US Envoy Calls Hamas Answer to Truce Proposal ‘Unacceptable'
Hamas said it submitted a response to the US proposal for a truce in Gaza, but Trump administration envoy Steve Witkoff quickly dismissed it as 'totally unacceptable.'
'Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward,' Witkoff said Saturday in a post on X. He added that further talks on a truce 'can begin immediately this coming week.'
The key differences between the US proposal and Hamas's response appeared to be the duration of any truce and the extent to which Israeli forces withdraw.
Hamas responded earlier in the day to the US proposal with changes that aimed 'to achieve a permanent ceasefire, a comprehensive withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and ensure the flow of aid to our people and our families in the Strip.'
As part of the agreement, Hamas said in a statement it would release 10 living Israeli prisoners and return 18 bodies, in exchange for an agreed-upon number of Palestinian prisoners, according to the statement. The group didn't specify whether it was accepting or rejecting the proposal.
Israel had earlier accepted the US ceasefire proposal for Gaza, which Witkoff said on social media involved a 60-day ceasefire and the release of half the living hostages and half of the dead ones. Israeli officials familiar with the matter said the proposal would also restore United Nations-led aid distribution to the Palestinian territory.
Hamas, which is designated a terrorist organization by the US, European Union and many other countries, is seeking amendments to some points, including the timing of the hostage release, delivery of aid and withdrawal of Israeli forces, the Associated Press reported, citing an unidentified official.
An earlier ceasefire ended in mid-March and talks over a new truce have stalled as Hamas has insisted on a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, while the Israeli government wants the group to disarm and disband.
International pressure to halt the protracted war has grown as the humanitarian crisis worsened in Gaza. Relief agencies say more than 2 million civilians in the ruined coastal enclave have been brought to the brink of famine by Israel's 11-week blockade. While food deliveries resumed this week under the auspices of a Swiss-based nonprofit Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the rollout has been dogged by delays and chaos.
While it's unclear whether Israel will accept any new conditions or amendments to the US proposal, at least some members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government expressed optimism over the prospects for a truce.
Speaking to Channel 12 TV on Saturday following reports of the Hamas response, Israeli Energy Minister Eli Cohen, a member of Netanyahu's security cabinet, said: 'I assess that time is not on the side of Hamas, and therefore that it will ultimately agree to the Witkoff proposal.'
With assistance from Dan Williams.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
UN, Iran and Egypt meet in Cairo to discuss Iran's nuclear program
Iranian, Egyptian and UN leaders met in Cairo on Monday to discuss Iran's nuclear program after a report from the UN nuclear watchdog agency said Iran is further increasing its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels. Rafael Mariano Grossi, the head of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, said the agency compiled the report because Iranian's uranium enrichment was an ongoing concern to the IAEA's board of governors. 'We hope that by providing the clarification we will be providing an incentive for clarity, an incentive for a peaceful solution and a diplomatic solution,' Grossi said in Cairo. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, though it was unclear if Araghchi would meet directly with Grossi. The two spoke by phone early Sunday. Araghchi wrote on the messaging app Telegram that he stressed Iran's 'continuous cooperation' when he spoke with confidential IAEA report, which was seen by The Associated Press on Saturday, raised a stern warning, saying Iran is now 'the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce such material,' something the agency said was of 'serious concern.' Iranian leadership believes the IAEA report is politically motivated by Grossi's hopes to become the UN secretary general. Grossi is attempting to attract votes of several members of the UN Security Council with the report, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, Mohammad Eslami, told the official IRNA news agency late Sunday. 'He basically has chosen a political attitude, and this political attitude has led the environment to be more political rather that technical,' Eslami said. Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi, who is mediating the US-Iran talks, visited Tehran on Saturday to present the latest US proposal for ongoing talks. Araghchi wrote on Telegram that Iran is examining the proposal and crafting a response. The US-Iran talks are an attempt to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for lifting of some of the crushing economic sanctions the US has imposed on the Islamic Republic, which have strained relations for almost 50 years. The fifth round of talks between the US and Iran concluded in Rome last week with 'some but not conclusive progress,' al-Busaidi said at the time. Iran's deputy foreign minister published a detailed response Sunday, which rejected many of the report's findings. Kazem Gharibabadi noted that out of the IAEA's 682 inspections of 32 states, 493 were carried out in Iran alone. 'So long as a country's nuclear activities are under the IAEA's monitoring, there is no cause for concern,' he said. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is neither pursuing nuclear weapons nor does it possess any undeclared nuclear materials or activities.' The IAEA report said Iran as of May 17 had amassed 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. That is an increase of almost 50% since the IAEA'
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian billionaire Gautam Adani comes under new scrutiny from US prosecutors
Gautam Adani, Asia's second-richest man, is trying to get the Trump administration to drop foreign bribery charges against him. Instead, he is facing a new front in his fight with prosecutors: a probe into whether his companies are buying Iranian petrochemical products. U.S. prosecutors are investigating whether Adani's companies imported Iranian liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG, into India through the company's Mundra port. A Wall Street Journal investigation into tankers that regularly traveled between Mundra and the Persian Gulf found their behavior often exhibited traits seen by ships seeking to evade sanctions. 'Adani categorically denies any deliberate engagement in sanctions evasion or trade involving Iranian-origin LPG," a company spokesman said in a statement. 'Further, we are not aware of any investigation by U.S. authorities on this subject." The expanding scrutiny by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Brooklyn could prove problematic for Adani's rehabilitation effort. President Trump is rolling back enforcement of longstanding laws punishing overseas bribery, but has also taken aim at purchasers of Iranian oil and gas products. 'Any Country or person who buys ANY AMOUNT of OIL or PETROCHEMICALS from Iran will be subject to, immediately, Secondary Sanctions," Trump wrote on social-media platform Truth Social last month. 'They will not be allowed to do business with the United States of America in any way, shape, or form." Adani is a close ally of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and sits atop a group of infrastructure companies bearing his name that has been integral to India's recent economic growth. The public companies have a valuation around $150 billion, yielding Adani and his family one of the world's largest fortunes. In January 2023, short-selling firm Hindenburg Research published a 33,000-word report alleging the Adani Group had violated Indian securities laws by having Adani family members secretly control swaths of shares through offshore vehicles. The companies' stocks plunged but have recovered some of their losses. In November, the group faced a new headwind when U.S. prosecutors charged Adani with fraud, alleging he orchestrated roughly $250 million in bribes to Indian officials to secure lucrative solar-power supply contracts in India. Adani Group called the short seller's report 'nothing but a lie," and the government allegations against it 'baseless." Adani has hired high-powered legal firms Kirkland & Ellis and Quinn Emanuel, according to lobbying disclosures. Adani's lawyers also met with prosecutors in March in hopes of having the case dropped, according to people familiar with the matter. Six Republican members of Congress have publicly argued Adani's indictment is at odds with Trump's foreign-policy priorities, including a strong trading relationship with India. Trump also issued an executive order 'pausing" prosecutions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. While the case grew out of an FCPA investigation, Adani was charged with conspiracy and securities fraud over alleged bribes, not with violating the act itself. Prosecutors are reviewing the activities of several LPG tankers used to ship cargoes to Adani Enterprises, the people said. The Adani spokesman said that importing LPG has been a small but growing part of the company's business, contributing 1.46% of its $11.7 billion in revenue last fiscal year. A Journal investigation into a group of LPG tankers making journeys between the Adani-run Mundra port and the Persian Gulf since early 2024 found they showcase signs that ship trackers say are typically evidence of ships attempting to obscure their activities. A common tactic includes manipulating the ship's automatic identification system, or AIS, which shares a ship's position, according to Tomer Raanan, a maritime risk analyst at Lloyd's List Intelligence who tracks LPG tankers. One journey in April of last year undertaken by a ship that carried an LPG cargo for Adani, the Panamanian-flagged SMS Bros, demonstrates some of the patterns. The ship was docked at Khor al Zubair in southern Iraq on April 3, 2024, according to its AIS, which the Journal analyzed using Lloyd's List's Seasearcher platform. Satellite images from April 3 don't show the SMS Bros at its reported berth in Iraq. But a satellite did capture images of a ship matching the SMS Bros's characteristics and length docked roughly 315 miles to the southeast at an LPG terminal in Tonbuk, Iran. The ship docked in Tonbuk was the SMS Bros, according to Samir Madani, whose service has indexed more than 9,000 ships from satellite imagery. By April 7, the SMS Bros's AIS data showed it off the coast of the United Arab Emirates. Its data was adjusted at that time to show it riding lower in the water, which would indicate it had taken on cargo. Its AIS data shows that it departed the night of April 8, heading south, and by the following day anchored offshore near Sohar, Oman. On April 10, documents purport that Adani Global PTE contracted the ship to load roughly 11,250 metric tons of LPG at Sohar and ship it to Mundra in India. The ship never appears to have docked in Sohar's port, according to the Journal's analysis of AIS data. From there, the SMS Bros sailed to Mundra, where customs records reviewed by the Journal show that on April 17, Adani Enterprises imported a load matching the cargo described in the shipping documents with a declared value just over $7 million. Purchasers of Iranian oil and gas products often use forged documents from Oman and Iraq, according to several people familiar with the trade. The Adani spokesman said the SMS Bros shipment was handled through a third-party logistics company and documentation identifies the shipment as originating from Sohar. Adani companies check the vessels they contract for red flags but don't own, operate or track vessels and can't comment on the activity of vessels they don't control, he added. 'Whatever the duties of and responsibilities of a bona fide importer are, we have fulfilled those," the spokesman said. The SMS Bros, which changed its name to the Neel last year, has shown other discrepancies. A Bangladeshi port record from last June shows the SMS Bros as importing a load of LPG originating in Iran for an unknown importer, yet its AIS data reports making the same journey to Iraq that it did in April. At several other points over the past year, satellite images don't show the SMS Bros at its reported AIS position, according to Bjorn Bergman, a data analyst who tracks AIS spoofing at the nonprofits Global Fishing Watch and SkyTruth. Three other LPG tankers show some elements of obfuscation while making runs between Adani's Mundra port and the Persian Gulf, according to the Journal's review of their data. One tanker operated by the same company that managed the SMS Bros showed similar signs of spoofing its AIS. That ship was also named on a list of tankers suspected of shipping Iranian oil and gas by a bipartisan group of U.S. senators. The company operating the ships, as well as the captain of the SMS Bros on its April 2024 journey, didn't respond to requests for comment. A third ship appears to have used similar tactics around its trips to Mundra, broadcasting via AIS a stop in Khor al Zubair that can't be seen on simultaneous satellite images of the port. A fourth tanker in the group often making deliveries to Mundra was listed in a 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Department as being involved in the export of Iranian petroleum products. In May, the Journal found that ship was reporting its position on the railroad tracks of the port in Khor al Zubair. Write to Ben Foldy at and Dave Michaels at
NDTV
35 minutes ago
- NDTV
"So Difficult To Be Patriotic?" Salman Khurshid's Stinger Dig At Opposition
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Congress leader Salman Khurshid defended opposition MPs joining anti-terrorism missions despite internal party criticism. He emphasized patriotism over political allegiance, highlighting India's global role and the need for unity against terrorism. New Delhi: Congress leader Salman Khurshid - a member of a cross-party delegation travelling to partner nations as part of an outreach after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor - has slammed critics, including those from his party, questioning opposition MPs' participation in these missions. "When on a mission against terrorism, to carry India's message to the world, it is distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances... is it so difficult to be patriotic?" he asked on X. The sharp remark follows praise days earlier for the BJP-led federal government's August 2019 decision to scrap Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. Mr Khurshid told Indonesia think tanks abrogation of a law that "gave the impression Kashmir was separate" from India resulted in prosperity for J&K. Mr Khurshid is part of a delegation led by Janata Dal (United) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha that has visited South Korea, Singapore, Japan, and Indonesia, and is presently in Malaysia. When on mission against terrorism, to carry India's message to the world, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic? — Salman Khurshid (@salman7khurshid) June 2, 2025 Speaking to reporters in Kuala Lumpur, he explained his X post was meant to call out people who "are not very encouraging when you want to do something for the nation". "People keep saying, 'what are you doing in a delegation where there are people from the BJP'. What we are doing is what is needed for the country. No matter which party you are from, today what is needed is a single voice to speak for the nation... the question is to be asked of those saying these things I believe are not very encouraging when you want to do something for the nation." "People are also saying 'he (referring to himself) is supporting so-and-so and is not supporting so-and-so'. But if I wanted to oppose the government I would stay at home. I have come to speak for India... whoever speaks for India, and in whichever way they speak, we are here to support them." #WATCH | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Member of all-party delegation led by JD(U) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha, Congress leader Salman Khurshid says, "...People are saying, he (Salman Khurshid) is supporting so and so and he is not supporting so and so; they are supporting Government etc. Have… — ANI (@ANI) June 2, 2025 "... we are here for India first... India and only India," Mr Khurshid told news agency ANI. Although the Congress has publicly said it will back the government in any attempts to combat the spectre of terrorism, home and abroad, the party is believed to be unhappy over its key figures - five, including Mr Khurshid, Shashi Tharoor, and Anand Sharma - becoming de facto BJP spokespersons. A former External Affairs Minister, he said in Malaysia that India had a key global role today and that it is not 'greedy' for Pakistan territory, which was a clear swipe over Pak's illegal occupation of Kashmir. READ | "Not Greedy For Pakistan, Their Region": Salman Khurshid On Op Sindoor Salman Khurshid's responses on 'political allegiances' comes amid criticism of opposition MPs on these anti-terrorism delegations, particularly the Congress' Shashi Tharoor, who faces rumours about his party future. Mr Tharoor is leading a team to the United States, Brazil, and other nations. Those jabbing Mr Tharoor include senior Congress leaders, including party comms boss Jairam Ramesh and spokesperson Pawan Khera, who have called out what they think is the former diplomat's unnecessary praise for the ruling BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. READ | Asked about those jabs, Mr Tharoor too said he is more focused on conveying India's message on terrorism, and said he would only speak to his colleagues once he returns. The seven anti-terrorism delegations are meant to carry India's revised doctrine on terrorism after Pahalgam - an attack in which a Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba killed 26 people. India responded to that attack with precision military strikes targeting only terror camps - four in Pak and five in Pak-occupied Kashmir - but Islamabad (and Rawalpindi, the Pak Army HQ) retaliated by launching drones and missiles at military and civilian centres in western India. The missiles and drones were neutralised or shot down by India's air defences and, after 100 hours of military conflict, Pak sought a ceasefire. India accepted the ceasefire request but warned Pak against resuming hostilities, and said it would no longer tolerate cross-border attacks. Pak was also told to desist from funding terrorist strikes, and dismantle terrorist infrastructure in that country, and also vacate illegally occupied regions in Kashmir.
