Suki Waterhouse Says She ‘Wore Pants So Tight' They ‘Caused a Hernia'
Earlier this week, actress and singer Suki Waterhouse posted a tweet claiming that she got a hernia from wearing too-tight pants.
For anyone who's ever zipped up a pair of jeans that are a little too small, this may come as a shock. Do those too-tight pants put you at risk of a hernia?
Here's what doctors say:
What is a hernia?
A hernia is 'a weakness in the abdominal wall that allows something from the abdomen to protrude through the layers of the abdominal wall,' said Dr. Brittany Mead, an assistant professor of surgery at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago.
'It's a fancy word for a hole in the human body,' added Dr. Eric Wise, an assistant professor of surgery at the University of Minnesota Medical School.
Tissue — such as fats, organs or intestines — that isn't supposed to protrude through ends up poking through, Wise added.
This often creates a bulge in your abdomen or groin, but it isn't always visible, Wise noted.
It can sometimes cause pain, Mead said. But this also isn't always the case.
Many things can cause a hernia.
'Many things can cause a hernia, and most are beyond our control,' said Wise.
They can happen after trauma and after surgery. Certain things present at birth can increase someone's risk of developing it, too, he added.
But there are some risk factors that we do have control over, added Mead.
'Things like chronic cough, obesity, pregnancy and lots of strenuous exercise can increase risk of hernia,' Mead said. Constipation can also increase your risk.
Quitting smoking, managing your weight and avoiding constipation by eating a high-fiber diet are all ways to reduce your risk of getting a hernia, added Wise.
'But oftentimes, hernias are unavoidable,' Wise said. Meaning, you won't totally erase the chance of developing a hernia by doing these things.
One thing that won't cause a hernia? Wearing tight pants.
Sorry to Suki, but tight pants likely weren't the reason for the hernia. It's 'not something that you're going to do by wearing the wrong piece of clothing one time,' Mead said.
So no, a pair of tight pants is not going to be the sole reason you end up with a hernia. And that's true even if you wear tight pants regularly for years and years.
Wise agreed. 'Up front, obviously, I don't know about her specific medical condition and don't know the details, but in my practice, I have never seen or are familiar with a case of tight pants causing a hernia,' said Wise.
Wise added that he also can't think of a 'plausible physiologic mechanism by which that can happen.'
The tight pants may have exacerbated any pain associated with an existing hernia by squeezing the abdominal area, but the tight pants wouldn't cause a hernia on their own, Wise added.
It's even more unlikely that the tight pants caused the hernia for another reason.
'In a lot of patients, we actually recommend... that they wear an abdominal binder or a waist trainer, which actually puts pressure on the hernia and kind of controls the protuberance of that intra-abdominal tissue,' said Mead.
'So, wearing tight pants would act in a very similar way,' she said.
While Mead stressed that she, of course, can't comment specifically on Waterhouse's specific health situation, Waterhouse had a baby in March 2024 and 'that's something that would make me feel like [the hernia] was related more to the pregnancy than anything else,' Mead noted.
Worrying about developing a hernia isn't worth it — live your life and if you develop one, see a doctor.
When it comes to decreasing your chance of developing a hernia, you shouldn't worry too much.
'What I tell my patients specifically is, especially if they don't have a hernia, that they should live their life,' said Mead.
Some studies say family history could put you at heightened risk of hernia, but Mead said she doesn't advise against any behaviors — 'we don't have enough research to say that one activity over another is going to cause a hernia that doesn't exist.'
'I don't specifically advise my patients against any type of activity. I want them to live their lives, and if they form a hernia, they form a hernia,' she added.
'If you see a bulge or feel a bulge or feel like something's not right, I think it's reasonable to have a physician examine the area,' said Wise. That can be your primary care provider or a specialist such as a general surgeon, he added.
Hernia management and treatment have advanced significantly in the past decade or so, said Wise.
'While not every hernia needs surgery, it's certainly something that is best evaluated by a physician, and the main things that can be done to prevent it are lifestyle modifications and not necessarily changing your wardrobe,' Wise added.
Related...
7 Signs Your Gas Or Bloating Is A Bigger Issue
Lupita Nyong'o Revealed She Has Painful Uterine Fibroids. Here's What That Means.
I'm A Gastro Doctor. Here's The 1 Thing I'd Never Do If I Had Stomach Pain.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
SIGA to Host Business Update Call on August 5, 2025 Following Release of Second-Quarter 2025 Results
NEW YORK, July 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) (Nasdaq: SIGA), a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company, today announced that management will host a webcast and conference call to provide a business update at 4:30 P.M. ET on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. Participating in the call will be Diem Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel Luckshire, Chief Financial Officer. A live webcast of the call will also be available on the Company's website at in the Investor Relations section of the site, or by clicking here. Please log in approximately 5-10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time. Participants may access the call by dialing 1-800-717-1738 for domestic callers or 1-646-307-1865 for international callers. A replay of the call will be available for two weeks by dialing 1-844-512-2921 for domestic callers or 1-412-317-6671 for international callers and using Conference ID: 1130215. The archived webcast will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. About SIGA SIGA is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company and leader in global health focused on the development of innovative medicines to treat and prevent infectious diseases. With a primary focus on orthopoxviruses, we are dedicated to protecting humanity against the world's most severe infectious diseases, including those that occur naturally, accidentally, or intentionally. Through partnerships with governments and public health agencies, we work to build a healthier and safer world by providing essential countermeasures against these global health threats. Our flagship product, TPOXX® (tecovirimat), is an antiviral medicine approved in the U.S. and Canada for the treatment of smallpox and authorized in Europe, the UK, and Japan for the treatment of smallpox, mpox (monkeypox), cowpox, and vaccinia complications. For more information about SIGA, visit Contacts:Suzanne Harnettsharnett@ and Investors Media Jennifer Drew-Bear, Edison GroupJdrew-bear@ Holly Stevens, CG Lifehstevens@
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sarepta shares rebound after shipments of gene therapy Elevidys resume in US
(Reuters) -Sarepta Therapeutics shares surged more than 30% before the bell on Tuesday, as analysts said the resumption of U.S. shipments for its muscular gene therapy partially removes financial headwinds and decreases the risk of market withdrawal. The company said on Monday it would resume shipments of Elevidys — approved in the U.S. to treat a rare condition called Duchenne muscular dystrophy — to patients who can walk. U.S. shipments to patients who cannot walk independently are still halted, following the death of two teenage boys earlier this year. These incidents brought heightened regulatory scrutiny to Sarepta in recent weeks, while the pause of shipments raised concerns about the future of Elevidys — the company's largest revenue generator. Sarepta's announcement followed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's recommendation that the voluntary hold on shipments be removed after a probe showed the death of an 8-year-old boy in Brazil was not related to Elevidys. Wall Street analysts said the resumption of shipments would allow Sarepta to fulfill its near-term payments to partner Arrowhead and maintain access to its debt facilities. "The FDA's recommendation and the resumption of commercial treatment in the U.S. virtually eliminate the risk of Elevidys being formally withdrawn from the market," said William Blair analyst Sami Corwin. While the decision allows some patients to regain access to the treatment, analysts warned that patients and doctors could show hesitancy in light of the recent hit to reputation. "It remains to be seen how the news headlines regarding the patient deaths will affect commercial interest in the near term," Corwin said. Sarepta's partner Roche had also stopped Elevidys shipments in certain countries outside the U.S. Shares of Sarepta surged 36% to $18.85 in premarket trading. They have fallen more than 80% since the first Elevidys-related death was reported in March. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Sweeping Problems Under The Rug By The Feds Doesn't Make Them Go Away
A man walks his dog past a homeless man sleeping under a message painted on a boarded up shop in San ... More Francisco, California on April, 1, 2020, during the novel coronavirus outbreak. - The US death toll from the coronavirus pandemic topped 5,000 late on April 1, according to a running tally from Johns Hopkins University. (Photo by Josh Edelson / AFP) (Photo by JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images) For decades, every administration, every Congress, put many things off for someone else to deal with. No one can get everything done all the time, that's understandable. But many current economic and social programs aren't a result of juggling what might be possible. Instead, they have become the ultimate attempt to kick every can down the road. That doesn't solve problems. It only hides them and allows them to grow and fester. One of the current examples is homelessness. Here is a statement out of the presidential executive order, Ending Crime And Disorder On America's Streets: 'The overwhelming majority of these individuals are addicted to drugs, have a mental health condition, or both. Nearly two-thirds of homeless individuals report having regularly used hard drugs like methamphetamines, cocaine, or opioids in their lifetimes. An equally large share of homeless individuals reported suffering from mental health conditions.' Homelessness is a problem in many parts of the country. And, yes, people on the streets are often troubled in one way or another. However, the entire executive order is a rhetorical setup, claiming that 'nearly two-thirds' of the individuals reporting having used 'hard drugs like methamphetamines, cocaine, or opioids in their lifetimes.' No source for the statistic that is then delivered to deemphasize that any such use might have been long before. And then a statement that an 'equally large share of homeless individuals reported suffering from mental health conditions.' No source, again, and no explanation of what mental health conditions mean. Broadly defined enough, like any amount of depression, anxiety, discomfort, and so on, it could include everyone in the country. Next, a combination of claiming that spending by the federal government and states has run tens of billions on failed programs 'that address homelessness but not its root causes.' After claiming that homeless people leave 'other citizens vulnerable to public safety threats' comes the statement, 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order.' After stating that previous spending never looked at root causes, presuming that the administration knows the root causes, the proffered solution is to lock people away. The message is to ignore the problem and put it out of sight. The point isn't really for safety, because most dangerous behavior in the country doesn't come from homeless people. It's for comfort and to pretend everything is fine. This has economic and social implications. Institutionalize where? Privately owned prisons where someone makes a lot of money from incarcerations? Hospitals that have been financially struggling but will even more now that Medicaid has been so thoroughly cut? Similar issues come in arguments over diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI. The administration wants it purged not only from websites and government discussions, but from corporations, universities, and anywhere else the term might appear. Again, the communication expressed by action is to strike any mention of the topic anywhere, to bury it from consciousness as though that makes issues go away. It never does. Other parts of life are no different. Corporations want to promote the use of the most recent forms of artificial intelligence. Traditionally, the argument executives would use is not that technology was about enabling job cuts, but to free people up to do more useful and interesting work. That mask has finally begun to slip as CEOs and their corporations boast of shrinking their workforces. Ultimately, this will lead to fewer people being employed, greater degrees of consumer financial struggle, and economic weakness. But, again, that all gets brushed under the carpet. No society can long stand with such undermining. So long as problems are ignored, they likely grow worse until there comes a point that they demand more resources than are available.