Trump hasn't ruled out meeting with Zelenskyy and Putin
White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt has confirmed that US President Donald Trump has not ruled out taking part in a potential meeting between the leaders of Ukraine and Russia to end Russia's war of aggression.
Source: Karoline Leavitt during a press briefing at the White House on Monday, as reported by European Pravda
Details: Leavitt recalled Trump saying that he is "open to" participating in a meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin "if it comes to that".
"But he wants both leaders and both sides to come to the table. And we saw them do that today at President Trump's request," Leavitt added.
The White House spokeswoman repeated that the US administration is in favour of ending the war as soon as possible.
"Too many people have died. And the president wants this war to end at the negotiating table. And he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately," Leavitt said.
Background:
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said on Monday 2 June that the Turkish side hopes to organise a meeting between US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian ruler Vladimir Putin in Istanbul or Ankara.
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan had previously put forward the idea of a meeting between the leaders of Türkiye, the US, Russia and Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday that he supports Erdoğan's idea of holding a meeting between the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, US and Türkiye.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
12 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Ukraine's game-changing drone attack is a wake-up call for vulnerable US airbases, particularly in the Pacific
Ukraine's shocking drone attack on the Russian bomber fleet and other strategic aircraft shows just how vulnerable US bases and planes, especially those in the Pacific, could be to a similar kind of attack by an adversary. The need to harden American airbases to protect US airpower assets has been an important topic of discussion for years now, particularly amid China's military rise and the significant expansion of its ballistic missile arsenal, but Ukraine's attack on Russia has reignited this discussion and fueled others. Operation Spiderweb saw Ukraine sneak more than one hundred drones into Russian territory and launch them near key airbases. The Ukrainians say they struck 41 Russian aircraft, including an unspecified number of strategic bombers. Ukraine says the damage it inflicted could exceed $7 billion. The operation was very unusual, raising key questions. US military leaders took note. For instance, Secretary of the Navy John Phelan and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George observed this week that the attack indicated the need to adapt to the quickening speed of warfare. Spiderweb, Phelan said at an artificial intelligence defense conference this week, "was pretty prolific." The operation, George noted at the same event, showed that the US needed to be more agile and think further about acquiring more counter-drone systems. George also said the attack was another example of Ukraine's asymmetric advantage that's been demonstrated throughout the war, using relatively cheap drones to destroy expensive, exquisite Russian air power. It's something the US needs to be thinking about, too, he said. Military leaders and defense experts have long recognized the growing threats to US airbases and American airpower, particularly in the western Pacific, and the need to harden defenses there to prevent a strike from an adversary like China from taking out bombers and fighters before they get off the ground. But Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb, Tom Shugart, an adjunct senior fellow with the defense program at the Center for a New American Security, told Business Insider, "should be a wake-up call at the senior policymaker level and congressional level to pay attention. There is no sanctuary anymore." US airfield expansion and fortification efforts have been limited in recent years, troublingly so in the Pacific. Facilities are seriously lacking in passive defenses, like hardened aircraft shelters and sufficiently dispersed forces. The issue is especially glaring compared to China's consistent work over the past decade on building shelters to hide aircraft, adding runways, and increasing ramp areas. In a Hudson Institute report earlier this year, Shugart and Tim Walton, a senior fellow at Hudson's Center for Defense Concepts and Technology, said that this has created an imbalance. Should the US and China go to war, the latter would need fewer shots to suppress or destroy airfields used by the US and its allies and partners. China would have more capacity for sustaining its air operations. Shugart and Walton also said the rise of foreign drones flying over military bases demonstrated a need for the Pentagon to harden its airfields, especially key ones that house bombers. Ukraine's attack on Russia is expected to ignite important conversations about anti-drone defenses at bases, Mark Cancian, a senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told BI. The focus has been on missiles, but drones come with a different set of problems. To protect against drones, it isn't enough to fortify shelters. "You have to be careful about any openings," Cancian said, explaining that "you can't have a roof and then an open front because they'll just fly in." One solution he said may start to appear is a mesh structure or curtain for those openings. Ukraine's recent strike on Russian airpower could be just a glimpse of what such a future attack could look like, experts said. Sunday's attack, Walton told BI, "was in the form of quadcopters; in the future, it could be similar drones but with even greater autonomy, small, low-cost cruise missiles, or other weapons." The list of potential targets could grow, too. Spiderweb demonstrated something that military experts and planners have long understood: aircraft are vulnerable on the ground, and striking them before they can take off can severely limit a military's air power capabilities. But future strikes could be on ships in the accessible littorals, ground stations, air and missile defense sites, and so on. The lessons from this strike for the US Department of Defense, experts said, include understanding how an adversary could pull off a similar attack. Tim Robinson, a military aviation specialist at the UK'S Royal Aeronautical Society, said that in light of the attack, the West will have not only need to consider hardening their bases but also potentially build "more of them than you have aircraft" to either confuse the enemy or fill with decoys. As Congress meets with military leaders this week, and service budgets are determined, "members should ask how are US bases and other critical facilities defended against these threats today; how much funding is required to appropriate passive and active defenses; and how much of that funding is included in the fiscal year 2026 president's budget proposal," Walton said. There are also questions around whether Golden Dome, the Trump administration's plan to fulfill a Reagan-era vision for a major missile and air defense network, will incorporate any lessons from this attack. Some industry figures have said that the project, while it is primarily about missiles, can't overlook the drone threat. US military leaders are saying the same. Robinson said that "if you're an air force chief and you are not lying awake at night thinking about how to protect" yourself, then "you're going to lose the next war."
USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
Putin tells Pope Leo XIV that Ukraine is bent on escalating conflict
Putin tells Pope Leo XIV that Ukraine is bent on escalating conflict A Kremlin statement said President Vladimir Putin and Pope Leo XIV spoke by phone but did not give a date Show Caption Hide Caption JD Vance gives Pope Leo a special American gift Pope Leo XIV was given a Bears jersey by Vice President JD Vance at their first official meeting. MOSCOW, June 4 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin thanked Pope Leo for offering to help settle the Ukraine conflict and told him Kyiv is intent on "escalating" the war, the Kremlin said on Wednesday. A Kremlin statement said they spoke by phone but did not give a date. President Donald Trump has said the pope offered to host Russia-Ukraine negotiations at the Vatican. "Gratitude was expressed to the Pontiff for his readiness to help settle the crisis, in particular the Vatican's participation in resolving difficult humanitarian issues on a depoliticised basis," the statement said. Putin highlighted "that the Kyiv regime is banking on escalating the conflict and is carrying out sabotage against civilian infrastructure sites on Russian territory," the statement said, describing those acts as terrorism. The Kremlin restated that the conflict's "root causes" must be addressed, a reference to Russian demands that Ukraine adopt a neutral status and NATO rule out eastward expansion. Russia has sought to cultivate good ties with the new pope and his predecessor, Francis, especially on humanitarian issues, like family reunifications. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and other officials have said the Vatican is not a suitable site for peace talks between two largely Orthodox Christian countries. The Kremlin noted progress at direct talks this week with Ukrainian negotiators on exchanging prisoners and returning the remains of servicemen. The Russian statement expressed hope the Vatican would "take a more active role" in calling for freedom of religion in Ukraine for members of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church that has historic links to Russia. Ukrainian authorities have launched criminal proceedings against many of its clergy because of suspected sympathies for Moscow. A Kyiv-based Ukrainian Orthodox Church has grown larger in Ukraine during the war.
Politico
16 minutes ago
- Politico
‘Wake-up call': Ukraine drone strike exposes dangers to US aircraft
Ukraine's stunning drone strikes on Russian airfields are intensifying calls from military leaders and lawmakers in both parties to address gaping vulnerabilities in U.S. air bases. Kyiv this week launched more than 100 drones inside Russia using artificial intelligence, a daring move that eviscerated five military bases and damaged more than 40 aircraft. Footage of Russian bombers and fighters erupting in flames while parked on open tarmacs rippled across the internet — and Washington. While it was a significant blow struck by a U.S. ally, the attacks also laid bare how easily and cheaply uncrewed systems can cripple sophisticated air forces. Officials' concerns are particularly acute in the Pacific, where the U.S. is seeking to beef up its presence. Ukraine's success underscored how swiftly an adversary can destroy airpower with drones. 'It has to make you much more aware of how vulnerable we as a nation are,' said Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), chair of the Appropriations subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, said in an interview. 'The Ukrainians defeated the Russian navy without owning any ships, and now they've decimated their air force with virtually no air force of their own.' Lawmakers and military officials say U.S. aircraft are particularly vulnerable since they sit out in the open without protective cover. The strike could force a reassessment of the American military's defensive posture and spending priorities, including whether to invest in more counter-drone technologies, hardened aircraft shelters or camouflage. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin called the Ukrainian offensive a 'wake-up moment' and suggested it would impact defense budget conversations unfolding in Washington. 'Seemingly impenetrable locations, maybe, are not,' he said Tuesday at a Center for a New American Security event, noting the damage of $7 billion was eyebrow-raising. 'We need to pay more attention to that.' The Air Force, in a statement, said its forces 'maintain a high state of readiness to defend against a range of threats,' including swarms of drones. The service is also developing capabilities to ward against future threats, the statement said, and investing in 'layered air and missile defense technologies, early warning systems, and rapid response protocols designed to detect, track and neutralize airborne threats.' President Donald Trump is aware of the military's vulnerabilities and taking steps to fix them, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday during a press conference. Plans for a massive Golden Dome missile shield were launched with this kind of threat in mind, she said. Trump 'has a full understanding … about the future of warfare and how drones are a big part of that.' That is one of the reasons Trump 'wants the one big beautiful bill to be passed,' Leavitt said, referring to Republicans' tax and spending package that would pump $150 billion into Pentagon coffers. The issue could reverberate through Congress' consideration of that megabill. Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) noted the bill includes more money for counter-drone defenses as demand for those capabilities skyrockets. The military has considered the threat drones present to grounded aircraft long before the Ukrainian attack, he said. But the episode could focus public attention on concerns posed by cheap uncrewed technology. 'There's no doubt that we have a myriad of aircraft …. stored in facilities, really, that are designed to protect them from the weather and are not resistant to explosives like the ones the Ukrainians used,' Wicker said Wednesday during a Defense Writers Group event with reporters. 'It should be a wake-up call to the public. I'm not sure that it is much of a surprise to our military strategists.' The alarm is especially high in the Pacific, where U.S. bases sit within range of China's growing missile arsenal. A Hudson Institute report by Thomas Shugart and Timothy Walton found that China has built more than 400 hardened aircraft shelters — protective concrete bunkers designed to shield warplanes from missile and drone attacks — over the past decade. The U.S. has added just 22 in the region. 'Large numbers of American bombers sit open on the tarmac, just like the ones we saw in those videos,' Shugart, a former Navy officer, said.'There needs to be more robust measures than appear to be happening at this time.' The worry is crossing partisan lines. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), the top Democrat on the Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee, said the drone attack shows Ukraine is 'really in this fight' and validates a 'pressing concern' that the U.S. doesn't have enough counter-drone capabilities at home and overseas. 'I have been raising this and pressing this in every meeting with every senior military leader, how to speed up procurement, speed up deployment,' Coons said in an interview. 'This makes it clear that we face genuine risks from sophisticated drone attacks almost everywhere in the world.' The attack is receiving particular attention in Virginia, a state with a heavy military presence. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the strikes a 'case study in battlefield innovation' that should prompt a reevaluation of the safety of U.S. bases. 'We have to do an awful lot to protect our infrastructure at home,' he said. 'I don't think we've figured out all the policies we need or the resources to implement them.' Fellow Virginian and the Senate Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner, said a national security professional sent him satellite images of American bases after the Ukraine attack with U.S. military aircraft sitting exposed. 'The Ukrainians are redefining warfare,' he said. 'We have to learn from this.' Jack Detsch contributed to this report.
