USC enacts hiring freeze and makes cuts over Trump threats to funding
The University of Southern California announced an immediate hiring freeze for all staff positions, 'with very few critical exceptions' in a letter to faculty and staff on Tuesday.
The letter, from USC's president, Carol Folt, and provost, Andrew Guzman, said the hiring freeze was one of nine steps to cut the school's operating budget amid deep uncertainty about federal funding – given sweeping cuts to scientific research, the reorganization of student loans, and an education department investigation accusing the university of failing to protect Jewish students during protests over Israel's destruction of Gaza following the Hamas attacks on 7 October 2023.
'Like other major research institutions, USC relies on significant amounts of federal funding to carry out our mission,' the university administrators wrote. 'In fiscal year 2024, for example, we received approximately $1.35 billion in federal funding, including roughly $650 million in student financial aid and $569 million for federally funded research. The health system also receives Medicare, Medicaid, and Medi-Cal payments – a significant portion of its revenues – and the futures of those funds are similarly uncertain.'
The other measures include: permanent budget reductions for administrative units and schools, a review of procurement contracts; a review of capital projects 'to determine which may be deferred or paused', a curtailment of faculty hiring, new restriction on discretionary spending and expenses for travel and conferences, an effort to streamline operations, a halt on merit-based pay increases, and an end to extended winter recess introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Two weeks ago, USC was one of 60 schools notified by the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights of 'potential enforcement actions if they do not fulfill their obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to protect Jewish students on campus'.
The newly announced budget cuts follow a university statement in November of last year that informed staff that 'rising costs require … budgetary adjustments'. In 2024, that statement said: 'USC's audited financial statement shows a deficit of $158 million.'
'Over the past six years, our deficit has ranged from $586 million during legal cost repayments and COVID, to a modest positive level of $36 million in 2023,' USC administrators wrote in November.
'Similar deficits are being reported at many peer institutions due to rising costs that outpace revenues across all of higher education,' they added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Democratic senators call on private firm to reveal how it will profit from Trump's Medicaid cuts
Two Democratic senators are demanding to know how a company that administers government benefits could profit from Republican-led cuts to Medicaid, the public health insurance program for people who are low-income, elderly and disabled. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden sent the letter to Maximus, Inc on Monday. The company is the largest private contractor to states who seek to outsource their administration of government assistance, including health insurance and food aid. 'Maximus's long history of kicking Americans off of Medicaid to boost their profits should be a warning of what's to come if Republicans pass their 'big beautiful bill,'' Warren told the Guardian in an exclusive comment. 'We need to hold Maximus accountable for padding their bottom line by making Americans suffer.' Maximus is a publicly traded company with a market capitalization of $3.9bn. It is the largest company in an industry that helps states privatize administrative obligations in programs that serve the poorest residents – a phenomenon one media outlet described as the 'welfare-to-work industrial complex'. Warren and Wyden wrote that the company, 'has an abysmal track record, with reports of egregious backlogs and service delays and several reported instances of fraud'. In states where it's hired, Maximus determines whether needy Americans qualify for a wide range of public assistance – from Medicaid to 'food stamps', formally called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) to 'welfare', or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), according to the letter. Warren and Wyden's letter comes as congressional Republicans seek to add red tape to government-run health insurance programs, including proposed historic cuts to Medicaid, the public health insurance program that covers roughly 71 million Americans who are low-income, disabled and elderly. In addition to Trump administration-led rule changes to other government health insurance programs, the non-partisan congressional budget office estimates Republican-led efforts could lead 16 million Americans to lose insurance by 2034. In a statement, Maximus told the Guardian: 'The accusations contained in the letter Maximus received this morning are baseless. The truth is Maximus has been recognized for its high quality service connecting individuals with critical health coverage.' 'Maximus prides itself on being a conflict-free and accountable partner to government,' the statement continued. 'We do not set policy, rather we deliver on policies enacted by members of both political parties by developing and deploying technology to rapidly fix problems in legacy government systems and deliver the right services to the right people at the right time.' Maximus has spent more than $2m lobbying the federal government since 2024, and said in an investor update that its objectives 'align' with the cost-cutting by billionaire Elon Musk's unofficial 'department of government efficiency' (Doge). 'Our teams are well prepared for this moment as the DOGE objectives align with many of our recent Maximus Forward initiatives,' the Maximus CEO Bruce Caswell told investors on the call, according to a transcript. He later added: 'A reduction in Medicaid recipients may not necessarily decrease consumer engagement, especially if eligibility verification or activity reporting requirements become more frequent than today. Additionally, in many of our largest states, we also manage state-based exchanges' – referring to individual insurance marketplaces colloquially called Obamacare exchanges – 'where customers can enroll if they no longer are eligible for Medicaid. This helps maintain our ongoing engagement with those consumers.' The senators also noted that in late 2022 and 2023, when states were going through a post-pandemic Medicaid 'determination' process – or reexamining whether beneficiaries were still eligible for the program – 'your company's stock price jumped almost 50% on the news'. 'With millions of dollars spent on lobbyists in Washington and around the nation, you have worked to enact the largest Medicaid cuts in the program's history – and ensure that your company and you personally will financially benefit,' Warren and Wyden wrote. A central tenet of Republican's plan to cut Medicaid is to force states to add more bureaucracy to the program, including 'work requirements' in the form of documentation from beneficiaries. The overwhelming majority of Medicaid beneficiaries either already work or would be eligible for exemptions to the requirement, but would be at-risk of losing insurance because of the added red tape. All those added documentation requirements need to be administered by states. Already, Warren and Wyden said, Republicans have set aside $100m in their proposed bill, the 'one big, beautiful bill'. However, they said that is likely an 'undercount' of what is necessary to administer the new programs, and that states would need hundreds of millions more dollars to implement new work requirements and changes to food assistance programs.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Left-wing activists like Greta Thunberg care more about fame than facts
This image will forever be compared with the horror show of the actual kidnap of hostages by Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups. There are girls younger than Greta, with bloodied pants, their Achilles tendons cut; a mother clutching her two red-haired children whom we now know are dead; a terrified old lady being abducted. It is said that the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) will force Thunberg and her crew to watch the brutal footage recorded on October 7. I doubt this will make much difference. In 2023, the IDF showed Hamas body cam footage collected after the Nova festival attack to the press in London. Most of the viewers were in tears but certain activist 'journalists' came out saying there was no proof of women being raped as they had not been shown that. Thunberg, like so many of her generation wrapped up in their made-in-China keffiyehs, are not interested in the specifics of this conflict. This is what happens when a young girl with a penchant for protest becomes too feted. She addressed national parliaments and Davos as a climate activist and was interviewed everywhere, so she must have grasped the fact that her youth and passion energised many. Unsurprisingly, then, her symbolic power was soon commodified as she appeared at protest after protest, morphing effortlessly from climate change activism to Palestinian solidarity. Political activism is now algorithmic. Hey, if you liked that cause, then try this one. The 'Left' these days often seems little more than a collection of disparate causes: eco stuff, trans rights and Free Palestine. The contradictions between these beliefs are underplayed as they become bundled together as an omnicause. I first heard that word used in 2023. The omnicause can incorporate everything from animal rights to emptying the jails. Forget the single issues that require specific, often boring campaigning: the omnicause is a moronic vacuum where analysis goes to die. It is a product partly of the horizontalisation of social media. By this, I mean that something such as Black Lives Matter and Defund the Police, which had relevance in America a few years ago, gets picked up here… even though we have a quite different population and methods of policing. Those protesting what is happening in Gaza are not all uninformed, but many are. Younger people recruited from Just Stop Oil (and now presenting as Youth Demand) have stopped soup-throwing in favour of this new pressing cause. But they have not talked about famine in Yemen or the atrocities of Sudan. Interconnectedness has its limits, after all. There may well be links between climate change and war. Many argue that drought was a factor in the unrest that led to the Syrian civil war. The omnicause, though, does not do specifics. It favours symbolic demonstrations that can go viral. These simplistic spectacles of righteousness often backfire. What did Fossil Free Books achieve, for instance? It decided to campaign against companies that had any connection to Israel. The result was that investment firms such as Baillie Gifford stopped funding book festivals. How this helped either the environment or indeed the Palestinian cause is something of a mystery. Thunberg's stunt has been similarly self-aggrandising and vacuous. Watching footage of this climate activist and her mates all chucking their expensive phones into the sea as they were about to be taken by the Israelis showed that, of course, when the chips were down, environmental concerns went out of the window. The omnicause does not require logic, consistency or even coherence. It is closer to acting than activism. It depends on melodrama and a narrative of provocative images. Thunberg may be brave and have been prepared to sacrifice herself – though for what, exactly, I am not sure. But now we have seen the pictures, I am afraid that what she has sacrificed has been her integrity. The omnicause burns itself out in the end because it has no actual strategy. It simply signifies tribal loyalty. It gobbles everything up and spits out its participants, who simply move on to the next 'wrong' thing. You might think that, for Thunberg, her ship has sailed. But that does not mean she won't clamber aboard the next one that hoves into view.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Battle Lines: Inside Hamas leader's secret Gaza tunnel
On today's episode, we confront the brutal realities of two of the world's most controversial flashpoints. First, our man on the ground, Jerusalem correspondent Henry Bodkin, joins Israeli troops in Gaza for a rare and eye-opening embed. He takes us inside the tunnel where Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar was allegedly hiding before an Israeli airstrike on May 13th — one that struck the entrance of the European Hospital, sparking outrage and headlines around the world. We cut through the noise and get straight to what really happened. We also discuss Hamas's so-called 'last man standing' — and what his survival means for the future of the conflict. Then, we turn to the pariah state of North Korea. Despite suffocating sanctions, Pyongyang is now in its strongest strategic position in decades, doubling its nuclear arsenal and quietly amassing the world's fourth largest military. How did that happen — and why isn't the West doing more about it? Our new Asia correspondent Allegra Mendelson explains all.
