logo
Trump wants to cut taxes for Americans. His $700bn tariffs raid could pay for it

Trump wants to cut taxes for Americans. His $700bn tariffs raid could pay for it

Yahoo04-04-2025

Alarm bells may have rung across the globe after Donald Trump's announcement on Wednesday but closer to home the president's tariffs blitz also amounts to America's biggest tax rise in nearly 60 years.
His 'reciprocal' measures alone will raise nearly $400bn (£305bn) of new revenue, according to JPMorgan, with the cash that businesses pay on tariffs going directly into the pocket of the US government.
'This would be the largest tax increase since the Revenue Act of 1968,' says Michael Feroli, an economist at the investment bank.
On the surface, it feels contradictory for a US president who has promised to slash taxes for Americans to start dipping into the pockets of American businesses.
But Trump has bigger plans for his windfall: he wants to use the revenue raised from the tariffs to pay for cuts to taxes paid by US citizens.
'For years, hard working American citizens were forced to sit on the sidelines as other nations got rich and powerful, much of it at our expense. But now it's our turn to prosper and, in doing so, use trillions and trillions of dollars to reduce our taxes,' Trump said in his White House Rose Garden speech.
'Now we're going to pass the largest tax cuts in American history.'
The sums that Trump can play with are huge. Wednesday's barrage came on top of charges already imposed on imports from Canada, Mexico and China, as well as all steel and aluminium imports.
All in, Citi bank calculates that Trump's tariffs will raise at least $700bn for America's public purse – a colossal sum equivalent to double the GDP of Portugal.
Ironically, Trump's flagship 'tax cut' will actually mean simply maintaining the status quo.
A package of tax reductions including sweeping income tax cuts passed during his first term, known as the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was only temporary and is due to expire at the end of December.
This means that if Donald Trump does nothing, millions of Americans will be hit by income tax rises at the start of 2026.
Trump is now pushing Congress to pass a package that would make the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent. Republicans are hoping to tag on additional tax cuts to these plans.
Keeping the 2017 tax cuts in place will cost $5.5 trillion over the next decade, or around $550bn per year – a figure that will almost wipe out the lion's share of Trump's $700bn tariff windfall.
James Knightley, chief international economist at ING bank in New York, says making the 2017 tax cuts permanent will be the president's main priority.
Partly, this is because Trump knows tax cuts are essential for maintaining his support.
US Chamber of Commerce polling last month showed overwhelming public backing for extending the 2017 cuts, with the share of those in favour outnumbering those against by a ratio of three to one.
'We may see Trump lean into the tax cuts, which could be accelerated and be bigger than originally thought as an effort to give the market what would be a very welcome proverbial dessert,' Libby Cantrill, head of US public policy at Pimco, said.
And economic pain will make them even more urgent. American stocks slumped on Thursday, with the S&P 500 falling by as much as 4.5pc and the Nasdaq dropping by as much as 5.9pc.
After extending his 2017 cuts, Trump's next priority is likely to be cutting corporation tax for companies that produce their goods in America from 21pc to 15pc.
This is a key part of Trump's bid to get companies to bring their operations back to American shores. The measure would cost between $20bn and $30bn a year.
Trump will also push to end tax on tips, a campaign promise that actually received bipartisan support, says Knightley. 'I think that one would be easier to get through.' This would also cost around $30bn a year.
If Trump presses ahead with all three of these tax cuts, the combined cost would therefore be around $610bn, in theory leaving him about $90bn to play with.
But this would not be enough to cover the bill of Trump's other promises to make overtime pay tax-free, which would cost around $200bn a year, or exempt social security benefits from tax, at a cost of around $100bn, says Knightley.
In total, then, Trump has outlined plans for tax cuts that would cost the public purse more than $1 trillion a year – far more than he can claw in from his new tariffs.
Trump needs to get tax cuts approved by Congress – to do this, he needs to show that he can balance the books. And economists warn that simple calculations on tariff revenue and tax cuts do not account for the fact that tariffs are likely to depress tax revenues elsewhere.
Warnings are mounting that if he keeps his tariffs in place, Trump will push the US economy into a painful downturn.
Mark Haefele, from UBS, warned in a client note on Wednesday that: '[if] the tariffs announced today remain in place for more than three to six months … we believe this could lead to a US recession.'
Tariffs will drive up inflation. Pimco warns that consumer price growth could accelerate to 4.5pc, nearly double the current 2.8pc rate of inflation.
Higher inflation means that real incomes could drop this year, bringing consumer spending down with it, says JPMorgan's Feroli. 'This is before accounting for the additional hits to gross exports and to investment spending.'
Companies will pull-back on hiring and investment, says Andrew Hollenhurst, US chief economist at Citi. Though foreign producers may pay for some of the tariff charges, at least part of the cost will be extracted by American consumers, he says.
High tariffs to pay for tax cuts may therefore be a self-defeating logic. 'What you're doing is you're giving with one hand but taking away with another,' says Knightley.
While tariffs will hit poorer families hardest, the benefits of income tax cuts will be felt primarily by higher earners. This could prove a major threat to Trump's support in the rust belt.
In turn, aggressive tariff charges may bring in less than expected because lower economic growth could reduce income tax receipts, says Knightley.
'If there is weaker consumer activity and weaker jobs, we're going to get less revenue from other sources. If the economy starts losing jobs, we're going to get less payroll tax revenue.'
While tax cuts for ordinary citizens could offset some of the economic toll from higher tariffs, they will not be able to shield America from an incoming economic tornado of higher inflation, a slump in spending, job losses and the increasingly likely prospect of recession.
Or in other words, Trump could simply be shooting himself in the foot.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Macron visits Greenland to show European support for Danish territory coveted by Trump
Macron visits Greenland to show European support for Danish territory coveted by Trump

Los Angeles Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Macron visits Greenland to show European support for Danish territory coveted by Trump

NUUK, Greenland — French President Emmanuel Macron landed Sunday in Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory coveted by President Trump, carrying a 'message of solidarity and friendship' from France and the European Union. Macron reiterated his criticism of Trump's intention to take control of the strategic Arctic island. 'I don't think that's something to be done between allies,' he said as he was greeted at the Nuuk airport by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen. 'It's important to show that Denmark and Europe are committed to this territory, which has very high strategic stakes and whose territorial integrity must be respected,' Macron said. He was making a stop on his way a summit of the Group of 7 leading industrialized nations in Canada that Trump will also attend. Macron, who is visiting Greenland for the first time, said that 'it means a lot to me ... to convey a message of friendship and solidarity from France and the European Union to help this territory face the different challenges: economic development, education, as well as the consequences of climate change.' In a speech last week at the U.N. Ocean Conference, Macron also mentioned Greenland and the deep seas, saying they are not 'up for grabs' in remarks that appeared directed largely at Trump. Macron in recent months has sought to reinvigorate France's role as the diplomatic and economic heavyweight of the 27-nation European Union. The French president has positioned himself as a leader in Europe amid Trump's threats to pull support from Ukraine as it fights against Russia's invasion. Macron hosted a summit in Paris with other European heads of state to discuss Kyiv, as well as security issues on the continent. Sunday's visit will also be the occasion to discuss how to further enhance relations between the EU and Greenland when it comes to economic development, low-carbon energy transition and critical minerals. The leaders will also have exchanges on efforts to curb global warming, according to Macron's office. Later Sunday, Macron, Frederiksen and Nielsen held a meeting on a Danish helicopter carrier, showing France's concerns over security issues in the region. Last week, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and the Panama Canal by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions during a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss highly sensitive military operations. Hegseth's comments were the latest controversial remarks made by a member of the Trump administration about Greenland, the world's largest island. Trump has said he won't rule out military force to take over Greenland, which he considers vital to American security in the high north. The Wall Street Journal last month reported that several high-ranking officials under the U.S. director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, had directed intelligence agency heads to learn more about Greenland's independence movement and sentiment about U.S. resource extraction there. Nielsen in April said that U.S. statements about the island have been disrespectful and that Greenland 'will never, ever be a piece of property that can be bought by just anyone.' Associated Press writers Ha and Corbet reported from Nuuk and Paris, respectively. AP writer Stefanie Dazio in Berlin contributed to this report.

Trump: ‘It's possible' US becomes involved in Israel-Iran conflict
Trump: ‘It's possible' US becomes involved in Israel-Iran conflict

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump: ‘It's possible' US becomes involved in Israel-Iran conflict

President Trump said 'it's possible' the United States becomes involved in the current conflict between Iran and Israel, ABC News reported Sunday. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' Trump told ABC News. ABC News also reported that Trump expressed interest in the possibility of mediation in the Iran-Israel conflict by Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'I would be open to it. [Putin] is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation. This is something I believe is going to get resolved,' Trump said, per ABC News. On Thursday overnight, Israel bombarded Iran, moving forward with its largest-ever military operation against its common Middle East rival and upending a push from President Trump for a nuclear deal with Iran. The U.S. attempted to quickly distance itself from the strikes that killed some of Iran's top military leaders. However, Trump administration officials were reportedly briefed on plans prior to the strikes. 'Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on Thursday evening. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners,' he added. The Hill has reached out to the White House for further comment.

Australians Equally Distrust Both Trump and Xi, Survey Finds
Australians Equally Distrust Both Trump and Xi, Survey Finds

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Australians Equally Distrust Both Trump and Xi, Survey Finds

(Bloomberg) -- Australians are equally distrustful of both US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, according to a new survey, complicating Canberra's task of managing ties with its key security ally and biggest trading partner. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space Do World's Fairs Still Matter? NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban As American Architects Gather in Boston, Retrofits Are All the Rage A new survey released by the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney showed that 72% of respondents said they didn't trust Trump to act responsibly in global affairs, just edging out the 71% who said they didn't trust China's Xi. When asked whether Trump or Xi would be a better partner for Australia, the two leaders were tied at 45% apiece. The results come as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attends a Group of Seven meeting in Canada, where he could hold his first face-to-face meeting with the US president. Albanese will be hoping to negotiate an exemption on US steel and aluminum tariffs for Australia, as well as trying to secure Trump's support for Aukus following the announcement in Washington of a review of the security accord. Albanese's balancing act with Trump is a difficult one. Australians' faith in the US has deteriorated following the president's return to the White House. Trust in America as a global player has fallen to just 36%, by far the lowest result in the Lowy survey's 20-year history. Yet despite an aversion to Trump, Australians aren't ready to move away from the US as the nation's primary security partner. The survey showed consistent support for the US alliance, with 80% of respondents saying America was important for Australia's security. Meanwhile, attitudes to China have slightly improved, although Beijing is generally considered less reliable than the US across most metrics. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store