logo
Heat and thirst drive families in Gaza to drink water that makes them sick

Heat and thirst drive families in Gaza to drink water that makes them sick

Associated Press19 hours ago
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — After waking early to stand in line for an hour under the August heat, Rana Odeh returns to her tent with her jug of murky water. She wipes the sweat from her brow and strategizes how much to portion out to her two small children. From its color alone, she knows full well it's likely contaminated.
Thirst supersedes the fear of illness.
She fills small bottles for her son and daughter and pours a sip into a teacup for herself. What's left she adds to a jerrycan for later.
'We are forced to give it to our children because we have no alternative,' Odeh, who was driven from her home in Khan Younis, said of the water. 'It causes diseases for us and our children.'
Such scenes have become the grim routine in Muwasi, a sprawling displacement camp in central Gaza where hundreds of thousands endure scorching summer heat. Sweat-soaked and dust-covered, parents and children chase down water trucks that come every two or three days, filling bottles, canisters and buckets and then hauling them home, sometimes on donkey-drawn carts.
Each drop is rationed for drinking, cooking, cleaning or washing. Some reuse what they can and save a couple of cloudy inches in their jerrycans for whatever tomorrow brings — or doesn't.
When water fails to arrive, Odeh said, she and her son fill bottles from the sea.
Over the 22 months since Israel launched its offensive, Gaza's water access has been progressively strained. Limits on fuel imports and electricity have hampered the operation of desalination plants while infrastructure bottlenecks and pipeline damage choked delivery to a dribble. Gaza's aquifers became polluted by sewage and the wreckage of bombed buildings. Wells are mostly inaccessible or destroyed, aid groups and the local utility say.
Meanwhile, the water crisis has helped fuel the rampant spread of disease, on top of Gaza's rising starvation. UNRWA — the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees — said Thursday that its health centers now see an average 10,300 patients a week with infectious diseases, mostly diarrhea from contaminated water.
Efforts to ease the water shortage are in motion, but for many the prospect is still overshadowed by the risk of what may unfold before new supply comes.
And the thirst is only growing as a heat wave bears down, with humidity and temperatures in Gaza soaring on Friday to 35 degrees Celsius (95 degrees Fahrenheit).
Searing heat and sullied water
Mahmoud al-Dibs, a father displaced from Gaza City to Muwasi, dumped water over his head from a flimsy plastic bag — one of the vessels used to carry water in the camps.
'Outside the tents it is hot and inside the tents it is hot, so we are forced to drink this water wherever we go,' he said.
Al-Dibs was among many who told The Associated Press they knowingly drink non-potable water.
The few people still possessing rooftop tanks can't muster enough water to clean them, so what flows from their taps is yellow and unsafe, said Bushra Khalidi, an official with Oxfam, an aid group working in Gaza.
Before the war, the coastal enclave's more than 2 million residents got their water from a patchwork of sources. Some was piped in by Mekorot, Israel's national water utility. Some came from desalination plants. Some was pulled from high-saline wells, and some imported in bottles.
Every source has been jeopardized.
Palestinians are relying more heavily on groundwater, which today makes up more than half of Gaza's supply. The well water has historically been brackish, but still serviceable for cleaning, bathing, or farming, according to Palestinian water officials and aid groups.
Now people have to drink it.
The effects of drinking unclean water don't always appear right away, said Mark Zeitoun, director general of the Geneva Water Hub, a policy institute.
'Untreated sewage mixes with drinking water, and you drink that or wash your food with it, then you're drinking microbes and can get dysentery,' Zeitoun said. 'If you're forced to drink salty, brackish water, it just does your kidneys in, and then you're on dialysis for decades.'
Deliveries average less than three liters (12.5 cups) per person per day — a fraction of the 15-liter (3.3-gallon) minimum humanitarian groups say is needed for drinking, cooking and basic hygiene. In February, acute watery diarrhea accounted for less than 20% of reported illnesses in Gaza. By July, it had surged to 44%, raising the risk of severe dehydration, according to UNICEF, the U.N. children's agency.
System breakdown
Early in the war, residents said deliveries from Israel's water company Mekorot were curtailed — a claim that Israel has denied. Airstrikes destroyed some of the transmission pipelines as well as one of Gaza's three desalination plants.
Bombardment and advancing troops damaged or cut off wells – to the point that today only 137 of Gaza's 392 wells are accessible, according to UNICEF. Water quality from some wells has deteriorated, fouled by sewage, the rubble of shattered buildings and the residue of spent munitions.
Fuel shortages have strained the system, slowing pumps at wells and the trucks that carry water. The remaining two desalination plants have operated far below capacity or ground to a halt at times, aid groups and officials say.
In recent weeks, Israel has taken some steps to reverse the damage. It delivers water via two of Mekorot's three pipelines into Gaza and reconnected one of the desalination plants to Israel's electricity grid, Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel told The Associated Press.
Still, the plants put out far less than before the war, Monther Shoblaq, head of Gaza's Coastal Municipalities Water Utility, told AP. That has forced him to make impossible choices.
The utility prioritizes getting water to hospitals and to people. But that means sometimes withholding water needed for sewage treatment, which can trigger neighborhood backups and heighten health risks.
Water hasn't sparked the same global outrage as limits on food entering Gaza. But Shoblaq warned of a direct line between the crisis and potential loss of life.
'It's obvious that you can survive for some days without food, but not without water,' he said.
Supply's future
Water access is steadying after Israel's steps. Aid workers have grown hopeful that the situation won't get worse and could improve.
Southern Gaza could get more relief from a United Arab Emirates-funded desalination plant just across the border in Egypt. COGAT, the Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, said it has allowed equipment into the enclave to build a pipeline from the plant and deliveries could start in a few weeks.
The plant wouldn't depend on Israel for power, but since Israel holds the crossings, it will control the entry of water into Gaza for the foreseeable future.
But aid groups warn that access to water and other aid could be disrupted again by Israel's plans to launch a new offensive on some of the last areas outside its military control. Those areas include Gaza City and Muwasi, where much of Gaza's population is now located.
In Muwasi's tent camps, people line up for the sporadic arrivals of water trucks.
Hosni Shaheen, whose family was also displaced from Khan Younis, already sees the water he drinks as a last resort.
'It causes stomach cramps for adults and children, without exception,' he said. 'You don't feel safe when your children drink it.'
___
Metz reported from Jerusalem. Alon Berstein contributed reporting from Kerem Shalom, Israel. ___
Follow AP's war coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/israel-hamas-war
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Gave Up Cardio After Weights – My Running And Lifting Has Never Been Better
I Gave Up Cardio After Weights – My Running And Lifting Has Never Been Better

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Gave Up Cardio After Weights – My Running And Lifting Has Never Been Better

Sometimes, it feels like science is on a mission to upset me. Not only does it turn out that upper body workouts (which I hate) might be key to better running, but apparently, cardio should be done after weights if you want to build muscle, pivotal to healthy ageing. Until about seven weeks ago, I was trying (and failing) to adopt the advice. I had previously been running before my strength training sessions every time I hit the gym – but the prospect of even a five-minute jog after Bulgarian split squats felt impossible. To be honest, though, the issues began long before that attempted change. Even when I was cramming cardio first in my hour-long, pre-work gym sessions, I didn't feel I was jogging for long enough to really improve my pace or endurance. And my lifts struggled, despite my (beloved) creatine supplementation. So, I stopped doing them in the same session altogether, in favour of separate sessions on the same day – and even though it doubles the amount of workouts on some days, I've been absolutely amazed by how much better I perform both at the squat rack and on the road. I split my running from my lifting altogether Rather than puffing desperately away on a treadmill after lifting (before giving up at the two-minute mark), I decided to try weightlifting before work and then jogging after it. Most days I only do one or the other, but I've been amazed to discover that even on the days when I do both, although it's double the load, I find both far easier – and it ends up taking about the same amount of time. My PBs for both have improved, too (not to mention the fact that my step count skyrocketed). According to Dr Suzanne Wylie, GP and medical adviser for IQdoctor, I'm not alone in my experience. 'It is quite common for people to notice better results when they separate strength training and cardiovascular exercise, rather than performing both in the same session,' she shared. 'By splitting your training into different times of day or alternating days entirely, you allow each type of workout to be performed when your body and nervous system are fresh, which can lead to greater strength gains, improved cardiovascular endurance, and less risk of injury.' Alex Kirkup-Lee, a personal trainer and writer at Gymshark, agrees. 'Ideally, you should split your cardio and weight training sessions, leaving four to six hours between workouts,' she explained, though she wouldn't recommend doing two intense sessions in a day. 'Balance your sessions with one higher intensity workout and one lower intensity, such as an interval run, and then light accessory work later, for example, core training... This allows for better recovery between each exercise type and maximises performance during both disciplines,' she recommended. So... is it ever OK to do cardio and weights in the same session? In short, yes. Kirkup-Lee explained that 'there might be a lot of reasons you want to do cardio and weights in one session, and it's important to note that it's also OK to do this'. Bear in mind, too, that I don't have kids and work from home – as the PT points out, 'many of us don't have time to train twice or even once a day, so it's best to not get too caught up in these finer details'. If you are going to try fitting both into a single session, either opt for a group class (which sometimes combines both) or, Kirkup-Lee said, go for weights before cardio. 'Lifting carries a higher risk of injury, and you don't want to pre-fatigue your muscles with cardio. Numerous studies have also proven that resistance training before cardio improves muscle strength and power,' she said. But if, like me, you find combining the two exhausting, try splitting them (ensuring you don't do two very hardcore sessions in one day) and see how you feel. For me, it's been life-changing. Related... I Tried 'Jeffing' And My Running Pace Skyrocketed I Swapped 10,000 Steps A Day For 30 Minutes Of 'Japanese Walking' – I've Never Been More Active I Tried 'Plogging,' The Eco-Friendly Running Trend – And I'll Never Do It Again

New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch
New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch

Fast Company

time2 hours ago

  • Fast Company

New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch

Coffee drinking has been studied for decades as researchers have aimed to answer one burning question: Is it good for you? Or is it better to stick to joyless drinks like, you know, tap water and mint tea? While there have been cases for just about every argument, one recently published study in The Journal of Nutrition just added another check in the 'healthy' column. Of course, there's a catch. You have to drink your coffee in a specific way. For the study, researchers at Tufts University analyzed the coffee-drinking habits of 46,332 Americans from 1999 to 2018. They found that drinking a cup of coffee each day has some major effects in terms of lowering mortality rates. One cup of joe per day was linked to a 16% lower risk of death, not just related to cardiovascular disease, which has been well-documented, but from any cause. More coffee is better, too—but not too much more. Drinking two to three cups per day showed a 17% lower risk of mortality. More coffee than that didn't offer any additional health benefits. However, these benefits didn't apply to all coffee drinkers across the board. The benefits were most pronounced in those who drank theirs sans cream and sugar (or with a very little amount of sugar). The ones who added cream and sugar had the same rates of all-cause mortality as those who tended toward non-coffee drinks. Essentially, the more cream and sugar added, the lower the benefits. 'Coffee is among the most-consumed beverages in the world, and with nearly half of American adults reporting drinking at least one cup per day, it's important for us to know what it might mean for health,' said Fang Fang Zhang, senior author of the study and a professor at Tufts. 'The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits.' Given that there is so much research around coffee, we always have to take findings with a grain of salt (and sans sweetener), but the good news does seem to be adding up for regular coffee drinkers. A study earlier this year similarly found lower rates of premature death for morning coffee drinkers. Another published in June 2025 found that coffee drinking is linked to healthy aging, particularly in women.

Majority of Americans think alcohol bad for health: poll
Majority of Americans think alcohol bad for health: poll

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Majority of Americans think alcohol bad for health: poll

A narrow majority of Americans now believe even moderate consumption of alcohol negatively affects health, as US drinking levels continue to decline, according to a recent survey. Pollster Gallup found the number of Americans who said they drink alcohol to be at an all-time low since the poll was first conducted in 1939 -- a few years after the United States ended its prohibition of alcohol. The survey found 54 percent of Americans reported they drank alcohol either occasionally or regularly in 2025, down from at least 60 percent recorded between 1997 and 2023. Those who did say they drank alcohol reported it was in smaller amounts, with the average number of drinks consumed in the last week being 2.8, "the lowest figure Gallup has recorded since 1996," the pollster said on its website. Attitudes toward alcohol, which Gallup has been tracking since 2001, saw the most significant difference in the poll published this week. The number of people who consider moderate consumption of alcohol -- up to one or two drinks per day -- to be bad for personal health rose to 53 percent in 2025. For comparison, the figure was 27 percent in the early 2000s. "Americans' drinking habits are shifting amid the medical world's reappraisal of alcohol's health effects," the pollster noted. In January, then-US surgeon general Vivek Murthy called for alcohol to be sold with a cancer warning label on its packaging. "Alcohol is a well-established, preventable cause of cancer, responsible for about 100,000 cancer cases and 20,000 cancer deaths annually in the United States," he said in a statement. "Yet the majority of Americans are unaware of this risk," he added, underscoring the urgent need for public education. cha/aem/jgc/dl

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store