Bonilla-Herrera inquest: High-risk offenders regularly released into community
By Adam Burns of RNZ
High-risk offenders - similar to the threat posed by the man who murdered Juliana Bonilla-Herrera - are regularly being paroled from prison and into the community, a senior Corrections staff member says.
The comments came as the coronial inquest into the Colombian woman's death continued in Christchurch on Tuesday.
Bonilla-Herrera was stabbed to death by Joseph James Brider in January 2022, just 10 weeks after he was released from prison to a unit next door in Addington.
Coroner Alexandra Cunninghame heard further evidence from Corrections' staff, all of whose identities remain suppressed, during the second day of proceedings.
This included Brider's probation officer, who broke down during the early stages of their testimony.
Earlier, a senior Corrections case manager gave evidence in court.
The experienced staffer acted as an intermediary between the department and community reintegration services when Brider's release was being planned for in 2021.
Counsel assisting the coroner Rebekah Jordan asked the witness about efforts to secure Brider a bed at the Salisbury Street Foundation (SSF) rehabilitation centre in 2021, including approving the arrangement before a June hearing with the New Zealand Parole Board.
Due to uncertainty that the SSF centre would have a bed for Brider, alternative accommodation arrangements were sought.
A referral to the centre would ultimately be cancelled by the department.
The Corrections staff member said there was a shortage of suitable accommodation options, exacerbated by the "unavoidable" closure of a community provider at that time.
"Whether that was a factor, I believe it played a part in terms of them being unable to confirm bed availability, because there was still people coming in and going and they were trying to juggle where they were at," they said.
During follow-up questions, Corrections lawyer Pip Currie asked generally about the release of parolees.
"In terms of Mr Brider and his risk, he was seen as a high-risk offender, are other high-risk offenders also being released into the community?"
"Yes," they replied.
"People with higher needs than Mr Brider, in terms of what was seen as the risk?" Currie followed.
"I would have to say yes."
The witness added there was not enough intensive support services like the SSF centre in the community.
Earlier in the day, Brider's case manager faced further questions after beginning their evidence on Monday.
When Jordan asked if they would have done anything differently in hindsight, they said it was a "difficult question to answer".
"I don't think anyone knew that this would've happened. The circumstances of his offending wasn't within the risk profile we were working with."
Cunninghame allowed the family, who were again dialled in via audio-visual link from overseas, to ask questions of witnesses.
Through interpreters, Bonilla-Herrera's sister Saray Bonilla asked both witnesses whether - "from a human perspective" - they considered it necessary to warn neighbours of the possible danger.
Both times Cunninghame intervened, explaining this was beyond scope of the witnesses' role in proceedings.
Later Brider's probation officer was called to give evidence.
Visibly upset, the witness expressed their condolences to the Bonilla-Herrera family as they began their pre-written statement,
The court heard how the probation officer was alerted via email the day after Bonilla-Herrera was murdered that Brider's curfew arrangements had not been correctly logged.
"I did not know it hadn't been loaded into the system."
Despite this, the officer continued to carry out daily checks as if it had been correctly entered.
They also explained growing concerns about their client following his release, particularly due to the fact Brider was no longer to be housed at the SSF centre.
"I already knew he we was high risk because Salisbury Street is where our high risk offenders go to. So the fact that was indicated, that he was supposed to go to Salisbury Street, made me hyper-aware.
As a result, they explained they would need to take on "a lot more oversight" for Brider.
The witness will resume their evidence on Wednesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Ticking time bomb': Killer's emails revealed, public deserves inquiry
By Sam Sherwood of RNZ The public "deserves an inquiry" into the forensic mental health system, says the chief victims advisor, after revelations an elderly mental health patient who murdered a pensioner killed his brother 50 years ago. Elliot Cameron was sentenced in the High Court at Christchurch last week to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 10 years by Justice Rachel Dunningham for murdering 83-year-old Frances Anne Phelps, known as Faye. A suppression order was lifted on Monday, allowing RNZ to report Cameron killed his brother Jeffrey Cameron in 1975. A jury found him not guilty of murder by reason of insanity and detained as a special patient. Cameron was made a voluntary patient at Hillmorton Hospital in 2016, and then in October last year murdered Phelps, striking her with an axe. RNZ exclusively obtained emails from Cameron to his cousin Alan Cameron sent over more than a decade, detailing his concerns that he might kill again. In response to the revelations, Chief Victims Advisor Ruth Money said it was hard to see Phelps' death as "anything other than preventable". "Mr Cameron was clearly in mental distress and as these communications show his risk was escalating. He knew it so why didn't those professionals caring for him recognise it and if they did, what action if any did they take?" RNZ earlier revealed another case involving a man who was made a special patient under the Mental Health Act after his first killing was recently found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for a second time, after killing someone he believed was possessed. After that article, Money called for a Royal Commission of Inquiry into forensic mental health facilities. On Monday evening, Money said she stood by her recommendation. "Now four weeks on, we learn of another patient who has warned of his intent and distress numerous times and yet he too has gone on to kill for a second time. "The public deserves an inquiry that can give actionable expert recommendations, as opposed to multiple Coroners inquests and recommendations that do not have the same binding influence. The patients themselves, and the public will be best served by an independent inquiry, not another internal review that changes nothing." The emails In 2010, Cameron made an alarming suggestion to his cousin. "Once someone has been driven to murder... it is a lot easier to... drive them to murder again," he wrote. "The probability of me repeating the offence outside hospital is greater than the probability of me repeating the offence where I am and so disrupting society is less when I remain in hospital." "I am correctly placed in a mental hospital," he said. "I should remain where I am." His anxieties around any change in his circumstances bubbled up again in 2016 when his patient status was changed to "informal" - meaning he was free to leave Hillmorton. "My mental state has not changed and I would be vulnerable in society and this would lead me to repeat the offence," he wrote to his cousin. "The mood here is to discharge anyone they can regardless of circumstances," he continued. "I would not like to go to jail but this may be my only option. I would need to remain in hospital. I would be grateful if you were prepared to look at this." In another email he wrote: "I may not have a better alternative than to re-offend. My vulnerability will lead me to recommit my original offence if forced on." At Elliot's sentencing it was revealed that in December 2022, he told nursing staff that he would be "hard to ignore if he was chopping up bodies" and continued threats over the next couple of months to kill people if discharged from hospital. In July 2024, Elliot threatened "disastrous measures" if he was discharged. 'Ticking time bomb' Phelps' daughter Karen Phelps told RNZ it was "shocking and appalling" that Cameron had expressed his vulnerability and the risk he believed he posed to the community with Hillmorton staff. She does not believe he was listened to or given the help he needed, and was therefore "a ticking time bomb". "They knew Elliot had vulnerabilities, they knew he'd killed before. "In my view, knowing Elliot was continually raising concerns about his mental health and the fact he might reoffend if released into the community, the blood of my mother is clearly on the hands of the DHB. It's hard to see it any other way. Health New Zealand deputy chief executive Te Waipounamu Martin Keogh earlier expressed "heartfelt condolences" to Phelps' family for their loss. "We have taken this tragic event extremely seriously and a full external review is progressing. "We have been in touch with the family and are keeping them updated on the review. Once the review is completed, it will be shared with the family and the coroner." Keogh was unable to provide further comment while the review is ongoing and the Coroner's inquest is yet to be completed. Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey said in a statement to RNZ he had been "very clear" more needed to be done to improve mental health and addiction outcomes and services in New Zealand. The Mental Health Bill currently before Parliament aimed to set out a new approach to the decision-making around change of status from special patient. If passed, the bill would establish a Forensic Review Tribunal responsible for determining long leave, reviewing the condition of these patients, and determining changes in legal status. "Any serious incident, particularly where someone is tragically killed, is a cause of very serious concern. "That is why it is important that investigations and reviews are triggered and recommendations for changes to services are acted on. As minister my focus will be on ensuring agencies involved are putting in place the necessary changes to help prevent these incidents occurring again."
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Public deserves inquiry' after double killer's emails revealed
By Sam Sherwood of RNZ The public "deserves an inquiry" into the forensic mental health system, says the Chief Victims Advisor, after revelations an elderly mental health patient who murdered a pensioner killed his brother 50 years ago. Elliot Cameron was sentenced in the High Court at Christchurch last week to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 10 years by Justice Rachel Dunningham for murdering 83-year-old Frances Anne Phelps, known as Faye. A suppression order was lifted on Monday, allowing RNZ to report Cameron killed his brother Jeffrey Cameron in 1975. A jury found him not guilty of murder by reason of insanity and detained as a special patient. Cameron was made a voluntary patient at Hillmorton Hospital in 2016, and then in October last year murdered Phelps, striking her with an axe. RNZ exclusively obtained emails from Cameron to his cousin Alan Cameron sent over more than a decade, detailing his concerns that he might kill again. In response to the revelations, Chief Victims Advisor Ruth Money said it was hard to see Phelps' death as "anything other than preventable". "Mr Cameron was clearly in mental distress and as these communications show his risk was escalating. He knew it so why didn't those professionals caring for him recognise it and if they did, what action if any did they take?" RNZ earlier revealed another case involving a man who was made a special patient under the Mental Health Act after his first killing was recently found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for a second time, after killing someone he believed was possessed. After that article, Money called for a Royal Commission of Inquiry into forensic mental health facilities. On Monday evening, Money said she stood by her recommendation. "Now four weeks on, we learn of another patient who has warned of his intent and distress numerous times and yet he too has gone on to kill for a second time. "The public deserves an inquiry that can give actionable expert recommendations, as opposed to multiple Coroners inquests and recommendations that do not have the same binding influence. The patients themselves, and the public will be best served by an independent inquiry, not another internal review that changes nothing." The emails In 2010, Cameron made an alarming suggestion to his cousin. "Once someone has been driven to murder... it is a lot easier to... drive them to murder again," he wrote. "The probability of me repeating the offence outside hospital is greater than the probability of me repeating the offence where I am and so disrupting society is less when I remain in hospital." "I am correctly placed in a mental hospital," he said. "I should remain where I am." His anxieties around any change in his circumstances bubbled up again in 2016 when his patient status was changed to "informal" - meaning he was free to leave Hillmorton. "My mental state has not changed and I would be vulnerable in society and this would lead me to repeat the offence," he wrote to his cousin. "The mood here is to discharge anyone they can regardless of circumstances," he continued. "I would not like to go to jail but this may be my only option. I would need to remain in hospital. I would be grateful if you were prepared to look at this." In another email he wrote: "I may not have a better alternative than to re-offend. My vulnerability will lead me to recommit my original offence if forced on." At Elliot's sentencing it was revealed that in December 2022, he told nursing staff that he would be "hard to ignore if he was chopping up bodies" and continued threats over the next couple of months to kill people if discharged from hospital. In July 2024, Elliot threatened "disastrous measures" if he was discharged. 'Ticking time bomb' Phelps' daughter Karen Phelps told RNZ it was "shocking and appalling" that Cameron had expressed his vulnerability and the risk he believed he posed to the community with Hillmorton staff. She does not believe he was listened to or given the help he needed, and was therefore "a ticking time bomb". "They knew Elliot had vulnerabilities, they knew he'd killed before. "In my view, knowing Elliot was continually raising concerns about his mental health and the fact he might reoffend if released into the community, the blood of my mother is clearly on the hands of the DHB. It's hard to see it any other way. Health New Zealand deputy chief executive Te Waipounamu Martin Keogh earlier expressed "heartfelt condolences" to Phelps' family for their loss. "We have taken this tragic event extremely seriously and a full external review is progressing. "We have been in touch with the family and are keeping them updated on the review. Once the review is completed, it will be shared with the family and the coroner." Keogh was unable to provide further comment while the review is ongoing and the Coroner's inquest is yet to be completed. Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey said in a statement to RNZ he had been "very clear" more needed to be done to improve mental health and addiction outcomes and services in New Zealand. The Mental Health Bill currently before Parliament aimed to set out a new approach to the decision-making around change of status from special patient. If passed, the bill would establish a Forensic Review Tribunal responsible for determining long leave, reviewing the condition of these patients, and determining changes in legal status. "Any serious incident, particularly where someone is tragically killed, is a cause of very serious concern. "That is why it is important that investigations and reviews are triggered and recommendations for changes to services are acted on. As minister my focus will be on ensuring agencies involved are putting in place the necessary changes to help prevent these incidents occurring again."
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
'Kids in sport stay out of court' - Sport NZ to help curb youth offending
Police Minister Mark Mitchell wants Sport NZ to "work collaboratively" to reduce youth offending and recidivism. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The government wants Sport New Zealand to help curb youth offending, but says the funding being redirected for those initiatives will not be put into the young offender "boot camps". Sport and Recreation Minister Mark Mitchell - who also has the Police and Corrections portfolios - unveiled the findings of a review into the Crown agency last month, resulting in savings of $2.9 million a year and moving its strategic policy arm to the Ministry for Culture and Heritage. He also pointed to plans to have Sport NZ "work collaboratively alongside my other portfolios, particularly in relation to priorities to reduce youth offending and recidivism". The government has set a target to reduce child and youth offending, aiming for a 15 percent reduction in the total number of children and young people with serious and persistent offending behaviour. Sport NZ group manager for play, active recreation and sport Jim Ellis told RNZ said they had been working on pilot projects with police, Corrections and Oranga Tamariki for the past three or four years. "Our ability to say to the particular police agency or district 'here is some funding that enables that particular young person to have an experience that is likely to lead to less offending, less reoffending' is an example that we've got live in Auckland at the moment, and we may well look to scale around the country as an option," he said. "We've also engaged very strongly over the last three to four years with a pilot attempting to look at the value of sport for young people growing up in state care and often on the edge of the youth justice system... really positive as a way of changing the potential course of those young people's lives." They were excited about taking the next step with the new funding. "[It] speaks very strongly to the work the Sport New Zealand wants to do, to see more youth - and in particular youth at some level of disadvantage - have opportunities for sport and to be active in ways that work for them, and we know that that historically just worked well," he said. "Kids in sports stay out of court - but also they do better at school, and their communities are healthier when they're engaged in being active through sport or other means." Blue Light NZ chief executive Brendon Crompton said 'kids in sport stay out of court' had been the catchphrase of former Principal Youth Court judge Andrew Becroft - who went on to be the Children's Commissioner - when he was patron of the group 15 years ago. "If you kind of dig down into that, what he's actually talking about is kids who are positively engaged - and sport is obviously one way kids can be positive engaged - tend not to get into trouble because their time is filled with things to do and obviously positive adults in their life. "For our youth offender program, 80 percent of kids who engage with us... don't reoffend." He pointed to New Zealand Open golf champion Ryan Peake as an example of how sport and other activities could turn a person's life around. It was more than just providing some shoes and uniforms, or paying team fees, he said. "The kids we're talking about, if that's who they're really targeting, they need a bit more support. And it's not ongoing forever, but going down and meeting the coach, attend the first couple of practices, meet the other kids, attending one or two games - that sounds like it should be the role of the parent, but the parent isn't doing that job, so we just have to accept that. "Often, once kids are engaged, then they'll walk to their games, they'll cycle to their games - but they were not going to do that as a cold call." But Sport NZ was likely not well set up to handle that pastoral care approach, he said, so he would hope to see it invest the funding into organisations like Blue Light. Ellis said the $2.9m a year found in the review - launched by the previous Sport Minister Chris Bishop in November - all came from internal programs or costs, and was not being recouped from any other sport and recreation sector investments. All of it will be redirected back into Sport NZ programmes, but which programmes it goes to will depend on the minister. Mitchell told RNZ he was expecting to hear back from the agency next month about options for reinvesting the $2.9m, but potentially all of it could go to curbing youth offending. "Obviously the overall strategic focus of the use of that money is to make sure we get young people into sport and exercise, get some good mentors and role models around them - particularly those ones that aren't engaged at the moment, and particularly those ones that are at risk of coming into the youth justice system," he said. "There's some programs running at the moment... using sport and rec, some of our best young sports people and role models to actually to spend time with them, get them active and mentor them. So just programs like that." Mitchell ruled out spending the funding on the government's Young Offender Military Academy "boot camp" schemes. "No, this fund is not designed for that, they've got their own funding that's done through OT (Oranga Tamariki)," he said. The young people on the pilot programme had asked to be involved in more sport, recreation and team-building exercises, he said. "And we're changing so that instead of being limited to three months, we can keep them in that residence and that program longer - that's exactly what they've been getting, they've been getting access to sport, recreation and team building exercises, and they've loved it, and they've asked for more of it." Children's Minister Karen Chhour's office confirmed the Military Academies would have the timeframes for the residential phase extended from the pilot's three months, but said the exact timeframe would be finalised after an independent evaluation was complete following the first pilot's conclusion next month. Crompton said the "boot camp" label - which was used by National when the party campaigned on the policy - was misleading. "That's a 1960s term. Essentially, they're intensive residential based programs, and we know intensive residential based programs work. "What I know they're doing is they're trying to have longer, more therapeutic residential-based courses. The problem you have then is that kids still have to come back to the community and in the last pilot, I think ... [where] they placed some of those young people post release, probably needed a little bit more thought." The Culture and Heritage Ministry had $2m cut from its Budget last month , and has proposed cutting 24 roles - about 15 percent of its staff - to make savings. Asked if the ministry would receive more funding to cover the new sport policy responsibilities being transferred to it, Mitchell said it would come out of baseline funding. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
