Labour Court rules in favour of pregnant employee in discrimination case against paint company
The Labour Court has determined that a paint company, which placed a pregnant worker on early pregnancy leave as she could no longer work among the paint chemicals, and it had no other work for her, discriminated against her.
Image: File
A paint company, which was found to have discriminated against a pregnant employee who worked for it by placing her on unpaid maternity leave months before she was due to go on leave, was ordered to pay her 11 months' back pay.
Daisy Moleme turned to the Durban Labour Court, where she sued her now former employer under the Employment Equity Act and the non-compliance with the Basic Conditions of Employment Act.
Moleme was employed by Induradec Coatings as a chemist, and her duties included aspects of both research relating to, as well as the development of products for the employer, a chemical coating company.
Having fallen pregnant some 12 weeks earlier, Moleme notified her employer of her pregnancy in March 2023. She was concerned about continuing to work in the laboratory, which would expose her to certain chemicals.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
She requested to be moved out of that environment, and she was moved to another office, but for two months, she was assigned no duties. This was after her manager had agreed that she would be provided with a computer to enable her to carry out such limited functions as she was able to while she was away from the laboratory.
The company, meanwhile, tried to obtain professional guidance as to how to handle Moleme's situation, as the paint company uses a variety of raw materials in the chemical makeup of its products, and it feared that this could affect the unborn baby.
All safety data sheets were available, but the literature does not specify pregnant persons; it said.
In May 2023, the company told Moleme that she was placed on early maternity leave without pay, as it was unable to use her. She was also told by her manager that the company was 'not getting value for money' at that stage, as she had fallen pregnant.
The court acknowledged that the company did obtain expert opinions on how to handle Moleme's situation. It was advised to accommodate her elsewhere in the company, but it did not do so.
It also accepted that by placing her on unpaid maternity leave, the decision was not made with deliberate intent to discriminate against her on account of her pregnancy.
But, the court said, the failure to utilise her services outside of the laboratory evinced complete indifference not only to its legal obligations but also to the negative consequences which would inevitably and foreseeably befall the applicant by being deprived of the ability to earn her salary.
'It can further not be doubted that whilst on maternity leave, whether paid or not, pregnant employees by virtue of their absence from the workplace in certain instances invariably lose out on advantages of being at the workplace, such as bonuses, promotions, and career development in the form of training and development offered to other employees,' the court stated.
It concluded that pregnant women continue to worry about the prospects of their continued employment once they disclose their pregnancy or even after childbirth.
In the case of the applicant, the invariable consequences of pregnancy were exacerbated by how the company treated her, the court stated.
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Weaponising the Public Finance Management Act: A new legal trend threatening public sector discipline
A concerning trend is emerging in public sector employment. Employees facing disciplinary action are increasingly wielding the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 (PFMA) not as the accountability tool it was designed to be, but as a shield against workplace consequences. This strategic pivot transforms financial governance legislation into an employment litigation weapon with potentially far-reaching implications for public administration. The PFMA was enacted in 1999 with the primary purpose of establishing a robust framework for financial governance in South Africa's public sector. At its core, the act aims to secure transparency, accountability, and sound management of revenue, expenditure, assets and liabilities across national and provincial government institutions. Among its core objectives, it provides mechanisms to prevent irregular, unauthorised, as well as fruitless and wasteful expenditure, thereby safeguarding public resources against misuse. The recent Labour Court case of Vico v The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment offers a compelling illustration of this new phenomenon. Thembalethu Vico, a director within the department who faced dismissal following disciplinary proceedings related to the removal of confiscated abalone valued at approximately R7.5-million, sought to challenge his dismissal through an unusual legal avenue: by attacking the procedural aspects of his disciplinary hearing through the lens of the PFMA. At the heart of Vico's application was an attempt to secure declaratory relief related to what he characterised as incomplete disciplinary proceedings. His arguments centred on several PFMA-related assertions: that the employer had 'unjustly and unfairly terminated' the briefing contract of the disciplinary hearing chairperson; that this termination caused 'unreasonable delay' in his disciplinary hearing; that respondents 'contravened the applicant's right to fair labour practice'; and rather notably, that expenditure on recusal applications against the chairperson constituted 'fruitless and wasteful expenditure' under the PFMA. The Labour Court's response was unequivocal. In his judgment, Judge Robert Lagrange not only dismissed the application, but characterised it as 'vexatious in nature', ordering the applicant to pay the respondents' costs. 'An attempt to circumvent the proper forums for labour disputes' The court found that Vico was 'no stranger to legal principles and reasoning' and determined that his PFMA-based arguments represented an attempt to circumvent the proper forums for labour disputes — namely the General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council where he had already lodged an unfair dismissal claim. This case highlights a broader issue deserving closer scrutiny: the strategic repurposing of financial management legislation to serve employment law objectives. The PFMA, enacted in 1999, was designed to promote transparent and effective management of government finances — not as a mechanism for employees to challenge disciplinary outcomes. Yet increasingly, we witness creative legal arguments that stretch the PFMA beyond its intended boundaries. Several notable examples demonstrate this concerning pattern in other contextual scenarios: Unsuccessful tender bidders increasingly invoke the PFMA not to address genuine financial irregularities, but to contest legitimate procurement decisions they simply disagree with. By alleging technical PFMA violations, these bidders attempt to overturn procurement outcomes through financial management legislation rather than following appropriate procurement appeal processes. Some employees facing disciplinary action for performance or conduct issues have strategically repositioned themselves as 'whistleblowers' under section 51 of the PFMA. By claiming they were disciplined for reporting financial misconduct, rather than for their own workplace infractions, they attempt to transform standard employment disputes into protected disclosure matters. Some senior employees facing poor performance reviews have contested their evaluations by claiming they were instructed to take actions that would violate the PFMA. This transforms performance management into a complex legal dispute about financial legislation interpretation. Public entities facing pressure to implement organisational changes have cited PFMA compliance concerns as reasons to delay implementation, effectively using financial legislation as a strategic tool to resist operational reforms. Perhaps most troublingly, the PFMA has become weaponised in political contexts, with allegations of technical PFMA violations used to undermine political opponents in positions of financial accountability, regardless of whether actual financial mismanagement occurred. In the misconduct context, the implications of this trend are significant. Public sector managers face the daunting prospect of defending not only the substantive merits of disciplinary decisions, but also navigating complex arguments about whether their internal processes satisfy the technical requirements of financial legislation. This creates a chilling effect on departmental decision-making, potentially undermining efforts to address misconduct effectively. More worryingly, this legal strategy diverts valuable court resources. Judge Lagrange noted that the application was largely an attempt to revisit a matter that had already been decided, writing that 'it beggars belief that the applicant could have seriously believed that he could simply avoid the unequivocal effect of the judgment by approaching this court under the guise of an application for declaratory relief'. When courts must attend to such applications, genuine cases requiring judicial attention face delays. The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment's approach in the Vico case provides a template for addressing such claims. Rather than becoming entangled in debates about the PFMA's application to employment matters, they successfully redirected the court's attention to the jurisdictional question: Whether the Labour Court was the appropriate forum for what was essentially an attempt to relitigate disciplinary proceedings through a different legal framework. Distinct forums and remedies PFMA matters and employment disputes are meant to follow different procedural paths, with distinct forums and remedies designed to preserve the integrity of both systems. When properly invoked, PFMA concerns should follow established channels that begin with internal departmental controls, escalate to Treasury oversight, proceed through audit mechanisms via the Auditor-General's examination, involve executive accountability and operate through specific financial misconduct procedures established in the PFMA — all pathways that exist distinctly from labour dispute mechanisms. Notably absent from the PFMA is any provision making the Labour Court a forum for adjudicating PFMA violations, which is why the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment correctly focused on the jurisdictional question, highlighting that the applicant was attempting to bypass proper forums for both employment disputes (the General Public Service Sectoral Bargaining Council) and financial governance concerns (internal controls, Treasury oversight and potentially criminal proceedings). As this trend continues to evolve, public sector employers would be wise to develop proactive strategies. This includes ensuring that disciplinary procedures are documented with meticulous attention to detail, that financial decisions related to such proceedings are properly authorised, and that legal teams are prepared to address PFMA-based arguments directly. The PFMA represents a crucial pillar of democratic governance and institutional transformation. The act has become instrumental in the country's ongoing struggle against corruption and State Capture — challenges that have threatened South Africa's democratic foundations and economic stability. However, the judiciary's response in the Vico case sends a clear message: the PFMA cannot be weaponised to circumvent established labour relations processes. This judgment establishes an important precedent that may discourage frivolous applications of this nature. Ultimately, public administration requires both financial accountability and efficient personnel management. When these systems are placed in artificial opposition through creative litigation strategies, neither objective is well served. The Labour Court's firm stance in the Vico case represents a welcome correction — one that reinforces the proper boundaries between financial governance and employment law in South Africa's public sector. DM
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Preparing for new employment equity targets in South Africa's financial sector
Explore the recent amendments to South Africa's Employment Equity Act and discover how financial institutions must adapt to new sector-specific targets to ensure compliance and drive transformation. Image: Freepik The transformation imperative in South Africa's financial services sector has reached a critical juncture with the recent amendments to the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA), which came into effect on 15 April 2025. These legislative changes signal a transition from a discretionary compliance model to a more prescriptive and measurable approach. Employers in the financial services sector are now required to actively drive change through clearly defined numerical targets and strategic employment equity planning. This is particularly important given the slow pace of transformation across all sectors, including the financial services sector. The sector faces challenges such as the underrepresentation of historically disadvantaged individuals in executive roles, skill shortages, and complex corporate structures. As a result, the financial services sector is under increased pressure to demonstrate concrete transformation outcomes. Sector-specific targets: What employers in the financial services sector must achieve The key driver behind these heightened obligations is the introduction of section 15A into the EEA. This provision grants the Minister of Employment and Labour the authority to determine sector-specific numerical targets applicable to designated employers. The amendments introduce five-year sectoral targets tailored to, amongst other sectors, the financial and insurance sector. Designated employers operating within this sector are required to incorporate these into their Employment Equity Plans (EEPs). For the financial and insurance sector specifically, the sectoral targets require that 63.1% of top management positions be held by members of designated groups. Of these, 27.8% should be occupied by males from designated groups, and 35.3% by females from those groups. At senior management level, the target increases to 77.0%, with 31.7% allocated to males and 45.3% to females within designated groups. For the professionally qualified and middle management category, the target is set at 86.8%, broken down into 40.7% male and 46.1% female representation among designated groups. For skilled technical positions, 95.6% of these are expected to be held by designated groups, comprising 49.5% male and 46.1% female representation. In addition to these occupational level targets, there is a universal requirement across all levels that at least 3% of positions be filled by persons with disabilities. These targets are not merely aspirational, they are enforceable. Employers are expected to report progress annually, and a failure to meet these thresholds may result in scrutiny, penalties, or loss of access to state contracts. While the legislation allows employers to justify non-compliance with sectoral targets, these justifications will be rigorously assessed. Acceptable grounds may include a lack of suitably qualified candidates from designated groups, limited promotion or recruitment opportunities, the impact of business transfers, mergers, CCMA awards, court orders, or adverse economic conditions. Importantly, these reasons must be thoroughly documented. The onus is on the employer to prove their validity, and unsupported or vague justifications are unlikely to be accepted. Therefore, employers must maintain detailed records and internal analyses to substantiate any departure from their EEP commitments. For effective implementation, organisations must strengthen their internal employment equity structures. This includes training line managers and employment equity forum representatives, particularly those involved in recruitment and promotion decisions. These forums must be empowered to act as transformation champions within the business. Additionally, employers should upgrade administrative processes to support accurate data collection, timely reporting, and robust monitoring. Record-keeping is particularly critical where employers rely on justifications for not meeting targets.
Daily Maverick
7 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Twin disruptors at work — tariffs, AI and the future of employment
The global economy stands at a precipice, shaped by two interconnected forces: the resurgence of tariff-driven protectionism and the relentless advance of artificial intelligence (AI). Together, these 'twin disruptors' are changing the world of work, reshaping trade dynamics, recalibrating labour markets and challenging the social contract that underpins modern societies. This presents a profound double disruption, compelling workers, employers, legislators and policymakers to confront urgent legal questions concerning rights, protections and regulatory obligations. The new tariff terrain: a trade law perspective Tariffs have re-emerged as an instrument of statecraft. Yet, their deployment is far from unfettered. It is governed by a robust international legal architecture, primarily the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade under the World Trade Organization (WTO). The increasing imposition of tariffs, particularly those justified under national security exemptions, is testing the limits of multilateral trade law. Disputes arising from such measures are before the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism, underscoring the critical need for legal predictability in global commerce. Tariff policy must adhere to the principles of administrative law, demanding transparency, thorough consultation and the minimisation of arbitrary or disproportionate impacts on affected sectors. Crucially, workers displaced by tariff-induced shifts in global supply chains may have legitimate claims under existing labour statutes, advocating for 'just transition' support or retraining guarantees to mitigate job losses. AI and labour: legal gaps and governance challenges The rapid integration of AI into the workplace introduces unprecedented complexities for labour law. Traditional legal protections – encompassing the right to fair labour practices, non-discrimination and safe working conditions – are severely strained by algorithmic decision-making 's pervasive influence. For instance, automated hiring or performance management tools carry the inherent risk of inadvertently violating anti-discrimination laws, data protection legislation or even constitutional rights to dignity and equality. In South Africa, these vital protections are enshrined in the Bill of Rights and further elaborated through key statutes like the Labour Relations Act, Employment Equity Act and the Protection of Personal Information Act. Globally, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) has proactively begun to address these emerging challenges, advocating for a 'human-centred' approach to the future of work and urging the adoption of new international standards that ensure algorithmic transparency and accountability in the workplace. South Africa's lacklustre economic growth: a deep dive into persistent challenges While South Africa holds significant potential as an emerging market with diversified industries and abundant natural resources, its economic growth has been persistently lacklustre, significantly hindering efforts to address challenges like high unemployment, poverty and inequality. For more than a decade the country's GDP growth has averaged a mere 0.7% annually, a rate lower than its population growth, leading to declining real per capita income. This sustained underperformance is not merely a cyclical downturn, but a symptom of deep-seated structural issues and governance weaknesses. One of the most critical impediments to South Africa's economic vitality is the energy crisis, primarily driven by the ailing state-owned power utility, Eskom. The result is load shedding – scheduled and unscheduled power outages that cripple businesses, disrupt daily life and deter investment. These power cuts have cost the economy billions of rands annually, forced small businesses to collapse and significantly reduced productivity across all sectors, from mining to manufacturing and retail. The impact extends to agriculture, where food processing delays lead to substantial losses, and even to the digital economy, with projected losses in the billions. While there have been recent improvements in electricity supply, the long-term shadow of energy insecurity continues to loom large over the economy. Beyond the energy woes, other structural rigidities contribute to the anaemic growth. The country's transport and logistics infrastructure, particularly rail and port operations, is in disrepair. This directly hinders export capacity and increases operational costs for businesses. Furthermore, a weak business environment, characterised by administrative burdens, stifles entrepreneurship and job creation, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) which are vital for employment. Despite efforts to improve the ease of doing business, reform has been slow. The public sector wage bill significantly strains national finances, diverting funds that could otherwise be invested in critical infrastructure or economic stimulus programmes. The cumulative effect of these challenges is a staggering unemployment rate, consistently among the highest in the world. In the first quarter of 2025, the overall unemployment rate climbed to 32.9%, with youth unemployment reaching an alarming 62.4%. This highlights a fundamental disconnect between the available workforce and the economy's capacity to create jobs, often exacerbated by a mismatch between skills and industry demands. The labour costs and insufficient demand also influence businesses' reluctance to expand their workforce. Addressing South Africa's lacklustre economic growth requires a comprehensive and sustained effort. This includes accelerating structural reforms in the energy and logistics sectors, enhancing the business environment to foster private sector investment and SME growth, improving effective and efficient governance, and implementing labour market reforms promoting job creation and addressing skill mismatches. Without such action, South Africa risks remaining trapped in a cycle of low growth, high unemployment and persistent inequality. The dual pressures of shifting tariffs and accelerating AI adoption intersect with entrenched structural inequalities in South Africa. South Africa bears a constitutional obligation to progressively realise socioeconomic rights, which, it is argued, impose positive duties on the state to proactively create enabling conditions for employment and skills development, particularly as traditional job pathways face obsolescence. If unchecked, the unmitigated displacement of mid-skilled jobs due to automation and evolving trade flows could seriously violate the state's duty to achieve these fundamental rights progressively. To comply with these constitutional mandates, legal strategies such as those aimed at developing sectoral master plans, inclusive procurement policies and robust public-private retraining partnerships are imperative. Furthermore, South Africa's international obligations under instruments such as the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the UN's Sustainable Development Goals reinforce the critical need for labour market policies that actively promote equity, sustainability and decent work for all. AI and tariffs are intrinsically transnational phenomena, demanding regulatory responses that transcend national borders. There is an urgent and pressing need for new global frameworks to address emerging digital labour rights, facilitate cross-border data governance, and ensure corporate accountability across complex global supply chains. Legal fragmentation will exacerbate inequalities between jurisdictions. Multinational firms may exploit regulatory arbitrage without coordinated frameworks to circumvent vital labour protections. Multilateral cooperation, channelled through institutions such as the WTO, ILO, UN and regional bodies like the African Union, is essential to ensure that legal protections keep pace with and actively guide technological and economic transformation towards equitable outcomes. Towards a legally grounded future of work The future of work in a world shaped by tariffs and AI will not be passively determined by technology or market forces alone. Crucially, it will be shaped by the legal frameworks we construct, our institutional choices and the political will we summon. If legal systems remain passive, they risk complicating inequality and eroding fundamental rights. Conversely, if boldly and strategically mobilised, law can be a powerful tool to steer disruption towards shared prosperity and a more just future. The imperative is clear: we must urgently update labour, trade and constitutional laws for a world where borders and algorithms increasingly define the boundaries of opportunity and risk. Legal certainty, fundamental fairness and human dignity must serve as the unshakeable foundations upon which we construct the new world of work. DM
