
5 things to know about cell phone bans in schools
More and more U.S. students will be entering cell phone-free zones this year as states and school districts have implemented restrictions either in the classroom or the moment a child enters the building.
Increased punishments, Yondr pouches and teacher collection baskets are just some of the ways school leaders have tried to reduce phone access, arguing they are a distraction and stymie social and academic growth.
While the number of schools taking action has quickly risen across the country, opponents voice objections including personal freedom for students and safety concerns in an emergency.
Here's what to know:
Where are cell phone bans happening?
At least 22 states have signed legislation regarding cell phone policies in K-12 schools, while some districts or schools have also acted on their own.
But not all the restrictions look the same.
States such as New York and Arkansas have implemented bell-to-bell cell phone bans, meaning students lack access to their phones the whole school day. Others including Kentucky and Tennessee have implemented instructional time bans, allowing students their phones between classes or at lunch.
'New York was the first state to target addictive social media feeds — and now we're the largest state to restrict smartphones in schools throughout the entire school day,' Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said. 'I know our young people succeed when they're learning and growing, not clicking and scrolling — and that's why New York continues to lead the nation on protecting our kids in the digital age.'
California and Arizona have laws requiring schools to create guidance around cell phone usage, and almost a dozen other states are considering legislation around cell phones in schools.
It is hard to know the exact number of schools that have cell phone bans as even states without restrictions on the books let individuals school districts decide if they want to enact strict bell-to-bell bans.
How are the policies implemented?
Implementation of cell phone restrictions vary by district.
The strictest districts have taken to using some version of a Yondr bag, a container that students must put their phones in at the beginning of the day that locks it inside. At the end of the day, there is a device where students can scan the bags, and the phones are released.
But not all districts have the resources to invest in hard prevention methods, with some opting for teachers to collect phones either at the beginning of the day or before class starts.
Other responses have been as simple as increasing punishments if a student is caught with a cell phone, such as taking the phone or detention.
What pushed the surge in cell phone bans?
A combination of factors led to a sweeping push to get phones out of young students' hands.
The Wait Until 8 th campaign wants parents to pledge they won't give their children cell phones under after 8 th grade, hoping it will take societal pressure off others to give students cell phones younger than that.
'Parents can join together with other parents in their community and let kids be kids a little longer,' Mark SooHoo, an organizer for Wait Until 8 th, told The Hill's 'Raising America,' which he joined for a discussion on the debate over cell phones and schools.
Studies have emerged showing decreased academic performance and social interaction among children with increased cell phone usage.
Reliance on cell phones has also created trouble in the classroom as teachers compete for student attention with the screens, along with concerns students could cheat or bully others with their devices.
What is the opposition to cell phone bans?
One of the main concerns for parents is lack of access to their children, especially during tragic events such as school shootings.
Another is personal freedom, as students and some parents argue schools should not be able to take away devices they have not paid for, and it should be up to the guardians' decision.
While some have suggested students could have Apple Watches or other devices that give more limited access to texting capabilities, economic concerns also come into play.
'One thing I would also like to point out there are economic differences,' Annette Anderson, deputy director of Johns Hopkins' Center for Safe and Healthy Schools, told 'Raising America's' Elizabeth Prann during the discussion.
Higher income students 'probably have a tablet, they probably have a laptop,' while others 'have a higher degree of reliance on their smart phones.'
'There is some dissonance in how these cell phones bans are applied' between wealthier and poorer schools, she added.
Others suggest schools should be the place where students learn how to be more responsible with their technology, and teachers should be giving instructions on how to make phones an assets and not a detriment in life.
'We need more civility and teaching digital character education,' Anderson said.
What's next?
More cell phone bans, likely.
As more and more states move on cell phone ban legislation, it is unlikely to see the trend reversed.
The real story will be in a few years when data and stories from school districts with cell phone bans emerge and the impact of students' academic and social performance is seen.
This experiment could shape the future of the K-12 classrooms at a time when the world is becoming more reliant on technology in the workforce.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
What to know about school phone bans
Increased punishments, Yondr pouches and teacher collection baskets are just some of the ways school leaders have tried to reduce phone access, arguing they are a distraction and stymie social and academic growth. While the number of schools taking action has quickly risen across the country, opponents voice objections including personal freedom for students and safety concerns in an emergency. Here's what to know: Where are cellphone bans happening? At least 22 states have signed legislation regarding cellphone policies in K-12 schools, while some districts or schools have also acted on their own. But not all the restrictions look the same. States such as New York and Arkansas have implemented bell-to-bell cellphone bans, meaning students lack access to their phones the whole school day. Others including Kentucky and Tennessee have implemented instructional time bans, allowing students their phones between classes or at lunch. California and Arizona have laws requiring schools to create guidance around cellphone usage, and almost a dozen other states are considering legislation around cellphones in schools. How are the policies implemented? Implementation of cellphone restrictions vary by district. The strictest districts have taken to using some version of a Yondr bag, a container that students must put their phones in at the beginning of the day that locks it inside. At the end of the day, there is a device on which students can scan the bags, and the phones are released. But not all districts have the resources to invest in hard prevention methods, with some opting for teachers to collect phones either at the beginning of the day or before class starts. Other responses have been as simple as increasing punishments if a student is caught with a cellphone, such as taking the phone or detention. The Hill's Lexi Lonas Cochran has more here.


New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump just offered NY kids cash for schools — will Gov. Hochul turn it down to please unions?
New federal law offers scholarship grants for kids to use at private schools — if their state's governor opts to allow it. We can't recall Gov. Kathy Hochul or any of her predecessors ever turning down free, no-strings-attached cash — but giving the thumbs-up here would risk the ire of New York's powerful teachers unions. Will she dare? Advertisement The program has two steps. First, it lets taxpayers give up to $1,700 to a scholarship-granting nonprofit, trimming their federal tax liability dollar-for-dollar. Advertisement Then, it lets the charities offer grants to help kids pay for private-school tuition, books or other educational expenses — as long as the state's governor 'or other entities/individuals designated by state law' opts in. The aid can surely help New York kids to better futures — by letting them escape low-performing public schools. A whopping 40% of New York City kids in grades 3-8 failed this spring's state tests in math and English (though city schools spend $37,000 a year per student, while the average private-school tuition in the state is about $22,000). That's why 74% of New York school parents back vouchers. And why tens of thousands of kids are on waitlists for seats at public charter schools, which are privately run. Advertisement Alas, teachers unions, which control public schools, fear losing students to schools they don't control: It means fewer union members, reduced dues collection — and ever-shrinking teacher-union power. So the unions hate the scholarship program, even pushing transparent lies that is somehow steals money away from public schools. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters In truth, not one dime would come from New York public schools or any state tax revenue at all. Advertisement If Hochul turns down the cash, as schools expert Corey DeAngelis notes, she'll be shooting New York in the foot: letting New York taxpayers' donations go to help other states' kids, while local children get bupkis. On every other front, Hochul is devoted to maximizing federal grants to New York; along with practically every elected Democrat in the state, she's been furiously denouncing Medicaid 'cuts' that mainly amount to imposing work requirements on able-bodied beneficiaries. If the gov blocks Empire State children from getting these scholarships, it'll be undeniable proof that unions matter to her more than New York's kids.


Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
'Full of s---': New York Republican accuses state Dems of hypocrisy in redistricting push
A House GOP lawmaker from New York is accusing Democratic leaders in his state of having a hypocritical response to redistricting efforts in Texas and other red states. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., one of three House Republicans nationwide who won a district that President Donald Trump lost in 2024, has been vocal about his opposition to the growing redistricting war across the U.S. "I think obviously across the board, you know, I don't agree with this effort," Lawler told Fox News Digital of the push in both red and blue states. "But I think we also have to look at this holistically – New York did mid-decade redistricting last year." "So, for [Gov.] Kathy Hochul and Democrats like [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries and [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer to decry what's happening in Texas, they're full of s---. They literally did it last year." The method for drawing congressional maps does vary between states, with some relying more on their state legislatures, while others – like New York – rely on advice from independent bodies known as redistricting commissions. The Empire State's bipartisan redistricting commission approved a new map in early 2024 that largely affected three congressional seats in upstate and central New York – two of which flipped from red to blue in last year's elections, while the third remained in Democratic hands. It came after New York State's highest court ordered new congressional maps to be drawn for the 2024 election, in what was regarded as a major victory for Democrats after they lost a number of suburban seats in the 2022 midterms. Two of those seats have since flipped back to blue in last year's races, though they saw no significant changes in the latest re-draw. "New York redrew its maps, getting a bogus court order to do so after stacking the Court of Appeals…in an effort to pick up five seats. They picked up four," Lawler said, referencing the four total seats Democrats won in 2024 that they lost in 2022. "So for them to act as though they are holier than thou and that they didn't actually do this first is laughable. And when you look at Texas, you know they legally can do it. New York legally cannot. And that's the difference." Lawler warned, however, that the growing redistricting fight could have negative implications for representation across the country. "When you look at these congressional seats, I mean, they've become so hyperpartisan that there's very few districts that are actually competitive," he said. "I think the larger point is that the American people should want more competitive races, because it forces members of Congress to make sure that they are appealing to a broader swath of voters in their districts. If they only have to worry about a primary to get elected, then they're only playing to the base instead of the broader middle." Lawler said he would soon be introducing a bill to ban partisan gerrymandering nationwide, as part of a larger package aimed at fixing what he saw as longstanding issues with Congress. "There's also other reforms as part of it that I think are essential, including term limits for members of Congress. And, you know, when you're talking about the census, you know, illegal immigrants should not be counted as part of the census – lawful permanent residents and legal, you know, visa holders, among others, should be – but illegals should not be," Lawler said. "I think most Americans agree with that. So there's a number of provisions that will be part of the legislation that I'm putting together." When reached for comment on Lawler's criticism, Viet Shelton, spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), told Fox News Digital, "We know Lawler never minds bending the knee to Donald Trump, but did he forget that Trump demanded Texas Republicans redraw their congressional map to steal seats because they know their party can't win on the merits? Stop whining." The interview comes as Texas is readying to adopt a new congressional map that could give Republicans as many as five new seats in the 2026 midterms. California leaders have pledged to press for new maps to give Democrats a corresponding advantage, while a host of states on both sides, including New York, are signaling that they're also not ruling out similar moves. Fox News Digital reached out to spokespeople for Jeffries, Schumer, and Hochul for comment but did not hear back.