Wales' future discussed in Cardiff by politicians and local leaders
The future of Wales was debated by politicians, business leaders, and grassroots activists in a 'Big Debate' run by the Big Issue in Cardiff.
The Welsh Government, represented by the Senedd's Minister for Delivery and General Counsel, Julie James MS, faced heavy criticism from the panel and audience.
Leading local journalist Will Hayward condemned Welsh Labour as "defined by very good intentions but very slow delivery."
Ms James responded to the criticism by highlighting the pressures placed on her government by "14 years of austerity."
Julie James at the Big Issue Big Debate. Credit: Exposure Photo Agency
She also acknowledged a growing rift between Labour in Wales and the UK Government, admitting: "There have definitely been decisions that we as Welsh Labour wouldn't have made."
"There are some things we fundamentally disagree with because in Welsh Labour we are different – our politics are further to the left than it is in England," Ms James told the panel.
However, her comments were met with anger by one audience member, James Mapstone, who told the debate panel that he doesn't "believe in Labour anymore."
"The Senedd has failed," the carer from Cardiff said.
"They failed the people.
"And it's the most vulnerable people in society.
"There's some very serious issues going on in this country – and the young people, the elderly, in particular, and the disabled are being targeted like they've never been before."
The panel also included the Future Generations Commissioner for Wales Derek Walker, Welsh Children's Commissioner Rocio Cifuentes, local entrepreneur Dylan Jones-Evans, and the Big Issue's founder Lord John Bird.
Credit: Exposure Photo Agency
Children's Commissioner for Wales Rocio Cifuentes criticised the "lack of clear measurable targets [which] mean we struggle to hold the Welsh Government to account", insisting Wales must "measure what we treasure".
The Big Issue is calling for governments to set statutory poverty reduction targets, which would legally hold politicians to account on taking long-term, preventative action on poverty.
Lord Bird argued for creating wealth and growth to boost communities and lift people out of poverty.
He said: "My plan before I leave this earth is to resocialise capitalism."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Harvard scores a temporary victory in battle against Trump administration ‘vendetta'
A court on Thursday put a temporary stay on Donald Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, as the US president's battle with one of the world's most prestigious universities intensified. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' the order said. Harvard quickly amended an existing complaint filed in federal court, saying: 'This is not the Administration's first attempt to sever Harvard from its international students.' '(It) is part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation by the government in clear retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students.' READ | 'Such a disgrace': Outrage as Trump ramps up attacks on Harvard, Columbia US District Judge Allison Burroughs on Thursday ruled the government cannot enforce Trump's proclamation. Harvard had showed, she said, that without a temporary restraining order, it risked sustaining 'immediate and irreparable injury before there is an opportunity to hear from all parties'. The same judge had already blocked Trump's earlier effort to bar international students from enrolling at the storied university. The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity'. Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27% of total enrolment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In its filing, Harvard acknowledged that Trump had the authority to bar an entire class of aliens if it was deemed to be in the public interest, but stressed that was not the case in this action. The president's actions thus are not undertaken to protect the 'interests of the United States' but instead to pursue a government vendetta against Harvard. Harvard filing Since returning to office Trump has targeted elite US universities which he and his allies accuse of being hotbeds of antisemitism, liberal bias and 'woke' ideology. Trump's education secretary also threatened on Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions - including Columbia - have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Most new homes must have solar panels and heat pumps under Government proposals
Builders will be required to fit solar panels on rooftops and install low-carbon heating for most new build homes in England under proposed changes to be published this year. The Energy Department (Desnz) said on Friday that the future homes standard (FHS), which will be published in autumn, is expected to require new residential properties to have solar panels by default. Gas boilers will also not meet the proposed standard, meaning low-carbon heating – such as heat pumps – will also likely become the new default under building regulations. With a significant amount of the UK's carbon footprint coming from gas heating of homes, the FHS will require new housing in England to produce fewer carbon emissions than those built under current regulations. The Government said the measures will also help to slash household energy bills and boost the nation's energy security. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said: 'Solar panels can save people hundreds of pounds off their energy bills, so it is just common sense for new homes to have them fitted as standard. 'So many people just don't understand why this doesn't already happen. With our plans, it will.' Desnz calculates that a typical existing UK home could save around £530 a year from installing rooftop solar based on the current energy price cap. Matthew Pennycook, housing and planning minister, said: 'The future homes standard will ensure new homes are modern and efficient with low-carbon heating, while our common-sense planning changes will now make it easier and cheaper for people to use heat pumps and switch to EVs so they can play their part in bolstering our nation's energy security.' Current building regulations do not require developers to add solar panels or heat pumps to new homes. In 2023, the previous Conservative government proposed new build homes would need solar panel coverage equivalent to 40% of the building's floor area. But this also allowed for exemptions, which would lead to no solar on many developments, the current Government says. Under the proposed changes, developers who cannot meet 40% coverage will still be required to install a reasonable amount of solar coverage – or other forms of renewable electricity generation, with rare exceptions. Ministers also say the FHS will effectively require low-carbon heating, such as domestic heat pumps installed into new builds. The previous Conservative government faced criticism for rowing back on its proposals to ban the sale of new gas boilers by 2035. While the Government is not planning to introduce such a ban, citing concerns around cost, Desnz confirmed on Friday that FHS proposals include mandating minimum criteria for energy efficiency which mean newly built homes have to install greener heating systems. Recent changes to planning rules aimed at removing barriers to heat pump installations came into force on May 29, enabling households to install a heat pump within one metre of their property's boundary without having to submit a planning application. The first quarter of 2025 saw a record number of applications to the boiler upgrade scheme, which provides households with up to £7,500 off the cost of a heat pump, seeing a 73% jump from the same quarter last year. Charles Wood, deputy director of policy (systems) at Energy UK, said: 'This change, alongside wider reforms to planning processes and network connections, will reduce bills for people in new build properties while also giving the industry confidence to invest in increased manufacturing and installer training as demand increases, creating jobs and bringing down technology costs for everyone.' The UK is legally committed to reaching its net zero target by 2050, meaning the UK must cut carbon emissions until it removes as much as it produces, in line with the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brace yourself for Rachel Reeves's most cynical tax raid yet
Cast your mind back to little over a year ago when Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves came into power and suddenly became very sombre about the state of the nation's finances. Starmer warned that 'things are worse than we ever imagined', and said that the October Budget would be 'painful'. Despite a £40bn tax raid in the Chancellor's maiden Budget, things are still, it appears, just as bleak. Reeves's economic blunders have helped create a funding void that economists warn could require a £30bn tax raid to fill. But still, Labour has doubled down on its naive manifesto pledge not to raise income tax, National Insurance or VAT. So if the Chancellor won't tax 'workers', who will she go after? I'm afraid it's bad news for pensioners and anyone who might be perceived as wealthy. Labour has now reluctantly announced a partial U-turn on its foolish decision to take the winter fuel allowance from 10 million pensioners in an effort to save £1.5bn a year. The Treasury is now reportedly drawing up plans to hand back the payments to lower-income pensioners. I suspect Labour will use the return of the winter fuel payment to justify a tax raid on wealth and retirement income. You want the return of the winter fuel allowance? Well, you'll have to pay for it. Bound by its election pledge, Labour will not be asking workers to pay for it. Instead, what we can expect are more backdoor tax grabs and insidious stealth rises. These will be, for all intents and purposes, tax rises that ultimately hurt households. Angela Rayner's demands to force more of us to pay the 45p in the pound rate of income tax and to reinstate the pension lifetime allowance can surely not be off the table. The Tory deep freeze on tax rates across the board will almost certainly be extended, dragging more workers and pensioners into higher tax brackets that consume more of their wealth. Aspiration and prudence will ultimately be the victims of this relentless tax drive that now means hard work no longer pays. The Government has already shown that it holds ideology above reason. Its capital gains tax raid will blow a £23bn hole in the public purse. Its inheritance tax assault on farmers risks a food crisis and will also cost the Treasury £2bn. Its vindictive attack on private schools is already proving to be a bad idea, and its talk of taxing the wealthy has triggered an exodus of millionaires whose taxes we desperately need. Fresh tax rises are only inevitable because of Labour's mismanagement of the economy. It has splurged on the wasteful public sector and punished the productive private sector. Now it is throwing billions at the North because it is scared of Reform UK. We can only hope that the Government has learnt lessons from its early months in power and will start to undo the damage. The winter fuel U-turn suggests so, but its blind stubbornness over farmers and blinkered tax pursuit of hard-earned wealth suggests otherwise. If the economy does improve, Labour needs to rescind its tax grabs and incentivise money-making and growth. It's patently obvious that you cannot tax your way to prosperity. Britain can hardly afford to have a Chancellor who is learning on the job. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
