Malta to Officially Recognize State of Palestine in Sept.
The announcement was made by Christopher Cutajar, Permanent Secretary at Malta's Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs and Trade, during a UN General Assembly meeting focused on the two-state solution. 'Malta has consistently supported the Palestinian people's right to self-determination,' Cutajar said. 'As responsible international actors, we must help turn the two-state solution from a concept into a reality.'
Prime Minister Robert Abela had previously confirmed Malta's intention to recognize Palestinian statehood, describing the move as part of the country's broader commitment to promoting lasting peace in the Middle East.
Related Topics:
60 MPs Urge UK to Immediately Recognize Palestinian State
Palestinian Bedouins Flee West Bank out of Settler Violence
Governor of Aseer Region Welcomes Palestinian Ambassador
Short link :
Post Views: 27 Related Stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Israel using US munitions to ‘indiscriminately' attack Gaza school shelters: Human Rights Watch
WASHINGTON — The Israeli military has 'illegally and indiscriminately' used US munitions to attack school shelters in Gaza, killing hundreds of people, Human Rights Watch (HRW) says. The US-based campaigners' report, 'Gaza: Israeli School Strikes Magnify Civilian Peril,' was published Thursday. Israel's campaign following the Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023 has made the vast majority of Gaza's 2.1 million people homeless – forcing many to flee their neighborhoods in search of civilian infrastructure. Israel has frequently said its strikes on school facilities in Gaza target embedded Hamas fighters. But HRW said it only found seven instances where the military published details of alleged militants killed – and highlighted two strikes, which killed nearly 50 people, where they found no evidence of any military target. Such attacks would violate international law because schools and other educational facilities are civilian objects and protected from attack, HRW said. They lose that protection when used for military purposes or are occupied by military forces. But the use of schools to house civilians does not alter their legal status. HRW called on the US and other governments to halt arms sales to Israel, given the 'clear risk' that weapons might be used to commit or facilitate 'serious violations' of international humanitarian law.' Washington's supply of arms to Israel has made the US 'complicit' in their lawful use, the group said.'Israeli strikes on schools sheltering displaced families provide a window into the widespread carnage that Israeli forces have carried out in Gaza,' Gerry Simpson, associate crisis, conflict and arms director at HRW, said in the report.'Other governments should not tolerate this horrendous slaughter of Palestinians merely seeking safety,' added Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it 'operates exclusively on the grounds of military necessity and in strict accordance with international law.''It must be emphasized that the report blatantly ignores Hamas' systematic pattern of unlawfully embedding its' military assets, including weapons and ammunition in, beneath, and in proximity to densely populated civilian areas, and cynically exploits civilian infrastructure for terror purposes,' the IDF added.'Specifically, it has been well documented that Hamas exploits schools and UNRWA facilities for its military activities by building military networks beneath and within schools; establishing command-and-control centers within them, launching attacks toward IDF forces from them, and imprisoning hostages in them.'The military said it takes 'feasible precautions' to mitigate harm to civilians as much as possible and 'regrets any harm caused to uninvolved civilians.'Israeli attacks on school shelters in Gaza have killed at least 836 Palestinians and injured another 2,527 people, as of July 18, HRW reported, citing the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).HRW investigated two such attacks where it identified the use of US munitions. The agency said it reviewed satellite imagery, photos, and videos of the attacks and their aftermath, as well as social media and interviews with has previously reported on the use of US weaponry in deadly strikes and has reached out to the State Department for comment on the HRW July 27, 2024, the Israeli military launched at least three strikes on the Khadija girls' school in Deir Al-Balah, central Gaza. At least 15 people were on September 21, Israel struck Al-Zeitoun school, northern Gaza. At least 34 people were killed.'Can you imagine, a building full of displaced people leveled in the blink of an eye?' a journalist cited in the HRW report said. 'I saw people with serious and more minor injuries, and then saw human remains on the ground.'The allegations chimed with repeated human rights warnings that Israel's 22-month bombing and siege has rendered much of the enclave said attacks on school shelters have diminished access to refuge, exacerbated reconstruction challenges, and disrupted education among a pre-war population of more than 2.2 million people – where half of those are under the age of least 97% of schools in Gaza have sustained damage, the UNICEF-led Education Cluster reported in August. Efforts to rebuild destroyed homes in Gaza could take until 2040, the UN said in May. The level of destruction is so extensive that it would require external assistance on a scale not seen since 1948, the agency least 61,158 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, the Ministry of Health there reported on Wednesday. At least 193 people have starved to death, including 96 children, the ministry Palestinian student told CNN that days spent going to university have been replaced by a brutal struggle for survival repeated displacement, and severe hunger.'The war came and destroyed everything,' Raghad Ezzat Hamouda, 20, told CNN on Wednesday.'I lost my ambitions and dreams,' added Hamouda, who is displaced with nine family members in Tal Al-Hawa, central Gaza. 'Gaza has become uninhabitable. (There are) no homes, no schools, no universities, no infrastructure... Just ashes.' — CNN
Leaders
4 hours ago
- Leaders
Hezbollah Defies Lebanese Government's Disarmament Plan
Lebanon's Hezbollah declared Wednesday it would ignore the government's decision to disarm the group, calling the cabinet's move a 'grave sin' against national sovereignty. The militant group vowed to treat the resolution 'as if it did not exist.' Hezbollah Rejects Sovereignty Threat This unprecedented stance follows heavy US pressure and escalating Israeli strikes on Lebanon as Prime Minister Nawaf Salam stated Tuesday the army must draft a plan by August's end to restrict all weapons to state forces. Furthermore, the government aims to implement this change before 2025 concludes. Consequently, another critical cabinet meeting is scheduled for Thursday. Hezbollah accused the government of undermining Lebanon's sovereignty and enabling Israeli aggression. 'This decision gives Israel a free hand over Lebanon's security and future,' the Iran-backed group asserted. It views the move as dictated by US envoy Tom Barrack, solely serving Israeli interests. Therefore, Hezbollah insists Israel must halt attacks before any weapons discussion begins. Government Pushes Ceasefire Implementation The cabinet framed its decision as fulfilling the November ceasefire ending over a year of Israel-Hezbollah conflict. However, Israel continues strikes despite the truce, threatening further action until disarming Hezbollah. An Israeli strike killed one person in Tulin Wednesday while other attacks wounded at least two more. The military claimed targets included Hezbollah weapons storage and infrastructure. Two Hezbollah-affiliated ministers walked out of Tuesday's session, rejecting 'American tutelage and Israeli occupation.' The Amal movement echoed this, accusing the government of rushing 'gratuitous concessions' to Israel. Meanwhile, the Lebanese Forces party hailed the disarmament push as 'a pivotal moment' restoring state authority. The Free Patriotic Movement also supported transferring weapons to the army to strengthen national defense. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated disarmament decisions ultimately rest with Hezbollah alone. 'We support it from afar but do not intervene,' he clarified, noting the group's post-war recovery. Hezbollah emerged weakened politically and militarily from the recent conflict, its leadership decimated. Nevertheless, the group remains 'prepared to discuss a national security strategy,' but only after ending Israeli aggression. This defiant stance now directly challenges Lebanon's government and its international partners. Short link : Post Views: 25
Arab News
19 hours ago
- Arab News
UK shift on Palestine reinforces a historical fact
The UK recently departed from decades of foreign policy, announcing plans to recognize Palestinian statehood unless Israel takes immediate action to address the crisis in Gaza. This announcement, coming alongside France and Canada's similar moves, marks a growing shift in international support for Palestine as the UN General Assembly approaches in September. The UK's announcement, while following France and Canada's lead, is notably different in its conditional nature. The Starmer government made it clear that it would proceed with recognizing Palestine as a state only if Israel agrees to a series of significant actions. These include a ceasefire in Gaza, a commitment not to annex the West Bank, and a pledge to work toward a credible, long-term peace process aimed at achieving a two-state solution. This move has been welcomed by many in the international community, yet it has also faced significant criticism, particularly given the UK's historical role in shaping the very conditions that have led to the conflict. Before British rule, the region now known as Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire, specifically the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, reorganized in 1872. This area was part of the larger Ottoman province of Syria, but was granted a special administrative status. It was only with the establishment of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1920 that the term 'Palestine' began to take on its modern political meaning. Under British administration, the land was known as Mandate Palestine, with Britain trying to balance its dual commitment to both the Zionist movement and the local Arab population. The 1917 Balfour Declaration, issued by the British foreign secretary at the time, expressed 'support for the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine,' leaving a historical record of British diplomatic recognition of a territory named Palestine. Despite its longstanding presence in the region, Britain has never officially recognized Palestine as a state — until now. This shift is significant, but it comes with a complex legacy. During the First World War, Britain entered into negotiations with Sharif Hussein, the leader of the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire. In exchange for Arab support, Britain promised Arab independence, a commitment later known as the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence. Though the specific interpretation of Palestine's status in this agreement has been a point of contention, this is another colonial-era record of official British utilization of the term, Palestine. While Arabs saw it as a promise for the independence of Palestine, Britain later argued that Palestine was excluded from this promise due to its strategic importance and other conflicting commitments, such as the Balfour Declaration. These historical British footnotes regarding Palestine statehood have shaped the Palestinian cause just as they have defined the very recognition of the territory itself. During the British Mandate for Palestine, Britain assumed administrative control with the aim of helping the region transition toward self-governance. One of the notable steps taken by the British was the establishment of the Palestinian passport system, which formally recognized Palestinians as residents of the Mandate, though not as a sovereign nation. These passports, issued under the Passports and Immigration Regulations, granted Palestinians some travel and residency rights, but they did not recognize Palestine as a distinct nation-state. In the first decade of the Mandate alone, about 70,000 of these documents were issued. In the context of Palestine's century-long struggle, the issuance of these documents supports one more time British utilization of the term Palestine. While the UK's announcement to recognize Palestine is a significant diplomatic step, it must be understood within the context of Britain's historical involvement in shaping the region's political landscape. Besides, this recognition carries significant geopolitical and diplomatic implications. Both the UK and Canada have tied their recognition of Palestine to specific actions from Israel or the Palestinian Authority, such as halting the expansion of Israeli settlements and agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. In doing so, they are responding to the urgent need for change in the region, while at the same time pushing for conditions that reflect their vision of a lasting, sustainable two-state solution. The UK's recognition, in particular, carries considerable diplomatic weight as one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council. If the UK follows through, it will join France, Canada, and several other nations in formally recognizing Palestinian statehood as the world gathers in New York this September. For the Palestinian Authority, this recognition is particularly pertinent as it legitimizes the organization's aspirations for a sovereign state and enhances its standing on the international stage. UK recognition carries considerable diplomatic weight. Zaid M. Belbagi In addition to this diplomatic shift, the UK has committed significant resources to alleviating the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The UK government pledged £60 million ($80 million) in humanitarian aid in July 2025 alone, focusing on healthcare, food, water, shelter, and emergency services. This includes funding for UK-Med field hospitals, which have treated over 500,000 people during the conflict. The UK has coupled its recent diplomatic overture with a continued program of humanitarian assistance. However, this diplomatic announcement raises questions about the future of UK-Israel relations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted strongly to the announcement, accusing the UK of rewarding 'Hamas' monstrous terrorism,' which signals potential strain in the longstanding bilateral relationship between the two nations, historically tied by economic, political, and diplomatic agreements. By the end of Q1 2025, total trade between the UK and Israel reached £5.8 billion, with Israeli investment in the UK contributing an additional £1 billion in gross value and creating about 16,000 British jobs. With an updated free trade agreement expected following the launch of talks in 2022, the UK's shift in policy could challenge the foundation of this economic partnership. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has made the UK's recognition of Palestine conditional, requiring Israel to take substantive steps to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, allow UN aid, halt annexations in the West Bank, and commit to a sustainable peace process aimed at reviving the two-state solution. The British government has made it clear that recognition will be upheld if these conditions are not met. However, given the current stance of Netanyahu's government, it seems unlikely that these conditions will be accepted, making the recognition of Palestine increasingly probable in the coming months. As such, the UK's recognition of Palestine before September seems all but certain, confirming what has been a historical fact.
