Dubai Police issue 431 jet ski violations, seizes 41 in safety crackdown
The recorded violations included expired jet ski licences, entry into restricted areas such as swimming zones and hotel beaches, non-compliance with permitted usage hours, failure to wear life jackets, underage operation of watercraft, and overloading.
Brigadier Dr Hassan Suhail, Director of the Ports Police Station, explained that the campaign aimed to improve maritime safety, reduce injuries caused by reckless driving, and clamp down on violations to curb dangerous behaviours.
Common violations identified
Brigadier Al Suwaidi detailed the types of violations recorded during the campaign, which included:
Expired jet ski licenses
Entering prohibited zones, such as swimming areas and hotel beaches
Using jet skis outside of designated hours
Failure to wear life jackets
Underage individuals operating jet skis
Overloading the jet ski beyond its capacity
Various other infractions
Fines for breaking law
Brigadier Al Suwaidi further noted that fines were imposed based on the severity of the offence:
The violations were spread across multiple coastal areas in Dubai. Brigadier Suhail also praised the readiness of maritime security and rescue patrols, which are operational 24/7 to monitor activity, enforce safety, and respond to emergencies.
The inspections were conducted by Dubai Police, in collaboration with the Dubai Maritime Authority (DMA). The campaign also sought to boost the sense of security and reinforce public confidence in the police's presence across marine zones.
Sheikh Dr Saeed bin Ahmed bin Khalifa Al Maktoum, CEO of DMA, highlighted the importance of joint efforts in ensuring maritime safety.
'The collaborative efforts between regulatory entities reflect our strategic vision of positioning Dubai as a global model for maritime safety. This initiative underscores our commitment to providing a secure and sustainable environment for all sea users, thereby supporting economic growth and strengthening Dubai's reputation as a leading global maritime hub.'
He emphasised that the safety of marine vehicle users is a top priority, and efforts are underway to develop regulatory and technological frameworks that ensure compliance and promote a culture of responsibility among sea-goers.
Safety reminders for jet ski users
Both Dubai Police and the Dubai Maritime Authority have urged jet ski users to prioritise safety by strictly complying with maritime laws and regulations.
Riders are reminded to wear appropriate safety gear, including life jackets, and to conduct regular maintenance checks on their watercraft. Authorities also emphasised the importance of avoiding navigation near private and tourist vessels, adhering to designated speed limits, typically not exceeding 5 to 7 nautical miles per hour, and refraining from overloading jet skis beyond their capacity. These measures are essential to ensure the safety of all sea users and prevent accidents.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Dubai: Accident on Al Khail Road near Umm Suqeim Street bridge
Dubai Police issued a traffic advisory on Monday (August 4) following an accident on Al Khail Road. In a social media post, the authority said the accident occurred on Al Khail Road heading towards Sharjah before the Umm Suqeim Street bridge. Details about the accident itself, including the number of vehicles involved or any potential injuries, were not immediately released.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Why Lebanon needs closure on the Beirut port blast
On this day five years ago, Lebanon experienced a traumatic event that arguably became the defining moment for an entire generation. Although the country is no stranger to tragedy, the detonation of nearly 3,000 tonnes of improperly stored ammonium nitrate at Beirut port continues to cast a shadow over Lebanon and its people. The blast, which killed more than 220, injured thousands more and flattened large parts of the capital, continues to stir up painful feelings and visceral reactions among many Lebanese and those who love Lebanon. Although the country has gone through the anguish of foreign occupation, Israeli bombardment and civil war, the explosion of August 4, 2020, remains unique in its significance. This is because it sums up so much of the Lebanese experience in recent times: chronic mismanagement; a lack of transparency; poor governance; a cavalier attitude to citizens' well-being as well as attempts to achieve accountability being hampered by obfuscation and delay. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast. The failure to prosecute those responsible for such a catastrophe has repercussions that reach far beyond the frustration of the victims' families. A pervasive sense that the country is on the wrong path led many young Lebanese to reluctantly pack their bags and leave for opportunities abroad. One of them, architect Grace Dergham, recently told The National how, when she left in July 2001, she did so to support her parents because she was 'starting to lose hope in the country'. This is not to overlook the efforts currently under way to put the country on the right path. On Friday, The National reported that tighter regulations concerning the shipping, handling and storage of goods have been introduced in Lebanon to prevent such a tragedy from happening again. That the country now has a functioning presidency and parliament is also an important step forward. And despite many setbacks – including political interference, legal challenges and the removal of lead investigators – a judicial investigation into the blast is continuing. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast Nevertheless, much remains to be done. Beirut port, which suffered extensive damage, has not resumed full operations. Housing, transport and cultural assets, including many religious and archaeological sites and national monuments, remain badly affected. And other issues have emerged to compound these challenges, such as the overspill from the Gaza war and a persistent financial crisis. But there are also faint signs that things may be slowly improving; a World Bank report released on June 19 found that Lebanon's real gross domestic product was projected to grow by 4.7 per cent this year 'supported by anticipated reform progress, a recovery in tourism and consumption and limited capital inflows'. What shines through is the spirit of the Lebanese people, who have demonstrated resilience and determination despite the physical and emotional hurt stemming from the blast and its aftermath. But they should not have to be so resilient. What they want – a better future and a fair, functioning country – is right and just. Therefore, it is the job of the government, the judiciary as well as Lebanon's political and business classes to draw a line under the devastating 2020 explosion by achieving accountability and rebuilding trust in the country's institutions. A failure to do so will dog Lebanon's leaders for years to come and take away the opportunity to meet its people's aspirations.
Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
UAE: Venting online about your ex? Experts warn of up to Dh500,000 defamation fine
As more people turn to social media to share personal details about their breakups or divorces, legal experts are warning that such posts could cross into criminal territory, while also discouraging the younger generation from commitment and marriage. Byron James, a partner at Expatriate Law and an international family law expert, explained that under UAE law, particularly Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combatting Rumours and Cybercrimes, both defamation and privacy violations are criminal offences, with strict penalties attached to online conduct. 'The UAE's legal approach reflects a broader commitment to protecting individual dignity, reputation and family privacy,' he said. 'These are matters of public order.' Defamation in the UAE includes any statement, written or implied, that harms someone's honour, reputation or social standing. Unlike in some jurisdictions, truth is not a defence; even accurate information can be considered defamatory if shared without justification and causes reputational damage. What makes this more severe is the method of publication. 'The offence is aggravated if defamatory content is posted online,' Byron said. 'Social media, WhatsApp, email or even blogs, all of these fall under electronic means. Once something is shared, it becomes a cybercrime. Penalties can go up to Dh500,000, jail time, and in some cases, deportation for non-citizens.' Privacy violations are also addressed under the same law. Sharing personal data, images, voice notes, private messages, or screenshots without consent may result in criminal charges. Even if the other party isn't directly named, if their identity can be inferred from context or known associations, a violation may have occurred. Byron adds: 'There's no need for malicious intent. Simply posting harmful or private information during or after a divorce could be enough to trigger liability, especially if it affects public perception or ongoing legal proceedings.' The emotional cost Shamsa (name changed), a 33-year-old Dubai resident, says she used to admire couples who shared their relationships online, until she saw how many ended up airing their separation just as publicly. 'Seeing a full relationship unfold online is nice, until it gets ugly,' she said. 'Even when people say they don't want to share the details, their followers pressure them. They say, 'We were part of your journey, we deserve to know what happened.' That kind of demand is unhealthy.' Shamsa believed that these public breakups have quietly shifted how people view marriage. 'It's changing the image of commitment. When people who once seemed so in love turn on each other online, it makes the idea of long-term relationships feel less stable.' Why do people post? Psychologist Rehab Al Hammadi, a UAE-based mental health professional, said that emotional regulation often breaks down during periods of grief or loss. 'People may feel the urge to defend themselves, tell their side, or seek validation. But social media isn't a safe outlet, especially when legal lines are involved.' She explained that the short-term relief of sharing often gives way to long-term consequences. 'Public judgment, potential legal action, or impact on custody battles can make things worse. Venting publicly doesn't resolve pain; it often adds new layers to it.' Even vague posts may count Indirect references or vague posts, sometimes called 'subtweeting' or 'soft launching' grievances, may still meet the legal threshold. 'If mutual followers can reasonably identify the person being referenced, and reputational harm occurs, that's enough,' Byron explained. 'Courts don't only look at content, they assess the overall context and impact.' He gives an example: a post like 'Some people pretend to be the victim while lying in court' may appear general, but if shared during a public or known divorce dispute, it can be interpreted as targeting a specific person. 'The legal system gives weight to emotional and moral harm as well, not just reputation.'
