Another win for Algonquin community in fight against nuclear waste dump
The Kebaowek First Nation is celebrating a second court win in the last month in its battle against the building of a nuclear waste dump at Chalk River.
In January, the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) received approval to construct the "near-surface disposal facility" at the Chalk River research campus, about 190 kilometres northwest of Ottawa and one kilometre from the river.
In that same announcement, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) determined the project "is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects," and that Indigenous groups were adequately consulted.
The Kebaowek community, among other advocate partners, challenged both of those rulings through separate judicial reviews.
On Friday, in addressing the latter judicial review, federal court Justice Russel Zinn acknowledged that construction of the facility would in fact be a threat to endangered Blanding's Turtle and two bat species in the area.
"We were absolutely elated because it's a victory for us, but again, it's a victory for those species at risk that are there," said Chief Lance Haymond of Kebaowek First Nation.
According to the ruling, CNL failed to properly assess other reasonable locations for the site.
Nicholas Pope, the legal counsel for Kebaowek First Nation, told CBC there are two other viable sites that were overlooked.
"Under the law, you can't put the waste facility somewhere that's worse for species at risk when there are other places that would work just as well," he said.
"Now the decision is being sent back to the government for redetermination and for right now, the project can't go ahead," Pope said.
As of Sunday evening, the CNSC had not responded to the court decision.
'We were completely ignored'
In a press release, Pope said the court's latest decision "is a landmark moment for environmental law in Canada."
Haymond agrees, but says getting to this point should not have required so much legal pushback.
"We were completely ignored, and for us, the two wins that we've won in the courts is validation that we have a voice, we have an understanding of our territory and that [what] we have to say is important," Haymond said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
A First Nations Power Authority Could Transform Electricity Generation for IndigenousNations
First Nations across British Columbia have developed renewable electricity projects for decades. Yet they've experienced significant barriers to implementing, owning and managing their own electricity supply. That's because there have been few procurement policies in place that require their involvement. While municipalities are allowed to own and operate electricity utilities in B.C., First Nations are not [ pdf ], writes at team of experts and advocates at The Conversation. The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) in B.C. requires that First Nations are provided with opportunities for economic development without discrimination. Many First Nations in B.C. view the development of renewable electricity projects on their lands-like hydro power, solar panels, wind turbines and transmission lines-as a way to achieve social, environmental and economic goals that are important to their community. These goals may include powering buildings in the community, creating economic development and local jobs, earning revenue, improving access to affordable and reliable electricity or using less diesel. Related: First Nations Power Authorities Could Show Path to Energy Justice The study shares the story of a coalition of First Nations and organizations that advocated for changes to electricity regulations and laws to give Indigenous communities more control to develop renewable electricity projects. Interviews with knowledge holders from 14 First Nations offer insight into motivations behind their calls for regulatory changes. The coalition includes the Clean Energy Association of B.C., New Relationship Trust, Pembina Institute, First Nations Power Authority, Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council, and the First Nations Clean Energy Working Group. View our latest digests Almost all electricity customers in B.C. are served by BC Hydro, the electric utility owned by the provincial government. The coalition argues that applying DRIPA to the electricity sector should allow First Nations to form a First Nations power authority. Such an organization would provide them with control over the development of electricity infrastructure that aligns with their values and would also help B.C. meet its greenhouse gas reduction targets. In the Re-Imagining Social Energy Transitions CoLaboratory (ReSET CoLab) at the University of Victoria, the team analyzed regulatory documents from the B.C. Utilities Commission, and advocacy documents and presentations for discussion developed by the coalition. Six proposed First Nations power authority (Indigenous Utility) models were identified: A capacity building point-of-contact model streamlines the development of renewable electricity projects to sell power to the provincial utility. For example, the First Nations Power Authority in Saskatchewan was formed for this purpose by SaskPower. This would be the most conformative model. It would provide vital networks and connections to First Nations while allowing BC Hydro and the British Columbia Utilities Commission to maintain full control over the electricity sector. In the second model, called a "put" contract, a B.C. First Nations Power Authority represents First Nations wishing to develop renewable electricity projects. Whenever the province needs to build new electricity generation projects to meet growing electricity demand, a portion of the new generation is developed by the First Nations authority. In the third model, First Nations build and operate electricity transmission and distribution lines to allow remote industrial facilities and communities to connect to the electricity grid. This is called "Industrial Interconnection." For example, the Wataynikaneyap Power Transmission line in Ontario is a 1,800-kilometre line that provides an electricity grid connection for 17 previously remote nations. Twenty-four First Nations own 51 per cent of the line, while private investors own 49 per cent. In the fourth model, the B.C. First Nation Power Authority acts as the designated body for various opportunities in the electricity sector, such as the development of electricity transmission, distribution, generation or customer services. This model is referred to as "local or regional 'ticket' opportunities." Fifth, the First Nation Power Authority develops renewable electricity projects and distributes electricity from these projects to customers as a retailer, or under an agreement through the BC Hydro electricity grid. For example, Nova Scotia Power's Green Choice program procures renewable electricity from independent power producers to supply to electricity customers. Sixth, new utility is formed in B.C., owned by First Nations, that owns and operates electricity generation, transmission and distribution services and offers standard customer services in a specific region of B.C. (called a "Regional Vertically-Integrated Power Authority"). Most of these models would require changes to regulations. The sixth and most transformative model would provide First Nations with full decision-making control over electricity generation, transmission and distribution. It would also give them the ability to sell to customers and require extensive changes in electricity regulation. First Nations knowledge-holders told us that a lack of reliable power, high electricity rates, lack of control over projects on their traditional lands and the need for resilience in the face of climate events were motivations for taking electricity planning into their own hands. They also expressed that varied factors motivate community interest in renewable energy: improving the quality of life for community members; financial independence; mitigating climate change; protecting the environment; reducing diesel use and providing stable and safe power for current and future generations. First Nations are already seeking to capitalize on the benefits of renewable energy by developing their own projects within the current regulatory system. Most of those we spoke to see a First Nations power authority in B.C. as a means to provide opportunities for economic development without discrimination - and to achieve self-determination, self-reliance and reconciliation by addressing the root causes of some of the colonial injustices they face by obtaining control over the electricity sector on their lands. This article , first published at The Conversation on June 4, was co-authored by David Benton, an adopted member and Clean Energy Project Lead of Gitga'at First Nation and Kayla Klym, a BSc student in Geography at the University of Victoria. Source: The Energy Mix
Toronto Star
10 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Mi'kmaq band drops legal case on N.S. lobster fishery
HALIFAX - A Mi'kmaq band has dropped a legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its treaty rights in the lobster fishery, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were 'moving to a conclusion.' Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation. Neither side has provided an update on the status of negotiations for a new agreement. Chief Michelle Glasgow, the leader of the Indigenous community about 70 kilometres north of Halifax, didn't reply to a request for comment. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' lobster harvest outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, while non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize how the courts have maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. The Unified Fisheries Conservation Alliance, a group that represents commercial fishers, said in a news release Monday that the discontinuing of the case is a 'major victory' for its members. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'It is an acknowledgement by Chief (Michelle) Glasgow and Sipekne'katik First Nation that the rights to the illegal out-of-season lobster fishing ... are not a treaty protected right, it is poaching, plain and simple', said Colin Sproul, president of the group. Meanwhile, the group said they will be pursuing separate legal action, filed in August 2024, asking the provincial Supreme Court to determine the rules and limits to be applied to Sipekne'katik First Nation's fishery under the Marshall decision. The Supreme Court of Canada's 1999 Marshall decision said the Mi'kmaq, Maliseet and Passamaquoddy bands in Eastern Canada could hunt, fish and gather to earn a 'moderate livelihood,' though the court followed up with a clarification saying the treaty right was subject to federal regulation to ensure conservation. In September 2020, the Sipekne'katik First Nation issued five lobster licences to its members, saying they could trap and sell their catch outside the federally regulated season. In the months that followed there were confrontations on the water, rowdy protests and riots at two lobster pounds, one of which was razed by arson. According to a letter the band's lawyers sent to the court last December, seven federal officials — including the regional director of the Fisheries Department — attended weekly mediation talks in the legal case, with 10 representatives of the First Nation participating. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'The progress made to date and moving forward from our 25 years of impasse is immeasurable,' wrote Ronald Pink, the lawyer at the time, in the 2024 letter to the judge. The talks were also described by lawyers last December as being extensive, with former senator Dan Christmas and retired federal mediator Barney Dobbin guiding discussions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.
Global News
11 hours ago
- Global News
N.S. Mi'kmaq band drops case arguing federal rules don't apply to its lobster fishery
A Mi'kmaq band has quietly discontinued its legal case alleging Ottawa was violating its right to fish for lobster, after hopes were raised of a historic deal. Last December, the lawyer for Sipekne'katik First Nation told Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice John Keith that discussions with Ottawa to settle the matter were of historic importance and 'moving to a conclusion.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Keith gave the parties until June 16 to finish the mediation, but said at that point the case would carry on before the courts. However, a letter to the courts sent June 6 by Sipekne'katik's lawyer Nathan Sutherland dropped the case without any further explanation, and without any kind of deal announced. Band members had argued their 'moderate livelihood' fishery outside of the regular season is permitted by a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada decision, but non-Indigenous commercial fishers have contended it threatens stocks and fails to recognize the courts also maintained Ottawa's right to regulate. Story continues below advertisement The original lawsuit was launched by the band in 2021, seeking a declaration that current federal regulations infringe on its treaty right to fish. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.
