German court to rule on Peruvian farmer versus RWE climate case
Peruvian farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya, who is suing German energy utility RWE, arguing that the company's emissions have contributed to the melting of Andean glaciers, poses for a photo in front of Lake Palcacocha, before the verdict of the high regional German court in Hamm, in Huaraz, Peru May 27, 2025. REUTERS/Angela Ponce
(Reuters) -A German court is due to decide on Wednesday whether a lawsuit brought by a Peruvian farmer against German energy giant RWE can continue, in a landmark case that is setting a precedent for future climate change litigation.
In a case that began a decade ago, farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya argues that RWE's emissions have contributed to the melting of Andean glaciers, increasing the flood risk to his home.
Using data from the Carbon Majors database, which tracks historic emissions from major fossil fuel producers, Lliuya says RWE is responsible for nearly 0.5% of global man-made emissions since the industrial revolution and must pay a proportional share of the costs needed to adapt to climate change.
For a $3.5 million flood defence project needed in his region, RWE's share would be around $17,500, according to Lliuya's calculations.
The 44-year-old farmer, whose family grows corn, wheat, barley and potatoes in a hilly region outside Huaraz, says he has chosen to sue RWE because it is one of the biggest polluters in Europe - rather than any particular company projects near his home.
RWE, which is phasing out its coal-fired power plants, says a single emitter of carbon dioxide cannot be held responsible for global warming.
In two days of hearing in March, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm examined a 200-page report by experts it had appointed to determine whether melting glaciers were raising the water levels in Lake Palcacocha and posing a direct risk to Lliuya's home in Huaraz over the next three decades.
Lliuya's lawyer Roda Verheyen in March raised concerns about the assessment of risks by the court experts, who found a 3% flood risk, and said she was ready to challenge their findings.
The verdict was originally due in April, but the court had to postpone it because Verheyen filed a motion to disqualify one of the court's experts.
Verheyen said the arguments were clear.
"In my view, we cannot lose," she told a media briefing last Thursday.
The amount that industrialised countries should contribute to mitigating the effects of global warming, including rising sea levels, extreme storms and heatwaves, has been fiercely debated at successive U.N. climate summits.
If the court on Wednesday finds a specific flooding risk to Lliuya's home, it will then examine the impact of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions on Andean glaciers melting and increasing the risk.
Whatever the outcome on Wednesday, climate academics said the case was a game-changer as the court's legal reasoning would be used by future cases.
"Even if the case is dismissed, we expect to get this legal precedent, which would be a massive step forward," Noah Walker-Crawford, a researcher at London School of Economics Grantham Research Institute, said.
($1 = 0.8809 euros)
(Reporting by Riham Alkousaa; editing by Barbara Lewis)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
29 minutes ago
- The Star
Air India CEO says Pakistan airspace ban adding to flying costs
FILE PHOTO: A general view of the new livery of the Air India Airbus A350 aeroplane, displayed at Wings India 2024 aviation event at Begumpet airport, Hyderabad, India, January 18, 2024. - Reuters NEW DELHI: The continuing ban for Indian airlines in using Pakistani airspace is adding flying hours for non-stop flights and will weigh down Air India Ltd.'s path to profitability, its top executive said in an interview. "The impact is significant but we have been able to sustain non-stop operations' to most destinations in North America and Europe, Air India Chief Executive Officer Campbell Wilson said in a Bloomberg TV interview Monday (June 2). "It'll certainly hit our bottomline.' The airspace curbs have increased flying time for west-bound flights from India by an hour or so, according to Wilson, who declined to give details on the discussions the Tata Group-owned carrier was having with stakeholders on this front. The armed conflict between India and Pakistan that erupted May 7 was the worst between the nuclear-armed neighbours in decades, with both sides trading drone and missile strikes besides artillery and small arms fire along their shared border. It was triggered by a gruesome attack on civilians in Indian-controlled Kashmir on April 22. While a ceasefire was announced on May 10, Pakistan has extended the airspace ban for Indian airlines until June 24. Geopolitical strife has been complicating flying routes and business models for airlines globally in the past few years as they skirt conflict zones. Tariffs are also now a closely watched development for the sector. "We want certainty. Uncertainty is difficult when you are making investment decisions,' Wilson said, adding that this was a common theme at the ongoing aviation industry event in New Delhi. So far, Air India sees no impact of tariffs on travel flows for its geography and markets. The recent showdown between the US President Donald Trump and Harvard University has added another layer of complication for international fliers especially those looking to study in American institutions. Pointing to anecdotal stories, Wilson said that there seems to be some shift in the large student population from India that usually vies to be on US campuses. "You hear people thinking of alternatives,' he said. "Obviously, it's a relatively new development, so people are still digesting it but it does seem that people are more willing to look at alternative locations than perhaps they were before.' Wilson, who steered the massive merger of Tata-owned carriers Air India and Vistara last year, declined to comment on media stories on the airline's discussions with plane makers to buy more narrowbody jets. Air India, the unprofitable carrier which the Tata conglomerate acquired from the Indian government in 2021, will start receiving new planes it had ordered toward the end of this year, according to Wilson. The deliveries are "later than we hoped, slower than we hoped,' he said. "It is constraining our ambitions a little bit in the short term but the long term opportunity for this market is massive, so we are very, very confident.' - Bloomberg
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
British digital bank Monzo's annual profit surges, revenue tops $1.35 billion
FILE PHOTO: A smartphone displays a Monzo logo in this illustration taken January 6, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo (Reuters) -British digital bank Monzo reported revenue above 1 billion pounds ($1.35 billion) for the first time and a sharp rise in annual pretax profit on Monday, driven by strong growth in personal and business customer numbers. The fintech company, which is reportedly gearing up for an initial public offering, posted a pretax profit of 60.5 million pounds for the year ended March 31, 2025, compared with 13.9 million pounds a year earlier. Fiscal year 2024 marked the company's first profitable year. The mobile app-based bank, launched in 2015, is one of several digital banks that have emerged in Britain to challenge the dominance of HSBC, Lloyds, Barclays and NatWest - the country's Big Four. Monzo, which has more than 12 million customers, last year outlined plans to expand into Europe through Ireland and strengthen its presence in the United States. Customer deposits increased 48% to 16.6 billion pounds for the year, the lender said. Monzo has considered listing in either Britain or the United States but has not set a firm timeline or chosen a venue for an IPO, a person familiar with the company's plans told Reuters in March. Sky News reported earlier this month that the lender was preparing to appoint bankers to spearhead its planned stock market floatation. Last October, the British bank was valued at 4.5 billion pounds in an employee share sale to a group of investors, including Singapore's sovereign wealth fund. ($1 = 0.7388 pounds) (Reporting by Yadarisa Shabong in Bengaluru; Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips)
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Trump tariff reprieve could create more risk in Treasury market
US President Donald Trump. — Reuters INVESTORS worldwide woke up last Thursday to news that the US Court of International Trade had ruled that US President Donald Trump exceeded his authority with many of the tariffs announced since January. But this news isn't as good as it may seem at first glance, especially for the US Treasury market. For now, the Trump administration has been given 10 days to return previously paid tariffs with interest to importing businesses. But in the meantime, the US Federal Court of Appeals can stay the lower court's order. And no matter what the appeals court decides, it seems likely that the case will make its way to the Supreme Court, which probably would not decide on the case until next June. A resolution is thus likely at least a year away. Until then, the legal uncertainty adds to the already record-high economic uncertainty being engendered by the Trump administration. Trump will likely try to find workarounds to impose the tariffs anyway. Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act appears to give the president the power to impose tariffs against foreign countries and businesses if they engage in 'unfair trade practices'. This was the legal authorisation that President Joe Biden used to impose tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, solar cells and other critical materials. It seems plausible that this act could be used as justification for imposing tariffs based on the 'unfair' practices – however ill-defined – that Trump believes created the United States trade deficit with other nations. Of course, these attempts would also be challenged in court and would likely make their way to the Supreme Court as well. If the various decisions ultimately go against the Trump administration, this would not only have serious implications for presidential powers moving forward, but also US Treasuries right now. The non-partisan Tax Foundation estimates that the tariffs Trump announced in recent months will bring in up to US$1.4 trillion in revenues over the next decade based on conventional assumptions. If the tariffs' potential negative impacts on gross domestic product (GDP) growth and inflation are taken into account, the additional revenue would likely be smaller, but it could still amount to more than US$920bil, according to the Tax Foundation. Meanwhile, the United States Congress is currently debating the Trump administration's budget bill, which includes significant tax cuts. The Tax Foundation estimates that this bill, if enacted, will increase budget deficits by an average of 1.4% of GDP per year over the next decade. This means the United States is projected to run budget deficits in excess of 7% of GDP for the foreseeable future. If the tariff revenues are eliminated, this deficit could increase by another 0.4% of GDP each year. My calculations, which take into account the above projections for budget deficits as well as estimates for nominal GDP growth over the next 10 years, indicate that the debt pile of the United States could grow by US$4.3 trillion over the next decade and push the United States debt and GDP ratio to the same level as Italy's. The result would likely be even higher Treasury yields, particularly for long-dated bonds, as investors would reasonably demand a higher term premium, or excess compensation for the risk of holding long-dated bonds versus rolling over short-dated debt. The clearest sign that the market is already getting anxious about the United States fiscal position is the movement in credit default swaps. The cost to insure against a default of the United States government in the next five years has risen to 54 basis points in recent months. This is higher than the cost of insuring against a default of Italy and almost as high as the insurance premium for Greece. — Reuters Joachim Klement is an investment strategist at Panmure Liberum. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
