logo
Frock Brothers Trucking and Lancaster mechanic sentenced in Clean Air Act violation scheme

Frock Brothers Trucking and Lancaster mechanic sentenced in Clean Air Act violation scheme

Yahoo07-03-2025

A New Oxford trucking company was sentenced to two years of probation and an $80,000 fine after having previously pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Air Act in a federal criminal case last year, according to a news release and court records.
The company pleaded guilty in October of 2024 to one felony count of violating the Clean Air Act, with prosecutors recommending the company be sentenced to an $80,000 fine and two years of probation.
That recommendation was ultimately taken by United States District Judge Julia K. Munley, who imposed the recommended sentence during a hearing on March 6, 2025, according to a press release issued by the United States Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Previously reported: New Oxford trucking company pleads to Clean Air Act violation - disabled emissions monitor
The charge had brought the potential for a maximum fine of $250,000 and up to five months of probation, according to court documents.
Prosecutors alleged that the company had conspired with a mechanic, based in Lititz, Pa., to remove emissions monitors from diesel trucks operated by the company, according to the criminal complaint.
The complaint alleged that between Nov. 13 and Dec. 28 of 2018, the company contracted Leon Martin, who operated as a mechanic out of his home in Lititz, to disable or remove emission control components that were required under the Clean Air Act.
In the case, prosecutors listed eight 2014 Kenworth trucks owned by the company that had their emissions systems disabled or removed by Martin.
Martin pleaded guilty to one count of felony violation of the Clean Air Act and a second count of felony conspiracy, according to court records.
On March 6, 2025, Martin was sentenced to two years of probation, a three month home curfew, and a fine of $500,000 by Judge Munley.
'Tampering with required emissions monitoring devices in heavy duty vehicles results in a significant increase in air pollution,' said Allison Landsman, the Special Agent in Charge for the Environmental Protection Agency's Criminal Investigations Division, in the Thursday news release.
'Today's sentencing demonstrates that we will hold violators accountable for breaking our environmental laws.'
Prior to the sentence being handed down, the counsel for Frock Brothers argued for a lower sentence, requesting a fine of $8,000 and one year of probation, court records show.
According to the documents filed by Frock Brothers and their counsel, the company was founded by brothers Ed and Daniel Frock in 1982.
After "starting with almost nothing," according to the defense counsel, the brothers built the business together. At its peak, the company had 70 tractors, 300 trailers, and employed around 85 people.
Daniel Frock, who "played a lesser role in the company," sold his entire interest to his brother, Ed Frock, in 2021, the documents said.
"Ed Frock, and Ed Frock alone, made arrangements with Leon Martin, a mechanic in Ephrata, Pennsylvania to have eight diesel trucks altered so that they would disable the emission control systems in the vehicles," the documents by counsel allege.
Defense counsel argued that, towards the end of his career, Ed Frock "began to exhibit disdain towards the industry that he thought had become over regulated," calling his actions a "final act of defiance" towards those regulations.
Ed Frock, the documents note, died in 2022, and the company was passed to his wife, Jane, who previously had "no involvement in the business."
"Through multiple obstacles, including the surprise revelation about the altered trucks, and related investigation, Jane has worked every day thereafter to keep the company afloat," counsel argued in the document.
"When Jane learned about the steps Ed had taken to alter the eight diesel trucks a few years before his passing, she was surprised, upset and immediately took steps to remedy the problem," counsel told the judge, adding that Jane Frock had "ordered that the eight trucks be altered back to their original condition."
According to the company's counsel, "Frock Brothers Trucking, Inc., through Jane's insistence, cooperated completely with the Government investigation."
In closing their argument to the judge, counsel stated that "Frock Brothers Trucking, Inc. is a unique corporate defendant whose current leadership played no role in the offending and criminal behavior.
"Frock Brothers Trucking, Inc. has no prior history of misconduct and has fully accepted responsibility for the conduct of its former owner," the document argued.
In the federal prosecutor's sentencing document, the government acknowledged that the company's cooperation had "saved the United States substantial time and effort," but stated that "Frock does not have in place any program to prevent or detect future violations."
Prosecutors argued, in their documents, that any sentence in the case must "reflect the seriousness of the offense" and "afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct."
In requesting the $80,000 fine, the prosecutors note that it would require the company to "disgorge some of the savings realized from its illegal conduct," which would act as a "deterrence to others considering this activity."
According to the prosecution, Frock has a total net worth of almost $2 million.
"The defendant's suggestion of a one year term of probation and a paltry fine of $8,000 would provide no deterrence to others similarly situated who contemplate engaging in similar criminal conduct and polluting the atmosphere," prosecutors argued.
Harrison Jones is the Hanover reporter for the Evening Sun. Reach him at hjones@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Hanover Evening Sun: Adams County trucking company gets $80K fine, probation for violations

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Attorney's Office indicts New Orleans man accused of enticing teen
U.S. Attorney's Office indicts New Orleans man accused of enticing teen

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. Attorney's Office indicts New Orleans man accused of enticing teen

NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — A New Orleans man accused of enticing a minor was indicted on June 5. Documents filed with the United States Attorney's Office report that between May 1 and May 13, 35-year-old Mark Brooks allegedly attempted to persuade, induce, entice and coerce a 15-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity. Person struck, killed by train: New Orleans police Additionally, between May 1 and May 4, Brooks allegedly attempted to transfer obscene matter to an individual under 16 years old via interstate commerce. If found guilty, Brooks could face either a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years or a maximum life sentence for coercion and enticement and up to 10 years for transmission of obscene to a minor. Slidell man pleads guilty in child sexual abuse material possession case He could also face a lifetime of supervised release, up to a $250,000 fine and will be required to register as a sex will let customers shop without crowds (for a price) Where the 'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests are planned DOJ calls Newsom legal challenge to National Guard 'crass political stunt' Newsom hits back at DeSantis over offer to send Florida state guard to LA Driver arrested after crash injures 3 children at lemonade stand in North Carolina Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump's EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plants
Trump's EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plants

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's EPA wants to repeal regulations on carbon emissions from power plants

The Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday that it will aim to eliminate existing limits on greenhouse gas emissions from coal- and gas-fired power plants, a move that would curb the agency's ability to combat climate change under the Clean Air Act. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a news conference that Biden-era carbon pollution standards for power plants 'suffocate' the economy in order to protect the environment. Zeldin, who was appointed by President Donald Trump in January, stated that the agency's announcement was a huge step forward in energy dominance for the U.S., while promising that no power plants would emit more than they already do. Currently, the power sector accounts for a quarter of all U.S. emissions, according to the latest EPA emissions data. Zeldin also said the EPA plans to weaken Biden-era regulations on mercury emissions from power plants. Environmental advocates say the EPA's proposal is an escalation in the Trump administration's ongoing push against climate action across federal agencies, including at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Energy and the National Weather Service. In 2024, the Biden administration finalized the most stringent carbon pollution standards for power plants to date in an effort to tackle the climate crisis — but now, those rules face an uncertain future. Gina McCarthy, a former EPA Administrator under President Joe Biden, called Zeldin's announcement a 'political play' that defies 'decades of science and policy review' in a statement on Wednesday. 'By giving a green light to more pollution, his legacy will forever be someone who does the bidding of the fossil fuel industry at the expense of our health,' McCarthy said. Jill Tauber, the vice president of litigation for climate and energy at Earthjustice, a nonprofit currently suing the Trump administration over several environmental rollbacks said: 'Eliminating pollution standards from the largest industrial source of greenhouse gas pollution in the United States flies in the face of what the law requires, what the science tells us, and what we're seeing every day.' Power plants in the U.S. are a huge contributor to global carbon emissions. A report published by the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law found that if the U.S. power sector were its own country, it would be the sixth-largest emitter in the world. Under the first Trump administration, the EPA rolled back several Obama-era greenhouse gas standards on power plants, but this recent announcement marks the first time the agency has suggested outright repeals. Zeldin's move on power plants follows his promise in March to tackle the 'climate change religion' by reconsidering or repealing 31 regulations surrounding tailpipe emissions, coal ash regulations and oil and gas wastewater management. The proposed rule, which will now move into its comment period, will face scrutiny from legal advocates and environmental nonprofits like Earthjustice and the Natural Resources Defense Council, which say the EPA is obligated to regulate greenhouse gas emissions by law — citing seminal cases like the 2007 Massachusetts v. EPA lawsuit, which determined that greenhouse gases must be regulated by the EPA under the Clean Air Act. 'We'll be watching closely to see if the EPA proceeds with repealing these life-saving standards based on a legal theory that doesn't pass the laugh test,' said Meredith Hawkins, the federal climate legal director at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'The NRDC stands ready to defend the public's right to breathe in court if needed.' Cutting historic limits on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants would impact global climate change, but it could also cause ripple effects on human health and the economy. Harvey Reiter, an energy and utilities lawyer and a law professor at George Washington University, says that if the EPA moves forward with its planned repeals, he expects some energy companies and utilities that have retooled operations and made long-term investments in renewable energy to sue the Trump administration. 'The biggest impacts of the proposed rules are uncertainty and instability,' he said. 'Nobody knows what to do next. It makes investment decisions harder. It makes decisions about hiring, staff and employees harder. It creates a lot of uncertainty in the market.' Greenhouse gas emissions from power plants are not just a climate issue. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide as well as other air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, mercury and fine particulate matter, which are linked to increased risk of respiratory issues and cardiovascular disease. Regulating carbon emissions from power plants broadly reduces other air pollution for communities living near power plants, said Laura Kate Bender, the vice president of nationwide advocacy and public policy at the American Lung Association. 'It works both ways. On the one hand, power plants burning fossil fuels contribute to climate change and cause health problems at the same time,' said Bender. 'And then climate change, in many cases, contributes to extreme heat, or more wildfire smoke, or more ozone smogs. Climate change is a health emergency, and cutting carbon in the power sector is a critical tool in the toolbox for fighting climate change.' This article was originally published on

Slidell man pleads guilty in child sexual abuse material possession case
Slidell man pleads guilty in child sexual abuse material possession case

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Slidell man pleads guilty in child sexual abuse material possession case

SLIDELL, La. (WGNO) — A Slidell man pled guilty on June 5 following an investigation into the online sharing of child sexual abuse material. According to the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Louisiana, back in January of 2020, FBI agents began investigating child sexual exploitation material being shared over an instant messaging mobile app, eventually identifying 27-year-old Brock Taylor Guillot as a suspect in the case. Person struck, killed by train: New Orleans police Later, in February of 2021, agents searched Guillot's home, seizing electronic items that belonged to him. His cell phone was found to have at least one image and 518 videos showing the sexual victimization of children, with some victims thought to have been under 3 years old. Similar content was also found on multiple social media instant messaging accounts. Guillot pled guilty to possession of images and videos depicting the sexual exploitation of children under the age of 12 years old. He faces sentencing of up to 20 years in prison as well as at least 5 years and up to a lifetime of supervised release. He may be fined up to $250,000 and a $100 mandatory special assessment fee, and may also have to register as a sex offender. His sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 25.U.S. Attorney's Office indicts New Orleans man accused of enticing teen LSU fans favored to win College World Series Jello Shot Challenge New Balance shoes and gear are up to 40% off on Amazon right now Slidell man pleads guilty in child sexual abuse material possession case Beach Boys' Brian Wilson dies, family 'at a loss for words' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store