
PM announces full inquiry into grooming gangs after resisting calls for probe
The Prime Minister said he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation.
The Government has for months held off launching a statutory probe, saying its focus was on implementing the outstanding recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay, which found institutional failings and tens of thousands of victims across England and Wales.
But speaking to reporters travelling with him on his visit to Canada, the Prime Minister said: 'From the start I have always said that we should implement the recommendations we have got because we have got many other recommendations… I think there are 200 when you take all of the reviews that have gone on at every level and we have got to get on with implementing them.
'I have never said we should not look again at any issue. I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry. That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit.
'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on.
'She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen.
'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation. That is the right thing to do on the basis of what she has put in her audit.
'I asked her to do that job to double check on this; she has done that job for me and having read her report, I respect her in any event. I shall now implement her recommendations.'
Asked when it would be launched, Sir Keir said the inquiry would be implemented under the Inquiries Act, which will take 'a bit of time to sort out' and would be done in 'an orderly way'.
The issue of grooming gangs was thrown back into the spotlight after tech billionaire Elon Musk used his X social media platform to launch a barrage of attacks on Prime Minister Sir Keir and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips.
It followed the Government's decision to decline a request from Oldham Council for a Whitehall-led inquiry into child sexual abuse in the town.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who has repeatedly attacked Sir Keir over his resistance to another national probe, said the Prime Minister had to be 'led by the nose to make the correct decision'.
'Keir Starmer doesn't know what he thinks unless an official report has told him so,' she said.
'Just like he dismissed concerns about the winter fuel payment and then had to U-turn, just like he needed the Supreme Court to tell him what a woman is, he had to be led by the nose to make the correct decision here.
'I've been repeatedly calling for a full National Inquiry since January. It's about time he recognised he made a mistake and apologised for six wasted months.
'But this must not be the end of the matter. There are many, many more questions that need answering to ensure this inquiry is done properly and quickly.
'Many survivors of the grooming gangs will be relieved that this is finally happening, but they need a resolution soon not in several years' time. Justice delayed is justice denied.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
15 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Opinion: Lib Dem led council must not close Powys day centre
They say 'a society is judged by how it treats its most vulnerable'. Yet as highlighted in last week's County Times, the future of the Sylfaen centre at Llanidloes is under threat. Sylfaen is a Powys County Council-owned day service in Llanidloes which offers service users aged 19 to 72 a programme of sensory-based activities including soap making, sensory craft, gardening, cooking and day trips. Yet there are fears that it could close under Powys County Council's Liberal Democrat-led cabinet. Bearing in mind that Disability is a Protected Characteristic under the Public Sector Equality Duty, public organisations have to consider the potential impacts fully and share the impact assessment with those affected. With that in mind, we need assurance that a full impact assessment about the closure of Sylfaen has been done and not a mere tick box. The general duty of the Equality Act 2010 (also known as the Public Sector Equality Duty or PSED) sets out that those subject to the duty must have due regard to the need to: Eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation and other conduct prohibited by the Act. Advance equality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not. Foster good relations between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not. In Wales, the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) goes further and contains express provisions about engagement (Regulation 5) and equality impact assessments (Regulation 8) which are not present in the English PSED. Regulation 8 (1) of Equality Act 2010 (Statutory Duties) (Wales) Regulations 2011, states that: a. assessing the likely impact of its proposed policies and practices on its ability to comply with the general duty; b. assessing the impact of any: 1. policy or practice that the authority has decided to review, 2. revision that the authority proposes to make to a policy or practice, on its ability to comply with that duty; c. monitoring the impact of its policies on its ability to comply with that duty. The reality is Lib Dem led Powys expect volunteers and Direct Payments to plug the gap yet as is well known that's merely further pressure on carers and families.

The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
Ian Murray 'does not understand how devolution works', minister says
The Scottish Secretary attempted to defend not informing the Government at Holyrood about alterations to the payment by suggesting Westminster would 'never' consult devolved governments on devolved policy. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said Murray "doesn't seem to understand the system", as she laid out how the Labour Government had made it "almost impossible" for the Scottish Government to know how to proceed with its own devolved winter payment. After making the Winter Fuel Payment means-tested last year – meaning only those on pension credit or other benefits would receive it – Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a major policy U-turn last week, with pensioners south of the Border earning up to £35,000 a year now set to get £200 for those aged up to 80 and £300 for those aged over 80. READ MORE: SNP Government rule out Scottish independence convention The current plan in Scotland – which has its own devolved Pension Age Winter Heating Payment – is for all pensioner households to receive £100 regardless of income, while those on pension credit will receive up to £305 depending on age. That was announced on the back of the initial cut made to the UK payment, but Reeves's latest announcement will mean – as things stand – pensioners in England and Wales earning less than £35,000 will get a larger payment than those in Scotland. Scotland will receive more money as a result of the UK change via Barnett consequentials, but Somerville told the Sunday National exact funding implications have not yet been made clear by the UK Government, making it 'almost impossible' for the Scottish Government to decide whether it can alter its own devolved payment. (Image: PA) Murray (above) said that if Labour had consulted the Scottish Government on the policy, it would 'be screaming blue murder at the fact that we're encroaching on the devolution settlement'. But Somerville said: 'If Ian Murray actually understood how the system works, he would know that changes in aspects that are devolved to Scotland, changes that happen down in England, have an implication for a Scottish budget,' she said. 'I don't think it's surprising, and I wouldn't have thought it was asking too much, for the UK Government to therefore talk to the Scottish Government when a decision they're going to make has major funding implications for the Scottish Government. 'I'm afraid Ian Murray, deliberately or otherwise, doesn't seem to understand the system.' Somerville insisted the only way Scotland will only ever be able to escape continued wranglings with the UK Government over social security is through gaining independence. She said she had 'long lost patience' with the Labour UK Government having "no respect" for Scotland after she found out through social media about the fresh changes to the Winter Fuel Payment. Somerville insisted Scotland must have full powers over social security. READ MORE: UK Government must 'urgently engage' with Scotland over migration 'I read about it [the Winter Fuel Payment change] first on social media before a meeting with the Treasury, where they couldn't tell me what the financial implications for Scotland were, and we are still trying to work out the details of how their scheme works and impacts on Scotland,' she said. 'So, there is deep disappointment. But when you have a system as we do, that is so reliant on the UK Government both in terms of its policy decisions and the finances, we are always going to be in this position. 'This is an inevitable consequence of having a Union and having a Union with a government which seems to take decisions with no thought to the implications for Scotland. 'There's clearly only one way we get past that and that's for the Scottish Parliament to have full control of our social security.' It is not the first time this year the Labour Government has left its Scottish counterpart in limbo when it comes to social security. (Image: PA) Earlier this year, the UK Government announced that from 2028/29 onwards, people would only be able to prove their eligibility for the health element of Universal Credit (UC) via the assessment for Personal Independence Payments (PIP). PIP has been replaced in Scotland by the devolved Adult Disability Payment, but the UK Government has still not confirmed whether Scots looking to obtain the UC health element can prove their eligibility via this new system. Somerville (above) told The National in March she had been seeking clarity on this matter from the previous UK Government and never got answers – a trend which she says is continuing under Labour. She said the Labour Government's failure to communicate effectively with Scotland should prove to people a switch in power at Westminster will never result in vulnerable people being better protected. 'Understandably some people thought one of the answers to further protecting vulnerable people in society – or indeed people who just have a right to support like disabled people and carers – was to elect a Labour government,' she said. 'So, we've had a Labour government elected, and the first thing they did was cut the Winter Fuel Payment from pensioners. They followed that with cuts to disabled benefits in the rest of the UK. 'If anyone needed further proof that the answer isn't a change of government in Westminster, we've unfortunately seen that. 'The only way we can protect people from those types of changes is we have those decisions being made up here by a Scottish Government through independence.' Somerville said she wanted to reassure Scottish pensioners they 'will have a winter heating payment this year' while the Government in Edinburgh continues to seek answers on the funding implications of Labour's latest U-turn. A UK Government spokesperson said: "Decisions on Scotland's Pension Age Winter Heating Payment are a matter for the Scottish Government. The Scottish Government will mechanically receive additional funding to reflect the increase in spending in England and Wales through a Block Grant Adjustment, as agreed in the Scottish Government's Fiscal Framework. "Regarding the comments about the Scottish Secretary, Ian Murray joined an HMT briefing with the Cabinet Secretary for Finance on Wednesday where she was informed ahead of publication of the Spending Review that it would mean an extra £9.1 billion for the Scottish Government over the next three years. That's more money than ever before for them to invest in Scottish public services."


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Over 17,000 ScotRail trains cancelled in last year according to new data
New data has revealed the amount of ScotRail services cancelled in 2024/25. Over 17,000 ScotRail trains were cancelled in the last year as revealed in a shocking freedom of information request. A total of 17,491 services were cancelled in 2024/25 according to data released after a request by the Scottish Liberal Democrats. Some 306,120 trains did not arrive within a minute of their scheduled arrival time, which the party said accounted for 45 percent of all trains. Another 71,691 were late by five or more minutes - around 10 percent of all trains. The Lib Dem transport spokesman at Holyrood Jamie Greene said the Scottish Government must deliver a transport system that works for all of Scotland. He said: "When it is done right, train travel is swift, reliable and reduces traffic on our roads. "Unfortunately these figures show that a considerable number of passengers are shelling out huge sums of money to travel by train, only to find that some services simply don't arrive. "It's more than three years since the SNP Government took over responsibility for Scotland's trains but we are still seeing tens of thousands of trains cancelled or running late. "If we want to coax people out of their cars, that has to start with a service that runs on time." Mr Greene urged the Government to work with ScotRail to drive down train delays. He added: "We also want to see Government working with councils to explore new lines, especially in areas where public transport links are poor, and new options for two/three-day-a-week season tickets. "That's how to make Scotland's railways an attractive prospect for tourists and commuters alike." The Scottish Government and ScotRail have been approached for comment. In March, we reported that ScotRail have paid out almost £2.5million in compensation to passengers since the SNP government nationalised it three years ago A Freedom of Information request showed that delay compensation has increased every year since the firm was brought into public hands in April 2022. ScotRail has paid out £2,495,000 in Delay Repay compensation since April 2022. £804,000 was paid out in 2022/23, £908,000 was paid out in 2023/24, and £783,000 was paid out in 2024/25 Compensation paid out for 30-59 minute delays has increased every year. £88,000 was paid out in 2022/23, £104,000 was paid out in 2023/24, and £108,000 was paid out in 2024/25. Pay-outs for 60-119 minute delays has increased every year. £211,000 was paid out in 2022/23, £224,000 was paid out in 2023/24, and £228,000 was paid out in 2024/25. Over £1.5m was paid out for 120+ minute plus delays since April 2022. It was noted that anyone delayed by 30 minutes or more is entitled to claim money back through the ScotRail website or mobile app due to their Delay Repay Guarantee. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.