Democratic senators call on private firm to reveal how it will profit from Trump's Medicaid cuts
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden sent the letter to Maximus, Inc on Monday. The company is the largest private contractor to states who seek to outsource their administration of government assistance, including health insurance and food aid.
'Maximus's long history of kicking Americans off of Medicaid to boost their profits should be a warning of what's to come if Republicans pass their 'big beautiful bill,'' Warren told the Guardian in an exclusive comment.
'We need to hold Maximus accountable for padding their bottom line by making Americans suffer.'
Maximus is a publicly traded company with a market capitalization of $3.9bn. It is the largest company in an industry that helps states privatize administrative obligations in programs that serve the poorest residents – a phenomenon one media outlet described as the 'welfare-to-work industrial complex'.
Warren and Wyden wrote that the company, 'has an abysmal track record, with reports of egregious backlogs and service delays and several reported instances of fraud'.
In states where it's hired, Maximus determines whether needy Americans qualify for a wide range of public assistance – from Medicaid to 'food stamps', formally called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) to 'welfare', or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), according to the letter.
Warren and Wyden's letter comes as congressional Republicans seek to add red tape to government-run health insurance programs, including proposed historic cuts to Medicaid, the public health insurance program that covers roughly 71 million Americans who are low-income, disabled and elderly.
In addition to Trump administration-led rule changes to other government health insurance programs, the non-partisan congressional budget office estimates Republican-led efforts could lead 16 million Americans to lose insurance by 2034.
In a statement, Maximus told the Guardian: 'The accusations contained in the letter Maximus received this morning are baseless. The truth is Maximus has been recognized for its high quality service connecting individuals with critical health coverage.'
'Maximus prides itself on being a conflict-free and accountable partner to government,' the statement continued. 'We do not set policy, rather we deliver on policies enacted by members of both political parties by developing and deploying technology to rapidly fix problems in legacy government systems and deliver the right services to the right people at the right time.'
Maximus has spent more than $2m lobbying the federal government since 2024, and said in an investor update that its objectives 'align' with the cost-cutting by billionaire Elon Musk's unofficial 'department of government efficiency' (Doge).
'Our teams are well prepared for this moment as the DOGE objectives align with many of our recent Maximus Forward initiatives,' the Maximus CEO Bruce Caswell told investors on the call, according to a transcript.
He later added: 'A reduction in Medicaid recipients may not necessarily decrease consumer engagement, especially if eligibility verification or activity reporting requirements become more frequent than today. Additionally, in many of our largest states, we also manage state-based exchanges' – referring to individual insurance marketplaces colloquially called Obamacare exchanges – 'where customers can enroll if they no longer are eligible for Medicaid. This helps maintain our ongoing engagement with those consumers.'
The senators also noted that in late 2022 and 2023, when states were going through a post-pandemic Medicaid 'determination' process – or reexamining whether beneficiaries were still eligible for the program – 'your company's stock price jumped almost 50% on the news'.
'With millions of dollars spent on lobbyists in Washington and around the nation, you have worked to enact the largest Medicaid cuts in the program's history – and ensure that your company and you personally will financially benefit,' Warren and Wyden wrote.
A central tenet of Republican's plan to cut Medicaid is to force states to add more bureaucracy to the program, including 'work requirements' in the form of documentation from beneficiaries. The overwhelming majority of Medicaid beneficiaries either already work or would be eligible for exemptions to the requirement, but would be at-risk of losing insurance because of the added red tape.
All those added documentation requirements need to be administered by states. Already, Warren and Wyden said, Republicans have set aside $100m in their proposed bill, the 'one big, beautiful bill'.
However, they said that is likely an 'undercount' of what is necessary to administer the new programs, and that states would need hundreds of millions more dollars to implement new work requirements and changes to food assistance programs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
23 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Claude Code Sub Agents : Build AI Automation Agents in Minutes Without Coding
What if managing complex workflows could feel as seamless as delegating tasks to a highly skilled team? Imagine a system where every task—whether it's analyzing data, reviewing code, or generating unit tests—is handled by a specialized expert, working independently yet harmoniously within a larger framework. That's the promise of Claude Code sub-agents. These task-oriented components are transforming how we approach workflow automation, offering a level of precision and efficiency that traditional systems often struggle to match. Whether you're a developer juggling multiple projects or a team leader striving for streamlined operations, sub-agents could be the fantastic option you didn't know you needed. Prompt Engineering takes you through the core mechanics and practical applications of sub-agents, equipping you with the tools to harness their full potential. You'll uncover how these autonomous units manage their own context windows, use customized system prompts, and execute tasks with laser focus—all while preserving the integrity of the main workflow. But their true power lies in their flexibility: from parallel task execution to tailored configurations, sub-agents can adapt to your unique needs. As you read on, you'll discover not just how to use sub-agents, but how to design them to transform your productivity. What could this level of precision and adaptability unlock for your projects? What Are Sub-Agents? Sub-agents are autonomous, task-oriented entities within Claude Code's multi-agent framework. Each sub-agent operates independently, using its own context window and customized system prompts to handle specific tasks without interfering with the main orchestrator. For example, one sub-agent might specialize in code review, another in unit test generation, and yet another in data analysis. This modular design ensures that tasks are executed with precision, reducing errors and improving overall efficiency. The architecture of sub-agents allows them to function as specialized units, each tailored to a particular purpose. This separation of responsibilities not only enhances performance but also simplifies the management of complex workflows by isolating tasks into distinct, manageable components. Key Benefits of Sub-Agents Sub-agents offer a range of advantages that can significantly enhance your productivity and streamline operations: Improved Context Management: By isolating tasks, sub-agents prevent interference with the main context, making sure clarity and focus for each operation. By isolating tasks, sub-agents prevent interference with the main context, making sure clarity and focus for each operation. Enhanced Tool Selection: Each sub-agent can be equipped with tools specifically designed for its purpose, improving accuracy and relevance in task execution. Each sub-agent can be equipped with tools specifically designed for its purpose, improving accuracy and relevance in task execution. Specialized Expertise: Sub-agents excel at their designated tasks due to their focused design, allowing higher-quality results. Sub-agents excel at their designated tasks due to their focused design, allowing higher-quality results. Reusability: Sub-agents can be reused across multiple projects or customized for specific users, offering flexibility and scalability. These benefits make sub-agents an invaluable resource for managing complex workflows, particularly in environments where precision and efficiency are critical. How to use Claude Code Sub‑Agents : Quick Guide Watch this video on YouTube. Gain further expertise in Claude Code by checking out these recommendations. How to Create Sub-Agents Creating sub-agents in Claude Code involves defining their configurations through structured markdown files. These files specify essential details such as the sub-agent's name, purpose, tools, and system prompts. Claude Code simplifies this process by providing built-in assistance for generating these configurations, making sure that even users with minimal experience can create sub-agents effectively. Sub-agents can be created at both the project level and the user level, allowing for tailored customization to meet specific needs. This flexibility enables you to design sub-agents that align closely with your operational requirements, whether you're working on a single project or managing multiple workflows. Using Sub-Agents Effectively Once configured, sub-agents can be invoked explicitly or automatically selected based on the task description. For instance, if a task involves generating unit tests, the system can route it to the appropriate sub-agent. The results are then returned to the main orchestrator, making sure that the primary context remains uncluttered and focused. Sub-agents also support advanced workflows, such as sequential task execution, where tasks are completed in a specific order, and parallel task execution, where multiple tasks are handled simultaneously. These capabilities enable efficient coordination of operations, making sub-agents a powerful tool for managing complex, multi-step processes. Practical Applications Sub-agents are highly versatile and can be applied to a wide range of use cases. Some common applications include: Code Review: A sub-agent can analyze code for errors, suggest improvements, and ensure compliance with best practices, saving time and reducing the risk of oversight. A sub-agent can analyze code for errors, suggest improvements, and ensure compliance with best practices, saving time and reducing the risk of oversight. Unit Test Generation: Another sub-agent can focus on creating and validating unit tests for specific modules, making sure robust and reliable software development. Another sub-agent can focus on creating and validating unit tests for specific modules, making sure robust and reliable software development. Data Analysis: Sub-agents equipped with data science tools can process and interpret datasets efficiently, providing actionable insights for decision-making. Customization is a key strength of sub-agents. You can define specific tools, instructions, and permissions to align with your project's unique requirements, making sure that each sub-agent is optimized for its intended purpose. Considerations for Optimal Use While sub-agents offer numerous benefits, their effective use requires careful planning and management. Overusing sub-agents or misconfiguring them can lead to excessive token consumption, which may impact system performance and increase costs. To mitigate these risks, consider the following strategies: Regularly monitor token usage to identify and address unnecessary resource consumption. Plan workflows strategically to ensure that sub-agents are only deployed when their specialized capabilities are genuinely needed. Configure sub-agents with clear and concise prompts to maximize their efficiency and minimize errors. By implementing these practices, you can optimize the performance and cost-effectiveness of your sub-agent workflows, making sure that they deliver maximum value without unnecessary overhead. Unlocking the Potential of Sub-Agents Claude Code sub-agents are powerful tools for managing complex workflows, preserving context, and enhancing task-specific operations. By isolating tasks into specialized instances, they enable greater flexibility, precision, and efficiency. Whether you're conducting code reviews, generating unit tests, or analyzing data, sub-agents can be tailored to meet your specific needs. With thoughtful planning, careful configuration, and regular monitoring, you can unlock the full potential of sub-agents, transforming them into an indispensable component of your workflow. By using their capabilities effectively, you can achieve greater productivity, reduce errors, and streamline operations, making sure success in even the most demanding environments. Media Credit: Prompt Engineering Filed Under: AI, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Texas's redistricting is a Republican power grab at the hands of Trump
When Texas Republicans redrew their congressional map this month at the urging of Donald Trump, they faced a difficult task. They needed to find a way to pick up five seats that the president wanted ahead of the midterm elections next year without spreading their voters too thin and jeopardizing the 25 seats they already held. Republicans unveiled their plan to pick up the seats on Wednesday, revealing a map that could dilute Hispanic voting power. Under the new proposed districts, they would be favored in five new seats, giving them a hold on 30 of Texas's 38 congressional districts. Had the district been in place for the 2024 election, Trump would have won all 30 by at least 10 points. Republicans accomplished their goal by shifting district boundaries in three different parts of the state. In south Texas, they shifted boundaries of congressional districts where Trump performed well in the 2024 elections, but are held by two Democrats, Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez. Trump won Cuellar's district by seven points and Gonzalez's districts by about four points in 2024. Had the proposed districts been in place in 2024, he would have won each by about 10 points. In central Texas, the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, and Houston, Republicans eliminated three separate Democratic congressional districts with a similar approach. They packed Democratic voters into one or two districts and then attached the rest to newly drawn, heavily Republican areas. It's an aggressive approach that gives Republicans a shot at picking up five seats, but doesn't necessarily guarantee they will get all five. Analysts believe that Cuellar – who faces federal bribery charges – and Gonzalez, are established enough incumbents that they could win in the new configurations of their districts. 'They didn't make the newly targeted, or the new seats targeted for pickups, as red as they could have,' said David Wasserman, a well-respected analyst at the Cook Political Report. 'Had Republicans drawn an uglier map, they could have basically guaranteed themselves five [seats].' Here are the results of the 2024 presidential race in south-central Texas. The circles represent results by precinct – the bigger the circle, the bigger the margin of victory for either Democrats or Republicans. Here are two of the congressional seats Democrats hold in the area. Kamala Harris easily carried both of them in November. Republicans' new map packs Democrats into district 37 in Austin and another heavily Democratic district in San Antonio. It cracks the remaining Democrats in San Antonio into new GOP-friendly district 35 that Donald Trump would have won in November by 12 points. Democrats hold three congressional districts in Dallas Fort Worth, here are two of them. The proposed map packs Democratic voters into district 33 and another heavily Democratic district in Dallas. The remaining democrats are cracked into rural far-flung district 32 that Trump would have won by nearly 18 pts. Guardian graphic. Sources: Redistricting Data Hub, Texas Legislative Council. Republicans are redrawing the map amid a four-year legal battle over the districts that are already in place. That suit, filed by a coalition of Latino voting organizations, advocacy groups and voters, argues that Texas's current congressional map diminishes the influence of non-white voters, who accounted for 95% of the state's population growth. 'The current map is already egregiously gerrymandered,' said Marina Jenkins, the executive director of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which opposes the redraw in Texas. 'The proposed new gerrymander, and even more extreme gerrymander, adds even more insult to that injury, Black voters and Latino voters will have even less opportunity to have their political will considered on an equal basis.' The new map replaces several districts where Hispanic and other non-white voters had been electing Democrats with majority-Hispanic districts that favor Republicans. It would increase the number of districts where white people comprise a majority from 22 to 24, according to an analysis by the Texas Tribune. It would also create an additional Hispanic-majority district, and two new Black-majority districts. 'The gambit by Republicans here is to actually increase the number of Hispanic majority districts in terms of population share, but to diminish the opportunities of Hispanic voters to elect their candidates of choice,' Wasserman said. 'Because there are a number of Hispanic majority districts where Democratic-leaning Hispanic voters will be outnumbered by a coalition of conservative Hispanic voters and white voters.' Simply adding additional majority-Hispanic districts isn't enough to evade scrutiny under the Voting Rights Act, said Thomas A Saenz, the president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing plaintiffs challenging the existing maps. If certain conditions are met, the Voting Rights Act requires states to draw districts that give minority groups the chance to elect their preferred candidates. 'When a line drawer draws majority Latino district but in such a way that it knows will not actually elect the candidates of choice of the Latino community that may be a violation of the Voting Rights Act,' he said, speaking generally about the map. 'You can do that by picking areas with large Latino voting population but that historically has a lower voter turnout right others with large Latino population.' 'Pointing to the number of quote unquote majority Latino district does not remotely answer the question of whether you have violated the Voting Rights Act.'
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Furious baseball star claims 'no one wants to stay' at Twins after stunning fire-sale at MLB trade deadline
The Minnesota Twins appear to be facing a full-scale mutiny after a fire-sale of players before the MLB trade deadline. Minnesota has over recent days traded star shortstop Carlos Correa to the Houston Astros, closer Jhoan Duran and outfielder Harrison Bader (both to the Phillies), relievers Brock Stewart (Dodgers) and Danny Coulombe (Rangers) and starting pitcher Chris Paddack (Tigers). The exodus has sparked fury in the clubhouse, with one player telling The Athletic: 'No no one wants to stay if they are selling like this' Soon after that comment emerged, reports surfaced that Minnesota had traded Willi Castro to the Chicago Cubs. And then right at the 6pm deadline, pitcher Griffin Jax was sent to the Rays. In total, the Twins traded 11 players in the past week - including eight on deadline day. It comes amid reports that the team could soon be sold. According to Front Office Sports, there is 'momentum' towards the franchise being sold by the Pohlad family, who reportedly set a $1.7billion asking price. The Twins currently sit fourth in the American League Central with a record of 51-57. They are currently seven games off the Seattle Mariners who currently hold the final wild card spot. Correa waved a no-trade clause in his contract in order to seal a shock return to the Astros on Thursday. He was named Rookie of the Year and a two-time All-Star during his previous stint in Houston. 'I had some conversations with the front office in Minnesota, and we were not moving (in the direction) I thought we were after making the playoffs (in 2023),' Correa said on Thursday. 'They agreed with me that it was time to move me. I let them know there was only one team I would allow that to happen.' The Twins, who have been up for sale since last October, agreed to take on just $33million of the $104m still owed to Correa through 2028.
