logo
This Colorado Town Denied Permit for 'No Kings' Day Protest

This Colorado Town Denied Permit for 'No Kings' Day Protest

Newsweeka day ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Officials in Parker, Colorado, denied a permit for a planned "No Kings" anti-Trump rally after the organizer was told it conflicted with the town's annual Parker Days festival, according to a report from local television station CBS Colorado.
The rally, scheduled for June 14, was one of hundreds set across the United States to protest authoritarianism and coincide with President Trump's birthday, the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, and Flag Day.
Organizer Carolyn Williamson told the outlet that the decision infringed on her right to free speech after her request for a permit was denied due to the proximity of the large Parker Days festivities.
Parker sits just over 20 miles southeast of Denver. It is a part of Douglas County where all but one state legislature seat went to Republicans last November, according to a report from Colorado Community Media.
Newsweek reached out to the Town of Parker for comment via email Tuesday.
Why It Matters
This dispute highlights ongoing national tensions over the balance between public safety and First Amendment rights—a perennial issue during politically charged events.
The situation in Parker raises questions about how local governments manage competing interests when citizens seek to demonstrate near major community activities. The case is especially relevant to Americans concerned with free expression protections, given the frequency of political rallies and public protests during election years.
What To Know
Williamson, a Parker resident, organized the local "No Kings" rally—drawing around 400 prospective participants, according to CBS Colorado.
She has trained for de-escalation, worked with local police, and planned for safety. However, Parker officials informed her that gatherings of more than 100 people required a permit, which would not be issued during the town's largest annual event, Parker Days, held only a half mile away.
A demonstrator holds an upside-down American flag during a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Trump administration at Metro Hall, Monday, June 9, 2025, in Louisville, Ky.
A demonstrator holds an upside-down American flag during a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Trump administration at Metro Hall, Monday, June 9, 2025, in Louisville, Ky.
AP Photo/Jon Cherry
The Town of Parker's official statement said that ensuring the safety of both events was not feasible, citing limited police and emergency resources during Parker Days.
"The Town has an obligation to balance First Amendment rights with the safety needs of residents, and due to resource constraints during this major festival, permits for additional gatherings could not be granted at this time," the statement given to the local station said.
Williamson said she believed the town's refusal to issue a permit restricted her constitutional rights. She noted that after the permit was denied, Parker's town attorney and police chief clarified that even smaller-scale gatherings would not be allowed during the festival timeframe.
Philip Chen, associate professor of political science at the University of Denver, explained the government can restrict time, place, and manner of assembly, but these constraints must be content-neutral.
The American Civil Liberties Union said that typically, permits for sidewalk or street demonstrations are not required unless an event obstructs traffic.
Despite the setback, Williamson stated she would move forward by staging a street-by-street protest along Parker Road between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. on June 14, aiming to avoid direct disruption of the Parker Days. Parallel events are also scheduled in Castle Rock, Littleton, and Denver.
What People Are Saying
Carolyn Williamson, Organizer, told CBS Colorado: "Civil disobedience doesn't always align conveniently with current events"
Town of Parker said in its official statement: "The Town has an obligation to balance individual's First Amendment rights with the safety needs of its residents, explaining it could not adequately ensure safety for the rally during Parker Days due to resource constraints. They offered to collaborate on rescheduling the rally."
Philip Chen, Associate Professor, University of Denver, told CBS Colorado: "While the government can restrict the time, place, and manner of speech, it must remain content neutral."
What Happens Next
The "No Kings" protest in Parker is expected to proceed in an alternative format on June 14 along Parker Road, with organizers and town officials monitoring for potential disruptions.
Additional rallies are scheduled in other parts of the Denver metropolitan area for the same day, as well as across the country.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Project 2025 Compares With Trump's Los Angeles Response
How Project 2025 Compares With Trump's Los Angeles Response

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

How Project 2025 Compares With Trump's Los Angeles Response

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's response to protests in Los Angeles is in keeping with suggestions put forth in Project 2025, a political commentator has said. Allison Gill, who worked at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, said on Wajahat Ali's the Left Hook Substack that the president's military response was "spelled out in Project 2025," a conservative policy dossier. She did not specify how. Newsweek has contacted the Heritage Foundation and Gill for comment by email. The Context Protests against immigration enforcement began in Los Angeles on Friday and have continued, with some isolated incidents of violence and looting. In response, Trump announced the deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to restore order, without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent. While the president has said the move was necessary to prevent the city from "burning to the ground" amid protests and riots, officials in California have accused Trump of exacerbating the situation in an "unprecedented power grab." A police officer firing a soft round near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 8. A police officer firing a soft round near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on June 8. AP Photo/Eric Thayer What To Know Gill, who served Trump a lawsuit in 2023 accusing him of conspiring to fire her from the Veterans Affairs Department during his first presidency, said sending in the Marines was "propaganda" because the protests were not severe enough to require them. Though she said Project 2025 predicted the president's response to the protests, she did not elaborate on how. Project 2025 is a 900-page document of policy proposals published by the Heritage Foundation think tank. It advocates limited government, border security and tough immigration laws among other conservative measures. The policy proposals have proved divisive, and the president's critics and supporters alike have debated their influence on him. While Project 2025 does not mention the Insurrection Act, a November 2023 report from The Washington Post, citing internal communications and a person involved in the conversations, said the Project 2025 group had drafted executive orders that would use the Insurrection Act to deploy the military domestically. Gill told Ali that she warned people of Trump's potential use of the military to curb protests before the presidential election. "We did everything that we could in leading up to the election in 2024 to tell everyone as loud as we can, they are planning to do this," she said, adding: "Saying he's going to call this an invasion. He's going to call this an insurrection. And he's going to use that to invoke emergency powers so that he can unleash the military on United States citizens and perhaps even suspend habeas corpus so that he can detain his political enemies without due process." "This is scary," Gill, who hosts the Mueller, She Wrote podcast, continued. "This is full-on fascism, full-on authoritarianism." "This is a test case for authoritarianism," Ali added. Before the 2024 presidential election, Democrats accused Trump of planning to implement Project 2025 if he won. While Trump initially called parts of the plan "ridiculous and abysmal," he told Time after his electoral victory that he disagreed with parts of it, but not all of it. He has since appointed a number of people linked to Project 2025 to White House positions. In an October interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Trump indicated that he would use the National Guard or the military if there were disruptions from "radical left lunatics" on Election Day. What Does Project 2025 Say? Project 2025 advocates for improved defense infrastructure and for the Department of Homeland Security to "thoroughly enforce immigration laws." The document added that DHS should "provide states and localities with a limited federal emergency response and preparedness." However, it did not say whether this would occur in the context of protests. What Trump's Advisers Have Said Trump's advisers have previously spoken about the use of National Guard troops in other contexts. According to a February 2024 report in The Atlantic, Stephen Miller, now the White House deputy chief of staff, said that Trump—if returned to office—would take National Guard troops from sympathetic Republican-controlled states and use them in Democratic-run states whose governors refused to cooperate with their mass deportation policy. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "We will always protect the constitutional right for Angelenos to peacefully protest. However, violence, destruction and vandalism will not be tolerated in our city and those responsible will be held fully accountable." What Happens Next The anti-ICE protests, which have spread to other cities, are likely to continue. Newsom has called on the Trump administration to remove federal troops from Los Angeles.

China affirms trade deal with US, says it always keeps its word
China affirms trade deal with US, says it always keeps its word

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China affirms trade deal with US, says it always keeps its word

BEIJING (Reuters) -China on Thursday affirmed a trade deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, saying both sides needed to abide by the consensus and adding China always kept its word. The deal, reached after Trump and China's President Xi Jinping spoke on the telephone last week, brings a delicate truce in a trade war between the world's two largest economies. "China has always kept its word and delivered results," Lin Jian, a foreign ministry spokesperson, said at a regular news conference. "Now that a consensus has been reached, both sides should abide by it." The Trump-Xi telephone call broke a standoff that had flared just weeks after a preliminary deal was reached in Geneva. The call was quickly followed by more talks in London that Washington said had put "meat on the bones" of the Geneva agreement to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. Trump on Wednesday said he was very happy with the trade deal. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%." Still, specifics of the latest deal and details on how it will be implemented remain unclear. A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all U.S. trading partners, 20% on all Chinese imports associated with his accusation that China had not done enough to stem the flow of fentanyl into the U.S., and pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China put in place during Trump's first presidential term. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Donald Trump Gold Card Visa Launches: How to Apply
Donald Trump Gold Card Visa Launches: How to Apply

Newsweek

time25 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Gold Card Visa Launches: How to Apply

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's administration has rolled out a website to register interest for its $5 million "gold card" visa. "Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World," Trump wrote in a post on TruthSocial on Wednesday. The president first proposed a gold card program that would offer U.S. residency to individuals who invest $5 million in the country. It is one of the few pathways to citizenship unveiled by the Trump administration. Visitors to are asked to provide their name, region, and email address, and indicate whether they are applying as an individual or a business, to receive a notification as soon as access becomes available. After applicants inquire, the website will display a message that reads: "You'll be the first to hear when access opens." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store