From stage to page: A Chicago poet honors her prima ballerina mother and Osage heritage
Some stories are about wealth, greed and murder, but one is of a mother and daughter who would make certain the world wouldn't forget the elders who lived it.
Elise Paschen is an enrolled member of the Osage Nation. She is the author of six poetry collections, gracefully penning the words her ancestors once spoke.
Forced relocation to reservations in Fairfax, Oklahoma, was deadly for Osage Indians. Oil was discovered on the reservation, and headrights, or royalty payments from the oil produced, were given to those in the tribe.
What followed was a period known as the Osage 'Reign of Terror' when as many as hundreds of Osage Indians were reportedly murdered by outsiders hoping to gain control over the valuable assets.
'The year my mother was born in Fairfax, Oklahoma, white men were marrying Osage women and killing them for their headrights,' Paschen said. 'My mother was born a year after the Indian Citizenship Act was passed.'
The hallway outside her Chicago home displays framed photos of Paschen in graduation tassels from Harvard and Oxford, clippings of her work in Poetry Magazine, and a faded Newseek Magazine featuring the first U.S. prima ballerina – an icon Paschen knew as 'mother.'
'My mother, the prima ballerina, Maria Tallchief, grew up on the Osage reservation,' she said.
As a child, Paschen watched her mother dance across the world's most prestigious stages.
'Standing in the wings and watching my mother perform and turn into these amazing creatures, into Cinderella, a swan queen, a firebird… then she'd come out of the wings, and she'd be panting and catching her breath and mopping her brow,' Paschen said.
But it wouldn't be until years later that Paschen realized her mother's greatest act was refusing to let the world trim her name to fit their tongue.
'They wanted her to change her name to Maria Tallchief,' Paschen said.
Ignoring the headline 'Red Skin Dances at the Opera,' Maria demanded the playbill proudly reflect her Osage name.
'It was huge that she held onto her last name and didn't succumb to the Russian influence,' she said.
While her mother danced out her identity, it was words, not movement that called Paschen. She began to write about the sepia pictures hanging in the hall, braiding a beat of generations with her own coming of age.
When Maria Tallchief took her final bow, passing in the presence of her daughter in 2013, Paschen knew their art, though different, pulsed with the same purpose.
'Nothing gives me greater pleasure than writing a poem,' she said.
This week, Paschen released her latest collection of poems titled 'Blood Wolf Moon,' a moving dance of words in both English and Osage Orthography.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
The Other 96%: Talent Beyond Elite Ivies
When many people think of higher education in America, they picture the Ivy League, such as Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Columbia. These elite institutions dominate headlines, policy debates, rankings, and even pop culture. But here's the reality: less than 5% of U.S. college students attend Ivy League or similarly elite private universities. The other 96%—the overwhelming majority—are enrolled in other public and private colleges, which receive far less attention. Many elite colleges have deep roots, predating the nation itself. The term 'Ivy League' began not in classrooms but on sports fields—it was the name of an athletic conference, not a mark of educational distinction. Today, these schools are ironically not known for their sports, but for the prestige and achievements of their graduates and faculty. Today, these schools sit atop the rankings not because they're doing the most good, but because they're best at serving the most advantaged. Rankings such as those from U.S. News & World Report place heavy weight on graduation rates and peer assessments—categories that inherently benefit schools that enroll wealthier students and enjoy name-brand recognition. If your institution primarily admits students who are already statistically likely to graduate, and your 'peers' are fellow elite schools, your top spot is all but guaranteed. Yes, many of these institutions offer generous financial aid packages, sometimes eliminating loans entirely for low-income undergraduates. Despite these programs, low- and middle-income students-the vast majority of Americans- remain underrepresented. As sociologist Anthony Jack has documented, even those who do make it in often face social isolation, unspoken cultural expectations, and an environment that can feel deeply alienating. The picture is even murkier at the graduate and professional level—where elite institutions continue to dominate rankings in fields like law, medicine, and business. But here, there's even less transparency. Unlike undergraduate programs, most graduate schools don't report Pell Grant enrollment or outcomes for students from less privileged backgrounds. Graduation rates, loan repayment, and employment outcomes are often hidden behind glossy brochures and institutional prestige. Thankfully, there are signs of change—at least at the undergraduate level. The American Council on Education and the Carnegie Foundation have developed a new classification system to recognize institutions that excel in serving Pell Grant recipients and boosting their post-graduation earnings. These schools are doing the hard, unglamorous work of helping students climb the income ladder. But notably, this system doesn't yet extend to graduate education, where such transparency is still sorely lacking. So what can be done? More Employers and policymakers should look beyond the Ivy halo. Since the Pandemic, more employers are already recruiting beyond the Elite Ivies. When recruiting for your company, look beyond just the college name and ask for meaningful data. What percentage of a program's students come from low-income backgrounds? What support systems exist for them? What are their outcomes—both in terms of earnings (and debt) as well as leadership impacts in society? With over 2,600 four-year colleges across the U.S.—many offering high-quality graduate and professional programs—employers have a vast talent pool beyond the Ivy League. While elite institutions will continue to thrive and produce great talent, they are not the sole source of capable, driven, and innovative graduates. The future of the workforce depends on recognizing and recruiting from the full spectrum of schools where students are gaining skills, solving real-world problems, and adding value. It's time to shift attention—and investment—to the broader landscape of graduate education that's powering opportunity across the country. Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today! Interested in engaging with us or have an idea for a future topic? Submit this brief form.
CNBC
6 days ago
- CNBC
I got accepted to Harvard, Stanford and Princeton—3 things my parents did at an early age: It 'made all the difference'
For every high schooler, the college admissions process is incredibly daunting. Thankfully, for me, the years of hard work all paid off. I recently graduated from PCTI STEM Academy in Wayne, New Jersey. This spring, I was accepted into 10 of the top 25 universities in the U.S., including Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and the University of Pennsylvania. This fall, I'll be attending Harvard University. Among my acceptances, I was offered a merit-based full ride from Washington University as a Langsdorf Scholar and a direct phone call from their Dean of Engineering, along with a Likely Scholar Designation through Columbia University's C.P. Davis Scholar program. What made all the difference? It started long before high school, with the way my parents raised me. We couldn't afford college consultants or expensive enrichment programs, so they focused on simple, consistent routines that laid the foundation for my success. Research consistently shows that good sleep and proper nutrition lead to better academic performance. My parents took this seriously. To make sure I got enough rest, my dad would wake up early so that he could drive me to school every morning before heading into work. Not having to catch the bus gave me an extra hour of sleep. My mom would similarly get up before sunrise, sometimes as early as 4:30 a.m., so that she could make me a nutritious breakfast — usually a couple of eggs, some protein, and garlic toast. My parents also arranged their schedules so that I'd never come home to an empty house. As soon as I was done with school, they'd be home from work. In Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers," he talks about how success requires not just talent and hard work, but also finding opportunities to develop our own interests. That really stuck with me. At the start of high school, I was too focused on academics. Yet, my parents encouraged me to join clubs. If I didn't like it, I didn't have to commit. Growing up, my immigrant parents didn't have access to extracurricular activities. I was reminded of how lucky I am. I became one of the most involved students in my district, and surprisingly ended up having a lot of fun. I participated in Robotics, Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA), and SkillsUSA. I even worked on real-world engineering projects, like optimizing math models for school-based initiatives. My proudest accomplishment? Leading a NASA HUNCH team that designed a lunar rover built to survive the moon's harsh terrain. We were invited to present our design at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, directly to NASA engineers and astronauts. My parents taught me that you can become talented through skill development, but you need opportunities to put that talent to good use. My parents, who immigrated to the U.S. without a formal American education, taught me that success means more than grades. It's also about character. They instilled in me values rooted in our Islamic faith: curiosity about the world, honesty, gratitude, and perseverance. Our faith also encourages us to observe and appreciate the beauty of the world, which is initially what got me interested in science! Those values shaped how I approached everything, from academics to relationships with teachers and classmates. When it came time for recommendation letters, my teachers didn't just write about my grades. They spoke about who I am as a person, and that came from how my parents raised me. What matters most to me is giving back — to my parents, my community, and everyone who helped me along the way. I believe that's how I'll truly make the most out of my Harvard education.
Forbes
27-07-2025
- Forbes
Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—By Solving The Wrong Problem
Psychological safety, problems at work, mistake, fatigue, dismissal, stress and overwork. Two months ago, Harvard Business School professor Amy C. Edmondson and associate professor Michaela J. Kerrissey wrote an eloquent article in the May-June issue of Harvard Business Review., 'What People Get Wrong About Psychological Safety.' A Massive Effort To Enhance Psychological Safety With Little Effect 'Psychological safety' was once an obscure term in psychology and management research. Professor Edmondson changed all that with her best-selling book, The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth (2017) HBRP. According to her recent article, 'Today the concept is downright popular. Countless managers, consultants, and training companies have worked hard to create psychologically safe workplaces, and thousands of articles have been devoted to the topic.' In 2017, the need for the effort was obvious: 'A 2017 Gallup poll found that only 3 in 10 employees strongly agree with the statement that their opinions count at work.' Yet today, 8 years later, those Gallup numbers have hardly budged. What went wrong? According to the 2025 article, 'As the popularity of psychological safety has grown, so too have misconceptions about it.' The authors identify six common misperceptions: 'Psychological safety means being nice; it means getting your way; it means job security; it requires a trade-off with performance; it's a policy; and it requires a top-down approach.' They explain why each misperception gets in the way and give advice on how to counter it. The Key Problem: What Is The Problem? What is the problem that this massive effort is trying to solve? One useful insight sometimes (unreliably) attributed to Albert Einstein is to rethink fundamentals. 'If I had an hour to solve a problem, I'd spend the first 55 minutes defining the problem and the last five minutes solving it." The effort on psychological safety may be doing the opposite. Thus, a closer look at the lack of progress on enhancing psychological safety points to another possible cause: a focus of the effort on the team level of the firm. As Professor Edmondson's 2017 book stated, 'My field-based research has primarily focused on groups and teams, because that's how most work gets done.' So too, the 2025 article focuses almost exclusively on leaders trying to enhance psychological safety at the team level. The team level may be where most of the work gets done, but not necessarily where most of the problems are caused. The Real Problem Behind Lack Of Psychological Safety Guess what? In many other aspects of management, the principal problem today is not at the team level, and rather in the way the whole organization is run. For the last half-century, the central problem addressed by management was how to cut costs so as to maximize shareholder value and enhance bonuses for the executives. That was the official position of the U.S. Business Roundtable for several decades. Business schools still teach it. Most of the processes, systems, and mindsets that support it are still in place in many big firms. So that is the problem that managers are required to address, whether they agree with it or not. Is it any wonder that there is a lack of psychological safety in such settings? The Shift From Cutting Costs To Creating Value For Customers The good news is that in a smaller group of public firms—perhaps 20% of public companies-- the primary dynamic of a business has shifted from cutting costs and extracting value to creating more value for customers. Value-creating enterprises emerged from the combination of two elements: first, entrepreneurs began using digital technology and AI to deliver exponentially more value than traditionally-managed firms; and second, digital technology gave customers the power to demand more value from businesses. The killer insight: value-creating enterprises not only satisfy customers: they make much more money than firms focused on making money. Workplaces devoted to creating value for customers are also likely to be more congenial as workplaces than those focused on extracting value from customers and boosting executive bonuses. Meanwhile, profit-seeking firms that still focus primarily on improving efficiency and cost-cutting are generating below-average value and are having difficulty in surviving. Two-thirds of the famous blue-chip firms in the Dow Jones Industrial Average are now performing below average (See the table below). The performance problems that these firms are facing of course aggravates even further the problem of workplace psychological safety, as workers in those firms are likely to be blamed for shortfalls in performance. Thus, many of the managers in struggling efforts to enhance psychological safety may be trying to solve the wrong problem. If they shifted the focus of their efforts to updating the goal of their firms and creating more value for their customers, their workplaces could transition from the dispiriting goal of extracting value from customers to the potentially inspiring purpose of creating value for them. And read also Why Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—It's Not Rocket Science—Or AI Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete: Master Value Creation Now 5-Year Total Returns of firms in the Dow Jones Industrial Average as of July 2025
