the world in the next five years'. The star-studded list of athletes – which included US stars Kenny Bednarek, Gabrielle Thomas and Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone as well as British names including Josh Kerr and Dina Asher-Smith – competed in two linked events, such as 100m and 200m sprints, with results combined to calculate the winners in each category. Prize money for winners stood at $100,000, with $50,000 for runners-up and $10,000 for eighth place. The competition was billed as a much-needed shot in the arm for athletics, although the decision to include only track events and omit field disciplines was met with criticism. 'I am going to save what I think I can save,' Johnson explained. 'I think I can save track, I don't think I can save track and field.' But ticket sales have been slow and sponsorship and broadcast revenues have not met lofty expectations. The Times reports that organisers will save around £2.2m in prize money and travel expenses by cancelling the Los Angeles event. Some of the action has played out in half-empty stadiums, although the third event in Philadelphia was more popular, with close to 30,000 tickets sold over two days after the action was compressed from the three days of events held in Kingston and Miami. A disappointing crowd in Jamaica prompted organisers to review their locations for 2026, with a variety of other markets being considered, including European cities. Johnson said Grand Slam was now working to put new systems in place with the aim to ensure this did not happen again in the future. He added: 'While I am no stranger to setbacks and overcoming obstacles, as an athlete, professionally and personally, this current situation of not being able to pay our athletes and partners has been one of the most difficult challenges I've ever experienced. 'The 2026 season will not happen until these obligations are met - and that is my number one priority.' additional reporting by PA
New York Times
10 hours ago
- New York Times
Mali's Junta Accuses Frenchman of Plot to Overthrow the Military Government
The junta that governs Mali said Thursday that it had foiled an attempted coup and arrested several individuals, including Malian military personnel and a French national it accused of organizing the plot. Mali, a landlocked country in Western Africa, has typified the turmoil that has rocked countries across the Sahel for more than a decade, including Islamist insurgencies, political instability, military takeovers and a decline in their relationship with France, a former colonizer. Among those arrested was a man the government identified as Yann Vezilier, a French citizen whom it accused of being a spy. In a statement broadcast by state television on Thursday, Gen. Daoud Aly Mohammedine, Mali's minister of security, accused Mr. Vezilier of working 'on behalf of the French intelligence service, which mobilized political leaders, civil society actors and military personnel.' The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately respond to a request for comment or even confirm Mr. Vezilier's nationality. Several other civilians and Malian military officials were also arrested for 'criminal offenses' related to a plot that General Mohammedine said began on Aug. 1. The general released scant other details about the nature or extent of the crimes. Mali has been ruled by a military government since August 2020, when the military exploited widespread public anger over a disputed parliamentary election. A second coup followed just nine months later. France maintained a contingent of troops in the country from 2013 until August 2022, when the junta expelled the forces in exchange for Russian mercenaries. That coup set into action a chain of similar military takeovers across the region, with soldiers seizing power across a belt of countries nine times between 2020 and 2023. Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger — all ruled by military governments — officially withdrew from the West African alliance known as ECOWAS in January after the bloc pressured them to restore civilian leadership. Since Mali's government came to power, human rights groups have accused it of cracking down on dissent and political opposition.
