Voters to select three new Oklahoma representatives
Voters cast their ballots on Nov. 5 at an polling location in Edmond. (Photo by Janelle Stecklein/Oklahoma Voice)
Three open seats in the Oklahoma House will be decided June 10 by voters in a special election.
Polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m on the day of the election.
In Tulsa County, voters will choose between Republican Beverly Atteberry and Democrat Amanda Clinton.
The seat opened up when Rep. Amanda Swope, D-Tulsa, stepped down in December for a position in the City of Tulsa's government.
Atteberry, 57, previously said she's lived in the district since 1993 and knows the community well since she's seen all of its 'ups and downs.'
As an attorney and business owner, she said her knowledge of the law and inner-workings of the state Capitol will let her 'hit the ground running.' Atteberry's law firm serves Tulsa area clients and focuses on wills, probate, and criminal law.
Improving Oklahoma's roads, public education and government spending to help bring more businesses to the state are among her priorities if elected, Atteberry told Oklahoma Voice.
Clinton, 46, is a small business owner, an adjunct professor at Oklahoma State University and a former journalist. She worked for Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols' campaign and on boards for Planned Parenthood and the OSU Foundation Board of Governors.
She previously said she's an advocate for reproductive health freedom, access to medical care, clean water and minimizing 'state Superintendent Ryan Walters' impact on public schools.' Her priorities also include lowering the cost of living and ending homelessness, according to her website.
Clinton has said her experience with the Cherokee Nation has been an example to her of a government serving its people.
Democrat Amy Hossain will face off against Republican Kevin Wayne Norwood in the race for House District 74. The district in Tulsa and Rogers Counties includes Owasso and part of Tulsa.
Rep. Mark Vancuren, R-Owasso, resigned in December for a job in the Tulsa County government.
Hossain, 50, works as the chief human resources officer for Domestic Violence Intervention Services in Tulsa and is the president of Khan Ohana, a nonprofit working to 'break the cycle of poverty among college students.'
She previously said she's running because as a voter, she's been frustrated by the lack of options on her ballot in the past and wanted to give voters the choice to elect someone from her party.
If elected, her priorities include raising the minimum wage, better funding for public schools, access to affordable and accessible health care and housing, according to her website.
Norwood, 58, is a pastor who said he's been involved in his community, helping to build businesses and mentoring youth, for three decades. His work with community initiatives like Keep Owasso Beautiful and Owasso Cares have led to recognition and awards, according to his website.
Building a 'vibrant' economy, tax relief for Oklahomans, safer communities, strong infrastructure and supporting community and family initiatives are among his priorities. He also intends to 'revitalize main streets' and stop the 'green energy grift,' according to his website.
Norwood will 'champion' his community and 'reflect conservative Oklahoma values,' according to his campaign website.
Finally, two Democrats, JeKia Harrison and Aletia Haynes Timmons, will vie for the open House District 91 seat, representing parts of Oklahoma City and Midwest City.
Rep. Jason Lowe, D-Oklahoma City, stepped down in April to serve as an Oklahoma County commissioner.
Harrison, 35, works as a legislative assistant for Rep. Meloyde Blancett, D-Tulsa, and previously worked as a child welfare specialist for the state Department of Human Services.
She also owns Pen 2 Paper Consulting, a political campaign consulting and management firm, and has been involved in leadership for organizations like Young Democrats of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma chapter of Moms Demand Action, which advocates for stronger gun laws.
Increased funding for Oklahoma public schools, more affordable housing, reforms to criminal justice and raising the minimum wage are some of Harrison's priorities, according to her campaign website.
Timmons, 64, is a recently retired Oklahoma County District judge and she previously worked in civil rights and employment law, as well as in the Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office.
Her priorities include criminal justice reforms, greater accountability in government, strengthening the economy and 'finding common ground and working for real solutions,' according to her campaign website.
Timmons has received several awards and recognitions for her 'dedication to justice, community service, and diversity,' according to her website. She's a founder of a program in Northeast Oklahoma City addressing food insecurity and has worked as an instructor on Langston University's Oklahoma City campus.
Early voting is set for Thursday and Friday at select locations between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.
Voters can check their registration status and polling location on the Oklahoma Election Board's website.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Four States Ask F.D.A. to Lift Special Restrictions on Abortion Pill
In a strategy aimed at countering efforts to further restrict the abortion pill mifepristone, attorneys general of four states that support abortion rights on Thursday asked the Food and Drug Administration to do the opposite and lift the most stringent remaining restrictions on the pill. The petition filed by Massachusetts, New York, California and New Jersey might seem surprising given the opposition to abortion expressed by Trump administration officials. But the attorneys general consider it a move that would require the F.D.A. to acknowledge extensive scientific research that has consistently found mifepristone safe and effective, said an official with the Massachusetts attorney general's office who worked on the filing and asked not to be named in order to share background information. It would also prevent the F.D.A. from changing mifepristone regulations while the petition is pending. The petition notes that at a May senate hearing, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary, responded to questions by Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, who opposes abortion, by saying he had ordered the F.D.A. to do a 'complete review' of mifepristone. 'We want to make sure that when F.D.A. is making these decisions that they have all the data in front of them, all of the really powerful data that show that mifepristone is safe' the Massachusetts official said. The F.D.A. is required to respond within 180 days by granting or denying the request, or saying it needs more time. In its responses, the agency must document its position, which could be useful in lawsuits, including one that the four states could file if their petition is denied. Mifepristone, which blocks a hormone necessary for pregnancy development, was approved for abortion in America in 2000. The F.D.A. imposed an additional regulatory framework called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, on mifepristone. That framework has been used for only about 300 drugs, currently covering only about 60 medications. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
20 minutes ago
- New York Times
Top Democrat Warns Hegseth He Could Face Fines for Accepting Qatari Plane
Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, informed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday that he could face steep fines for having accepted a luxury jet from the Qatari government, arguing the gift violated the Constitution and a federal gifts law, and required congressional approval. Mr. Hegseth was the official who formally accepted a Boeing 747 jetliner from Qatar last month, according to a Defense Department spokesman. The Pentagon has directed the Air Force to upgrade its security measures so that President Trump can use the plane as a new Air Force One. The gift has raised a host of concerns among both Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Some have focused on national security risks, saying they worry the plane might have listening devices, or that Mr. Trump's desire for a new plane before he leaves office might rush any security upgrade and lead corners to be cut on critical protection systems. But many lawmakers, especially Democrats such as Mr. Raskin, have focused on the ethical issues raised by a lavish gift to an American president from a foreign government. They have accused Mr. Trump of corruption and expressed fears that Qatar may be trying to improperly influence the Trump administration. In a letter on Wednesday, Mr. Raskin, a former professor of constitutional law, warned Mr. Hegseth that his acceptance of the plane violated the Constitution's emoluments clause, which bars federal officials from accepting financial benefits from foreign governments without Congress's approval. Congress has not yet taken any formal vote to accept the plane as a gift from Qatar. Officials in the Trump administration have said that the gift is to the U.S. government, not to him as president, and therefore that it does not violate the Constitution or ethics laws. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' losing momentum in Senate
The sprawling bill to enact President Trump's 'big, beautiful' agenda is losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk and outspoken opposition from conservatives. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) warned colleagues at a special conference meeting Wednesday afternoon that there are two likely 'no' votes against the bill within the Senate GOP conference, which means just one more defection would derail the legislation, according to a senator who attended the meeting. 'Crapo just said, 'I think [there] are two of us who are pretty definite no's,' which means we can't lose anybody else,' the source said. Crapo did not name names, but colleagues assumed he was talking about conservative Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). Paul says he will vote against the bill because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, extending the federal government's borrowing authority past the 2026 midterm election. Johnson, meanwhile, has called for Senate GOP colleagues to scrap the House-passed bill and move a smaller measure that would focus on extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, securing the border and banking on the spending cuts identified by House committee chairs. 'What I am rock-solid on is that I can't accept this as the new normal,' he said of projections that the annual federal deficit will reach $2.2 trillion in 2025 and grow to $2.7 trillion by 2035. 'We have our chance to reverse this,' he said of growing deficits. 'I will not be responsible for continuing this.' Paul and Johnson are stepping up their criticism of the bill just as Musk is urging lawmakers to 'KILL' the legislation, warning it will blow up the deficit. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk posted on his social platform X. The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that the 1,116-page bill passed by the House will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to get the bill to his desk. But some GOP lawmakers say that's looking increasingly unlikely because of a battle between Republican senators over cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the repeal of renewable energy tax incentives. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said. 'The sooner President Trump recognizes the reality of the situation, the sooner we can work on a smaller version of the bill, do the things that have to be done: Extend current tax law, increase the debt ceiling, provide border funding,' he said. He said the package could include spending cuts already passed by the House, such as a proposal to reduce federal subsidies to Medicaid by $698 billion and reduce SNAP spending by $267 billion. The expectation that Paul and Johnson will vote against the bill could give more leverage to Republicans who want to make other changes, further delaying the effort. Those moderates include Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who are warning against Medicaid spending cuts that would affect benefits. Senate Republicans control 53 seats, which means they could only afford three defections and still pass the bill. Collins, Murkowski, Hawley and Moran say they are closely following the proposed reforms to Medicaid. 'I am evaluating those provisions,' Collins said of the changes to Medicaid. She said it's difficult to fully assess the bill until the Senate parliamentarian weighs in on what policy changes can remain in the legislation and which need to be stripped out for it to qualify for fast-track consideration on the floor. She said some of the most controversial provisions 'may fall out.' 'We still don't know exactly what we're looking at,' she said. Collins, who is up for reelection in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 election, said she's concerned about changes to the SNAP program that would require Maine to shoulder more of its costs. She said the bill 'switches a lot of the administrative costs' for SNAP 'onto the state.' Murkowski said it will be 'hard' to meet Trump's deadline of passing the bill by July 4, noting that even after Republican senators reach a deal, many of the provisions will need to be vetted by the Senate parliamentarian. Moran said he's 'waiting for where we end up in the Ag [Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry] Committee' on reforms to SNAP. 'What we do will be different from the House. I'm analyzing and participating in the discussion,' he said. He said the negotiations over the nutrition program for low-income Americans are 'taking time.' Republicans at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon discussed expanding their search for savings to Medicaid, despite Trump's warning to House lawmakers last month not to 'f‑‑‑ with Medicaid.' And, notably, they raised the possibility of changes to Medicare. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss the bill. Cramer said senators talked about also examining waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare to further reduce future deficits. 'There was a lot of presentation and then debate, people throwing out other ideas, like, 'What about waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare?'' he said. But tackling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare would be a time-consuming task and likely generate a lot of anxiety among GOP senators who are balking at cuts to Medicaid that they worry could impact benefits. 'Some people are making that case, other people are wringing their hands,' Cramer said of the internal debate. Updated at 8:37 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
