Metro Atlanta outpaces U.S. average for gyms
Why it matters: Gyms offer city dwellers a way to get and stay healthy, and can serve as excellent "third places" — a spot to hang out and connect outside home or work.
By the numbers: Metro Atlanta has 16.5 gyms per 100,000 residents, more than the national average, per government data.
The region is home to more than 1,000 gyms, putting it in the top 25 metros in the country.
Zoom out: Bridgeport, Conn., Boston and San Diego take the crown with at least 20 gyms per 100,000 residents.
How it works: These figures represent "fitness and recreational sports centers" in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data for Q3 2024.
Axios looked at metro areas with at least 500,000 residents, for which BLS had sufficient data.
What's next: The latest crop of high-end gyms are setting themselves up as both a place to pump iron and take work meetings — though hopefully not at the same time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
OB-GYN group won't take federal funds over Trump policies
The leading professional association for gynecologists is cutting financial ties with the federal government, citing Trump administration policies it says prevent it from providing evidence-based guidance. Why it matters: The decision by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists appears to be the first time a medical society has divested itself over conditions the administration has placed on government contractors and grant recipients. Professional medical groups routinely contract with the federal health agencies to administer or contribute to public health initiatives. ACOG has about 60,000 members and lists diversity and equity among its core values. State of play: ACOG sent an email to members last week notifying them that it will stop accepting federal funding for current contracts. "After careful deliberation, ACOG has made an organization-wide decision to stop accepting federal funding for all ACOG programs and activities for current contracts," the organization said in a statement shared with Axios. "Recent changes in federal funding laws and regulations significantly impact ACOG's program goals, policy positions, and ability to provide timely and evidence-based guidance and recommendations for care." "We remain fully committed to this critical work and will allocate our own resources to continue it in a way that is centered on patient needs and grounded in evidence." The organization will continue to engage with the federal government on policy advocacy, ACOG said. By the numbers: The ACOG Foundation — the group's 501(c)(3) affiliate — has received $950,000 from Health and Human Services this year to oversee reviews and updates of preventive services guidelines for women, according to an HHS grant-tracking website. ACOG wouldn't elaborate on what aspects of the work its decision will affect. Other medical societies that contract with the federal government include the American Medical Association, which has received $750,000 from HHS this year, per federal records. What they're saying: "This is great news for the American taxpayer," HHS communications director Andrew Nixon wrote in an email to Axios. "ACOG taking itself off the federal payroll might be the most responsible budgeting decision they've made." HHS will make sure the preventive services guidelines "reflect gold-standard, evidence-based science and in partnership with those who can deliver this guidance in accordance with the law," he said. Zoom out: ACOG is one of a few medical associations vocally pushing back against President Trump and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s health policy shifts. Health care during pregnancy has become a flashpoint. Kennedy has removed the recommendation that pregnant people get COVID-19 vaccines, and a recent advisory panel to the Food and Drug Administration cast doubt on the safety of antidepressants during pregnancy. ACOG said afterward that the composition of the panel was "alarmingly unbalanced" and that there's robust evidence showing the medications are safe during pregnancy. The American Academy of Pediatrics has also publicly opposed recent HHS actions. The group boycotted a June meeting of Kennedy's handpicked vaccine advisory committee, saying a June purge of the panel's 17 advisers compromised its credibility. What to watch: ACOG left the door open to resuming federal contracting work in the future.
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
Trump brings back the Presidential Fitness Test in public schools
President Trump will revive the Presidential Fitness Test in public schools, which was phased out more than a decade ago, a White House official confirmed to Axios on Thursday. The big picture: The test — featuring challenges like a one-mile run, pull-ups and the sit-and-reach — was once a rite of passage for America's youth. It was also a source of anxiety and shame for more than a few kids, who ended up feeling like they weren't strong enough for the president's (or Arnold Schwarzenegger ' s) purposes. Trump on Thursday will sign an executive order to reestablish the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition, which includes re-establishing the test, as first reported by CNN. Why it matters: The Trump administration has focused on sports and athletics, including banning transgender athletes and hosting major national and international sporting events. State of play: Then-President Dwight D. Eisenhower established the test in 1956 to assess cardiovascular fitness, upper body and core strength, endurance, flexibility and agility, according to Harvard Health. The test included a one-mile run, pull-ups or push-ups, sit-ups, shuttle run, and sit-and-reach. Children in the top 15% received the Presidential Physical Fitness Award, established by former President Lyndon B. Johnson. President Obama replaced the test after the 2012-13 school year and instituted the Presidential Youth Fitness Program, putting more emphasis on students' health rather than performance, per Education Week. Flashback: Eisenhower originally established the test out of panic over American children being less fit than European children, Vox reported. One of its early iterations was akin to a military training exercise. What's next: The Presidential Fitness test will be administered by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The executive order directs the council to create school programs rewarding excellence in physical education and develop criteria for a fitness award. What they're saying: "President Trump wants to ensure America's future generations are strong, healthy, and successful," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.
Axios
4 days ago
- Axios
RFK Jr. targets vaccine makers' federal liability protections
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took aim Monday at vaccine makers' federal liability protections. The big picture: Kennedy, who has repeatedly pushed the debunked idea that vaccines cause autism and in the past was involved in litigation over patient injury claims, has argued in the past that the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) takes away manufacturers' incentive to make vaccines safe. Zoom in: Kennedy is proposing an overhaul to the VICP, which was established by law in 1986 in response to the threat of vaccine lawsuits leading to shortages. It's essentially an alternative legal system for resolving vaccine injury cases. Successful plaintiffs win money from the U.S. government, not vaccine manufacturers. Kennedy argued in a lengthy post on X Monday that the VICP "routinely dismisses meritorious cases" or drags them out. What he's saying: "The VICP no longer functions to achieve its Congressional intent," Kennedy wrote. "Instead, the VICP has devolved into a morass of inefficiency, favoritism, and outright corruption," he alleged, taking aim at the vaccine court judges. "I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals," Kennedy said. Between the lines. Weakening or removing liability protections for certain vaccines could be the thing that makes manufacturers contemplate leaving the market, experts say — or at least causes them to significantly raise prices, Axios' Caitlin Owens reports. Flashback: During the confirmation process, Kennedy was asked what changes he was considering making to the VICP and avoided addressing the issue directly in his written response to senators. "I will do nothing as HHS secretary that makes it difficult or discourages people from taking vaccines. As I testified to the Committee, I am not anti-vaccination. I support transparency and sound data for vaccines," he wrote.
