Valley Fever Cases Surge To Record Levels In California
What Causes Valley Fever and How Is It Transmitted?
Coccidioidomycosis, commonly known as Valley Fever, is caused by the fungus Coccidioides, which exists naturally in the soil of certain arid and semi-arid regions. The fungus thrives in areas with hot, dry summers and mild winters, making California, Arizona, and parts of Nevada, New Mexico, and northern Mexico prime endemic zones.
The disease is transmitted through inhalation of fungal spores called arthroconidia. When soil containing the fungus is disturbed by activities such as construction, farming, excavation, or strong winds, the microscopic spores become airborne and can travel significant distances. People become infected by breathing in dust particles that are contaminated with the microscopic spores. Importantly, Valley Fever is not contagious between people or animals, meaning that an infected person can't transmit the disease to another individual or pet. The infection comes exclusively from environmental exposure to contaminated soil.
Weather patterns and climate change have significantly impacted the risk of transmission. Periods of increased rainfall followed by dry conditions create an ideal setting for fungal growth and subsequent dispersion of the spores. This explains why California has seen such a dramatic increase in cases following recent wet winters, as the enhanced fungal growth eventually leads to greater spore production when conditions dry out.
Often Silent, Yet Potentially Deadly
Fortunately, nearly 60% of those who are infected with Coccidioides will not develop symptoms. However, in the remaining 40%, symptoms typically appear one to three weeks after exposure, though they can emerge anywhere from a few days to several months later. The disease presents in various forms, ranging from mild to severe.
Most people with Valley Fever experience flu-like symptoms that can persist for weeks to months. Symptoms can include persistent fatigue, fever, dry cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, headaches, muscle aches, and joint pain. Many patients also develop a characteristic skin rash with red bumps or patches. The fatigue associated with Valley Fever can be particularly debilitating and may last for months even after other symptoms resolve.
In approximately 5-10% of cases, the infection may progress to a chronic pulmonary form, causing persistent pneumonia-like symptoms, with the development of lung nodules that may be seen on chest X-ray. Less commonly, the infection can spread beyond the lungs to other parts of the body, including bones, joints, skin, and the central nervous system. This disseminated form is more serious and has a higher prevalence in pregnant women, people with a compromised immune system, and certain ethnic groups including African Americans, Filipinos, and Hispanics.
Testing and Diagnosis
Diagnosing Valley Fever can be challenging because its symptoms may closely resemble other respiratory illnesses. Many cases go undiagnosed or are misdiagnosed, leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment and delayed prescription of antifungal medication.
Several testing methods are available for diagnosis. Blood (i.e., serology) tests can detect antibodies that the immune system produces in response to the fungal infection. The fungus can also be grown in culture, but this can take several days, which may delay diagnosis and treatment. Molecular, or PCR, tests are available at select laboratories and can provide a rapid diagnosis from samples such as sputum, tissue or cerebrospinal fluid.
Healthcare providers should consider Valley Fever testing for patients in endemic areas who present with persistent respiratory symptoms, especially during peak transmission seasons, which are usually late fall and early winter.
Prevention Strategies
While it's impossible to completely eliminate the risk of Valley Fever in endemic areas, several measures can significantly reduce the risk of becoming infected.
The most effective prevention involves minimizing exposure to dust and disturbed soil. During high-risk periods, particularly windy days or dust storms, people should stay indoors with windows and doors closed and use air purification systems with high-efficiency filters. When outdoor activities are necessary, wearing a mask can provide protection against inhaling fungal spores. Those working in high-risk occupations, such as construction or agriculture, should use appropriate respiratory protection.
Individuals at higher risk for severe disease, including pregnant women or those with a compromised immune system, should take extra precautions. This may include avoiding high-risk activities entirely and consulting with their healthcare provider about steps to stay safe and symptoms to watch out for.
As Valley Fever cases continue to climb in California and other southwestern states, awareness and prevention become increasingly important. Understanding this fungal disease, recognizing its symptoms, and taking appropriate protective measures can help individuals and communities better navigate this growing public health challenge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is reparenting and do I need to try it?
Unpacking the misunderstood practice of reparenting, and how it can help you live more fully, freely, and intentionally. Many of us recognize the early imprints of our childhood. Some of us even sense that our inner child is still with us, showing up in ways we don't always expect. We may be aware of the patterns we've inherited, and we might even feel called to break the unhelpful ones. But what if the key to doing that is a specific skill that often gets overlooked? Reparenting. You may have heard the term. Reparenting is gaining traction in wellness spaces, but like many things that go mainstream, it's often misunderstood. One of the biggest issues I see as a mental health counselor and educator is how narrowly it tends to be defined. That misunderstanding leads many people who could benefit from it to shy away from the practice entirely. Even for those who embrace it, they may be putting in more effort than they are receiving due to a limited scope. So let's fix that. Let's clarify what reparenting is, who it's for (spoiler: it's more than you think), and how to begin the practice in a way that feels empowering, not overwhelming. What is reparenting? In order to understand reparenting we have to get clear on the concept of the inner child. We often think of childhood as a past segment of our lives, but we carry those versions of ourselves with us every day. The brain doesn't process time the way we do with our calendars. That's why being in a familiar environment (i.e., hearing a certain sound, smelling a familiar scent) can instantly transport us to a moment from the past. That's your inner child, showing up. Sometimes it's a neutral recollection and sometimes it can be a splendid memory. Other times, it brings up unhealed pain. Your inner child may be coming forward with needs, desires, and fears that were never fully seen or met. Ignoring them often causes those problems to persist, or even worsen. Reparenting is your chance to show up for them. Think about the prefix 're': it means again, back, or anew. Reparenting is the process of allowing your present-day self to care for your past self. In the best cases, you had a caregiver who modeled love, safety, and attunement. If you didn't, reparenting gives you a new opportunity to heal old wounds and rewrite your story. Since you carry your inner child with you, reparenting is a way to offer that child the love, safety, and support needed in the present in order to find balance, healing, and growth. Why reparenting matters (even if your childhood was 'fine') If you experienced trauma or unmet emotional needs in childhood, your inner child likely shows up more often, and not always in convenient ways. This can feel frustrating at first. But in reality, it's an invitation. It's a signal that you have an opportunity to give yourself what you may never have received. When we face interpersonal pain, it's easy to focus on who hurt us or failed to protect us. Sometimes, it is possible to heal in connection with those people: but that's not always the case. Reparenting allows you to reclaim power by becoming the one who tends to your inner wounds versus depending on anyone else for closure. Here's an important distinction: reparenting isn't about blaming your parents. It's not about claiming victimhood either. It's about owning your healing and honoring your needs regardless of how they were (or weren't) met in the past. Childhood wounds don't always stem from parents. Sometimes, they come from teachers, peers, systemic conditions, or simply the experience of feeling unworthy over time. Reparenting isn't 'my parents didn't care for me, so now I have to.' It's 'I care enough about myself now to tend to the parts that still hurt.' Who is reparenting for? Let me be blunt: if you have an inner child, you can benefit from reparenting. So if you've been following you realize that includes everyone. With that being said, a lot of individuals enter this phase of healing when they see themselves reflected in their child, whether it's their eyes, temperament, or emotional responses. If you're someone who is parenting while reparenting: my heart is with you. That's one of the hardest ways to begin this journey. This moment of recognition can feel overwhelming, but it's also powerful. Knowing this, if you are not a parent but aspire to be, keep in mind that the ideal time to begin reparenting is before you're in a caregiving role, and even before you're in a serious partnership. At the risk of sounding contradictory, know that any time is the right time. Starting is more important than perfect timing. You may not be able to prevent every tantrum, every outburst, every relational rupture. But reparenting helps you respond to life from a place of compassion and clarity, rather than unprocessed pain. How to begin your reparenting practice Reparenting looks different for everyone. At its core, it's about connecting the you that exists now with the you that once was. Start by recalling your inner child. Who were you? What did you love? What made you feel safe or unsafe? What qualities do you want to nurture? If you didn't have positive parental figures, think of others who embodied care (e.g.,coaches, teachers, neighbors, even fictional characters) . Draw from those examples as you define how you want to show up for yourself now. Alchemize your lack into inspiration. While it may not be a copy and paste framework, tapping into what you longed for can begin to sketch a sample. Be honest about your wounds. You don't have to relive every moment, but naming what still hurts gives you clarity and direction. It doesn't have to be all serious and stern, integrate softness, nature, play, and creativity to your liking. If it becomes a heavy lift to carry alone consider walking alongside others in this path through group support or seeking the guidance of a mental health professional. Reparenting is a gift you can offer yourself at any age. It's not about erasing the past; it's about creating a new sense of safety, offering consistent love, and building emotional resilience from the inside out. Like any relationship with a child, this process takes time, attunement, and care. Solve the daily Crossword
TechCrunch
27 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Starship launches could delay Florida flights up to 2 hours, FAA says
As regulators weigh SpaceX's plans to launch its massive Starship rocket from Kennedy Space Center, federal documents warn those flights could ripple through Florida airspace, forcing ground stops at multiple airports, reroutes, and delays of up to two hours. Even after launch, reentry of Starship's two stages could require ground stops at some of the busiest airports in the country, according to a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) released by the Federal Aviation Administration this month. Florida airports affected by the launches may include Orlando International, Miami International, Tampa International, and Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International. Average delays could be as long as 40 minutes to 2 hours for launches and Super Heavy booster landings, and 40 minutes to one hour for Starship reentries. Diversions and cancellations are possible, the FAA said in a companion slide deck. To manage risk, the FAA would establish Aircraft Hazard Areas (AHAs) over potentially impacted zones, as it does for commercial space launches today. Depending on the Starship flight trajectory, those zones could overlay routes above the Atlantic, parts of the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean, and airspace in several Central American countries. 'AHAs may necessitate the closure of dozens of coastal and deep-water oceanic airways over the Atlantic Ocean, requiring substantial aircraft rerouting to avoid the AHAs,' the draft EIS says regarding Starship launches. Tampa International Airport spokesperson Emily Nipps told TechCrunch the airport has not been involved in any briefings or procedural planning with the FAA or SpaceX, so far. However, a day after TechCrunch sent its inquiries to the relevant airports and the FAA, Nipps said the airport was informed it would be having those discussions 'soon.' Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW 'Whether that changes anything for us operationally, I don't yet know,' she said. A spokesperson for Miami International said they have not received any briefings on possible ground stops. SpaceX has been launching its flagship Falcon rockets from the Florida coast for years, and that cadence has sharply increased since 2020. Despite launching over 80 Falcon rockets from the Eastern Range last year, these launches don't typically interrupt commercial airlines. But the Falcon rockets are substantially different from Starship: Falcon's smaller size means a smaller possible footprint for debris in the case of an anomaly, and the Falcon launches are at this point predictable and mature. Starship is in a much earlier stage of development, with vehicles still occasionally blowing up during both ground tests and orbital flights. Indeed, the draft EIS notes that the size of airspace closures may vary with each Starship mission, and that it could shrink as the vehicle becomes more reliable. An FAA spokesperson said the agency has already engaged with aviation organizations, and worked with SpaceX to develop notional launch and reentry trajectories. Prior to launch, the agency will also distribute a final Airspace Management Plan. The FAA relies on a number of factors, including the number of affected passengers, launch window duration, and major holidays when determining when a space launch can proceed, the spokesperson added. Starship is SpaceX's next-generation launch system designed for travel to the Moon and Mars. The 400-foot-tall rocket is composed of two stages: an upper stage, also called Starship, and a Super Heavy booster. Both stages are designed to be fully reusable and rapidly refurbished for high-cadence satellite delivery and missions to deep space. Today, SpaceX conducts all Starship launch activities from Starbase in south Texas. But the company is looking to expand operations to NASA's Kennedy Space Center, prompting the environmental review. That review is conducted by the FAA in cooperation with NASA, the Air Force, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and other federal agencies. The draft EIS analyzes up to 44 Starship launches per year, which could include up to 44 Super Heavy booster landings and 44 Starship landings. Super Heavy could land back at LC-39A, the launch pad at KSC, on a droneship, or be expended in the Atlantic. Starship landings could likewise occur at the pad, on a ship, or as water splashdowns with recovery in the Atlantic, Pacific, or Indian Oceans. The FAA said in the draft EIS that while temporary airspace closures may impact commercial airlines and other stakeholders, 'mitigation strategies such as pre-coordinated reroutes, dynamic scheduling, and time-based traffic flow management could reduce operational burdens.' Today, FAA uses a prototype tool called Space Data Integrator, which ingests real-time flight data from SpaceX and other operators to shrink the amount of time airspace is closed. The regulator says it wants to develop more tools to beef out its situational awareness capability, and each time Starship launches it will get more data on its operations. The U.S. Space Force is running a parallel environmental review at neighboring Cape Canaveral Space Force Base that analyzes up to 76 annual Starship launches. While the draft EIS for that site states Starship launches would result in airspace closures, it says details of the closures are not yet known because the site is expected to take months to prepare.
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump admin strips ocean and air pollution monitoring from next-gen weather satellites
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is narrowing the capabilities and reducing the number of next-generation weather and climate satellites it plans to build and launch in the coming decades, two people familiar with the plans told CNN. This move — which comes as hurricane season ramps up with Erin lashing the East Coast — fits a pattern in which the Trump administration is seeking to not only slash climate pollution rules, but also reduce the information collected about the pollution in the first place. Critics of the plan also say it's a short-sighted attempt to save money at the expense of understanding the oceans and atmosphere better. Two planned instruments, one that would measure air quality, including pollution and wildfire smoke, and another that would observe ocean conditions in unprecedented detail, are no longer part of the project, the sources said. 'This administration has taken a very narrow view of weather,' one NOAA official told CNN, noting the jettisoned satellite instruments could have led to better enforcement and regulations on air pollution by more precisely measuring it. The cost of the four satellites, known as the Geostationary Extended Observations, nicknamed GeoXO, would be lower than originally spelled out under the Biden administration, at a maximum of $500 million per year for a total of $12 billion, but some scientists say the cheaper up-front price would come at a cost to those who would have benefited from the air and oceans data. 'Our information will be less rich, and our understanding of the whole phenomenon of a hurricane event, or of a fire event or of a drought event will be lesser because we don't have these context information instruments adding real time, integrated understanding of the events,' the official stated. Both instruments were already contracted to BAE Systems, which could now charge cancelation fees. The changes are aimed at curtailing costs and are due in part to the perception that some of the instruments were going to be focused on gathering data to study climate change. According to a Trump administration budget document, weather forecasting should be the 'exclusive' focus of the satellites. In addition to the reduced number of instruments, NOAA is now only building four satellites as part of the constellation, rather than six, with the first set to launch in 2032. Having fewer satellites in the sky means less redundancy and raises the risk of critical data outages, the NOAA official stated. 'It's gambling with the continuity of an operational system that we've relied on since the early 70s,' they said. The satellite series is meant to be the successor to the GOES satellites, which provide a wealth of data for weather forecasting, with the first launch set for 2032 and service lasting through 2055. CNN has contacted NOAA for comment. The atmospheric composition instrument, for example, would have enabled scientists to more precisely measure air pollutants, which could help reduce health risks from wildfire smoke events. It would also enhance US capabilities to conduct air quality monitoring and forecasting, as well as keep tabs on emissions of greenhouse gases and the pollutants that form smog. The atmospheric composition instrument would have been beneficial for both NOAA's weather and climate missions, according to an assessment of the instrument's value that NOAA performed and was signed off on by the Commerce Department, which oversees NOAA. The instrument, the report said, 'is fundamental to understanding changes in air quality, the stratospheric ozone layer, and climate, as well as their corresponding impacts on human health and natural and engineered ecosystems.' The report warned that without the instrument on GeoXO, the US would risk falling behind other countries' air quality monitoring capabilities, jeopardizing America's longtime leadership in Earth observations. Also cut from the planned GeoXO series of satellites is an instrument that would measure ocean color, which could provide insights into fisheries populations, algal blooms, ocean productivity and water quality. While it is not unheard of for NOAA or Congress to alter major satellite series, given a history of cost and schedule overruns in NOAA satellite programs, cancelling already contracted instruments — and doing so in part due to the administration's determination to focus NOAA more narrowly on weather forecasting, and away from climate change observations and research — stands out. The Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget request would close NOAA's extensive research facilities, shutting down its greenhouse gas monitoring network, among others. Congress is currently considering that proposal.
