
We did that through trade: Trump again claims he averted India-Pak conflict
He had made a similar claim in June while talking to reporters on Air Force One."You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan," he said."I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," Trump added.Trump has often taken credit for helping calm tensions between the two countries, especially after India carried out air strikes on terror camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following the attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 civilians.INDIA REJECTS TRUMP'S CLAIMSIndia has firmly denied President Trump's claims, saying that all matters related to Jammu and Kashmir must be handled bilaterally between India and Pakistan, with no foreign involvement.In a statement, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said, "As you are aware, we have a long-standing national position that any issues pertaining to the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir have to be addressed by India and Pakistan bilaterally. That stated policy has not changed."The MEA also reminded that the main issue remains Pakistan's occupation of Indian territory: "The outstanding matter is the vacation of illegally occupied Indian Territory by Pakistan."The Indian government also rejected Trump's claim that trade was used to settle the conflict. Officials clarified that during the time of 'Operation Sindoor', no discussion about trade took place between Indian and US leaders.advertisement"From the time OPERATION SINDOOR commenced on 7th May till the understanding on cessation of firing and military action on 10th May, there were conversations between Indian and US leaders on the evolving military situation. The issue of trade did not come up in any of these discussions," the MEA said.India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan and PoK in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. After defending itself from Pakistan's military action, India cripple Pakistan's airbases.Hostilities between India and Pakistan ended after a call from Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) to his Indian counterpart, leading to an agreement to stop further military action.- EndsWith inputs from ANIMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
Indian Lawmakers Demand Bharat Ratna for the Dalai Lama
Indian Lawmakers Demand Bharat Ratna for the Dalai Lama | Vantage with Palki Sharma Indian Lawmakers Demand Bharat Ratna for the Dalai Lama | Vantage with Palki Sharma At least 80 Indian lawmakers have reportedly signed a petition seeking the Bharat Ratna for the Dalai Lama. As a non-Indian, is the Dalai Lama eligible to receive the Bharat Ratna? Why have successive Indian governments been reluctant to award it? Palki Sharma brings you New Delhi's options and considerations. See More


India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Turkey, Pak revise $900-million drone deal after setback against India
In a bid to explore more advanced UAV systems to improve precision-strike and surveillance capabilities, Turkey and Pakistan are restructuring a USD 900 million drone deal following operational failures against India during Operation Sindoor, sources new arrangement seeks to boost both countries' drone and munition capabilities with advanced systems. The revised deal is expected to address previous shortcomings and enhance military told India Today that representatives from both nations have met multiple times post-Operation Sindoor to address deficiencies in their military equipment. The Indian air defence system thwarted drone attacks by Pakistan in the aftermath of the May 7 Operation Sindoor precision strikes against Pak terror launch pads. Most of these drones were obtained by Pakistan from Turkey and China, putting the effectiveness of these devices under Baykar, a prominent drone manufacturer, is at the centre of these discussions, aiming to supply enhanced drones and munitions. The collaboration is seen as a strategic move to fortify defence ties between the two recently conducted successful tests of its KEMANKE 1 AI-powered mini smart cruise missile, demonstrating precision-strike tests took place in orlu and Kean, in the Turkish provinces of Tekirda and Edirne, showcasing the missile's effectiveness against airborne and ground targets. The success of these tests is crucial for Turkey's defence industry, highlighting its growing previous deployment of Turkish YIHA drones by Pakistan against India was unsuccessful, as these drones were neutralised by Indian air defence systems. The failure has led the two countries to a reassessment of tactics and to information, the revised agreement will include Bayraktar TB2 and AKINCI UAVs, alongside over 700 Turkish-made loitering munitions. These kamikaze drones are intended to enhance Pakistan's military operational early July, high-level discussions were held in Islamabad involving Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, Defence Minister Yasar Guler, and top Pakistani officials, including Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal General Asim talks focused on strengthening military cooperation and intelligence sharing. The meetings underscored the importance of strategic alignment between the two to Indian intelligence agencies, the discussions revealed intentions of aligning efforts against India within the regional power military synergy is also part of broader efforts to elevate bilateral trade between Turkey and Pakistan to USD 5 billion by the end of 2025.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
'Can you hit Moscow, St. Petersburg?' Trump privately asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine could strike deep inside Russia
Trump privately encouraged Zelenskyy to intensify attacks within Russian territory, asking whether Ukraine could target cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg if provided with the appropriate weapons, according to a report, citing sources read more Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and US President Donald Trump appear at a meeting, while they attend the funeral of Pope Francis, at the Vatican, April 26, 2025. (Photo: Reuters) US President Donald Trump privately encouraged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to intensify attacks within Russian territory, asking whether Ukraine could target cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg if provided with the appropriate weapons, according to a report, citing two people briefed on the conversation. 'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? . . . Can you hit St Petersburg too?' Financial Times quoted Trump as saying during a July 4 call with Zelensky. Zelenskyy reportedly replied, 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The provocative remarks made by Trump to Zelenskyy reportedly came just a day after a tense phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which Trump later described as 'bad,' according to Financial Times, citing sources. Trump's conversation with Zelenskyy is being viewed as a direct response to Putin's refusal to engage in US-backed ceasefire negotiations. The behind-the-scenes exchange reflects growing frustration within the Trump administration over Moscow's unwillingness to compromise and signals a sharp shift from Trump's earlier campaign pledge to avoid deeper US involvement in foreign conflicts. It also contrasts with his traditionally cautious stance toward confronting Russia. Trump signalled support for Ukraine launching long-range strikes, describing the approach as a way to 'make them (Russians) feel the pain' and force the Kremlin to negotiate, reported FT, citing two individuals familiar with the call. While it is still uncertain whether the US will supply long-range weapons to Ukraine, a Western official familiar with the discussions told FT that Trump's remarks reflect a growing sentiment among Ukraine's Western allies, one that supports more aggressive strikes inside Russian territory to 'bring the war to Muscovites.' This view, the official added, is quietly gaining momentum among American policymakers as frustration with Moscow's stance continues to build. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, neither the White House nor the Ukrainian president's office has responded to requests for comment on the report. On Monday, in major policy shift, President Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine and threatened sanctions on countries that continue buying Russian exports unless Moscow agrees to a peace deal within 50 days. Sitting alongside Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night,' Trump told reporters, adding that Putin had repeatedly broken promises to end the war. 'He's fooled a lot of people,' Trump said, calling Putin a 'tough guy.' 'He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden — he didn't fool me,' he added. Trump said billions of dollars in advanced weapons would be sent to Ukraine, including urgently requested Patriot air defence systems. 'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato,' he said, clarifying that Nato allies would cover the costs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It's a full complement with the batteries,' he noted. 'We're going to have some come very soon, within days… a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have.' Up to 17 Patriot batteries ordered by other countries could be diverted to Ukraine 'very quickly,' he said. Trump's threat to impose secondary sanctions—targeting nations that continue to buy Russian oil—would mark a significant escalation in Western sanctions policy. Currently, while Western nations have largely cut direct financial ties with Moscow, they have stopped short of penalising other countries such as China and India for continuing to import Russian oil, allowing the Kremlin to earn hundreds of billions in revenues since the war began. Bipartisan support is growing in Congress for legislation that would authorise such measures. With inputs from agencies