logo
Associated Press publishes anti-Trump 'fact check' that admits president's most damaging DC claim is CORRECT

Associated Press publishes anti-Trump 'fact check' that admits president's most damaging DC claim is CORRECT

Daily Mail​a day ago
The Associated Press has published a fact-check appearing to substantiate Donald Trump 's claim that the murder rate in Washington, DC, is higher than that of both Bogota, Colombia, and Mexico City.
The piece - titled 'FACT FOCUS: Trump exaggerates, misstates facts on Washington crime' - comes after an impassioned press conference from the president.
'The murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Colombia, Mexico City, some of the places that you hear about as being the worst places on earth,' he told onlookers.
The administration, in turn, posted a chart to X comparing DC's murder rate to other cities around the world.
The graphic showed DC's murder rate at roughly 27 percent, Bogota at 15 percent, and Mexico City at 10 percent.
The AP piece conceded Washington is 'one of America's most-dangerous big cities,' but pointed to how 'the US in general' sees higher rates of than many other countries.
'Washington does have a higher homicide rate than many other global cities, including some that have historically been considered unsafe by many Americans,' a portion reads. 'But Trump is leaving out important context.'
The rest of the fact-check carried a similar tone, after Trump announced a federal takeover of the municipality's police just hours earlier.
'Look at these. Baghdad is … we doubled up on Baghdad. Panama City, Brasilia, San Jose, Costa Rica, Bogota, Colombia,' Trump told reporters as he showed charts comparing rates of crime in the nation's capital to other cities.
'Heavy drugs. Mexico City, I mentioned Lima, Peru, all double and triple what they are. So do you want to live in places like that? I don't think so. I don't think so.'
The White House attempted to substantiate its claims surrounding DC's 2024 murder rate with a screenshot of a New York Post article, which in turn cited a report published by the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) in February 2025.
The report showed D.C.'s murder rate sitting at 27.54 per 100,000 in 2024 - slightly more than the 25 percent tabulated by the FBI.
Still, DC's murder rate is high - seventh in the nation when looking at cities with 250,000 or more citizens.
Its rate is also markedly less than that of numerous Mexico cities, like Colima (126), Tijuana (91), Celaya (86), Cuernavaca (74), and Juárez (71), and cities in Colombia like Santa Marta (45) and Cali (42), which the AP piece touched on as well.
The AP piece, in turn, pointed out other factoids like murders in Washington in 2023 being 'high, but not the highest ever,' after Trump correctly noted at the press conference that the year was a terrible year for murders.
He then flubbed by saying it was the 'highest rate, probably ever. Probably 25 years.'
'THE FACTS,' the AP fact piece blared. 'In 2023, the District of Columbia recorded 274 murders in a city of about 700,000, its highest number in 20 years.
'But the city's own crime statistics from the 1970s, 80s and 90s, when the population was smaller, show much higher numbers of homicides.'
Other inconsistencies from Trump's speech honed in on included Trump's blaming of cashless bail for DC's crime situation despite an absence of data, and statistics from Washington's Metropolitan Police that contradicted claims that violent crime has risen in Washington since its post-pandemic peak in 2023.
The nation's capital, like the country overall, has been plagued by an uptick in violent crimes in 2020, where there was a nationwide 30 percent increase in murders compared to the year prior.
Shoplifting crimes and attacks on government employees have persisted in DC even since, paving the way for Trump's revelation Monday that he was federalizing the local police department under section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act.
The law allows the commander-in-chief to assume control of the capital's police force in the event of an emergency.
He hailed the occasion as DC's 'Liberation Day' in his announcement.
He has repeatedly called Washington 'horribly run'. During his campaign last year, he promised to 'restore' the capital.
Trump previously deployed the federal government in Washington, DC, in June, when protesters pushed back against his immigration enforcement. Gov. Gavin Newsom sued in response. The case goes to trial this week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump will host Kennedy Center Honors in presidential first. Here's who's on the honorees list
Trump will host Kennedy Center Honors in presidential first. Here's who's on the honorees list

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump will host Kennedy Center Honors in presidential first. Here's who's on the honorees list

Ten years after his career as a television star ended when he launched his first campaign for the presidency, President Donald Trump is returning to his presenter roots as host of this year's Kennedy Center Honors award ceremony this December. The president, who appointed himself head of the Kennedy Center shortly after taking office, made the announcement himself at a press conference to unveil this year's slate of honorees. He claimed the Kennedy Center board had requested that he serve as the emcee of this year's show, stepping into shoes once filled by the late CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite from 1981 to 2002, then by Ambassador Caroline Kennedy — the daughter of President John F. Kennedy, for whom the arts center is named — from 2003 to 2012. More recently, the award ceremony was hosted by Glenn Close, Stephen Colbert, Gloria Estefan, LL Cool J, and David Letterman.

Russia restricts calls via WhatsApp and Telegram, the latest step to control the internet
Russia restricts calls via WhatsApp and Telegram, the latest step to control the internet

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Russia restricts calls via WhatsApp and Telegram, the latest step to control the internet

Russian authorities announced Wednesday they were 'partially' restricting calls in messaging apps Telegram and WhatsApp, the latest step in an effort to tighten control over the internet. In a statement, government media and internet regulator Roskomnadzor justified the measure as necessary for fighting crime, saying that 'according to law enforcement agencies and numerous appeals from citizens, foreign messengers Telegram and WhatsApp have become the main voice services used to deceive and extort money, and to involve Russian citizens in sabotage and terrorist activities.' The regulator also alleged that 'repeated requests to take countermeasures have been ignored by the owners of the messengers.' There was no immediate comment from either platform. Russian authorities have long engaged in a deliberate and multipronged effort to rein in the internet. Over the years, they have adopted restrictive laws and banned websites and platforms that won't comply. Technology has been perfected to monitor and manipulate online traffic. While it's still possible to circumvent restrictions by using virtual private network services, those are routinely blocked, too. Authorities further restricted internet access this summer with widespread shutdowns of cellphone internet connections and by adopting a law punishing users for searching for content they deem illicit. They have also threatened to go after WhatsApp — one of the most popular platforms in the country — while rolling out a new 'national' messaging app that's widely expected to be heavily monitored. Reports that calls were being disrupted in WhatsApp and Telegram appeared in Russian media earlier this week, with users complaining about calls not going through or not being able to hear each other speak. According to Russian media monitoring service Mediascope, WhatsApp in July was the most popular platform in Russia, with over 96 million monthly users. Telegram, with more than 89 million users, came a close second. Both platforms had their run-ins with the Russian authorities in the past. The Kremlin tried to block Telegram between 2018-20 but failed. After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the government blocked major social media like Facebook and Instagram, and outlawed their parent company, Meta, that also owns WhatsApp, as extremist. In July, lawmaker Anton Gorelkin said WhatsApp 'should prepare to leave the Russian market,' and a new 'national' messenger, MAX, developed by Russian social media company VK, would take its place. MAX, promoted as a one-stop shop for messaging, online government services, making payments and more, was rolled out for beta tests but has yet to attract a wide following. Over 2 million people registered by July, the Tass news agency reported. Its terms and conditions say it will share user data with authorities upon request, and a new law stipulates its preinstallation in all smartphones sold in Russia. State institutions, officials and businesses are actively encouraged to move communications and blogs to MAX.

An Uber ride that should've taken 23 minutes became a nightmare — and she's not alone: ‘Attacks every 8 minutes'
An Uber ride that should've taken 23 minutes became a nightmare — and she's not alone: ‘Attacks every 8 minutes'

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

An Uber ride that should've taken 23 minutes became a nightmare — and she's not alone: ‘Attacks every 8 minutes'

In May 2021, an intoxicated Oklahoma woman called an Uber to take her home from her niece's engagement party. Although the ride should have only taken 23 minutes, when she woke up hours later, she wasn't home, but seated behind the steering wheel of a strange car, with her underwear in her purse and her jeans on inside out. Her mind blurred with confusion and her body covered in bruises, she went to the hospital and was given a sexual assault examination, according to a civil lawsuit against Uber and the driver, seen by The Independent. Authorities charged the driver, Timothy Alexander Greene, in June 2021. A jury convicted him of sexual battery two years later, court records show, and he is serving a 10-year prison sentence. The woman's horrifying assault in a ride-share vehicle is far from an isolated incident. 'Especially with solo female passengers, this is a huge problem in the industry,' Jim Mitchell, one of the attorneys representing the Oklahoma woman, told The Independent. 'Safety is a core value at Uber, and we have invested billions of dollars and countless hours to reduce safety incidents during trips, particularly when it comes to sexual misconduct and assault,' the company said in a statement on its website. Across the country, passengers have shared claims of misconduct that took place in Uber rides. In Utah, a woman on her way home was subjected to unwanted touching. In California, a driver touched himself as a female passenger vomited. In Texas, a 20-minute ride turned into a five-hour ordeal and an alleged rape at a motel. While Uber touts its safety record — and the company has implemented a string of features to protect passengers and drivers since its inception — allegations detailed in thousands of legal cases, internal company documents, and stories on social media underscore that staying safe in ride-shares is still an issue. Uber received reports of sexual misconduct every eight minutes from U.S. riders from 2017 through 2022, documents first reported by The New York Times revealed this week. Over six years, that totaled more than 400,000 Uber trips in the U.S. resulting in reports of sexual assault and sexual misconduct, according to the report. Uber's 2022 safety report disclosed 12,522 sexual assault and misconduct reports over the same time period. The tech company addressed the large discrepancy in a statement posted on the company website Wednesday after the Times published its report. The 'vast majority' of the hundreds of thousands of misconduct reports were 'less serious and non-physical in nature,' like flirting or staring, Hannah Nilles, Uber's Head of Safety for the Americas, wrote. Most of these 400,000-plus reports have not been subjected to a 'rigorous' process that vets allegations and weeds out false reports made 'with the goal of getting a refund,' Nilles continued. Uber claims that 99.99 percent of trips end without any issue. Roughly 0.006 percent of the 6.3 billion trips in the U.S. in the six-year span ended with a sexual misconduct or assault report, according to Nilles. The most serious reports accounted for 0.00002 percent — or 1 in 5 million trips — she said. The vast majority of sexual misconduct reports between 2017-2022 were made by female drivers or riders. Women represented 89 percent of survivors, according to the company's 2022 safety has not released a safety report since. The Independent has asked the company why this is the case. Uber identified other patterns in the sexual assault report data, according to internal documents seen by the Times. Incidents tended to occur late at night and on weekends with pick-ups near bars. The company has implemented a series of safety measures over the past several years. 'RideCheck' uses GPS tracking to detect whether the ride stays on course, pinging drivers and riders to ensure they're safe. There's also a 'Follow My Ride' feature that allows riders to share their trips so loved ones can track. But Uber acknowledges the features' limitations. 'No single safety feature or policy is going to prevent unpredictable incidents from happening on Uber, or in our world,' Nilles told the Times. In one case, what should have been a 20-minute trip became a harrowing five-hour ordeal that culminated in an alleged rape, The Times reported. A woman in Houston requested an Uber in December 2023. The driver picked her up at 8.53 p.m. at an apartment complex to take her to a house 22 minutes away. But the driver took a detour to a gas station around 9.10 p.m., the records show. That's when Uber sent a ping to check in on the woman, who didn't respond. By 9.29 p.m., the car continued to veer off the requested course and instead stopped at a motel. The company notified the woman again, and again, it went unanswered. Minutes later, Uber tried to get in touch with her with a robocall, to which she also didn't respond. The driver didn't mark the trip as complete until 2.01 a.m. Three hours later, the woman called Uber, claiming that she had been intoxicated and woke up in a motel with the driver, who had raped her, the Times reported. Uber banned the driver immediately after the alleged attack. An investigation into him the following month revealed a 'a concerning fact pattern' that included two previous accusations of sexual misconduct for inappropriate comments. The three missed contact attempts served as a potential signal that something could have gone wrong in the trip, the documents said. The report asked: 'Are our actions (or lack of actions) defensible?' In Oklahoma, when charges were brought against Uber driver Greene in 2021, the State Bureau of Investigation warned that there may be other survivors. Authorities had 'reason to believe other women could also have been assaulted by the ride-share driver.' It appears that investigators found another survivor. Last June, Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office brought another charge against Greene, accusing him of raping a woman in July 2019 while he was driving for Lyft, court records show. He has pleaded not guilty and is next due in court on August 20. An attorney for Greene declined to comment on the ongoing cases. The woman filed a police report and contacted Lyft to report the alleged incident. Greene was booted from the platform, the 2021 civil suit says. Greene then allegedly engaged in 'platform hopping,' jumping over to Uber after being deactivated from Lyft, said Mitchell, who also represents the woman. In March 2021, Lyft and Uber launched the Industry Sharing Safety Program which allows both companies to share information about drivers who were banned from the other's platform for sexual or physical assaults. "Any act of violence or assault has no place in the Lyft community or our society. When an incident is reported to us, our trained team takes immediate action to investigate, provides our support to the victim, and works with law enforcement on any investigation. With regard to the Oklahoma case, we were made aware of the allegations against the driver in June of 2019, and we immediately and permanently banned him from ever driving on the Lyft platform again. At that time we also provided support to the rider, and assisted law enforcement with their investigation,' a Lyft spokesperson told The Independent. Since Uber issued its first safety report for 2017 and 2018, the rate of reported sexual assaults has declined 44 percent, according to the company's latest report. Meanwhile, hundreds of plaintiffs across 29 states have joined a class action lawsuit against the ride-share giant. More than 2,435 cases are pending in the multidistrict litigation against Uber for activity described in the Times article, lead attorneys Rachel Abrams, Sarah London, and Roopal Luhana told The Independent in a statement. There are an additional 621 cases brought in California under a related proceeding. 'We look forward to litigating these claims in Court on behalf of the brave survivors who have come forward to seek justice from a company that has put profits over safety,' the attorneys said. The cases are scheduled to go to trial in December. Lyft, Uber's ride-share rival, also disclosed thousands of sexual misconduct reports from 2017 through 2022. In that period, there were 6,809 reports, accounting for 0.0002 percent of rides, according to Lyft's 2022 safety report. On social media, women have also been sharing their disturbing stories. One TikToker, xknowlsallpodcast, alleged she was sexually assaulted in 2016 in San Francisco. Intoxicated, she got in an Uber and immediately started feeling sick. She threw up a little on the car's central console. The driver then stopped the car and asked what she was doing, she recalled. The rider then opened the door and continued to vomit. The driver walked around to her side of the car. He then took off his pants and started touching himself, she said. She then ran out of the car, hid behind a nearby house, and called another Uber. Later, she looked at her Uber receipts to find that her second ride picked her up far from where she wanted to go. She had ordered a car to take her from a holiday party in downtown San Francisco to her home in the northern part of the city. Instead, she said, her receipts showed that she was south, near the airport. 'When I look at my Uber receipts, the first car that was supposed to take me downtown to my house was cancelled,' the woman said in the video. 'My theory is this driver saw me, he saw how intoxicated I was, he saw an opportunity to hurt me, and he cancelled the ride when I got into his car.' When she reported the incident to Uber, the company told her that she got into the wrong car that night, the TikToker recalled. She also said that this was a possibility. Since then, she said she shares her rides with her friends and 'never, ever, ever get into a car by myself intoxicated like that.' The Independent has asked Uber about the alleged incident but received no response. In Utah, a Facebook user said she called an Uber to take her home in August 2021. The driver reached into the backseat where she was sitting and started 'repeatedly touching and rubbing' her leg, despite her pleas for him to stop, she wrote in a social media post. When she tried to exit, he locked the door, she claimed. She eventually got to her destination after telling him that family members were expecting her. The woman contacted Uber about the incident, she said, and urged other riders to share their locations when using a ride-share. The driver was banned from the platform, Uber told The Independent. Safety issues extend to female drivers as well. And due to the media attention around ride-share assaults, attracting female drivers has become a challenge. 'Safety has ranked as one of the top reasons for prospective female drivers to not join Uber, and for current female drivers to not drive during certain hours of the day,' an internal document, seen by the Times, stated. Uber rolled out an experimental program that matched female riders with female drivers in Saudi Arabia in 2019 and found an 'overwhelmingly positive response,' the company said. It has since replicated the feature in 40 countries. The company had planned to launch the same program in the U.S. in November, but Donald Trump's election victory prompted executives to rethink the timing of the rollout. 'This is not the right environment to launch, and we want to take a beat to assess our timing,' an internal document, reported by The Times, stated. The Independent has asked Uber about the decision. Last month, Uber announced that the 'Women Preferences' option for riders and drivers will become available in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Detroit starting 'in the next few weeks.' Lyft rolled out a similar program — 'Women + Connect' — last September, giving women and nonbinary riders and drivers the option to be paired. The company has since expanded the program nationwide.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store