logo
Five people charged over alleged break-in during Palestine Action protest

Five people charged over alleged break-in during Palestine Action protest

Glasgow Times18-07-2025
The group is accused of forcing their way into Elbit's South Gloucestershire facility on August 6 last year, causing extensive damage and seriously assaulting staff and two police officers.
Counter Terrorism Policing South East carried out a series of raids on Tuesday before arresting the five suspects.
The Crown Prosecution Service has authorised charges and said it will submit to the court that the offences were committed with a terrorist connection.
Finn Collins, 20, from Whitstable in Kent; Harland Archer, also 20 and from Whitstable; Salaam Mahmood, 19, from London; Moiz Ibrahim, 27, from London; and Louie Adams, 33, from London, have all been charged with aggravated burglary, criminal damage and violent disorder.
They are due to appear from custody at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Saturday.
A sixth person, a 66-year-old man from Bristol, was also arrested during Tuesday's operation – but has since been released without charge.
Ten people were arrested shortly after the incident in August 2024, and a further eight in November.
All 18 were later charged and are awaiting trial.
Elbit Systems UK, which is Israeli-owned, has been repeatedly targeted by Palestine Action over its role in producing military technology.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brit passenger, 62, faces 10 YEARS in jail after ‘telling airline steward ‘f** off' & ‘calling him a ‘d**khead'
Brit passenger, 62, faces 10 YEARS in jail after ‘telling airline steward ‘f** off' & ‘calling him a ‘d**khead'

Scottish Sun

time18 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Brit passenger, 62, faces 10 YEARS in jail after ‘telling airline steward ‘f** off' & ‘calling him a ‘d**khead'

He is alleged to have yelled insults and threats at other people on board AIR RAGE RANT Brit passenger, 62, faces 10 YEARS in jail after 'telling airline steward 'f** off' & 'calling him a 'd**khead' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A BRIT passenger has been charged and could face 10 years in jail after allegedly hurling abuse at other people on a flight. The incident is reported to have happened on a Singapore Airlines flight from London to Singapore. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The man is alleged to have yelled insults and threats at other people on board Credit: Getty 2 He has now been handed four charges over the alleged conduct Credit: Getty The man, identified as Steven George Harris, is alleged to have yelled insults and threats at other people on board, including crew members. He is reported to have said "it was disgusting that two races would mix" and that "Britain is not white anymore". The 62-year-old also allegedly threatened another person saying: "You are Israeli, **** off, I'll kill you." According to court documents, this person believed that Harris might attack him. read more in world news SHOP DROP World's BIGGEST shopping centre is now abandoned with over 2,000 empty shops He is also reported to have called a cabin crew member a "d***head" and pushed him on the shoulders, causing him to fall to the ground. Harris further allegedly insulted another air steward, swearing at him and saying "you are just a glorified bar man". He has now been handed four charges over the alleged conduct, Channel News Asia has reported. These include one charge each of criminal intimidation and using insulting words to cause harassment. The other two charges are under the Singaporean Air Navigation Act, which are for his alleged behaviour against the two crew members. These incidents are said to have happened between 5.15pm on April 27 and 6.20am on April 28. Harris has reportedly indicated that he will plead not guilty. But the case has been adjourned for a pre-trial conference scheduled for next month. If he's found guilty of harassment, Harris could face six months in jail or a fine up to S$5,000 - or both. For criminal intimidation, he could get maximum of two years jail or a fine, or both, if found guilty. With a threat to cause death, the maximum jail term increases to 10 years. And for behaving in an insulting or disorderly manner towards flight crew, the penalty could be up to five years in jail or a fine up to S$100,000, or both. Singapore's legal system is handling the charges. This is because Singapore Changi Airport was the point of arrival. The Foreign Office was contacted for comment.

Woman who stabbed father-of-six on Christmas Day jailed for life
Woman who stabbed father-of-six on Christmas Day jailed for life

ITV News

timea day ago

  • ITV News

Woman who stabbed father-of-six on Christmas Day jailed for life

Police bodycam shows the moment Carless was arrested by police A woman who stabbed her ex-boyfriend on Christmas Day in the heart last year has been jailed. The court had previously heard that Kirsty Carless, 33, was "fuelled by cocaine and alcohol" when she took a taxi from her home in Cannock, Staffordshire to her ex-partner's home in Norton Canes in the early hours of December 25 last year. Carless, 33, took a knife in a taxi to confront Louis Price, 31, after seeing his profile on a dating app, Stafford Crown Court heard. The attack was 'motivated by anger and jealousy and fuelled by cocaine and alcohol', the jury heard. She was convicted unanimously of murder and possessing an offensive weapon in a public place. Carless was also found guilty by majority of assault occasioning actual bodily harm over a previous incident, but cleared of intentional strangulation. She was cleared of intentional strangulation in relation to the same incident. The trial was told Carless, of Haling Way in Cannock, Staffordshire, had been at the pub drinking double vodka and cokes with a male friend on December 24. While there, she plunged a kitchen knife she had taken from her home into Price's chest. The taxi driver reported that around 30 seconds after Carless let herself into the property with a key, he heard a 'very loud and prolonged' scream from a man and that he 'sounded scared'. Less than two minutes after arriving at the scene, Carless was 'anxious and sweating' as she got back into the taxi and demanded the driver take her to her parents' home, where she admitted what she had done and 999 was called. At the time of the stabbing, Carless was known to police. She had been on police bail after allegedly strangling Louis Price the previous year. A charge which she had denied. On that occasion, Mr Price phoned 999 to say Carless had poured bleach over tracksuits worth £400 after she put them in the bin, had thrown a glass candle holder at him, pulled him down the stairs and choked him. He was seen crying on police body-worn video footage, telling the officer: 'It's f****** embarrassing… it can't keep happening, man. In a witness statement after the incident, he said the relationship, which started in 2021, had been 'on the whole, abusive', that she had stopped him doing things he liked, such as playing football and had physically abused him. Police confirmed that a referral was made to the IOPC following recent contact. In her evidence to the trial, Carless said she had no recollection of stabbing him, was 'not a violent person' and had only gone to Mr Price's address as she believed he had taken money from inside a card she had in her home. She said she picked up a knife with the intent to destroy the caravan he was staying in in his parents' back garden and had 'panicked' after Mr Price was stabbed and fled. Narmina Rafiq of the Crown Prosecution Service said: 'This was a truly awful case that shows just how severe and calculated domestic violence can be. "Kirsty Carless did not have a sudden outburst, instead this was a deliberate and premeditated killing, following a series of events that began with jealousy over Louis Price's use of dating apps and ended in murder. 'The Crown Prosecution Service built a compelling case using DNA evidence, CCTV footage, witness testimony, forensic tests and pathological evidence that not only proved Kirsty Carless intended to kill Mr Price but showed exactly how it happened, leaving the jury certain of her guilt. 'Her unbelievably cruel and heartless actions have robbed six children of their father and his parents of their beloved son. We hope today's outcome brings them some comfort. Our condolences remain with Mr Price's family.'

Motorists warned of £200 fine for using headlights in harmless way
Motorists warned of £200 fine for using headlights in harmless way

Daily Record

timea day ago

  • Daily Record

Motorists warned of £200 fine for using headlights in harmless way

You might think you are being courteous, but you could end up in trouble with one common action Motorists could face a hefty fine for warning other motorists of speed cameras. Most drivers think they're being courteous when they flash their headlights to alert others of speed cameras, give way at junctions, or to even signal "thanks" to fellow motorists. ‌ However, these friendly flashes are actually illegal under Highway Code Rule 110 and could result in fines of up to £200 and penalty points. Even more alarmingly, drivers who flash their lights to warn others of police presence face potentially devastating penalties of up to £1,000 for obstructing police duties. ‌ Highway Code Rule 110 states that drivers should "only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there." It explicitly warns: "Do not flash your headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users." ‌ This means virtually every common use of headlight flashing is technically breaking the law, including warning other drivers of speed cameras, giving way at junctions, signalling "thank you," or expressing frustration. The penalties depend on exactly why drivers flashed their lights, creating a confusing two-tier system most motorists are unaware of. Car finance expert and owner of Simple PCP Claims, Tom Riley, said: "Most drivers flash their lights with good intentions, thinking they're being helpful. But the law is crystal clear, you can only flash your headlights to alert others to your presence. Anything else could technically land you in hot water." ‌ The regulations stem from the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989. While Highway Code breaches aren't directly criminal, police can issue penalties when misuse creates danger or impedes law enforcement. The Crown Prosecution Service specifically lists "giving a warning to other motorists of a police speed trap ahead" as an example of obstructing police duties, making it clear that authorities actively target this common practice. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ While prosecution for everyday "polite" flashing remains relatively rare, the legal framework exists to catch drivers who step outside legally acceptable bounds. Traffic officers are particularly vigilant about drivers warning others of speed cameras. The confusion arises because headlight flashing has become ingrained in British driving culture. Many drivers assume it's perfectly legal, having learned these habits during lessons or from experienced drivers. Tom Riley adds: "The £200 fine might not sound enormous, but add penalty points and you're looking at a serious hit to your driving record. For drivers who warn others about speed traps, that £1,000 maximum penalty could be financially devastating. The safest approach is simple, only flash when you genuinely need to alert someone to your presence." With road traffic enforcement becoming increasingly sophisticated, drivers using headlights as a communication tool are playing a dangerous game with potentially expensive consequences.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store