South Carolina bill aims to limit offensive content in schools
Columbia S.C. (WSPA) – There's a push in the final weeks of this year's session to pass a bill that would affect students in South Carolina.
If passed, teachers and schools could face consequences if they discuss topics or content seen as 'offensive' or 'obscene' with students.
'This material would not be, like I said, allowed on TV, wouldn't be allowed on the radio,' said Representative April Cromer (R – Anderson). 'So why are we exposing our children to it? There's a time and a place for those materials, and the schoolhouse is not that place.'
The bill would change the state's current obscenity laws by making the definition of 'harmful to minors' more strict. Small parts of a book would be considered 'inappropriate' if they contain obscene or graphic material.
The South Carolina Code of Laws defines obscenity, but the bill would redefine it.
'Categorizing an absurdly amount of speech as obscene. This bill is a far-reaching attack on South Carolinians first amendment rights,' Josh Malkin, American Civil Liberties Union.
Cromer said that as the bill's sponsor, it is crucial to protect children.
'We've had parents that have complained and called in all over the state with concerns of what the material that their children are being exposed to,' Cromer said.
Malkin strongly opposes this bill. He testified and said if this bill is passed, a potty-training book would be seen as 'obscene.'
He said since there was a minor in the room while he was testifying, if this bill was a current law, he could be in trouble.
'I think if Bill 4123 were to pass, a bill that categorizes a mention of excretion as sexual activity. My testimony where I talked about excretion in the book 'Everybody Poops' could technically be considered a violation of that bill,' said Malkin.
Representative Travis Moore said this bill has significant constitutional implications.This bill is still in discussion in the House and will likely not pass this year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
Musk is 'flat wrong' about Trump tax bill, GOP speaker says
Musk is 'flat wrong' about Trump tax bill, GOP speaker says The House speaker responded to Elon Musk calling Trump's tax bill a 'disgusting abomination' and threatened its supporters with political payback Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel President Trump, during a visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania, announced he will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%. WASHINGTON – House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was surprised by Elon Musk's blistering opposition to President Donald Trump's sweeping tax bill and that the world's richest man is "flat wrong" about the legislative proposal. Musk in his June 3 tweet called the bill a 'disgusting abomination" that Trump and Johnson helped push through the U.S. House last month by the slimmest of margins and with only GOP support. In 2024, Musk spent more than $250 million to help Trump win back the White House, and now he's threatening political payback against the GOP lawmakers who voted with the president. 'It surprised me, frankly, and I don't take it personal,' Johnson told reporters on June 4 in the U.S. Capitol. 'We don't take it personal. You know, policy differences are not personal. I think he's flat wrong. I think he's way off on this, and I've told him as much, and I've said it publicly and privately. I'm very consistent in that.' More: Elon Musk slams President Trump's big tax and policy bill as a 'disgusting abomination' Johnson added that Musk did 'a 180' to oppose the bill after they left on a 'great note' with the former DOGE adviser's recent departure from the Trump White House. The tiff between Musk and Republicans continued as the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the House bill would add roughly $2.4 million to the deficit over the next decade. The bill would extend Trump's tax cuts, fund Trump's deportation plans and increase defense spending. The tax and policy bill is currently in the Senate, where Trump is lobbying lawmakers as they prepare to make changes to the House-passed measure. Some Republicans have already come out and opposed the cost of the House bill, including Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johenson. 'I agree with Elon,' Paul said in a tweet on June 3 in response to Musk. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.' Trump and GOP leaders have set a self-imposed deadline of July 4 to try to get the tax bill through both chambers of Congress and to the president's desk for signature into law.


Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
Republicans scramble to avoid a war with Elon Musk
House Republicans, dismayed by Elon Musk's harsh criticism of President Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill," are now trying to talk their erstwhile ally down from the ledge. Why it matters: With over $400 billion at his disposal, the Tesla and SpaceX owner could drown Republicans in opposition cash. And he's saying GOP lawmakers who voted for the bill should be "fired." House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said he called Musk on Tuesday but that the recently departed Trump lieutenant "didn't answer," adding that he hopes to "talk to him today." What we're hearing: Coming out of their closed-door conference meeting, House Republicans projected optimism they can get Musk back on side. "There's a sense that Elon is still learning about the full number of wins in the One Big, Beautiful Bill," another House Republican, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations, told Axios. The lawmaker said House Republicans have "talked to him in the last 24 hours" and "have helped him understand the big picture." Another House Republican told Axios: "I think he'll recognize maybe more than most the challenge that we face when we're trying to cut spending. He simply wants more spending as I understanding. He should know how hard that is." State of play: Musk slammed the bill as a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday, writing in a post on X, "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." In another post, Musk responded to another user's criticism of the bill writing, "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." All but five House Republicans voted for the reconciliation bill last month. Between the lines: Johnson said he had a "great conversation" with Musk on Monday morning, before his social media rampage, and that "it's curious to me what happened this week." The House speaker said Musk told him in that conversation that he would lend support to Republicans in the 2026 elections. Zoom in: There is also simmering anger behind the scenes, with Johnson telling colleagues in the conference meeting that Trump is "pissed off" at Musk, according to a source familiar with his comments. A third House Republican argued that the bill benefits "middle class families and taxpaying, working-class people" and that "maybe that upsets the billionaire class, I don't know." "I think he's flat wrong," Johnson said at his press conference. "I think he's way off on this and I've told him as much."


Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
House GOP expands its investigation of Biden's health
House Republicans are expanding their investigation into President Biden's health with a new tranche of requests to interview top White House aides, including former Chief of Staff Ron Klain and senior advisor Anita Dunn. Why it matters: House Oversight Committee chair James Comer (R-Ky.), citing Axios' reporting, noted that Klain, Dunn and the other aides whose testimony he is seeking made up the ex-president's inner circle. Axios' Alex Thompson and CNN's Jake Tapper, in their new book "Original Sin," implicate what they dub Biden's "politburo" in a coordinated campaign to hide details of Biden's deteriorating health from public view. Biden's spokespeople have pushed back on the claim that there was a cover-up around his health, arguing that he was mentally and physically capable of serving as president through the end of his term. Driving the news: In addition to Klain and Dunn, Comer sent letters requesting testimony from former deputy chief of staff Bruce Reed, senior advisor Mike Donilon and counselor Steve Ricchetti. "The Committee requests your testimony to evaluate your eye-witness account of former President Biden's decline," Comer wrote in each letter. Comer said the aides must agree by June 11 to testify before his panel in July — or else he will subpoena them. Zoom out: Comer sent letters last month requesting testimony from Biden's personal physician, Kevin O'Connor, as well as former White House officials Neera Tanden, Anthony Bernal, Annie Tomasini and Ashley Willians. Many of those aides were also mentioned in "Original Sin" as being part of a select group who had up-close access to the president. Comer said in an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity that "our staff attorneys have been communicating with their attorneys" and that he expects each of the ex-officials to testify voluntarily. What they're saying: " These five former senior advisors were eyewitnesses to President Biden's condition and operations within the Biden White House," Comer said in a statement.