Minister for Housing reverses decision not to meet Dublin Lord Mayor
James Browne
has reversed a decision not to meet Dublin Lord Mayor
Emma Blain
over the tenant-in-situ scheme after he issued a one-line 'blanket refusal' to meet her despite her writing to him three times on the issue.
The mayor, who is a Fine Gael councillor, wrote to Mr Browne three times during March and April on behalf of the council. Its members had agreed to seek a meeting, looking for assurances about future funding for the tenant-in-situ scheme.
Under it, a local authority buys the property off the landlord, leaving the existing tenant in place. Councillors were looking for a guarantee on future funding for a scheme they agreed was very successful in preventing homelessness.
Ms Blain received no reply to the first two letters. After the third letter, an official in Mr Browne's office wrote a one-line email to Ms Blain stating: 'The Minister has acknowledged receipt of this letter. Unfortunately he is unable to facilitate this meeting request.'
READ MORE
The email also addressed Ms Blain as Emma, rather than her title as Lord Mayor.
Ms Blain has since raised the matter with Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
and asked him to intervene with the Minister.
James Browne's letter to the Lord Mayor addressed her as 'Emma'. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw
She pointed out the invitations were open-ended and deliberately flexible in terms of time and date to accommodate the Minister's availability.
In a letter to the Taoiseach, Ms Blain said she had received 'only a single, one-line email stating that he is 'unfortunately unable to facilitate this meeting request'.
'Given that no specific date was proposed, this response can only be interpreted as a blanket refusal to engage.'
She continued: 'This refusal to engage – on an issue of such significance – is profoundly disappointing. It shows a marked disrespect for the office of the Lord Mayor and to me as the first citizen of Dublin, as well as to the elected members of Dublin City Council who are working hard to protect tenants at risk of homelessness.'
She asked the Taoiseach to intervene in the matter.
Earlier, Ms Blain's office wrote to Mr Browne's office to advise the Lord Mayor should be addressed as Lord Mayor, and not by her first name, similar to other elected representatives.
A spokeswoman for Mr Browne said the Minister would now meet Ms Blain on the matter.
'The Minister's office has today issued an invite for the Lord Mayor to meet him directly next week on the matter of second-hand acquisitions and the delivery and status of that specific scheme by Dublin City Council.'
It stated it hoped the meeting could be confirmed on Wednesday.
Ms Blain's stance was supported by the Social Democrats' housing spokesman Rory Hearne, who criticised Mr Browne's refusal to meet the mayor and councillors.
'Dublin city councillors have confirmed that large portions of the tenant-in-situ funding are already committed to closing 2024 acquisitions – but it is not known how much exactly,' he said.
He said they were looking for funding certainty for a scheme that has worked really well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
27 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Coalition warned against diluting contentious Occupied Territories Bill
The Government will be warned not to allow the potential for legal challenges to be used as an excuse to water down the legislation known as the Occupied Territories Bill . The Oireachtas foreign affairs committee will this week publish its report on a proposal to ban trade with illegally occupied territories in Palestine. The report, finalised on Friday, is understood to recommend widening the legislation to include a ban on services as well as goods. There have been stark warnings from business lobby groups that such a measure could damage the Republic's trading relationship with the US and cause economic harm to Irish businesses and households. The Occupied Territories Bill is now undergoing pre-legislative scrutiny Listen | 41:13 The committee will tell the Government to model the ban on trade with illegal settlements in Palestine on 2014 trade restrictions with Russia regarding illegally occupied territories in Ukraine. The committee, chaired by Fianna Fáil TD John Lahart , which did not have statistics on the volume of trade in services between the State and illegally occupied territories, will call on Minister for Trade Simon Harris to collate and publish such information. It will also tell Mr Harris to establish what kind of backlash the State would face in terms of trade and diplomacy should it ban trade with the occupied Palestinian territories. [ Republic joins 25 states urging end to Gaza war Opens in new window ] Ministers will also be advised to consider what defences could be available to a business charged with an offence under the proposed law. . It is understood that the committee believes further work is required from the Government before the law could be enacted. And it will ask that Attorney General Rossa Fanning's advice on the complex Bill is 'expedited' so it can move forward as a matter of urgency. During meetings before the Dáil rose for the summer recess, Mr Lahart was critical of 'misinformation' about the Bill and the State's motivation for passing it – much of which was repeated by senior US political figures. Chairwoman of US House Republicans Lisa McClaine described the Bill as a type of 'extreme anti-Semitic hate'. [ How life in the West Bank is deteriorating for Palestinians Opens in new window ] It is understood that the committee's report will call on the Government to explain the motivation behind the Bill to European Union and international colleagues, while also lobbying Brussels for further collective EU action against Israel. The committee will propose a Government-funded public communications campaign for domestic and international audiences to explain the facts of the Bill and to challenge misinformation spread about it.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Tariff-free services exports are key to growth for now
Across the business front, particularly the digital providers, an audible sigh of relief can be noticed as it became clear that the EU's €93bn list of countermeasure tariffs against the US does not include services trade. The EU's countermeasures will automatically click into force on August 7, said the European Commission, should the US fail to drop the Trump-threatened 30% tariff on all EU exports by then. The big worry for Ireland's services companies, which are mainly US multinationals, accounting for €115bn in exports sales in the first three months of the year as reported by the Central Statistics Office earlier in the month, was that the EU countermeasure tariffs on the US would include services. This would have had major implications for the many thousands employed in the sector, likely forcing relocations to other non-EU countries, as well as significantly hitting the Government's corporation tax take. Now the full weight of the EU-US tariff war is set to fall on the wide range of manufactured goods, inclusive of food and drinks products, which could impact on sales output to our largest customer the US, and in the process hitting State funding. The implication of this change in trading relationship with the US is the need to bolster support for Ireland's traders in the services sector, in particular, digital trade providers such as Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft. Foreign-owned enterprises account for 80% of Ireland's services exports, the second highest of the OECD countries, as reported in its Services Trade Restrictiveness Index report 2025. This leaves Ireland more exposed than most countries to US trade pressures, as the vast majority of these Ireland-based multinationals are US-owned. Retaining these global digital players in Ireland must continue to be a priority for the Government, but also there is an urgent need to do more to develop indigenous Irish companies, to ensure more controllable and sustainable growth of the services exports sector. Amazon scraps plan for plant Amazon's scrapping of its plan to build an industrial plant in Dublin, involving a €300m investment which would employ more than 500, because it did not receive the necessary Government guarantees about power supplies the plant would require, is a clear indicator of the challenges faced in retaining the multinationals in Ireland. This Amazon project loss is a critical blow to our attempts to stay up with the global AI tech race, as the now scuttled project involved the creation of an AI testing and manufacturing facility and not a data centre. It would also have enabled the training of a fresh cohort of employees, who could in the future enable the setting up of indigenous AI start-ups. To date, Enterprise Ireland, which supports Irish-owned companies, has failed to significantly grow the service exporting industry. Enterprise Ireland client companies account for under 2% of our total service trade exports. The other 18% of the services exports from Ireland come from entrepreneurs who have built their export businesses without State support. Many of them depend on good access to digital services platforms provided by the likes of Google, Meta, and Microsoft, which again underscores the critical reliance on the connection with the US. Reducing dependence on the US and deepening EU integration in services could be achieved by encouraging more innovation and stimulating much-needed investment. An easy win should be with the UK, which last year imported €314bn in services, but only €12bn from Ireland. Service sector reforms are, of course, not going to be easy, either in their politics or in their execution. The freedom to establish a company in another EU country and the freedom to provide or receive services in another EU country are already established for many services through the EU Services Directive — but implementation has been weak. Services regulations are complex and highly decentralised. In many EU member states, reforms are often implemented by professional associations, who may have a bias against reforms or even a conflict of interest. Many professions and industries thrive on the fees that regulatory constraints generate — and you and I, as service users, are rarely aware of the costs that these regulations impose on us. Read More Trump and von der Leyen set for crunch meeting on EU-US trade talks
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Jobseekers are avoiding part-time roles in fear of losing other social welfare
JOBSEEKERS ARE DETERRED from taking up part-time employment in case they lose out on other social welfare entitlements, a specialist expert group has told the government ahead of Budget 2026. In order to ensure unemployed people are motivated to get a job again in the future, the government has been told to increase means-tested social welfare allowance thresholds so that they are in line with the national minimum wage or a recipient's earnings. It comes as Fine Gael leader and Tánaiste Simon Harris floats the possibility that the jobseekers' allowance would be removed from the overall increases to social welfare, in favour of higher increases to pensioners. The Tax Strategy Group, an expert advisory panel at the Department of Finance, said this week that 'inconsistencies' have appeared in Ireland's social welfare system as it has evolved since the late 1800s. It explained, in its annual reports to government ahead of the budget this year, that jobseekers are disincentivised from picking up shifts in part-time roles in case they impact the specific thresholds of income which are disregarded from social welfare payments. A portion of a person's income is not taken into account when assessing how much they are entitled to from a social welfare payment. This means that you can earn a certain amount of money, without it affecting your entitlements. Advertisement In some cases, the threshold of income that is disregarded from the means test, which will later determine the value of the total payment, is surpassed when jobseekers take up part-time roles, leaving them with not enough money to rely on each week. It can also impact any other means-tested social welfare payments that they may be receiving, the tax experts' report said. 'This is a penal approach that acts to disincentive an unemployed person from taking up part-time work,' the report from the Tax Strategy Group said this year . It has recommended that a system should be agreed whereby the values of these thresholds increase annually, 'whether aligned with the National Minimum Wage or earnings', to make sure that jobseekers find work. It added that this change would avoid situations where a person's social welfare entitlements are impacted or reduced, and that it should be done in order to achieve Ireland's policy aims for social welfare. The report later questioned if there was indeed a 'policy rationale for creating this deviation' – in which case, the state should disregard the advice, it said. Speaking earlier this month, Tánaiste Harris said he was not convinced that dole increases should be in line with other social welfare payments, such as pensions and disability payments. 'When there are other supports out there for very many people who can't work for very many good reasons. That's my opinion. We'll thrash it out all that out at the time of budget,' he told reporters. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
