Reynolds Consumer Products CEO pays $3.1M for Lake Forest mansion
Reynolds Consumer Products President and CEO Scott Huckins and his wife, Elizabeth, on March 14 paid $3.125 million for a six-bedroom, 7,541-square-foot mansion in Lake Forest.
In January, Huckins was named the CEO of the Lake-Forest based maker of Hefty trash bags and Reynolds aluminum wrap, after previously serving as the company's chief financial officer for a little more than a year.
In Lake Forest, the custom-built stone mansion that Huckins bought was built in 2010 and is situated on a 1.69-acre property. The mansion has eight bathrooms, seven fireplaces, a slate roof, hand-scraped wood floors and a family room with a large fireplace and a custom mantel, along with French doors leading to the back yard.
Other features include a paneled library with a wood-coffered ceiling, a limestone fireplace and built-ins, along with a custom movie projector and screen. The kitchen has a large island, a Wolf range with a hand-made metal hood, Wolf double ovens and a breakfast room.
The home also has a heated sunroom with a fireplace, a large mudroom, an office, a first-floor primary bedroom suite with vaulted ceilings and a fireplace and a full basement with a recreational area and a second kitchen. Outside on the property are a pergola and an expansive patio area.
Lori Glattly of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Chicago, who represented Huckins, declined to comment on the transaction.
The mansion had been listed for a time last year for $3.995 million before it was taken off the market.
The property had a $55,994 property tax bill in the 2023 tax year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Musk v Trump, the markets will win
City AM columnist Rainer Zitelmann has been predicting a rift between Musk and Trump ever since the two started working together. Now that this has happened, the French daily newspaper L'Express has spoken to him again. The interview was conducted by Thomas Mahler. 'I never believed that the alliance between Elon Musk and Donald Trump would last,' you told L'Express in April. Why were you so certain that the alliance between the two men would fall apart so quickly? I have read every single biography about these two men and have been following their exploits closely for many years. Trump only tolerates people who completely subordinate themselves to him, whereas Musk won't bow to anyone. And especially not to someone he is so superior to both in terms of intelligence and as an entrepreneur. This is something I have stated on numerous occasions, including in an interview with L'Express in April. On top of that, Trump is not an advocate of economic freedom, his only two convictions are these: he is the greatest and should be all-powerful, and that tariffs are amazing. Trump thinks that tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary (which, by the way, is just as absurd as saying that taxes are the most wonderful word in the dictionary). Musk, in contrast, is in many ways a libertarian – he hates high taxes, tariffs, and excessive federal spending that ramp up U.S. debt. Tesla shares fell again after Musk's criticism of Trump's tax bill, and Trump threatened to cut public funding for SpaceX. As an entrepreneur, did Musk lose a lot with his political adventure? That may be the case – but no one can say for sure just yet. I admire Musk, he is driven by deep personal convictions and has consistently taken huge risks throughout his career. So far, those risks have always paid off. Whether Musk will prevail against Trump is debatable, because while Musk is a far superior entrepreneur, Trump outguns Musk in the field of political communication. If Musk were as politically desperate as Trump, he would go to China, which would quickly become the most successful nation in space exploration. If the European Union was not so stupid, it would offer Musk the opportunity to bring SpaceX to Europe on excellent terms. What would be the consequences for the US if they lose SpaceX? Without SpaceX, the US does not currently have much to offer. Prior to SpaceX, they couldn't even transport their own astronauts to the International Space Station and had to rely on outdated Russian rockets – and paid exorbitant prices to do so. In 2024, there were 134 SpaceX launches out of 261 space missions worldwide. If SpaceX were a country, it would easily surpass the second-largest, China, which had 68 launches. Notably, SpaceX is responsible for 86% of all U.S. launches and has delivered more than 80% of the world's total payload weight into orbit and beyond. Incidentally, there were just three launches in Europe. According to you, was Musk right to call Trump's funding bill a 'disgusting abomination'? Absolutely. Not because of the tax cuts – they're the right thing to do! But because Trump has thrown his weight behind a budget that dramatically exacerbates the national debt. Trump's funding bill is a continuation of the insane debt-fueled policies of Obama, Biden, and Trump's first term in office. Consequently, the US is spending more and more on interest payments. Musk must be deeply frustrated: he's neglected his companies for months to help the US government do something it is completely incapable of – namely, reducing the national debt, even just slightly, through the DOGE initiative. And then Trump turns around and backs legislation that does the exact opposite, massively expanding an already astronomical debt mountain. Does this mean that Trump will go even further in his obsessions for protectionism or immigration? Did the MAGA movement and Steve Bannon win the fight inside the Republican camp? It's too early to tell. But if Bannon did come out on top, it would be a disaster for the United States. Musk believes in political and economic freedom. Bannon, at heart, is a right-wing anti-capitalist. Are you worried about the US economy? Absolutely. Trump has promised the American people that his protectionist policies will bring about a new 'Golden Age.' That's complete nonsense. No country has ever become wealthy through protectionism – but many have become poor because of it. A hundred years ago, Argentina was as rich as the U.S., and then, over decades, Peronists drove it into poverty with their protectionist policies. My only hope lies in the capital markets – the stock and bond markets. If anyone can force Trump to change course, it will be the financial markets. I hope the markets prove to be stronger than Trump. Dr Rainer Zitelmann is a German historian, sociologist and author. His latest book is 'The Origins of Poverty and Wealth' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
5 hours ago
- CNBC
Spirit makers face a sobering cocktail of challenges — from tariffs to teetotalers
Global spirit makers are staring down a sobering cocktail of challenges as tariffs and brand boycotts threaten to exacerbate wider shifts in drinking habits. French cognac maker Rémy Cointreau on Wednesday became the latest spirits maker, following Diageo and Pernod Ricard, to withdraw its sales targets on increased economic and trade uncertainty. "Given the continued lack of macroeconomic visibility, the geopolitical uncertainties surrounding U.S.-China tariff policies, and the absence to date of a recovery in the U.S. market ... the conditions required to maintain [Remy Cointreau's] 2029-2030 targets are no longer in place," it said in a statement. The move came as full-year sales at the group's cognac business, which includes its namesake Remy Martin brand, fell 22% on an organic basis on slowing U.S. consumption and "complex market conditions" in China. The popular brandy variety, which hails from the French region of Cognac, has been particularly caught in the crosshairs of ongoing U.S.-Sino tensions. LVMH similarly saw a 17% drop in its Hennessy cognac in the first quarter. But the specialty drink is far from alone as trade barriers weaken already drying demand for spirits. LVMH's wine and spirits remains the French luxury group's worst performing division, while Diageo spirits including Tanqueray, Gordon's and Smirnoff saw the steepest declines in the first quarter as sales of Irish stout Guinness rallied ahead. "Distilled spirits in the U.S. are going through a correction, and U.S. tariffs add another layer of uncertainty," Jefferies said in a note last month. The prestige — and often legal requirements — associated with spirits and wines mean that they are heavily dependent on local production and thus heavily exposed to U.S. import levies. Champagne must be produced and bottled within the Champagne region, for instance. "With spirits and wines you have terroir caches, and that means you're producing locally and exporting. Hence it's much more vulnerable to geopolitical tensions," Sanjeet Aujla, analyst at UBS, told CNBC via video call. Remy Cointreau estimated that tariffs as they currently stand could serve a 65-million-euro blow ($55 million) to its business after mitigating measures. Diageo, meanwhile, said about 25% of its business is set to be impacted by duties. The same does not apply for beer, which relies on local production and has been flagged as an unlikely winner from brewing trade divisions. Notably, the world's largest brewer AB InBev, as well as Dutch and Danish beermakers Heineken and Carlsberg all maintained their full-year guidance in the first quarter. As a result, wines and spirits are potentially more exposed to brand boycotts too, with consumers more likely to swap out a particular product on political grounds in favor of a locally-made alternative. The tariff hit comes as the industry has slowed over recent years following a strong decade of growth, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Locked-down consumers forked out more on alcohol in 2020 and 2021, fueling a simultaneous surge in premium brands. "During the pandemic, not only did people drink more, they premiumized more," Aujla said. Spirits are often seen as an affordable luxury, especially in good economic times. But they nevertheless tend to be an occasional purchase, with many Covid-era stockpiles remaining in liquor cabinets across the world. As economic conditions turn, however, consumers may be less inclined to cough up $100 for a good bottle, instead downtrading or opting for lower-cost ready-to-drink (RTD) alternatives. "Spirits-based RTDs are weighing on distilled spirits growth alongside the impact of cumulative inflation," the Jefferies note said, adding that downtrading was most visible in vodka and rum products, while demand for premium whisky, tequila and gin remained more robust. "That [premiumization] is on pause today, given the cyclical headwinds we have in the industry," Aujla added. The drying demand comes as health and wellness trends spark a shift in consumer habits, with more people becoming "sober curious" and experimenting with lower alcohol consumption. Indeed, many drinks makers have sought to embrace that shift with new ranges of low and no alcohol products. Meanwhile, the proliferation of weight loss drugs — and early evidence of their role in suppressing alcohol cravings — pose another potential challenge for the industry. Nevertheless, analysts remain divided over the severity and permanence of the downturn. "There is considerable debate over the extent to which currently anemic demand is cyclical or structural," James Edwardes Jones, analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said in emailed comments. Cyclical pressures refer to economic headwinds and hangover supplies from the Covid-era, while structural shifts refer to changing consumer patterns. "It's a bit of both, and more cyclical than structural," Aujla said. "But when the cyclical headwinds dissipate, we think US Spirits industry growth will be 1-2% lower than the 4-5% historical growth."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
L'Oreal sees Middle East and Southeast Asia as next growth engines as China slows: ‘Eventually demographics have to win'
For more than a decade, China's aspirational shoppers, spurred by a fast-growing economy and rising wages, snapped up products from cosmetics giants like L'Oreal, Estee Lauder, and Shiseido. Before the COVID pandemic hit, China appeared set to overtake the U.S. as the world's largest makeup market. Those boom times are over, as more Chinese consumers now turn to up-and-coming local brands, like Mao Geping and Florasis. L'Oreal's sales in Mainland China dropped last year, shrinking its overall North Asia sales by around 3%. The Chinese market, the bulk of the firm's North Asia revenue, now accounts for 17% of group sales, down from 23% in 2022. The French firm continues to call China an important market, but has reportedly started cutting its retail workforce due to slower Chinese demand. As China stagnates, L'Oreal is now looking to regions, like the Middle East and Southeast Asia, as a source of growth. SAPMENA—L'Oreal's term for 'South Asia Pacific, Middle East, and North Africa'—will soon 'play a much bigger role' when it comes to beauty, says Vismay Sharma, who oversees the region for the French cosmetics firm. L'Oreal, No. 91 on Fortune's Europe 500, reported sales of 1.1 billion euros ($1.19 billion) for the first quarter of 2025, up 12.2% year-on-year, across SAPMENA and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). That's still small compared to other regions, sitting far behind Europe, North America and North Asia. But while SAPMENA-SSA only contributed 9.2% of L'Oreal's quarterly revenue, it was the only region to log double-digit growth. SAPMENA covers a huge swathe of the globe, stretching from Morocco all the way down to New Zealand just under 19,000 kilometers away. The region's 35 markets cover 3 billion people, or about 40% of the world's population, yet only accounts for 10% of global beauty sales. 'It has to come together, and eventually demographics have to win,' Sharma says. SAPMENA's quick growth doesn't surprise Sharma. 'The consumers in this part of the world are about 5 years younger than the rest of the world, live in aspirational societies and in economies that are growing fast,' he says. China has proved to be a tricky market for global cosmetics firms post-pandemic. Sluggish China sales have dragged down the financial results of U.S. firm Estee Lauder and Japan's Shiseido. A sluggish economy and stagnant consumption are partly to blame. But there's also new competition. 'C-Beauty' brands are starting to pick up steam among Chinese shoppers, with new brands going viral on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, and other social media platforms. (L'Oreal is paying attention, investing in local Chinese brands like To Summer) Still, Sharma thinks China offers lessons for SAPMENA. Southeast Asia, like China, has highly connected consumers who are used to e-commerce and livestreaming. For example, Sharma notes that over 50% of L'Oreal's business in Vietnam comes from e-commerce. This is less true of the Middle East and North Africa. 'When you look at the ecosystem of beauty over there, you still don't have TikTok Shop. They're still a few years behind platforms like Shopee, like Lazada,' he says. Yet consumers in the Middle East share similar preferences to those in Southeast Asia. 'Expectations for beauty are very similar. We can see aspirations in terms of kind of hair, skin, lips, and eyes,' Sharma says, pointing to a preference for longer black hair as an example. That gives L'Oreal a chance to grow in the region. 'Our ability to create content at scale in the GCC becomes a huge advantage,' Sharma says. This story was originally featured on
