States spend £100k so far on evicting Fermain Beach Cafe tenants
It added: "It is standard practice to engage external lawyers when there is not sufficient capacity within the Law Officers. "This ensures that matters are handled efficiently and without delay."In April 2024, the States said the lease tender process for the site had been fair and the tenant's proposals to carry out improvements to the site since 2009 had not been carried out.
Having raised the issue with P&R, Deputy Mark Helyar said he would like to see the matter come to an end soon.He said: "I would just like to see a political intervention and a step-in for some negotiation and mediation so that it can be brought to a close. "We've got a new committee [since the general election], so a fresh pair of eyes, hopefully it might lead to a more satisfactory resolution."The States Property Unit reiterated that a formal tender process had been run for the site and the party that submitted the best bid would be selected.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
Santander customers FUME over ‘disgusting' £120 fee for key bank account after being promised it would be ‘free forever'
SANTANDER customers are outraged after the bank revealed it will start charging £120 a year for an account it promised would be "free forever". Thousands of small business and self-employed account holders are facing £9.99 monthly charges from October. 1 This comes despite written assurances that their accounts would always remain free of fees. Santander's move has left customers feeling betrayed. Customers have taken to social media to vent their anger. One user said on "Promised me free business banking forever in writing, and now they want to charge £9.99 a month. Is this even legal?" Another branded the move "absolutely disgusting". The changes will impact three types of business accounts: 1|2|3 Business Current Accounts, Business Everyday Current Accounts, and Business Current Accounts. Santander said that the "free forever" promise only applied to accounts offered by Abbey and Alliance & Leicester before their 2008 merger. The bank first attempted to introduce fees for these accounts in 2012 but backed down after customers threatened legal action. However, these accounts were shifted to the Business Everyday account in 2015, which did not include the "free forever" promise. From October 1, these accounts will be closed, and customers will be automatically switched to Santander's new Business Current Account – Classic. Switch bank accounts for free perks This migration comes with new fees and charges that could significantly impact businesses, especially those handling large cash deposits or relying on cheque transactions. Under the new structure, every Business Current Account – Classic will incur a £9.99 monthly fee, regardless of the type of account customers previously held. While some accounts were free, others offered additional benefits with charges as high as £40 per month. Several other companies, such as Virgin Money, Monzo, and Co-operative Bank, offer free business banking. A spokesperson for Santander said: "The business banking landscape has changed significantly over the last decade. "As such, we are simplifying our business banking offering as the first step to ensure that we can sustainably and efficiently evolve to better meet the needs of our business customers in the future." Santander Business Current Account – Classic charges SANTANDER has also revised other charges that could hit businesses hard. For example: Cash deposits: Free up to £1,000 per month via Santander cash machines, but £1.25 per £100 for anything over that. Deposits made at Santander branches or Post Office counters will also cost £1.25 per £100. Cash withdrawals: Free at Santander cash machines, but £1.25 per £100 withdrawn at branch counters or Post Office counters. Cheque deposits: £0.70 per cheque. Overdraft fees are also set to change, adding further financial strain for some customers. What else is happening at Santander? The bank is closing its 123 Lite current account, which offers up to 3% cashback on household bills for a £2 monthly fee, on August 21. Customers affected by the closure will be automatically switched to Santander's Everyday Current Account. This account has no monthly fee but does not include cashback benefits. The 123 Lite account has not been available to new customers since 2022, however, hundreds of thousands still rely on the current account. The 123 Lite account allowed bill payers to earn up to 3% cashback, capped at £15 per month, on expenses like council tax, mobile phone bills, energy, and water. However, if you still have a 123 Lite account, cashback will stop automatically, and you will no longer need to pay the £2 monthly fee from August 21. If you're looking to keep cashback perks, the Everyday Current Account you'll be switched to won't be suitable, as it doesn't offer any cashback features. Instead, customers who want to stay with Santander may want to explore the Edge or Edge Up accounts. The Santander Edge account offers 1% cashback on certain household bills and debit card spending at supermarkets, petrol stations, and on travel. This account has a £3 monthly fee, with cashback capped at £10 per month. For a higher cashback limit, the Santander Edge Up account costs £5 per month and allows you to earn up to £15 per month on both bills and debit card spending. To keep these accounts active, Edge customers must deposit at least £500 per month, while Edge Up customers need to deposit £1,000. However, from September 9, cashback on supermarket, fuel, and travel spending will be removed for both accounts. Customers will only continue to earn 1% cashback on household bills like council tax and utilities. If you're looking to maximise your cashback, there are other options available. For example, American Express ' Cashback Everyday Credit Card offers an impressive 5% cashback on purchases for the first five months (up to £125). What is cashback? CASHBACK is a type of reward offered by banks, credit card providers, and retailers where customers receive a percentage of their spending back as cash. Essentially, it's a way to earn money while making purchases. For example, if your card offers 1% cashback and you spend £100, you'll earn £1 back. Cashback can be credited to your account, deducted from your balance, or saved up for future use, depending on the provider's terms. It's often offered on everyday purchases, such as groceries, fuel, or online shopping, and may be part of a promotional deal or an ongoing benefit of your account. However, remember to check the terms and conditions, as some transactions may not qualify for cashback rewards. By using cashback offers wisely, you can usually make your money go further on purchases you'd already be making.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Peppa Pig toy boss faces losing his home after being sacked for threatening his boss with a pen - then losing £300,000 in failed court bids to get his job back
A former top executive of Peppa Pig toys is at risk of losing his home after being sacked for threatening his boss with a pen and losing nearly £300,000 in failed court challenges. Mark Dowding, chief financial officer and company secretary of Character Group PLC, home of Peppa Pig soft toys, was sacked from his £160k-a-year salary job in September 2017. The management team were said to have 'lost confidence' in Mr Dowding after he was found in an employment tribunal to 'brandished' his boss with a pen in a 'threatening manner' during a 'heated' exchange in August 2017. Mr Dowding subsequently claimed he was unfairly dismissed based on fabricated allegations, arguing that he 'had been subjected to various acts of victimisation'. But despite losing his case in 2020, the finance executive kept fighting, bringing five years worth of appeals and challenges, as well as launching a High Court claim - running up massive legal costs. Mr Dowding still has one remaining court claim over his treatment by the company, but has now been told it will be struck out unless he stumps up the £288,000 he owes from his previous battles. Making the order, High Court judge Richard Spearman KC said it means Mr Dowding now 'faces losing' the pension fund which forms his only regular income 'and maybe also his home, to meet those costs orders'. In his ruling, he said: 'Sophocles wrote...'It is a painful thing to look at your own trouble and know that you yourself and no one else has made it'. That, in my view, is the predicament in which the claimant Mr Dowding now finds himself.' Employed by The Character Group from August 2012 to September 2017, at the time of Mr Dowding's dismissal he was working as a group finance director on a £110,000 salary plus an additional 50 per cent bonus. Describing the pen incident which occurred during a work-related meeting between Mr Dowding and his boss, Mr Shah, Judge Khalil said: 'Their discussion became heated and voices were raised. The claimant accepted in evidence he raised his voice first. 'Mr Shah also alleged that the claimant had pointed a pen towards him, causing Mr Shah to retreat. This was set out in his email, which followed this altercation on the same day. 'In that email, Mr Shah said about the incident, 'Your behaviour was inappropriate and unprofessional. You raised your voice towards me in a threatening manner and pointed a pen in my face whilst rolling forward towards me with your chair. I had to roll my chair back to prevent injury to my face'.' Despite Mr Dowding claiming that such pen threat was fabricated, Judge Khalil said: 'The tribunal concludes that the incident as described by Mr Shah did occur, which included the claimant pointing towards him, brandishing a pen in a threatening manner. 'This dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses both procedurally and substantively,' he concluded. An order was made last December securing the existing court bills on Mr Dowding's £850,000 home in Rotherhithe Street, south London. The case went before Judge Spearman on applications for Mr Dowding to clarify the terms of his claim, while TCG Toys asked for an order that his case be struck out completely if he doesn't pay what he already owes. In a judgment given this week, the judge made orders to end several elements of Mr Dowding's claim, including his bid to sue his former boss personally as a defendant alongside the company. Although the rest of the case can go ahead, the judge went on to make an order that it be struck out unless he pays the £288,000 he already owes. Explaining that Mr Dowding 'now faces losing' both his personal pension fund and his home, Judge Spearman described Mr Dowding as being 'in a very unhappy position'. He added: 'On the disclosure he has made, he can ill-afford to meet these costs liabilities: either his home may be forfeit or his pension may be forfeit - possibly, if things go on the way they have, both. 'That is a consequence of bringing and pursuing expensive litigation which has all been unsuccessful, resulting in the costs orders.' If Mr Dowding pays what he owes, the remaining case will return to court at a later date.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
China expected to keep lending rates steady, focus turns to Politburo meet
SHANGHAI, July 18 (Reuters) - China is widely expected to leave its benchmark lending rates unchanged at a monthly fixing on Monday, a Reuters survey showed, as signs of economic resilience reduced the urgency for further monetary easing. The loan prime rate (LPR), normally charged to banks' best clients, is calculated each month after 20 designated commercial banks submit proposed rates to the People's Bank of China (PBOC). In a Reuters survey of 20 market watchers conducted this week, all respondents expected both the one-year and five-year LPRs to remain steady. Most new and outstanding loans in China are based on the one-year LPR, while the five-year rate influences the pricing of mortgages. The consensus of no immediate monetary easing comes as data this week showed China's second-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) growth nudged slightly above market expectations, even though weak domestic demand and uncertainty around U.S. tariffs have raised economic risks. "Although continued downward price pressures and sluggish loan demand present a solid case for further easing, the PBOC may opt to hold off until a more opportune window," said Lynn Song, chief China economist for Greater China at ING. "We continue to expect one more 10-basis-point rate cut and 50-basis-point reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut before year-end." For now, market attention would be squarely on the Politburo meeting later this month, which is likely to shape economic policy for the rest of the year, traders and analysts said. "With H1 real GDP growth still solid, we do not think policymakers see the immediate need to launch broad-based, significant stimulus in the near-term, including at the July Politburo meeting," analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a note. "Instead, we expect incremental, targeted easing to help stem the property downturn and mitigate labour market pressures in H2." China's new home prices declined at the fastest pace in eight months in June from the previous month, official data showed on Tuesday, underscoring the challenges policymakers face in reviving demand even after multiple rounds of support measures.
