Metro school districts react to new Missouri cell phone policy
In the metro, the Blue Springs School District sent a letter to families alerting them that students will not be allowed to use their 'electronic communication devices' during the school day.
'While the law aims to reduce distractions, improve academic focus, and enhance student well-being, we understand that not every family or student will see this as a welcome change,' the district's letter reads.
'Students will not be allowed to use their phones during the school day.'
Some Kansas City-area events canceled due to storms expected Friday
The 'school day' mentioned also includes lunchtime and passing periods. Phones must be turned off and stored away. Unauthorized use may lead to disciplinary action.
However, Blue Spring Schools did say that there are exceptions, including emergencies and medical-related circumstances.
This goes for all public and charter schools across Missouri.
'Honestly, if Missouri is trying to better their school education system by not having telephones there, I'm all for it, all for it,' said a parent in the Independence School District, Krystal Neenan.
Neenan has a freshman and a first grader in the Independence School District. She's all for no cell phones at school.
'I honestly think that kids, when they're in school, should be focused on the education, and not on the distraction of a cell phone,' she said.
'I also understand the need for a safety component to that, as well. Like being in contact with your kid 24/7, as well. Like, with the school shootings and all of that. That makes me think that there is a reason for kids to have their phones in school.'
Joe's Blog: Storms and cold fronts (FRI-7/11)
Shain Bergan, the spokesperson for Kansas City Public Schools, said on Friday that they're working to gather feedback as to how they can better serve their students.
'We have been seeking feedback and carrying out a productive dialogue with our community regarding how best to craft a new policy in a way that is cooperative with our community while fulfilling state law, including a comprehensive ongoing survey and direct meetings with stakeholders.'
In Lee's Summit, Lee's Summit R-7 released the following statement:
The Lee's Summit R-7 School District revised its cell phone policy in January after a series of community engagement with students, parents, staff and other community members. This policy removed cell phones from the classroom K-12 but allowed cell phone use in the lunchroom and passing periods for high school students. We have drafted an update to our policy to address the requirements written in Senate Bill 68 and it will be implemented before the state deadline.
Additionally, Park Hill K-12 said that they've been working on the issue since last school year.
'Thanks for checking in. In Park Hill, we've been communicating about this with our families since last spring,' a spokesperson for the district said.
'In May, we sent information to our families about our new cell phone policy at the high school level. I'm copying our communication below. Given the legislative action at the state level, we will be following the guidance of 'no cell phone usage during the school day.'
Lastly, the Raytown School District says that cell phone use during the school day was already prohibited in their schools
'The use of cell phones is already prohibited and outlined in the student handbook,' a spokesperson said.
'We'll be sending communication out to families soon letting them know about the new law and reminding them of the policy.'
Again, these policies must be implemented for all Missouri Public and Charter schools starting this school year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 days ago
- Fox News
The fight over charter schools in some of America's rural states
Nebraska, South Dakota, and Vermont have resisted charter schools due to the negative impact such institutions can have on rural school districts — but that's reportedly changing due to a shift in political leadership. "These are states that love their rural public schools, that depend upon their rural public schools," Carol Burris told Education Week. Burris is the executive director of the Network for Public Education, an advocacy group focused on supporting and improving traditional public schools. "These are not states that are going to be welcoming charter schools," Burris added. Burris said that rural states typically resist charter schools. Most states restrict parents to schools within their zip code or the school district that presides over their residential area, but charter schools allow parents the option to send their kids to a different school. When charter schools are located near public schools, they compete for per-pupil funding as parents are allowed to opt out of sending their children to the neighborhood public school. Concerns include that the money taken away from traditional public schools could be used to boost teachers' salaries, invest in public school facilities and recruit more teachers. North Dakota was previously among the states blocking charter school efforts but eventually embraced them. Education Week also spoke with North Dakota's Superintendent of Public Instruction, Kirsten Baesler, who was recently nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as the assistant secretary of elementary and secondary education in the U.S. Department of Education. Baesler still has to be confirmed by Congress. Baesler said the "desire for more school choice among legislators and voters changed things," which "prompted the legislature to pass the new law allowing charters" in North Dakota. "This new position—approved by the state's super-majority Republican legislature—also aligns more closely with the Trump administration's policies on K-12 education," Education Week reported. According to American Federation for Children President Tommy Schultz, Trump's Big Beautiful Bill will have a huge impact on education in the country. It is considered "the biggest piece of legislation that's ever passed in school choice history" by establishing a federal tax-credit scholarship program. Trump and Education Secretary Linda McMahon previously signaled concern about children being trapped in failing schools. "You're not going to have a lot of charter schools in North Dakota. It's rural, and it's small," Burris said. She added that residents "value local control and fiscal prudence, which has contributed to a cautious approach toward new state-funded educational models." The report from Education Week came after several red states with GOP resistance to charter schools eventually flipped on the issue. Iowa, Idaho, Tennessee, Wyoming and Texas eventually passed universal school choice, overcoming pushback from state-level Republican lawmakers who had previously obstructed the effort. The states have many constituents who live in rural areas. Rural schools tend to face funding challenges due to low enrollment and scarce resources. Rural Republicans, once obstacles to school choice measures, have shifted to supporting the policy in those states. Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds overcame resistance from her GOP colleagues when she sought to pass universal school choice legislation. Reynolds endorsed nine candidates with a pro-parent platform in primary elections, ousting incumbent GOP candidates who did not support that platform. A similar phenomenon occurred in Texas and Tennessee. Several states with GOP trifectas passed universal school choice legislation. Montana is another state that embraced charter schools after electing a Republican governor, Education Week reported. The state's superintendent of public instruction said the fate of charter schools depends on the state's political leadership. "It depends on the legislature. Charter schools have become a cause of the Republican Party," Montana's Superintendent of Public Instruction Susie Hedalen told Education Week. "When Montana had a governor who was a Democrat, the state rejected charter schools," she said. School choice policies typically face hurdles in blue states and where teachers' unions have significant influence. Left-leaning teachers' unions usually reject school choice measures, claiming they debilitate public school funding and resources. No Democratic-controlled state has passed school choice legislation. "Burris expressed doubts that Nebraska or Vermont will implement any kind of charter authorization laws, because Nebraska has strong support for its public schools and Vermont's legislature is controlled by Democrats," reported Education Week.
New York Times
3 days ago
- New York Times
What Is Mamdani's Vision for New York City's $40 Billion School System?
In New York City, mayors often stake their legacies on the records of two huge agencies that touch millions of lives: the Police Department and the public schools. Zohran Mamdani, the front-runner to be the city's next leader, has offered voters a plan to overhaul the city's approach to policing. But with three months until the general election, the state assemblyman's agenda for New York's public school system — the biggest in the United States — remains far less clear. His most significant idea to date would reduce his control over the city's more than 1,500 public schools. New York's mayor retains more authority over education policy than nearly any other big city leader in the nation. But Mr. Mamdani supports ending the model of mayoral control and giving more influence to teachers and parents. He has also backed down from calling for the elimination of a contentious admissions test at a group of eight elite public high schools. The next mayor will enter City Hall at a precarious moment. New York is confronting threats to school funding from the federal government, dismal literacy rates, an alarming crisis of school absences and stark gaps in outcomes between students from well-off families and those from low-income households. Yet during the Democratic primary, most candidates devoted scant attention to public schools, rarely speaking about the district's 900,000 students or its mammoth $40 billion budget, which often represents more than a third of all municipal spending. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Washington Post
5 days ago
- Washington Post
Schools brace for potential cuts to special education funding
Special-education advocates and some public school districts are bracing for potential budget constraints as they prepare for the $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts the president signed into law last month. The billions that public schools get each year in reimbursements from Medicaid for services such as counseling and speech therapy are at risk, advocates warn.
