Government must clean up rivers
Norwich South MP Clive Lewis has introduced a Private Members' Bill on water to Parliament, exploring different ownership models.
He spoke at an event in Norwich alongside singer-turned-clean-water campaigner Feargal Sharkey.
The government said a full review of the sector was already under way and pointed out that it had introduced tougher legislation last year.
Lewis said private companies were using the water sector as a "cash cow" and said: "I personally think it's time we had a government that stood up for people."
Anglian Water has been approached for comment.
Most water companies in England and Wales are privately owned and regulated by the government.
The Norwich MP said he wanted his bill to set government targets for water quality
A keen fly fisherman, Sharkey described how he had stood in rivers and watched them "die a slow, agonising death" due to pollution.
He claimed that after 35 years of privatisation, customers were waking up to large bills while rivers were still being polluted.
"What we can all agree on is this version of privatisation has utterly, utterly failed," he said.
The amount of raw sewage entering England's rivers and seas doubled year-on-year in 2023 to 3.6 million hours of spills, according to the Environment Agency.
The public, environment groups and investors are being asked for their views about how the water sector can be changed by the government.
A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs spokesperson pointed out it had introduced powers to ban bonuses for bosses of polluting companies, and had brought in tougher criminal charges for breaches.
"For too long, water companies have pumped record levels of sewage into our waterways," they said.
"We have delivered on our promise to put water companies under tough special measures through our landmark Water Act."
They continued: "A full review of the water sector is under way to shape further legislation that will transform how our water system works and clean up our waterways for good."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Public asked for views on how to fix the water industry
Anglian Water bosses warned bonuses may be blocked
Anti-pollution law to threaten water bosses with jail
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ukraine weighs Trump's offer of security guarantees with caution
Advertisement European leaders met virtually Sunday afternoon to discuss the aftermath of the Alaska summit, including potential security guarantees. In a show of support for Ukraine, six European leaders, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, announced that they would join Zelensky when he meets with Trump on Monday in Washington. While the specifics of the US proposal remain unclear, Trump said Putin agreed that Ukraine should have strong security guarantees after a settlement, though not under NATO, two senior European officials who were briefed on the call have said. US troops might participate, Trump told the Europeans. Should Trump's proposal come to fruition, it would mark a win for Ukraine, which has long sought postwar security guarantees to prevent a future Russian invasion, but has so far received little beyond vague commitments. Advertisement But Zelensky warned Sunday that 'there are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, what Europe's role will be,' stressing that the proposal still needed to be worked out. 'We need security to work in practice,' he said. An official briefed on Trump's call to Zelensky said the Ukrainian leader would aim to seek clarity on potential security guarantees when he visits Washington on Monday. He will also seek answers on Trump's unexpected shift away from pursuing a cease-fire to instead call for a peace deal that would be likely to see Ukraine cede unconquered territory to Russia. Several Ukrainian lawmakers cautioned that they remained confused about what exactly Trump had in mind and what Putin may have agreed to in Alaska. The officials expressed worries that Trump may have misread what Moscow would be willing to accept and overstated his own proposal to Ukraine. White House officials did not immediately reply to a question about those concerns. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of Italy said that in Trump's call with Zelensky and European leaders, Trump had drawn on her earlier idea of guarantees modeled on Article 5 of the NATO pact that stipulates that an attack on one ally would be defended as an attack on all. While Ukraine would not join NATO under such guarantees, its Western allies would abide by 'a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the United States, ready to take action if it is attacked again,' Meloni said in a statement after the call. Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, said during the Brussels news conference on Sunday that Trump had shown a 'willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine.' Advertisement The idea, while appealing to the Ukrainians, has left them questioning its viability. Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the foreign affairs committee in the Ukrainian Parliament, said Meloni's idea was 'too vague' and left room for multiple interpretations that did not necessarily guarantee that Ukraine's allies would immediately come to its defense if Russia were to ever invade again. Solomiia Bobrovska, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament's defense and intelligence committee, said Meloni's idea could be interpreted only as a commitment to provide more financial aid to Ukraine or to send additional ammunition. Ukraine does not want to sign another Budapest Memorandum, a pledge signed in 1994 that was meant to protect the country after it gained independence — but clearly failed. Under that accord, Ukraine agreed to give Russia back old Soviet nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from Russia, the United States, and Britain. But the agreement did not detail those guarantees, and included no promise of military assistance in the event of an attack. Ukrainian officials say the lack of specificity gave Russia free rein to attack their country, as it did starting in 2014. 'In order to avoid the fate of the Budapest Memorandum, these guarantees must be legally binding and also provide for specific steps and an algorithm of actions by the guarantors in the event of repeated aggression against Ukraine,' Yehor Chernev, the deputy chair of the Ukrainian Parliament's defense and intelligence committee, said in a text message. One concrete guarantee that Ukraine has been seeking is the presence of Western troops on the ground — an idea that Trump appeared to entertain, despite previously opposing. Advertisement Ukraine's European allies have already made headway in that direction. In the spring, a group of countries including France, Britain, and Germany formed a 'coalition of the willing' to help safeguard an eventual peace. Some of the countries have said that to do so, they would be willing to send troops to Ukrainian soil after the conflict ends. But the contours of that force have not been ironed out, and details of who is willing to do what remain scarce. The coalition met Sunday afternoon to coordinate ahead of the White House summit. After the meeting, President Emmanuel Macron of France, one of the participants, said several European countries were ready to send troops to Ukraine in a postwar settlement, though not in areas near the frozen front line. Macron added that European leaders would ask Trump how far he would back security guarantees for Ukraine. 'That's what we need to discuss with the Americans: Who is willing to do what?' he said. 'If we are weak today with Russia,' he added, 'we are preparing the conflicts of tomorrow.' This article originally appeared in
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
The rizz kid: How a campus Communist turned conservative kingmaker put the ‘social' in ‘social movement'
Gen Z calls it 'rizz.' Conservative theorist Frank Meyer radiated it. Rizz is what Donald Trump exudes and Kamala Harris lacks, and this je ne sais quoi quality, at least to all who came before Gen Z brilliantly put a name on it, explains not just one's success on Hinge but whether a political figure can pull a crowd. Advertisement Marble-mouthed mumblers and shoegazers take note: It turns out people follow the very individuals in mass movements they follow around in social situations. Frank Meyer's 3D, pops-off-the-page life illustrates this truth. After the Newark-born Meyer acted as the pied piper of campus Communism in 1930s England, he remarkably became in America during the 1960s, as the title of my new biography puts it, the man who invented conservatism. Advertisement British intelligence conducted a black-bag job on his apartment, placed a mail cover on his correspondence and noted the bars he frequented, the tweed he wore and the frequent female company he kept as they tailed him. Nowhere in the 161 pages of the declassified Meyer files do agents memorialize on paper that the revolutionary they followed — described therein as 'the founder' of the student Communist movement — dated the big boss' daughter. The most Frank Meyer thing Frank Meyer ever did was enter into a relationship with Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald's youngest child as he conspicuously called for the violent overthrow of the British government the man led. Che, Lenin and Mao never pulled off such a brash caper. 'Come here at 7.0 — or if you don't like the idea of Downing Street — even though I am the sole occupant at the moment — fix any other place you like,' Sheila MacDonald wrote Meyer in one of their letters I discovered in an Altoona, Penn., warehouse during research for 'The Man Who Invented Conservatism: The Unlikely Life of Frank S. Meyer,' out Aug. 19. Predictably, the British government sought to deport Meyer (and, predictably, Miss MacDonald volunteered to intervene). The same rizz that placed the prime minister's daughter in his arms brought a phalanx of famous Brits to his defense. Advertisement Clement Attlee, future prime minister, pleaded his case in Parliament. A petition signed by philosopher Bertrand Russell, 'Howards End' and 'A Passage to India' author E.M. Forster and Labour Party leader (and Angela Lansbury's grandfather) George Lansbury called the deportation 'discrimination' prompted by the cause célèbre's 'left-wing politics.' Students marched about London chanting, 'Free Frank Meyer!' Women desired his romantic attention. Rizz meant men wanted his company, too. In 1930, an unknown Pottstown, Penn., prep-school teacher plaintively petitioned Meyer for more 'scintillating conversations' and 'provocative' letters. He wished to again drink with Meyer and 'to take a Cook's Tour of this particular part of the world with you.' Without Meyer's company, he confessed, he inhabited an 'intellectual desert.' The sycophantic missive came from the typewriter of James A. Michener long before he won a Pulitzer Prize for 'Tales of the South Pacific.' Advertisement By 1949, when Meyer testified against former comrades in the Foley Square trial — the longest, most expensive court case in US history to that point — he had witnessed much evil. He knew that Prince Mirsky, the force who pushed him to join the Communist Party, had disappeared in a Soviet gulag; his protégé, Charles Darwin's great-grandson John Cornford, had died fighting in the Spanish Civil War; his boss on 'peace' activism, Walter Ulbricht (who later built the Berlin Wall), went about making the lives of East Germans hell; and his American idol, longtime party chief Earl Browder, had transformed overnight in Communist rhetoric from a brilliant, courageous leader into a perfidious enemy of the people. Slowly, he embraced a very different outlook. Quickly, and characteristically, the conservative convert became conservative pope. Present at the creation of National Review, the Conservative Party of New York, the Philadelphia Society, the American Conservative Union and Young Americans for Freedom, Meyer helped erect the skeletal structure of the conservative movement. Going to Woodstock meant something very different for 1960s young conservatives. Those making the obligatory pilgrimage to his farmhouse there included Joan Didion, who credited him as the editor who first published her freelance work, Garry Wills, who said he spent more time with this mentor in the late 1950s and early 1960s than anyone outside his family, and Heritage Foundation founder Ed Feulner. His philosophy, fusionism, became the default outlook of the American right from Barry Goldwater well through Ronald Reagan, who cheered that Meyer had 'fashioned a vigorous new synthesis of traditional and libertarian thought — a synthesis that is today recognized by many as modern conservatism.' What made conservatives so easily follow a former Communist? Rizz. Those doubting the power of rizz may wish to apply this test to every presidential election in their lifetimes: Did the winning candidate also win the rizz contest? Advertisement Undertaker-face John Kerry lost to George W. Bush in 2004. John McCain, who looked like he walked off the set of a black-and-white television show, lost to Technicolor Barack Obama in 2008. Monotone Gerald Ford lost to Jimmy Carter with his ear-to-ear grin and mellifluous diction in 1976. And a fist-in-the-air, 'Fight'-shouting Donald Trump — far from the cranky, complaining COVID case of 2020 — triumphed over word-salad chef Kamala Harris in 2024. Frank Meyer understood the power of rizz long before Twitch streamer Kai Cenat popularized the term. They don't call them social movements for nothing. Daniel J. Flynn is the author of 'The Man Who Invented Conservatism: The Unlikely Life of Frank S. Meyer' (Encounter/ISI Books), an American Spectator senior editor and Hoover Institution visiting fellow.
18 hours ago
Meet the actor with Down syndrome who wants to run for president of Chile
SANTIAGO, Chile -- Sebastián Solorza is already a familiar face to many Chileans, having starred in a popular Netflix series and won national acting awards. Now, the 43-year-old actor with Down syndrome wants to enter the race for president in Chile's national election this year. Solorza is racing against the clock to gather 35,000 signatures by Aug. 18, a requirement for him to run as an independent candidate. He positions himself as a 'point of balance' between the far right and the far left — a fierce ideological battle that dominates Chile's political scene. 'I listen with my heart,' Solorza told The Associated Press, adding that his condition allows him to offer a softer communication style. Should he enter the electoral race, his platform will focus on greater inclusion, improved healthcare and education, and enhanced security — a main concern of citizens who have been grappling with an unprecedented crisis of violence in recent years. Chile will choose its new president on Nov. 16, with the campaign so far defined by the mutual attacks between the two main contestants: The far-right José Antonio Kast, who lost to current leftist president Gabriel Boric in 2021, and Jeannette Jara, the ruling coalition's communist nominee. With three months remaining until the election, polls show Kast and Jara vying for the top two spots. This scenario suggests they would face each other in a second-round runoff on Dec. 14. Solorza argues that his candidacy offers a middle ground between political extremes, while working toward a 'more inclusive country.' 'I've spent my entire life breaking down prejudices, as an actor, as a worker and as a citizen,' he said last month when announcing his plans to run as an independent candidate. 'We all deserve the same opportunities.' The actor hopes his candidacy will give greater visibility to people with Down syndrome and other disabilities. While it's unlikely he will secure the necessary support to run for president — he has collected a little over 600 of the 35,000 signatures required — he sees his political foray as a success. Solorza keeps a tight schedule, balancing an acting career with a day job at a construction company. In his limited free time, he spends time visiting Congress, talking with members of the Parliament and meeting with constituents to promote his campaign. On the streets of Huechuraba, a quiet and green neighborhood in the northern part of Chile's capital, Solorza is often greeted by supporters, fans, and workers from restaurants and cafés where he is a regular. Always smiling, he walks slowly, making time for anyone who wants a photo or a brief chat. In Valparaíso — a coastal town about 100 kilometers (62 miles) from Santiago — Chileans show up at the Parliament to express their support. 'Good luck with the signatures,' one supporter said last week. 'Let it be the people who ultimately decide our future.' Solorza's political aspirations open the door to 'raise the voices of people with Down syndrome' and help to 'demystify myths and prejudices still present in society,' said Carolina Gallardo, director of the Chilean nonprofit Down Up Foundation, which offers support and community for families raising children with Down syndrome. The attempt at a political debut is just the latest in a long line of barriers Solorza has overcome. He was born and raised in the 1980s, a time with far less knowledge about Down syndrome than today. His mother, Jenny Solorza, recalls his early years as 'very dark,' because doctors never provided a clear diagnosis for their son, leading them to search for information on their own. 'We wanted to do our best and always encouraged him with music," she said. As a result, 'Sebastián has a very broad musical culture, and that's what he grew up with.' Solorza attended special schools where he developed his passion for the arts, fueled by music, rather than focusing on traditional academics. At 18, he received a scholarship to join a theater school and began performing regularly on stage and appearing in popular TV talk shows. He later rose to national fame for his leading role as Tomy in the Chilean thriller 'Chromosome 21.' The series, which follows a detective trying to determine if a young man found at a murder scene is a witness or a suspect, ranked second on Netflix in Chile just two days after its release in 2022. The part earned Solorza the Best New Actor award at the 2023 Caleuche Awards, one of the most important ceremonies in the Chilean film industry. Despite social media criticism that he lacks preparedness and political experience to run for office, he insists he will not be deterred.
