logo
I fear Britain is lurching towards civil war, and nobody knows how to stop it

I fear Britain is lurching towards civil war, and nobody knows how to stop it

Yahoo03-04-2025
I now fear Britain is heading for open sectarian conflict, possibly war, and there's nothing we can do to stop it. Here's a snapshot of what I'm hearing.
On one night in Westminster, I met someone who argued for voluntary repatriation, two generations back; a Labour activist told me we must 're-educate' Muslims; and Jacob Rees-Mogg, debating me on GB News, said Britain should take 'zero' refugees. I spluttered a reply about the good Samaritan and staggered off to bed, confused and depressed.
For two decades I've argued for controlling immigration, and successive governments, including Jacob's, increased it. Suddenly I've woken up in a land where everyone manically wants to reduce or even reverse it, and they've leapfrogged me into a pool of dark resentment.
Nigel Farage is mocked as a 'dhimmi' for appointing a Muslim to chair his party; he looks nervous of his own supporters. Even Labour has turned on the Sentencing Council, which, for all its faults, was trying to fix a genuine racial disparity (it's black people who tend to get longer sentences than whites, not the other way around).
On that last saga, so much hinges. It goes to the heart of how a society kills itself with kindness.
Nearly 200,000 YouTubers have watched an interview given to Louise Perry by David Betz, a professor of conflict studies at King's, London. Betz argues that the conditions for a failed state we ordinarily apply overseas are now found here: frayed social contract, falling trust, polarisation. Into this mix Britain injected multiculturalism, encouraging millions to move here without expecting integration.
If you think 'fear of the other' is a human instinct, the policy was mad to begin with. Combine it with economic decline and you invite ethnic competition over services and jobs.
Implicit in the Sentencing Council's guidance is the belief that when you operate a multicultural society – packed with groups with different values and experiences, advantages and handicaps – the only way to achieve equal outcomes is to treat people differently. In this spirit, says Betz, the modern state acts like an imperial administrator, promoting the interests of preferred minorities while trying to avoid a riot.
I grew up in a post-colonial world where we said 'I don't see race' and honestly, if naively, meant it. Over the past 30 years, liberal institutions have taught us to see race again – by stressing the wonders of diversity so persistently that some white people feel the state has actively taken a side against them. Ancient, binding concepts, such as 'equality before the law' ring hollow. The latest Police Race Action Plan openly rejects the principle of 'treating everyone the same' in favour of 'equality of police outcomes'.
A situation in which millions believe cops are not impartial public servants but an occupying force is the headline metric of state failure. Mainland Britain has become Ulster.
It isn't an endorsement of white resentment to acknowledge that it's real and growing, that beyond the curated Question Time audience, millions have evolved from irony to nihilism to something more disturbing. Just read the comments beneath the Betz video. 'As a 28-year-old, fighting-age male, I am ready to lay down my life for Mother England and the survival of my folk.' Viewers refer in code to Rotherham – to avoid being muted in the forum – and the grooming scandal that suggested the authorities were willing to cover up rape to maintain the peace.
The UK is 'a tinder box waiting to explode', writes an unhappy reviewer, which is also the worry of Canadian officials. In 2024, its police force produced a report warning their nation might be further buffeted by inequality, climate change and 'paranoid populism'. Separately, a government think tank warned of 'civil war… in the United States' as a potential 'underanticipated disruption'.
In fact, the low level insurgency has already begun. Ireland has seen arson at asylum hotels. Last year, Britain had riots. Why did No10 insist that so many be thrown into jail? Betz notes that while Islamist terrorism is more lethal than far-Right extremism, there are only 4 million Muslims whereas there are around 50 million whites.
Were the latter group radicalised, things might go south very fast, hence some in the security forces clearly regard white Britons as the emergent threat.
Well, when 'a formerly dominant social majority fears it is in danger of losing that dominance,' to quote Betz, it doesn't surrender its position quietly – and yet this is what elites constantly tell the white working-class they must do, while refusing to abandon their own privileges.
Labour, the party of racial and gender equality, has never seen fit to elect a non-white or a woman as leader. Neither is it willing to revive the economy with free market capitalism; nor to revive solidarity with socialism.
Instead it tries to knit the country back together with petty cash thrown at potholes or a roundtable on the spectre of white male violence. Centrist dad redux.
Labour's instinct is to lean into multiculturalism, flirting with laws against islamophobia: the worst response imaginable. In that vein, what moron thought it would be clever to ban Marine Le Pen from running for office?
Every conspiracy theory is confirmed, and without a democratic outlet for anger – seeing their aspirations limited and being too poor to emigrate – where else will a militant faction of angry whites go but to violence?
Reform is a vehicle for dissent but offers no programme for change. The Tories lack imagination, and the world they exist to preserve is dead. We have no national culture to reunite us; no universalising religion to appeal to. When I saw a Tory MP tell GB News that the Sentencing Council evinced a bias against 'white Christian' defendants, I laughed at the innocence. If someone's in the dock for murder or rape, they probably don't go to Evensong.
Betz sees no solution, so suggests we prepare for anarchy. I'm more concerned about fascism. We're not far away from a politician running for office as explicitly anti-Muslim, and to those who say authoritarianism cannot happen here, I reply: lockdown.
Did you ever think the state could imprison us in our homes? And if it can isolate the diseased from the healthy, the vaxed from the unvaxed, do you think it can't, or won't, someday separate us based on race or religion? We are literally debating the legalisation of euthanasia, a favourite tool of tyrants.
As my companion on that horrid evening spoke of repatriation, I imagined foreign-made parts of me being politely invited to leave and floating off through the window, an arm to Ireland, a foot to France. What remained prayed silently that if this country does go mad, I won't lose my head.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-Adams aide pleads guilty to campaign funding scam
Ex-Adams aide pleads guilty to campaign funding scam

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Ex-Adams aide pleads guilty to campaign funding scam

Mayor Eric Adams' former liaison to the Muslim community — considered a key witness in the feds' quashed corruption case against Hizzoner — on Tuesday pleaded guilty in a funding scam tied to Adams' 2021 campaign. Months after the Justice Department moved to toss Adams' corruption case in an arrangement a judge said smacked of an unsavory 'bargain,' Mohamed Bahi admitted that 'it was wrong' for him to falsely claim he collected $32,000 in donations from real-estate firms at a Brooklyn fundraiser in 2020. Bahi, 41, pleaded guilty to felony conspiracy to commit wire fraud at the Manhattan federal court hearing, where he said he knew Adams' campaign was ripping off city taxpayers by fraudulently applying for 8-to-1 so-called 'matching funds' off the phantom donations. Mohamed Bahi cracks a half-smile outside Manhattan court Tuesday when asked if it was fair for him to have to plead guilty to a felony while Mayor Eric Adams' case was tossed. William Farrington Advertisement He will face a likely sentence of probation to six months in jail when he is sentenced Nov. 18 — two weeks after the mayoral election in which Adams is running for another term. Bahi cracked a wry half-smile but kept walking when asked as he left court whether it was 'fair' for him to have to plead guilty to a felony while his former boss Adams saw his case dismissed. The former aide had been expected to testify as a prosecution witness at Adams' trial on bribery and wire fraud charges after the feds in Manhattan's Southern District revealed in October 2024 that he allegedly name-dropped the mayor while encouraging a campaign donor to lie to the FBI. Advertisement Bahi copped a plea deal for himself with the feds in February, court papers say. Soon afterward, Manhattan federal prosecutors prepped a new bombshell indictment charging Adams, 64, with destroying evidence and telling people to lie to the FBI, according to the interim US Attorney for the Southern District at the time, Danielle Sassoon. Bahi had name-dropped Adams while encouraging a donor to lie to the FBI, court papers alleged. Facebook/Mohamed Bahi But before the new indictment could be unveiled, President Trump's Department of Justice moved to dismiss Adams' case — prompting Sassoon and the lead prosecutor on Adams' case to resign in protest. Advertisement The mayor, who is seeking re-election as an independent, pleaded not guilty after being charged with soliciting tens of thousands of illegal donations and taking $123,000 worth of travel-perk bribes from Turkish nationals in exchange for fast-tracking the opening of the Turkish Consulate in Manhattan. He denied wrongdoing, with his lawyers deriding the case as overhyped and 'politically motivated.' The judge overseeing Adams' case, Dale Ho, has written that the situation struck him as a 'bargain' in which the DOJ agreed to toss the charges in exchange for Adams' compliance with the White House's aggressive deportation efforts. Advertisement 'Everything here smacks of a bargain: dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions,' Ho said in a 78-page ruling formally getting rid of the case. City Hall spokeswoman Kayla Mamelak Atlus told The Post on Tuesday, 'As Mayor Adams has said both publicly and under oath, he has broken no laws and has always instructed his team to follow the law.' –– Additional reporting by Craig McCarthy

The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?
The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?

Labour has been accused of creating a 'crisis over nothing' as the number of small boat crossings since the last election to reached 50,000. Home Office data confirmed that 474 asylum seekers made the perilous crossing yesterday, taking the total since Keir Starmer became prime minister 13 months ago to 50,271. According to the Daily Express, that is quicker than under Tory PMs Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'This is an invasion Labour are too cowardly to confront. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.' The number of small boat crossings are a major source of embarrassment for Labour, which pledged during last year's general election to 'smash the people-smuggling gangs' responsible. And even government minister Jacqui Smith, who served as the home secretary under Gordon Brown, told BBC Breakfast this morning that number pf crossings under Labour was 'unacceptable'. But independent migration policy researcher Zoe Gardner, told HuffPost UK the government is focusing on the wrong issue. She said Labour should instead increase the number of legal immigration routes to the UK, thereby taking away the need for asylum seekers to risk their lives in the English Channel. She said: '50,000 people since Labour came to power corresponds to about 5 or 6% of all immigration during that period. 'If it wasn't coming on boats but through safe, regulated routes instead these numbers would not even register. 'By refusing to offer safe routes, the government has created a crisis out of nothing at all.' Net migration in 2024 was 431,000 – much lower than the historical high of 906,000 recorded in 2023, but still a number which dwarves how many arrived people arrived in small boats during the same period (37,000). The government has often been criticised over its lack of safe and legal routes for people to claim asylum in the UK. And, as human rights organisation Amnesty International explained, a 'safe and legal route' means a journey formally approved by the government. But, 'the government allows nobody to make a claim for asylum in the UK unless they are physically present in the UK' and 'it is impossible to come to the UK for the purpose of seeking asylum in any way permitted by the government's immigration rules'. The only exceptions apply to people from Ukraine and someone who has family in the UK or has a partner or child who has been granted asylum in Britain. There is also a visa route for some Afghans who have worked for the government. As Amnesty International noted on its website: 'Seeking asylum from persecution is lawful – refugees don't need anyone's permission to do so.' It concluded: 'It is a government choice to require refugees wishing to seek asylum in the UK to rely on dangerous journeys and people smugglers.' The government is desperate to bring the number of small boat crossings down and prove to voters it is dealing with the migration crisis. It announced a new 'one in, one out' returns scheme with France last week, which will allow the UK to return one person to France who entered the Britain via so-called 'illegal' means. The UK then has to accept someone with a greater claim to asylum in Britain from France. The first returns are expected to take place in the coming weeks, but the impact will likely be very small initially as the scheme is tested. Related... Almost Half Of Brits Are Getting An Essential Fact About UK Immigration Wrong Yvette Cooper Delivers Brutal Commons Slapdown To Chris Philp Over The Tories' Immigration Failures 'A Horrific Moral Failure': Campaigner Slams Labour And Tories Over Illegal Immigration

Migrant milestone reached faster under Starmer than previous prime ministers
Migrant milestone reached faster under Starmer than previous prime ministers

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Migrant milestone reached faster under Starmer than previous prime ministers

Migrant milestone reached faster under Starmer than previous prime ministers The milestone of 50,000 migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel has been reached just 13 months into Sir Keir Starmer's premiership – seven months faster than under his Conservative predecessor Rishi Sunak, figures show. The number of people recorded as making the journey across the Channel since the Labour leader became Prime Minister passed 50,000 on August 11 2025: day 403 of his time in office – or one year, one month and seven days since Labour won the general election on July 4 2025. By contrast, the number of arrivals during Mr Sunak's premiership did not reach the 50,000 mark until the 610th day of his time in office, on June 25 2024, according to Home Office data. This was exactly 20 months since Mr Sunak became prime minister on October 25 2022, and only a few days before the Conservatives lost the general election to Labour. On day 403 of Mr Sunak's premiership – the point at which 50,000 was reached for Sir Keir – some 36,079 migrants had arrived in small boats. A total of 10,532 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel during the 49 days of Liz Truss's premiership from September 6 to October 24 2022. This includes 1,241 on September 9: the third highest number of arrivals ever recorded on a single day. The first and second highest daily totals both occurred during Boris Johnson's premiership, on September 3 2022 (1,305 arrivals) and November 11 2021 (1,250) respectively. Some 65,676 migrants arrived across the Channel over the course of Mr Johnson's three years, one month and 12 days as prime minister, from July 24 2019 to September 5 2022. The 50,000 mark was passed on the 1,066th day of his premiership, June 23 2022. The number of migrants crossing the English Channel per boat has been on a steady upwards trend since data was first recorded in 2018, when the average for the year was seven. It then rose to an average of 11 per boat in 2019, 13 in 2020, 28 in 2021, 41 in 2022, 49 in 2023 and 53 in 2024. The average for 2025 is currently running at 59 people per boat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store