Activists seek restoration of flagship schemes, focus on health infrastructure
Health activists attached to the Rajasthan Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) on Friday (May 2, 2025) sought restoration of three major health initiatives launched by the previous Congress government as the flagship schemes. The JSA said the status of flagship schemes would help safeguard their impact and priority.
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government had recently removed three initiatives, namely Nirogi Rajasthan, Chief Minister's Nishulk Dawa Yojana and Chief Minister's Nishulk Jaanch Yojana from the category of flagship schemes. The JSA pointed out that these schemes had strengthened the State's public healthcare framework and enhanced people's access to government health services.
The JSA, functioning as the Rajasthan chapter of the People's Health Movement and supported by a coalition of 70 networks and organisations, has submitted a memorandum to Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma, seeking his intervention in the matter.
Chhaya Pachauli, director of voluntary group Prayas, said these initiatives had improved health outcomes across the State and served as a model for universal healthcare, inspiring several other States to adopt similar programmes. 'Their role in advancing equitable healthcare access has been widely recognised as a milestone in Rajasthan's public health journey,' Ms. Pachauli said.
The JSA said the decision to downgrade these schemes from flagship status had raised serious concerns about their future funding, political commitment, and operational priority. This move could reverse the substantial progress made in healthcare accessibility and affordability, particularly for the State's poorest and most vulnerable populations, Ms. Pachauli said.
The JSA has sought an urgent dialogue with the State government and swift action to restore the three schemes to their rightful flagship status. Among the three schemes, Nirogi Rajasthan dealt with elderly care, women and children and spreading awareness about vaccination and drug addiction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
2 days ago
- Deccan Herald
Mallikarjun Kharge urges govt to transform Kalyana Karnataka like Bengaluru & Mysuru
The Congress president was speaking at an event to lay the foundation stone for various development projects under the Arogya Avishkara scheme worth Rs 440 crore, aimed at enhancing health infrastructure in the Kalyana Karnataka region.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
CM: Rs 13,000 cr allocated to Kalyana K'taka in 3 yrs
Yadgir: Underlining govt's commitment to develop the Kalyana Karnataka region, chief minister Siddaramaiah Sunday said the state govt has released as much as Rs 13,000 crore in the last two-and-a-half years and that it is committed to developing the seven underdeveloped districts in the region. "The Congress promised Rs 5,000 crore annually to KKRDB. Following through, Rs 13,000 crore has been allocated, with Rs 5,300 crore already utilised for public welfare projects," he said. In its first thanksgiving event after completing two years in power, the entire Congress brass including Siddaramaiah, deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar, AICC president Mallikarjun Kharge and the rest of the ministers attended the foundation laying ceremony of various works in Yadgir district. During the course of his speech, Siddaramaiah targeted the BJP and said the saffron party peddled a lot of lies. He made these remarks while inaugurating development projects worth Rs 440.6 crore under the Aarogya Avishkara scheme by Kalyan Karnataka Development Board, alongside inaugurating the Banjara Bhavan in Yadgir Saturday. "The BJP operates on falsehoods. During their governance, Kalyana Karnataka remained underdeveloped. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pinga-Pinga e HBP? Tome isso 1x ao dia se tem mais de 40 anos Portal Saúde do Homem Clique aqui Undo They said they did not have money in the state's coffers for development, but we have shown that there is enough and more money as it is reaching the doorsteps of the people," the CM said. He said govt has delivered 200 promises of those made in its election manifesto in 2023, including five guarantees and is committed to fulfilling all the other promises in a short while. What is Arogya Kavach? The health innovation programme, launched today, costs Rs 440.6 crore, covering 42 hospital upgrades and new constructions. Govt plans to invest Rs 847 crore for expanding regional healthcare. As part of the Aarogya Avishkara initiative, construction of 12 new primary centres, eight community health centres, and one urban health centre are being taken up apart from increasing the bed capacity in 16 community health centres from 30 to 50. The programme also encompasses upgrading the bed capacity in three taluk health centres from 100 to 150, expanding two community health centres to 50-bed facilities, and elevating one primary health centre to a 100-bed community health centre. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Trump Medicaid cuts could devastate rural health services, hospitals warn
Washington: Rural hospitals are sounding the alarm over proposed healthcare cuts in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending package, warning the changes could force them to scale back services or close their doors. The bill would reduce federal spending on Medicaid, the health program for low-income Americans, by tightening enrollment standards and limiting federal aid to states. That worries rural providers, who rely heavily on the program to serve a population that tends to be poorer and sicker than the nation as a whole. "We can't sustain serving our community the way we are with additional cuts," said Carrie Lutz, CEO of Holton Community Hospital in Holton, Kansas. The independent nonprofit hospital, which serves a farming community of 13,000, is asking voters for a quarter-cent sales-tax increase to help cover its costs, which outpace annual revenues in many years. Lutz's concerns highlight the delicate balancing act lawmakers face as they try to enact Trump's priorities. Republicans who control both chambers of the U.S. Congress aim to cut Medicaid spending by $785 billion over a decade, to partly offset the cost of extending and adding to the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's signature first-term legislative achievement. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill will add $3 trillion to the $36.2 trillion national debt over the next decade, when interest payments are taken into account. Independent analysts have said the bill will effectively boost incomes for wealthier Americans and reduce incomes for the less affluent, due to cuts to Medicaid and other safety-net programs. Republicans have set a July 4 deadline to pass the bill out of Congress, giving the Senate three weeks to make changes, pass it and send it back to the House of Representatives. No Democrats voted for the bill in the House, and no Democratic supporters for it have emerged in the Senate. So Republicans who hold a slim 53-47 Senate majority must reconcile demands of budget hawks who want deeper spending cuts against concerns of others worried about the toll on rural and working-class voters who helped elect Trump. An internal Republican poll in May found voters in the most competitive congressional districts would be less likely to vote for a Republican who supported cutting Medicaid to pay for tax cuts. LOBBYING PUSHBACK The upper chamber's slower pace has given interest groups time to seek changes to the 1,100-page bill. Multinational companies seek to neutralize a retaliatory tax they say could discourage investment in the U.S. Some states are fighting a provision that would prevent them from regulating artificial intelligence. Solar-energy companies warn the bill could devastate their industry by revoking subsidies for green energy. Much opposition has focused on changes to Medicaid, which covers 71 million low-income Americans. The bill would cut spending on Medicaid, which represented about 9% of the $6.8 trillion federal budget last year, by requiring adult recipients to work, excluding non-citizens and limiting an accounting mechanism states use to boost the federal government's contribution. Overall, the bill would leave 10.9 million more people without insurance, CBO estimates. Any cuts to Medicaid would hit hard in rural areas and small towns, where roughly 18% of adults are enrolled in Medicaid compared with 16% for the country as a whole, according to Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Rural residents tend to be sicker, with higher rates of addiction, mental illness, and mortality from heart disease, cancer and stroke, the center found. The National Rural Health Association said the bill could force providers to cut services or close. Nearly half of rural hospitals currently lose money, and 120 have closed or stopped offering inpatient services over the past decade, the trade group says. The cuts could be especially acute in Kansas. The state recently increased its tax on Medicaid providers from 3% to 6%, an accounting maneuver that would effectively boost the federal government's contribution. The provider tax has been widely criticized as a gimmick or loophole that does not accurately reflect how much money is actually being spent on medical care. The bill would block that increase, freezing the state's provider tax at a lower level than in many other states. Lutz said that would reduce Holton Hospital's $22 million annual revenue by roughly $1 million - a significant hit for an organization that typically spends more money than it takes in each year. Tighter Medicaid enrollment standards, meanwhile, would increase red tape for hospital staff, while the citizenship provisions could exclude the town's Guatemalan immigrants, she said. With those changes, she said, the hospital would have to treat more uninsured patients. 'DON'T CUT INTO THE BONE' At least 41 of the Senate's 53 Republicans represent rural states, and several said they will work to remove the bill's limits on the provider tax. "Leave the provider tax alone. Put the work requirements in and all that kind of stuff. But for God's sakes don't cut into the bone," said Senator Jim Justice of West Virginia. The Senate Finance Committee could unveil changes to the House-passed bill in coming days. Failure to tackle that issue, they say, could leave many of their residents without reliable access to care. "If we don't get it right, doctors do not have to serve Medicaid patients and so in rural areas we could have doctors exit and I don't think our members from rural states would want that," said Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina.
