Online retailer Temu potentially in breach of EU digital marketplace rules
Illegal products, such as small toys for infant children and miniature electronics, were found to have been listed on the website
. The European Commission today said its investigation believes Temu does not mitigate properly for the sale of the products.
It comes as Ireland's European Commissioner Michael McGrath – in charge of consumer protection in Europe – told reporters last month that he has 'serious concerns' over the sale of products from online Chinese retailers, such as Temu.
Europe has strict laws over the sale of products online, and it is up to retailers to properly moderate and mitigate the listing of illegal goods on their platforms, or face harsh sanctions from the European Commission.
More than 12m small packages of products are imported to Europe every day, with more than 90% of them arriving from China. McGrath singled out the Chinese online retailer Temu last month.
He told reporters: 'We have serious concerns about their product safety record and also about the lack of respect, in many accounts, for the EU safety rules.'
Advertisement
Temu, an online wholesale retailer, is one of the largest digital marketplaces available to citizens in the EU. The firm said today that it 'will continue to co-operate fully with the commission'.
The European Commission will continue to complete its full investigation into the potential breaches. If the final findings of its probe confirm that there has been a breach, a deadline will be set for the retailer to pay a fine, which could be valued in the millions.
Should a fine be imposed, it will be up to the Irish Digital Services Officer to collect the penalty as Temu has its European headquarters in Dublin.
McGrath is set to meet with Chinese authorities in an upcoming trade mission, where he will discuss the issue with officials. He said the EU will be 'robustly implementing' consumer protection legislation.
'I have responsibility for consumer protection. It's a hugely important part of the portfolio, which is not just about protecting consumers and keeping them safe, it's also about the level playing field issue for European businesses,' he said last month.
'We expect [them] to compete. And if they're competing with companies or platforms that don't respect our rules, then it's not a fair fight. That's something we are determined to address,' he added.
Products sold in the EU's single market
must pass a risk assessment
, which evaluates potential risks to consumer health and details mitigation plans when and if breaches are identified.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
16 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Lebanese authorities know where man sentenced to death for killing Pte Seán Rooney is, Irish officials believe
Irish officials believe Lebanese authorities are aware of the location of a Hizbullah member who was on Monday convicted of the murder of Pte Seán Rooney in December 2022. Mohammad Ayyad was sentenced to death in absentia by a Lebanese military court for killing the Defence Forces member. The sentence is likely to be later commuted to a prison term. Ayyad was accused of firing his weapon into Pte Rooney's jeep during an attack in the village of Al-Aqbiya. Six other accused received lesser sentences while one was acquitted. Pte Rooney and three other Irish peacekeepers, who were serving with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) mission in south Lebanon, were driving to Beruit Airport when their vehicle came under attack. READ MORE Trooper Shane Kearney was seriously injured in the incident while two other Irish soldiers suffered more minor injuries. Ayyad was produced to the court by Hizbullah in 2023 and charged under Article 549 of the Lebanese Penal Code, which states the murder of a public official carrying out official duties shall be punishable by death. He was later released on bail to receive medical treatment after his lawyers told the court he was seriously ill. Before his sentencing on Monday, documents were handed into court detailing the current location of Ayyad, sources said. The documents stated he was seriously ill in hospital. Another man present during the attack, Ali Suleiman, was sentenced to three months in prison and a fine of 100 million Lebanese pounds (€960). A third accused, Ali Khalifa, was jailed for one month and given a similar fine while two others, Hussein Suleiman, Mustafa Suleiman, and Ali Hakim fined 200 million Lebanese pounds (€1,920) each. A seventh accused, Mohammed Mazhar, was found not guilty. Before Monday, none of the accused aside from Ayyad had ever appeared in court. However, all six others turned up for the verdict and sentencing. A verdict had not been expected in the case until mid-September. The early conclusion of the case is seen by Irish officials as an attempt by the Lebanese authorities to draw a line under the incident before a crucial vote to renew Unifil's peacekeeping mandate, which ends on August 31st. The Lebanese government wants the mandate renewed. However, Israel has been lobbying for Unifil to be wound up or to have its mandate significantly curtailed. The value Lebanon places on the peacekeeping mission was emphasised by the chief military judge during Monday's hearing. 'Hearts beat for the continued presence of the peacekeeping forces in Lebanon, given the humanitarian, social, and even cultural work they are doing,' Brig Gen Wassim Fayyad said. The willingness of the court to convict the accused also underlines the reduction in Hizbullah's power and influence since Pte Rooney's murder, officials said. The militant group, which is designated as a terrorist organisation by the European Union, was left badly weakened following Israel's invasion of Lebanon last October. Monday's three-hour hearing was overseen by Brig Gen Fayyad, who was appointed earlier this year by Lebanon's new president, Joseph Aoun, a former army chief who has pledged to reform the Lebanese judiciary. The proceedings in Beirut were attended by: Nuala O'Brien, the Irish Ambassador to Egypt with responsibility for Lebanon; Bernie Maguire, an assistant secretary at the Department of Defence; Paul McCloskey, the husband of Pte Rooney's mother Natasha Rooney-McCloskey; Joe Karam, a Lebanese lawyer appointed to represent the Irish Government during the proceedings; and an observer from Unifil. During the proceedings, the court reviewed video and photographic evidence and heard testimony from the defendants. The defendants told the court that they had been watching a World Cup football match between France and Morocco in Al-Aqbiya, a town in south Lebanon, on December 14th, 2022, when a Unifil vehicle drove by crowds gathered there. The Lebanese men said Unifil did not typically undertake patrols in this area. They said the vehicle did not have a UN flag on it and was not accompanied by a Lebanese military patrol. The defendants told the court that they believed it may have been part of an undercover Israeli operation. The lawyer for the defendants told the military court there was no premeditated plan to kill a UN soldier, in particular a soldier from Ireland. The defendants said they had received no instructions from Hizbullah, or any other group, to kill a UN peacekeeper. The military court's decision is open to appeal by the defendants and the military prosecutor, Fadi Akiki, who was represented at the hearing on Monday by his deputy Roland Chartouni. If there is no appeal or once such an appeal concludes, civil proceedings can be instigated by Pte Rooney's family against the defendants. Evidence from the military court proceedings would then be presented in Lebanon's civil courts, according to Lebanese lawyers familiar with the system.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
X loses High Court challenge against Online Safety Code
X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, has lost a High Court challenge against Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Code. The company had accused the Irish media regulator of "regulatory overreach" by imposing the rules, which require video-sharing platforms to protect users from harmful content. In a judgement today, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley said he did not agree that X was entitled to reliefs sought by way of judicial review. X had argued that the provisions of Part B of the Online Safety Code go further than what was required in transposing the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Mr Justice Bradley found that the provisions of the code are within the authority of the AVMSD and the 2009 Act, and are entirely complementary to the EU's Digital Services Act and not in conflict with it. A spokesperson for Coimisiún na Meán said it welcomed the court's judgment and will study it in full before commenting further. In recent days, X introduced new age assurance measures in a bid to comply with the Irish Online Safety Code, as well as UK and EU regulations. Under provisions of the code that came into force on 21 July, video-sharing platforms that allow pornography must have effective age assurance measures. Last week, Coimisiún na Meán said it had not seen evidence of measures taken by X to comply with the code. It contacted the platform and asked for an explanation by last Friday. Coimisiún na Meán received a reply from X on Friday outlining the new measures which the regulator is now studying. In an online help centre post, X said it will take a multi-step approach to verification. This will include age assurance using existing signals, as well as age estimates using email addresses and social connections. X said it is also planning user-involved verification options which will include facial recognition and uploading IDs.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
High Court action over use of Irish airspace for weapons transport
A legal challenge to the use of Irish airspace for flights transporting weapons to Israel has been lodged at the High Court. Campaign group Uplift, along with news organisation The Ditch and Irish-born Palestinian surgeon, Dr Ahmed El Mokhallalati have lodged papers seeking permission to apply for judicial review. In the statement filed to ground the application, they say they are seeking declarations that the Minister for Transport has failed to investigate allegations that Irish airspace has been used for the transport of weapons for use by the Israeli Defence Force in its military operations in Gaza and that part of the relevant legislation is unconstitutional. They also claim the Irish Government is in breach of export legislation in the manner in which "dual use export licences" are being granted for goods which they say are used to manufacture weapons. Uplift says it published a report in May last year outlining its view that a surge in "dual use" trade between Ireland and Israel, since Israel commenced military action against Gaza may be linked to goods being used in the production of military equipment. They say there is a high risk that goods from Ireland are being exported to be used by two Israeli companies involved in manufacturing weapons and military equipment. The Government has said the level of dual use exports is not related to the ongoing military attack on Gaza. The Ditch has published research on tracking flights which appeared to be transporting weapons to Israel through Irish airspace. They say there's clear evidence that this is being done. They say in their statement of grounds, that it is legally impermissible to do this, that it's facilitating genocide being carried out by the IDF against the Palestinian people and that no exemptions were sought for the transportation of these weapons. They claim the Minister for Transport has failed in his duties under Air navigation and transport legislation to investigate the allegations about the use of Irish airspace. They also say the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment has been unlawfully granting dual use export licences. Surgeon Ahmed El Mokhallalati, who was born in Dublin, outlined his experiences in Gaza and described how he had contacted the Uplift organisation with a wish to do something about the ongoing death and destruction there. He said he believed Ireland had been facilitating the transfer of weapons and munitions of war to be used against the people in Gaza and he said these were the same weapons which destroyed his home, killed his friends and families and caused horrific and unspeakable harm to the people whose lives he worked hard to try to save. He said he was disappointed to see that the Government was continuing to ignore the abuse of its airspace in this manner and he said he felt compelled to take some action. He said he believed the Government was turning a blind eye to the use of Irish airspace to transport weapons and facilitating the most egregious crimes against humanity. Uplift say they are hoping to get a hearing at the High Court to seek leave to bring the judicial review proceedings before the end of this week.
